SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines a 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with a 24 GB Ampere flagship GPU, producing a system that sits in the 91st percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations tracked in this database. The CPU holds an 86th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU reaches the 95th percentile among all GPUs, making this a high-end desktop configuration. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all game performance discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores and percentile positions rather than direct testing.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13700F compare to its nearest CPU rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i7-13700F averages 39,009 points across all benchmarks. It sits 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4245P (39,215), 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (39,325), and 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (38,561). The gap to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is 1.2% in that rival's favor (39,485 vs 39,009).

Q: What is the RTX 3090 Ti's standing relative to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti averages 131,938 points, which is 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA L4 (131,072) but 2.4% behind both the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation (135,218) and the NVIDIA A10M (135,230). The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135,396) leads by 2.6%.

Q: Does this CPU support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700F memory support lists both DDR4 and DDR5. It uses a dual-channel memory bus, though the FACT PACK does not provide a specific memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. This means the graphics card runs at PCIe 4.0 speeds even though the CPU can support Gen 5 for other devices.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have, and what are its clock speeds?

A: The i7-13700F has 16 cores and 24 threads. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It uses a 65 W TDP and is built on Intel's 10 nm process (Raptor Lake architecture, die size 257 mm²).

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement in terms of PSU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has a 450 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 850 W. It uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a triple-slot width.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU leans toward GPU-bound scenarios in most gaming workloads, but the CPU has enough headroom to avoid becoming a limiting factor in productivity tasks. The GPU's 95th percentile rank versus the CPU's 86th percentile suggests the graphics card is the stronger component in this pairing. In gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 3090 Ti's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth will likely be the primary driver of frame rates, with the CPU's single-thread score of 1,092 in 3dMark single-thread and 4,532 in Cinebench R23 single-core providing sufficient per-core performance for game logic and draw calls.

For multi-threaded workloads, the CPU is the more dominant factor. The i7-13700F's 3dMark max-threads score of 10,716 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 indicate strong parallel processing capability. The GPU, while powerful, does not contribute to CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score 471,838) or encryption (26,956). In mixed workloads such as streaming while gaming, the CPU's 24 threads can handle encoding overhead while the GPU focuses on rendering, though the data does not specify encoder capabilities.

The bottleneck profile shifts based on workload type. For 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the RTX 3090 Ti's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the limiting factor. For physics simulations, the CPU's PassMark physics score of 2,236 and 3dMark 16-thread score of 8,994 define the ceiling. For memory-intensive tasks, the CPU's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support and the GPU's 384-bit memory bus are both critical, but the GPU's 1.01 TB/s bandwidth far exceeds what the CPU memory controller can provide, making the CPU the memory bandwidth bottleneck in most scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At lower resolutions where CPU frame rates matter, the i7-13700F's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4,532, Geekbench single-core 2,225) should keep frame rates high. At 4K, the RTX 3090 Ti's 95th percentile GPU rank and 24 GB VRAM provide the headroom needed for ultra textures and ray tracing, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and 3dmark max-threads score of 10,716 suggest it can handle software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 336 tensor cores and 84 RT cores may also assist with encoding tasks, though the FACT PACK does not list specific NVENC capabilities. The 450 W GPU TDP means the system will draw significant power during simultaneous gaming and streaming.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 and PassMark multithread score of 38,369 indicate strong export and render performance. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM allows for large timeline previews and GPU-accelerated effects. The combination of 16 CPU cores and 10,752 shading units provides balanced performance for both CPU and GPU-accelerated editing workflows.

3D rendering: The RTX 3090 Ti's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.00 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio) deliver substantial compute throughput for GPU renderers. The CPU's 3dmark max-threads score of 10,716 and Cinebench R23 multicore 32,101 handle CPU-based rendering tasks. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly useful for scenes that exceed 8-12 GB memory footprints common in professional work.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with PassMark integer math score of 141,370 and floating-point math of 100,422. The GPU is less relevant for most development tasks, but its compute capabilities could accelerate machine learning workloads given the 336 tensor cores and 28,300 million transistors.

Student and office work: This system is massively over-provisioned for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 4,121) handles spreadsheet and document workloads effortlessly. The GPU's 95th percentile rank is far beyond what office applications require, but the 24 GB VRAM could support data visualization or simulation software used in advanced coursework.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets enthusiasts and professionals who need both strong CPU compute and top-tier GPU rendering. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates will benefit from the GPU's 95th percentile position and 24 GB VRAM. Content creators working with 4K or 8K video, complex After Effects compositions, or Blender/Cinema 4D scenes will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 and the GPU's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 useful. 3D artists and architects using GPU renderers like Octane or Redshift will appreciate the 24 GB VRAM capacity.

Software developers building large C++ or Rust projects will see strong compilation times from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 141,370 and 16 cores. Data scientists running local machine learning experiments can leverage the GPU's 336 tensor cores and 40.00 TFLOPS FP16 performance. Students in engineering or computer science programs will have far more performance than required for coursework, but the system can handle any academic workload without breaking a sweat. Small business workstations running CAD, simulation, or video production tools will find this configuration suitable, though the 450 W GPU TDP and 850 W suggested PSU mean the system requires adequate cooling and power infrastructure.

