SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates at a base clock of 1900 MHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and its 65 W TDP places it in the efficiency-oriented segment of the 13th Gen lineup, despite carrying the Core i7 designation and an unlocked multiplier. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports demanding multi-threaded workloads that benefit from large, fast on-die storage.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that performs strongly in multi-threaded scenarios but is less dominant in single-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 27941 points in multi-core and 3944 points in single-core. The multi-core result places it in the 64th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the majority of processors currently tracked, though it is not at the extreme top tier. The single-core score of 3944 is competitive for modern desktop workloads, suggesting that the 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers solid per-thread performance for applications that rely on fewer cores.

The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 7957. Comparing this to the nearest rivals, the Core i7-13700E sits within a narrow band of performance. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7551P (avg score 7952) and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10980XE (avg score 7910). Conversely, it trails the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 by 1.4% (avg score 8071) and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M by 1.9% (avg score 8110). These deltas are small, indicating that the 13700E is essentially performance-equivalent to a range of server and high-end desktop parts from previous generations, but with a much lower TDP, which is a significant efficiency advantage.

For real workloads, the 16-core/24-thread configuration is well-suited for parallel tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with data-intensive applications, while the dual-channel memory controller supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility in platform configuration. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a basic display output capability, though it is not intended for gaming or compute-heavy tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes ensures that modern GPUs and NVMe storage devices can operate at full bandwidth, which is critical for minimizing data transfer bottlenecks in content creation workflows.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the combination of the Intel Core i7-13700E and the Intel Arc A770. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components, rather than direct empirical measurements. This distinction is important: the data indicates that the CPU and GPU are capable of high performance, but actual frame rates will vary depending on game optimization, driver maturity, and system configuration.

Based on the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3944 and the GPU's 90th percentile ranking among all GPUs, the pairing is expected to deliver strong performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in most modern titles. The Arc A770's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 suggests that it can handle DirectX 12 workloads efficiently, which is the dominant API for recent AAA games. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance is likely sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, though in esports titles with very high frame rates, the 5.10 GHz boost clock should help maintain smooth gameplay.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the more significant factor, and the Arc A770's 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and memory-intensive effects. The 90th percentile GPU ranking implies that the Arc A770 outperforms roughly 90% of all GPUs in the database, which positions it as a high-end part suitable for ultra settings at 1440p in many games. However, without measured FPS data, it is prudent to expect that the most demanding titles with ray tracing enabled may require some settings adjustments to maintain playable frame rates.

At 4K, the Arc A770's 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are respectable but not top-tier. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong asset at this resolution, but the GPU's overall compute throughput may limit performance in the most graphically intensive scenes. The CPU's 64th percentile ranking suggests that it is not the bottleneck at 4K, where the GPU workload dominates. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is one of high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p performance, with 4K being playable but not consistently at maximum settings.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700E and Intel Arc A770 each have distinct benchmark profiles that, when combined, paint a picture of a balanced system with a slight GPU emphasis. The CPU's average benchmark score is 7957, placing it in the 64th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 68809, placing it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. This significant gap in percentiles — 64 vs. 90 — indicates that the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU when compared to their respective peer groups.

Examining the CPU benchmarks in detail: Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 2816 points, single-core 397 points; Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 11735, single-core 1656; Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 27941, single-core 3944; Geekbench multi-core scores 12728, single-core 2437. These results show a consistent pattern of strong multi-threaded performance, with the multi-core scores being approximately 7 to 9 times higher than single-core scores, which is typical for a 16-core/24-thread processor.

The GPU benchmarks are fewer but equally informative. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and Vulkan score of 94284 demonstrate strong compute capabilities across different APIs. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (avg score 69000, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (avg score 68562, delta +0.4%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg score 69870, delta -1.5%), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (avg score 69986, delta -1.7%). The Arc A770's average score of 68809 sits in the middle of this group, indicating that it is competitive with professional-grade GPUs from the previous generation.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, which places the system in the upper quartile of all tracked builds. This suggests that the overall performance is well above average, though not at the extreme enthusiast tier. The combined picture is one of a high-end desktop system where the GPU leads in relative performance, but the CPU is more than capable of supporting demanding workloads without being a weak link.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the GPU is the performance leader, but the CPU is sufficiently strong to avoid being a bottleneck in most scenarios. The GPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 64th percentile is the primary evidence of this imbalance. In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the Arc A770 will be the limiting factor, which is expected and generally desirable for a balanced system.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation or single-threaded applications, the Core i7-13700E's 64th percentile ranking means it will perform adequately but will not be the strongest component in the system. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 indicates that heavily threaded tasks will still run well, but users seeking maximum performance in such workloads would need a higher-percentile CPU.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this analysis. At 1080p, where CPU load is relatively higher, the 13700E's single-core performance (3944 in Cinebench R23) is likely sufficient to keep the GPU fed in most titles. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the Arc A770's 90th percentile ranking should provide consistent frame rates. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores suggest that the system is well-balanced for gaming, with neither component severely limiting the other.

For mixed workloads, such as streaming while gaming, the 16 cores and 24 threads of the CPU provide ample headroom for encoding and background tasks without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is also beneficial for multitasking, as it allows for large textures and multiple applications to reside in memory simultaneously. Overall, the bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the primary limiter in graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU is the limiter in heavily threaded compute tasks, but neither is extreme enough to cause major performance issues.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the combination of the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 90th percentile ranking is estimated to support high frame rates in competitive titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact numbers are speculative. The Arc A770's 16 GB VRAM ensures that memory capacity is not a constraint at this resolution.

