SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F and Intel Arc B580 pairing represents a modern desktop build that combines a high-core-count 13th Generation Intel processor with Intel’s latest Battlemage graphics architecture. This analysis draws exclusively from synthetic benchmark data, as no measured frame-rate results exist for this specific combination. The combined hardware sits at the 77th percentile across all benchmarked systems, indicating a configuration that is well above average but not at the extreme enthusiast tier. With the CPU ranking in the 86th percentile among all processors and the GPU in the 68th percentile among all graphics cards, this pairing shows a clear skew toward computational and multi-threaded workloads rather than purely graphics-bound tasks. The following sections break down the benchmark scores, architectural details, and practical implications for various user types.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all benchmarked system configurations. This places it in the upper-middle tier of overall system performance, with the CPU contributing a significantly higher individual percentile of 86 compared to the GPU’s 68.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700F compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 39009, which is 0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4245P’s score of 39215. It also trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by 0.8% and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 by 1.2%, while leading the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T by 1.2%.

Q: What is the GPU’s position relative to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080’s score of 23172. The data shows the two cards are statistically near-identical in aggregate benchmark performance, despite being from different generations and architectures.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 modules or higher-bandwidth DDR5 kits, depending on motherboard selection and budget constraints.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i7-13700F does not include integrated graphics. The “F” suffix indicates that the processor requires a discrete graphics card for video output, which is why this build pairs it with the Intel Arc B580.

Q: What is the process node size for each component?

A: The CPU is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², while the GPU is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with a die size of 272 mm². The GPU packs 19,600 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm².

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 190 W and a suggested power supply rating of 450 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, so the combined system power draw is well within the capacity of a standard 450 W PSU, leaving reasonable headroom for other components.

Benchmark Performance

The aggregate benchmark picture for this build is defined by a strong CPU and a mid-pack GPU. The Intel Core i7-13700F achieves an average benchmark score of 39009, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with deltas of just -0.5%, -0.8%, and -1.2% against the AMD EPYC 4245P, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 respectively, and a +1.2% lead over the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T. These sub-2% differences indicate that the 13700F is competitively positioned within a narrow performance band at the top of the desktop CPU market.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B580 posts an average benchmark score of 23021, good for the 68th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival comparisons are striking: it is only 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, and 1.0% behind the NVIDIA P106-100. The fact that the B580 trades blows with the RTX 3080 in synthetic averages is noteworthy, though the aggregate score masks workload-specific differences. The GPU’s individual benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92821, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672, indicating solid DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance.

When combining the two components, the system’s 77th percentile overall position reflects a CPU-heavy configuration. The CPU’s 86th percentile is substantially higher than the GPU’s 68th percentile, meaning that in many workloads the processor will be the star performer while the graphics card may hold back the system in GPU-bound scenarios. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 7729 further suggests that the Arc B580 is capable in compute tasks but not exceptional, reinforcing the idea that this build prioritizes CPU throughput over raw graphics horsepower.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both efficiency and peak performance. The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², and it features a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is critical for workloads that benefit from large, fast on-die storage, such as database operations and complex simulations.

Benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern across thread counts. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 2178 with 2 threads, 4258 with 4 threads, 7136 with 8 threads, 8994 with 16 threads, and 10716 with max threads. This progression shows strong multi-threading efficiency, with the max-thread score being nearly five times the 2-thread score. The single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 4532 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate robust per-core performance, which is essential for lightly-threaded applications like older games and certain productivity tools.

In Cinebench, the multicore scores are particularly impressive: 3235 in R15, 13482 in R20, and 32101 in R23. The R23 multicore score of 32101 is more than seven times the single-core score of 4532, demonstrating excellent parallel scaling. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 15058 against a single-core score of 2225, a ratio of roughly 6.8x. PassMark tests further break down performance: multithread score of 38369, single-thread score of 4121, integer math at 141370, floating point math at 100422, and extended instructions at 28295. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in integer-heavy tasks like compilation and data processing, while also handling floating-point workloads comfortably.

For real-world workloads, the 13700F’s 24 threads make it a strong contender for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The data compression score of 471838 in PassMark suggests excellent performance in archiving and file management tasks, while the data encryption score of 26956 indicates solid security-related throughput. The find prime numbers score of 156 is relatively low, but this is a niche benchmark. Overall, the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking places it among the top tier of desktop processors, with nearest rivals including server-class EPYC parts and high-end mobile chips, underscoring its versatility.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-13700F paired with the Intel Arc B580; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this combination. As such, all frame-rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so the following analysis relies on the CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 68th percentile to infer gaming capability.

Based on the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 and its aggregate position near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (0.7% lower in average score), the Arc B580 should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most modern titles. The GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for high-resolution textures and moderate ray tracing workloads. The 20 ray tracing cores and 2560 shading units further support modern gaming features, though the 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests the card is not a top-tier 4K powerhouse.

At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1092 in 3DMark single-thread, 4121 in PassMark single-thread) ensures that the 13700F will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. The GPU’s 68th percentile means it will likely deliver 60-100+ FPS in esports titles and 40-70 FPS in AAA games at 1440p, but these are estimates. At 4K, the GPU’s 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.67 TFLOPS will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, making 1440p the practical ceiling for this pairing. The CPU’s 30 MB of L3 cache and high boost clock help reduce frame time spikes, but the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios. For competitive gamers prioritizing high refresh rates at 1080p, this build should suffice; for 4K enthusiasts, it will require significant settings reductions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with a wide range of 12th and 13th Generation motherboards. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility in platform choice. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth connectivity to modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The GPU, meanwhile, uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 lanes, though the GPU will operate at its native PCIe 4.0 speed.