The CPU's 86th percentile rank and the GPU's 95th percentile rank place this build above most desktop systems. The combined 91st percentile confirms that this is a high-end configuration, not a mid-range compromise. Users who primarily play esports titles at 1080p will be overspending on the GPU, as the CPU alone (single-thread score 1,092 in 3dmark) could handle those workloads with a lesser graphics card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with Raptor Lake architecture. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory kits. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The platform does not support ECC memory. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 16-core part, suggesting that most LGA 1700 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it.

The GPU's 450 W TDP and 850 W suggested PSU mean the power supply is a critical consideration. The RTX 3090 Ti uses a single 16-pin power connector and is triple-slot wide, measuring 336 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. Builders need a case with sufficient clearance for this large card.

For future upgrades, the CPU's boost clock of 5.20 GHz and 30 MB of L3 cache represent the high end of the Raptor Lake desktop lineup. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. A sensible next upgrade would be moving to a newer generation GPU when available, though the RTX 3090 Ti's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth remain competitive. The platform itself is limited to Socket 1700 CPUs, so a CPU upgrade would require staying within the 13th generation lineup or moving to a different socket entirely.

The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for robust air cooling or entry-level liquid cooling. The GPU's 450 W TDP, however, generates significant heat, and the triple-slot cooler design indicates substantial thermal requirements. The 850 W PSU suggestion provides enough headroom for the CPU and GPU combined, though overclocking is not possible since the CPU's multiplier is locked.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on the GA102 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The memory subsystem comprises 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s bandwidth at 1313 MHz memory clock (21 Gbps effective). The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs.

For ray tracing, the GPU includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 40.00 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 208.3 GPixel/s and texture rate is 625.0 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark results, the GPU scores 5,741 in 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12, 174,441 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 215,633 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 131,938, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to rivals, it is 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA L4 (131,072) but 2.4% behind the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation (135,218) and NVIDIA A10M (135,230). The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 leads by 2.6% at 135,396.

For rendering workloads, the 24 GB VRAM is the standout feature, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures without memory overflow. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that data moves quickly between VRAM and the GPU cores. The 84 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 336 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and AI-based workloads, though the FACT PACK does not list specific DLSS versions or performance metrics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded profile. In 3dmark tests, scores scale from 1,092 (single-thread) to 2,178 (2-threads), 4,258 (4-threads), 7,136 (8-threads), 8,994 (16-threads), and 10,716 (max-threads). Cinebench results include R15 multicore 3,235 and single-core 456, R20 multicore 13,482 and single-core 1,903, and R23 multicore 32,101 and single-core 4,532. Geekbench shows multicore 15,058 and single-core 2,225.

PassMark tests reveal specific workload strengths: data compression 471,838, data encryption 26,956, extended instructions 28,295, find prime numbers 156, floating-point math 100,422, integer math 141,370, multithread 38,369, physics 2,236, random string sorting 49,974, and single-thread 4,121. The average benchmark score is 39,009, with an 86th percentile rank among all CPUs.

The GPU's benchmarks are fewer but significant: 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 5,741, Geekbench OpenCL 174,441, and Geekbench Vulkan 215,633. The average GPU score is 131,938, at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 91st.

Interpreting these numbers, the CPU's multi-thread scores are strong but not class-leading; it trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by 0.8% and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 by 1.2% in average score, while leading the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T by 1.2%. The GPU's 95th percentile rank indicates it outperforms 95% of all tracked GPUs, though it sits slightly behind several workstation-class rivals in average score.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700F (Raptor Lake, 16 cores, 24 threads, 65 W TDP) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti (Ampere, 450 W TDP, 24 GB GDDR6X). The combined percentile is 91st, meaning this system outperforms 91% of all tracked CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU is at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 95th percentile, indicating a GPU-heavy balance.

The build targets high-end desktop use cases: 4K gaming, GPU-accelerated rendering, video editing, and compute workloads. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 450 W TDP together suggest a system power draw that requires an 850 W PSU. The GPU's triple-slot design and 336 mm length demand a spacious case with good airflow.

This is not a budget or mid-range configuration. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile positions place this build firmly in the enthusiast tier. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as successor, but the 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth keep it competitive. The CPU is actively in production. This pairing makes sense for users who need maximum GPU compute and strong CPU multi-threading without stepping up to HEDT or workstation platforms.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) using Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm². It has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, and the multiplier is locked (no overclocking). The launch MSRP was $359.

Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but no ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Cache configuration includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache. There is no integrated graphics. The socket is Intel Socket 1700.

Benchmark performance shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads but is not dominant in single-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 indicates strong rendering capability, while the single-core score of 4,532 is respectable but not class-leading. The 3dmark scaling from 1,092 (single-thread) to 10,716 (max-threads) shows good parallel scaling across the 16 cores.

The PassMark results reveal workload-specific strengths: data compression (471,838) and integer math (141,370) are strong, while find prime numbers (156) is relatively weak, indicating the architecture favors certain instruction patterns. The floating-point math score of 100,422 shows solid FPU performance. The physics score of 2,236 is modest. The 86th percentile rank places it above most CPUs but below the top 14% of all tracked processors.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-13700F is effectively tied with an AMD EPYC server chip (0.5% difference) and a mobile Ryzen 7 PRO (0.8% difference), while slightly ahead of a Core Ultra 5 desktop chip (1.2%) and slightly behind a Ryzen AI 7 mobile chip (1.2%). This indicates the i7-13700F delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance that competes with both server and mobile parts in aggregate benchmark scores, though the workload distribution differs.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds