SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake desktop processor with an 8 GB Ampere-generation graphics card, resulting in a combined benchmark percentile of 73 across all CPU and GPU configurations. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 59th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a system where compute-heavy workloads are strongly favored over pure graphics throughput. The data in this analysis is drawn entirely from the provided benchmark scores, with no measured frame-rate data available for this exact combination — all FPS figures discussed later are estimates derived from those benchmark results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a desktop-class processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². It offers 16 cores and 24 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput and power draw. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, which can boost up to 5.20 GHz under load, and the processor carries a 65 W TDP. Cache is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though ECC memory is not supported.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the score rises from 1,092 in single-thread to 2,178 with 2 threads, 4,258 with 4 threads, 7,136 with 8 threads, 8,994 with 16 threads, and peaks at 10,716 with maximum threads. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-threading efficiency, making the CPU well-suited for rendering, compilation, and other parallel workloads. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 3,235 versus 456 single-core, R20 multicore hits 13,482 versus 1,903 single-core, and R23 multicore reaches 32,101 versus 4,532 single-core. The multicore-to-single-core ratio in R23 is roughly 7:1, confirming that the CPU delivers near-linear gains when all cores are engaged.

Geekbench scores of 15,058 multicore and 2,225 single-core place the chip in a range comfortable for both productivity and responsive desktop use. PassMark results further detail the CPU's strengths: integer math scores 141,370, floating-point math scores 100,422, and extended instructions score 28,295. Data compression reaches 471,838, while encryption scores 26,956 — the former suggests strong archival and database performance, while the latter indicates moderate cryptographic throughput. The average benchmark score across all tests is 39,009, placing the CPU in the 86th percentile of all processors. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-13700F trails the AMD EPYC 4245P by 0.5% (39,215 vs. 39,009), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by 0.8% (39,325), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 by 1.2% (39,485), while leading the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T by 1.2% (38,561). These deltas are tiny, meaning the CPU trades blows with server and mobile flagship parts within a ±1.2% band.

For real workloads, the data indicates the i7-13700F excels in multi-threaded scenarios like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software builds. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,121, which supports fast application launches and responsive gaming. The 65 W TDP is modest for a 16-core part, suggesting thermal headroom for sustained loads in well-ventilated cases.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13700F uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th generation Core processors. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for fast NVMe storage and next-generation GPUs. Memory support spans DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility to reuse older DDR4 modules or invest in newer DDR5 kits, both in dual-channel mode. The lack of ECC support limits the CPU's appeal for error-sensitive server workloads, but this is a desktop part by design.

The platform's longevity depends on the motherboard's BIOS support, but Socket 1700 is a mature ecosystem with a wide range of boards. A sensible next upgrade from this CPU would involve moving to a higher-core-count 13th or 14th generation part on the same socket, assuming motherboard compatibility — the data does not list specific successor CPUs, but the socket's active production status suggests ongoing support.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, which is a moderate requirement for a 200 W graphics card. The power connectors are a single 12-pin, which may require an adapter for standard PSUs. The CPU's 65 W TDP is low, so the combined system draw is well within a 550 W power supply's headroom, leaving room for drives, fans, and minor overclocking. The GPU is dual-slot and measures 242 mm in length, fitting most mid-tower cases. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups.

For users considering upgrades, the PCIe 4.0 x16 bus on the GPU matches the platform's PCIe 5.0 CPU lanes, meaning no bottleneck from the interface. The memory bandwidth of the GPU is 448.0 GB/s, which is ample for 1080p gaming and mid-range 1440p. The 8 GB VRAM could be a limiting factor for future high-resolution textures, but for current titles it is adequate.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with a die size of 392 mm² and 17,400 million transistors. The chip, designated GA104, contains 4,864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It also includes 38 ray-tracing cores and 152 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The base clock is 1,410 MHz with a boost clock of 1,665 MHz, while memory runs at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a key strength for bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

Compute performance is rated at 16.20 TFLOPS for FP32 and the same for FP16 (1:1 ratio), indicating strong general-purpose compute. Pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s, which supports high-resolution rendering with multiple textures per pixel. Benchmark scores show mixed results: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 2,626, Geekbench OpenCL scores 78,927, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 47,784. PassMark tests reveal a strong DirectX 11 score of 163, but lower DirectX 10 (132) and DirectX 12 (78) scores — the latter is notably low, suggesting drivers or architecture may favor older APIs in this particular test. DirectX 9 scores 234, and G2D (2D graphics) scores 989. The G3D score is 20,349, which is the most representative overall graphics benchmark, while GPU compute scores 10,006.

The average benchmark score for the GPU is 16,129, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Nearest rivals show how close the competition is: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16,014 (0.7% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16,351 (1.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16,361 (1.4% ahead), and the AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15,862 (1.7% behind). These deltas are under 2%, meaning the RTX 3060 Ti performs nearly identically to a set of GPUs ranging from a 2020 flagship (RX 5700 XT) to a 2025 mainstream part (RX 9060). For gaming and rendering, the GPU is a solid mid-range performer that punches at the edge of its class.