The GPU has a TDP of 190 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU rating of 450 W. The CPU’s TDP is just 65 W, so the total system power draw remains modest. This leaves significant headroom for upgrades: a user could install a more power-hungry GPU (up to around 250-300 W) without exceeding a typical 650 W PSU, though the FACT PACK does not specify such numbers. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 272 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 45 mm in width, so case compatibility is straightforward for most mid-tower chassis. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

A sensible next upgrade would be to the GPU, as the CPU’s 86th percentile leaves ample headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the B580 means that a future GPU with PCIe 4.0 x16 or PCIe 5.0 x16 would not be bottlenecked by the CPU’s lane configuration. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 RAM could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, given the CPU’s dual-channel support. The Socket 1700 platform is a dead-end for future CPU upgrades beyond 13th Gen, so users planning long-term expansion should consider this a final-stop platform for the processor.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over pure gaming performance. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the 13700F’s 24 threads and strong multicore scores, such as the 32101 in Cinebench R23 and 15058 in Geekbench multicore. The CPU’s 86th percentile places it above 86% of all processors, making it a compelling choice for professionals who need fast compile times, quick render passes, and efficient data processing. The GPU’s 68th percentile is adequate for accelerated previews and light GPU compute, but it is not the primary draw.

For gamers, this system targets 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming rather than 4K. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4532 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame rates remain stable in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 12 GB memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game assets. Students and small business workstations will find the 65 W TDP CPU efficient and quiet under load, with the PassMark multithread score of 38369 handling office suites, spreadsheets, and coding environments with ease. The build is not ideal for 4K gaming or extreme GPU compute, but for a balanced desktop workstation that can also game at high settings, this pairing is a strong fit.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (4121 in PassMark single-thread) will drive high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU’s 68th percentile should maintain 100+ FPS in lighter games. At 1440p, expect 60-90 FPS in most AAA games, though the GPU may require setting reductions in the most demanding titles. The 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for competitive play, but not for maxed-out 4K.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and strong multicore score of 10716 in 3DMark max threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The GPU’s 20 ray tracing cores and 2560 shading units can assist with encoding offload, though the lack of measured FPS data means streaming frame rates are estimates. The 65 W TDP keeps thermals manageable during prolonged streaming sessions.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32101 and Geekbench multicore score of 15058 indicate excellent export and rendering times in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 12 GB memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading, though the 68th percentile GPU may struggle with complex 4K timelines. The PassMark data compression score of 471838 speeds up project file management.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24 threads deliver strong performance in CPU-based renderers, with the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13482 showing solid throughput. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 and 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance can accelerate GPU renderers, though the 68th percentile means it is not a dedicated render farm card. For Blender or similar, expect CPU rendering to be the primary strength.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 141370 and extended instructions score of 28295 indicate fast compilation and code execution. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces latency for large codebases, and the 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The CPU’s 86th percentile makes this an excellent developer workstation, with the GPU providing adequate display output for multiple monitors.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support make this a practical, power-efficient choice for everyday tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 38369 handles office suites, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The GPU’s 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups, and the 12 GB memory is overkill for office tasks but future-proof.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700F, a 16-core/24-thread processor from the Raptor Lake generation, with the Intel Arc B580, a Battlemage-generation GPU on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The CPU targets the high-end desktop segment with a launch MSRP of $359, while the GPU has a launch MSRP of 249 USD. The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 68th percentile combine to a system-level 77th percentile, indicating a configuration that is well above average but not flagship-tier.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 39009 positions it just 0.5% below the AMD EPYC 4245P and 0.8% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, while leading the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T by 1.2%. The GPU’s average score of 23021 places it within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, showing that the Arc B580 punches near the RTX 3080 in synthetic benchmarks. This pairing is a CPU-first build: the processor is the dominant component, and the GPU is a capable but secondary partner. It occupies the upper-middle tier of desktop systems, suitable for power users who need strong multi-threaded performance without the cost or power draw of flagship components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Intel Core i7-13700F and Intel Arc B580 is clearly weighted toward the CPU. The CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 68th percentile means the processor outperforms the graphics card by a significant margin in the aggregate. In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the 13700F will operate at near-peak efficiency, while the GPU remains underutilized. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32101 and PassMark multithread score of 38369 show that the processor can handle heavily threaded tasks without breaking a sweat.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or complex 3D rendering with ray tracing, the Arc B580 becomes the limiting factor. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K or with maxed-out settings, the GPU will saturate well before the CPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 suggests the GPU is competent but not exceptional. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: for productivity tasks, the CPU leads; for gaming at high resolutions, the GPU holds the system back.

The FPS scaling evidence, though unmeasured, can be inferred from the percentile gap. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1092 in 3DMark single-thread) will push frame rates higher, but the GPU’s 68th percentile caps the ceiling. At 1440p, the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck, as its bandwidth and shader count limit fill rates. The system is best balanced at 1080p gaming and resolution-independent productivity, while 4K gaming will expose the GPU as the weak link. Users seeking a more balanced system should upgrade the GPU first, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a significantly faster graphics card.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds