SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F and Intel Arc A750 pairing represents a desktop build centered on a 16-core Raptor Lake processor and Intel’s Alchemist-generation graphics. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 24 threads, posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 points and a single-core score of 4,532 points, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The Arc A750, built on the Xe-HPG architecture, delivers a Passmark G3D score of 12,534 and sits in the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Together, this combination reaches the 76th percentile in combined performance. The data in this analysis is drawn entirely from synthetic benchmark scores; no measured frame-rate data exists for this specific pairing, so all gaming performance discussions are estimated projections from those scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales strongly with thread count. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 8,994, while the max-thread score reaches 10,716. The single-thread 3DMark score is 1,092, and the 2-thread score is 2,178, indicating that multi-threaded scaling is efficient but not perfectly linear. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 32,101 is substantial, while the single-core score of 4,532 shows strong per-thread performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 15,058 and single-core score of 2,225 reinforce this pattern of a processor that excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs reflects its position as a high-end desktop part. Its nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD EPYC 4245P with an average score of 39,215 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS with 39,325 (0.8% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T with 38,561 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 with 39,485 (1.2% higher). These deltas are all within roughly one percent, meaning the i7-13700F trades blows with these parts despite their different market segments—an EPYC server chip and mobile processors alike.

Real workload interpretation: the Passmark multi-thread score of 38,369 and integer math score of 141,370 suggest strong performance in compilation, database operations, and financial modeling. The floating-point math score of 100,422 points toward scientific computing and engineering simulations. The data compression score of 471,838 and encryption score of 26,956 indicate that the processor handles archiving and cryptography tasks with ease. The single-thread Passmark score of 4,121, combined with the Cinebench R23 single-core result, demonstrates that the i7-13700F remains responsive in lightly threaded applications like legacy software or single-threaded game engines.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-13700F have?

A: The i7-13700F has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: What is the CPU’s position relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13700F sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P, has an average score 0.5% higher, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is 1.2% lower.

Q: What memory types does the i7-13700F support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with no ECC support.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A750 is in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitor, the Intel Arc B570, has an average score just 0.1% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.2% higher.

Q: What are the CPU’s clock speeds?

A: The base clock is 2.10 GHz and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the i7-13700F and Arc A750 together is 76.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the i7-13700F’s single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,532 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092, provides the per-core horsepower needed to drive high frame rates. The Arc A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and likely 1440p gaming, though no measured FPS data exists to confirm exact figures.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 38,369 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 indicate that encoding and simultaneous gameplay are well within reach. The Arc A750’s dedicated video encoding capabilities, implicit in its DirectX 12 Ultimate support, complement the CPU’s strong multi-threaded showing.

Video editing workloads rely on both components. The CPU’s data compression score of 471,838 and floating-point math score of 100,422 suggest fast timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 98,554 in Geekbench indicates that GPU-accelerated effects and color grading would offload work from the CPU effectively.

3D rendering favors the CPU’s multi-core muscle. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13,482 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15,058 demonstrate that CPU-based rendering engines would see strong throughput. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 85,631 suggests that GPU-accelerated renderers would also perform competently.

Software development sees a balance of single-thread and multi-thread demands. The integer math score of 141,370 and random string sorting score of 49,974 on Passmark indicate fast compilation and data manipulation. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking ensures it competes with server-class parts like the AMD EPYC 4245P within 0.5%, making this a viable workstation CPU.

Student and office work is largely over-provisioned here. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,178 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,121 show snappy responsiveness for document editing and web browsing. The 65 W TDP means the CPU runs cool and efficient, though the GPU’s 225 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU are far more than basic office tasks require.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring compatibility with the fastest available SSDs and expansion cards. Memory bandwidth is not explicitly listed, but the dual-channel support means users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5.

The GPU, Intel Arc A750, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. It has a 225 W TDP and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W, with power delivered through one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector. The GPU is dual-slot and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. Its display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 ports.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier Raptor Lake processor, as the Socket 1700 platform supports the full 13th Gen lineup. The 65 W TDP of the i7-13700F leaves thermal headroom for a more power-hungry chip. On the GPU side, the Arc A750 is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor, so a future GPU upgrade would be the primary path to improved graphics performance. The PCIe 4.0 x16 slot ensures that any modern GPU will function at full bandwidth.