For rendering workloads, the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput make the card capable for 1080p and 1440p 3D rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large scenes. The 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores enable ray-traced effects and DLSS upscaling, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 59th percentile indicates a significant imbalance: the processor is much stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads — such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation — the GPU will not be the limiting factor, and the i7-13700F will deliver near-peak performance. In GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution gaming, the RTX 3060 Ti will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could feed it. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,994 on the CPU versus the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,626 illustrates this gap: the CPU can process geometry and physics far faster than the GPU can rasterize frames.

The PassMark physics score of 2,236 on the CPU and G3D score of 20,349 on the GPU reinforce this. For gaming at 1080p, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck in most titles, as the CPU's single-thread score of 4,121 (PassMark) is high enough to avoid stutter in most games. At 1440p, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced, and at 4K, the GPU will be the clear limiter. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this mismatch, suggesting that the system is optimized for productivity over raw gaming performance.

The FPS scaling data is not measured for this exact combination, so bottleneck analysis relies on benchmark deltas. The CPU's 2-thread score of 2,178 (3DMark) is nearly double the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 163, indicating that light-threaded tasks will not stress the CPU. The data shows a system where the CPU has headroom for background tasks while gaming, making it suitable for streaming or recording — the i7-13700F can handle encoding while the GPU focuses on rendering frames.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39,009, with a percentile rank of 86 among all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 32,101, Geekbench multicore at 15,058, and PassMark multithread at 38,369. The GPU's average benchmark score is 16,129, with a percentile rank of 59 among all GPUs. Its standout scores are PassMark G3D at 20,349, Geekbench OpenCL at 78,927, and PassMark GPU compute at 10,006.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, which sits between the CPU's 86th and GPU's 59th percentiles, weighted toward the stronger CPU. The nearest CPU rivals are all within 1.2% of the i7-13700F's average score, indicating that the processor is highly competitive with server and mobile parts. The nearest GPU rivals are within 1.7%, showing that the RTX 3060 Ti is mid-pack for its generation.

The picture that emerges is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer for its class, ranking in the top 14% of all processors, while the GPU is a solid mid-range part, ranking in the top 41% of all GPUs. In combined workloads, the system's 73rd percentile means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop and laptop configurations, but it is not a high-end gaming rig by any measure.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks over GPU-heavy ones. For gamers at 1080p, the RTX 3060 Ti will handle most titles at high settings, with the CPU ensuring no frame drops from physics or AI calculations. At 1440p, the GPU will still deliver playable frame rates in many games, but the CPU will be underutilized, making this a better choice for competitive shooters than triple-A titles at maxed settings. For content creators, the i7-13700F's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 makes it excellent for video editing, 3D rendering, and batch processing, while the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate CUDA-based effects in software like Blender or Premiere Pro.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's 24 threads, which speed up compilation and test runs, and the PassMark data compression score of 471,838 indicates fast archival and database operations. Students and small business users will find the system responsive for office tasks, but the GPU is overkill for spreadsheets and documents — the CPU alone would suffice. The build is less ideal for those needing high-end gaming at 4K or heavy AI training, where the 8 GB VRAM and 59th percentile GPU would be limiting.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13700F scores 39,009 on average, which is 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4245P (39,215), 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (39,325), and 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (38,561).

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3060 Ti has 38 ray-tracing cores and 152 tensor cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 73, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 59th percentile.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, but does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti had a launch MSRP of 399 USD, while the CPU had a launch MSRP of $359.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor on Socket 1700, with a 65 W TDP and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The GPU is an Ampere-based card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, a 200 W TDP, and a boost clock of 1,665 MHz. The combined percentile of 73 places this system in the upper-mid tier of all configurations, driven primarily by the CPU's strong 86th percentile ranking. The GPU's 59th percentile holds the system back from higher-tier status, but for CPU-bound workloads, this is a high-performance machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,121 and the GPU's G3D score of 20,349 suggest the system can push high frame rates in esports titles, though the GPU's 59th percentile means it will not sustain max settings in the most demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,994 provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, with the GPU's tensor cores available for NVENC, making this a capable streaming setup.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,101 and PassMark integer math score of 141,370 indicate fast timeline rendering and export times, while the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates effects and previews.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores excel at CPU-based rendering, with R20 multicore at 13,482, and the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate CUDA-based renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The 24 threads and PassMark data compression score of 471,838 speed up compilation and packaging, making this a strong workstation for developers.

Student and office work: The system is overqualified for documents and spreadsheets, with the CPU's single-thread score of 4,121 ensuring instant responsiveness, but the GPU's power draw and cost are unnecessary for such tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-13700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination, so all frame-rate estimates are derived from benchmark scores. At 1080p, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20,349 and the CPU's high single-thread performance suggest 60+ FPS in most titles at high settings, with competitive shooters potentially exceeding 144 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU's 59th percentile will likely reduce frame rates to 50-70 FPS in demanding games, requiring settings adjustments. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and moderate compute power will struggle, with estimates below 40 FPS in recent titles. The CPU's 86th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, but the GPU is the limiting factor for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.