The 550 W suggested PSU provides headroom for the combined 65 W CPU and 225 W GPU, totaling 290 W of component power draw. This leaves a substantial buffer for drives, fans, and other peripherals. Upgrading to a more powerful CPU would keep the PSU requirement modest, but moving to a higher-tier GPU would necessitate a re-evaluation of the power supply.

Balance and Bottleneck

The i7-13700F and Arc A750 present an asymmetric pairing. The CPU is in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 66th percentile among all GPUs. This 20-point gap suggests that the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own competition. In most gaming scenarios, the GPU would be the limiting factor, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,532 in Cinebench R23 is ample for feeding frames to a mid-tier GPU.

The combined percentile of 76 sits between the CPU’s 86 and the GPU’s 66, reflecting that the overall system performance is dragged down by the GPU. For CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or software compilation, the bottleneck reverses—the GPU would idle while the CPU’s 32,101 Cinebench R23 multi-core score drives the work. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU’s 24 threads handle encoding while the GPU renders, though the GPU’s lower relative standing means frame rates would be constrained.

FPS scaling, in the absence of measured data, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12,534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 indicate that it is a competent 1080p card, but the 66th percentile ranking means it will not push extremely high frame rates at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures it will not be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario until the GPU is upgraded. For productivity tasks, the CPU is the clear workhorse, and the GPU’s compute scores (OpenCL 98,554, Vulkan 85,631) are secondary accelerators rather than primary processors.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p with high settings will find this pairing well-matched. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, shown by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092, prevents frame drops, while the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern textures. At 1440p, the GPU would become the limiter, as its 66th percentile ranking places it below the top tier.

Content creators working in video editing will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread might. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 and Passmark data compression score of 471,838 mean fast exports and archive operations. The GPU’s compute scores provide acceleration for effects, though its 8 GB memory may constrain very large projects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 141,370 and random string sorting score of 49,974. The 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the CPU’s 86th percentile ensures it keeps pace with workstation-class parts like the AMD EPYC 4245P.

Students and small business workstations are over-served by this build, but the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs low. The GPU’s 225 W TDP is the main power draw, making this less ideal for always-on office machines. For users who occasionally game or render, the dual-purpose nature works, but pure office workloads would be better served by integrated graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s aggregate average benchmark score is 39,009, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4245P, scores 39,215, a 0.5% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561, which is 1.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325 (0.8% higher) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485 (1.2% higher). These rivals span server, mobile, and desktop segments, indicating the i7-13700F’s broad competitiveness.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20,582, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 at 20,556 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20,662 (0.4% lower), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20,480 (0.5% higher). The GPU’s specific scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 85,631.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer and the GPU is a solid mid-tier part. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this disparity. In CPU-heavy benchmarks like Passmark multi-thread (38,369) or Cinebench R20 multi-core (13,482), the system punches well above its combined percentile. In GPU-heavy synthetic tests like Passmark G3D (12,534) or 3DMark Steel Nomad (2,612), the system falls toward the GPU’s lower percentile. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 10,716 and the GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 5,368 together suggest a balanced system for heterogeneous workloads, but the GPU is the clear performance ceiling.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700F with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-S part with 16 cores and 24 threads, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 part with 3,584 shading units. The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile combine for a 76th percentile overall ranking.

The i7-13700F is an active production CPU with a launch MSRP of $359. The Arc A750 is an end-of-life GPU with a launch MSRP of 289 USD. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.20 GHz and the GPU’s boost clock of 2400 MHz represent the peak performance points. The system’s combined percentile of 76 indicates it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all recorded configurations, though the GPU pulls the average down from the CPU’s higher standing.

This pairing is best described as a CPU-first build. The processor is a high-end part that competes with server and mobile chips within 1.2%, while the GPU is a mid-range part that trades blows with mobile RTX 3070-class hardware. The desktop form factor means both components have full thermal and power headroom, unlike their mobile counterparts.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-13700F and Intel Arc A750 combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12,534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p with high settings. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient texture throughput for most games. The GPU’s 66th percentile ranking places it below top-tier cards, so frame rates at 1440p would likely drop to medium settings for demanding titles.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,532 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092, ensures that the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads also handle background tasks like streaming without impacting frame rates. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensure compatibility with current and upcoming game engines.

For competitive esports titles, the CPU’s strong single-thread scores would drive high frame rates, and the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute would easily handle low-detail settings at high refresh rates. For AAA single-player games, the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking suggests frame rates in the playable range at 1080p, but users seeking 1440p or 4K would need to lower settings or upgrade the GPU. These figures are estimates; actual performance may vary by title and driver optimization.