Streaming: The 16-core/24-thread CPU is well-equipped to handle encoding workloads alongside gameplay, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 indicating substantial parallel processing headroom. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth also support simultaneous game rendering and stream output without excessive memory pressure.

Video Editing: The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and 24 threads are beneficial for timeline scrubbing and export tasks, with the multi-core scores suggesting strong performance in rendering pipelines. The GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading, while the 16 GB VRAM handles large 4K and 8K project files.

3D Rendering: The GPU is the primary workhorse here, with its 90th percentile ranking and 4096 shading units providing substantial compute throughput. The CPU's 27941 Cinebench R23 multi-core score supports the scene preparation and simulation phases, while the GPU handles final frame rendering. The 32 ray tracing cores offer hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders.

Software Development: The 16 cores and 24 threads are ideal for parallel compilation, with the Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 indicating solid build performance. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces compilation times for large codebases, and the ECC memory support is a notable feature for stability in long-running build processes.

Student and Office Work: The 65 W TDP makes this an efficient system for daily use, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output. The CPU's 64th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking in office applications, and the 16 GB GPU memory is overkill for this scenario but does not detract from the experience.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 depending on their budget and performance needs. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, which is future-proof for next-generation GPUs and storage devices.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A770, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot, though it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, and the CPU's TDP is 65 W, meaning that a system with a 550 W power supply has sufficient headroom for the combined 290 W draw of the CPU and GPU at their TDPs, plus other components. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which must be available on the PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-end GPU to match the CPU's potential more closely, as the current GPU's 90th percentile is the system's strongest component. Alternatively, upgrading to a CPU with a higher percentile ranking would benefit CPU-bound workloads, though the 13700E's 64th percentile is already respectable. The Socket 1700 platform supports 13th Gen and 14th Gen Intel Core processors, so users could potentially upgrade to a higher-tier chip within the same socket without changing the motherboard. However, the current pairing is well-balanced for most use cases, and the primary upgrade path would be GPU-driven for gaming or CPU-driven for compute tasks.

# FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i7-13700E?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A770 compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Arc A770 has an average benchmark score of 68809, which is 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (69000), 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68562), 1.5% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (69870), and 1.7% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (69986).

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile ranking for the Intel Core i7-13700E and Intel Arc A770 is 77, placing it in the upper quartile of all tracked builds.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700E supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation and server platforms.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Core i7-13700E and the Intel Arc A770?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E has a TDP of 65 W, and the Intel Arc A770 has a TDP of 225 W.

Q: What is the VRAM size and memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A770?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus width and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A770 still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A770 is marked as end-of-life in the FACT PACK, with its successor being Battlemage.

# Build Overview

The Intel Core i7-13700E and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop-class build with a combined percentile ranking of 77, which places it in the upper quartile of all tracked systems. The CPU is a 16-core/24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, a 64th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 7957. The GPU is an Intel Arc A770 with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 90th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 68809.

This pairing represents a balanced high-end desktop system where the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. The CPU's 64th percentile indicates it outperforms most processors, while the GPU's 90th percentile places it well above the vast majority of GPUs. The 77th combined percentile confirms that this is a capable system for a wide range of workloads, from gaming to content creation. The build class is desktop, which means it is intended for stationary use with full-size components and upgrade potential.

The overall tier is high-end, with the GPU being the standout component. The system is well-suited for users who prioritize graphics performance but also need solid multi-threaded CPU performance. The efficiency of the 65 W CPU is a notable advantage, allowing for lower power consumption under load compared to higher-TDP rivals, while the GPU's 225 W TDP is typical for its performance class.

# Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high to ultra settings, as the Arc A770's 90th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM provide ample performance for modern titles. The CPU's 64th percentile ensures that it does not bottleneck the GPU at this resolution, and the estimated frame rates are expected to be smooth, though the lack of measured FPS data requires caution in making definitive claims.

Content creators, specifically video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the combination of the CPU's 24 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 and the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance are strong indicators of productivity performance. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for handling large textures and complex scenes without running out of memory.

Software developers will appreciate the 16 cores for parallel compilation and the ECC memory support for system stability. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 suggests solid build times, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with frequent code recompilation. Students and small business users will find the system overkill for office tasks, but the efficiency of the 65 W CPU and the integrated graphics backup make it a reliable and quiet workstation.

The primary target audience is the enthusiast gamer or prosumer who wants a high-end GPU without sacrificing CPU performance. The system is also suitable for small business workstations that require occasional 3D rendering or video processing, where the GPU's 90th percentile ranking provides a significant boost over typical office GPUs. Overall, this build is a versatile high-performance desktop that excels in graphics-intensive tasks while maintaining strong CPU throughput for compute-heavy workloads.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors and a die size of 406 mm². It features 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

The compute performance is notable: 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 39.32 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. These figures indicate strong rasterization and texturing capabilities, placing the Arc A770 in the high-end segment of GPUs. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, which is increasingly important in modern games and rendering applications. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future software APIs.

In benchmark tests, the Arc A770 scores 2969 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 109175 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 94284 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68809. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (avg 69000, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (avg 68562, delta +0.4%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg 69870, delta -1.5%), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (avg 69986, delta -1.7%). The deltas are small, indicating that the Arc A770 performs on par with these professional and mining-focused GPUs.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing for large scenes and high-resolution textures to be loaded entirely into memory. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the compute units efficiently. The 32 ray tracing cores, while not as numerous as some higher-end competitors, provide hardware acceleration that is beneficial for ray-traced rendering in DCC applications. The GPU's 90th percentile ranking suggests that it is a top-tier part for its generation, though it is now marked as end-of-life with Battlemage as its successor. The 225 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU are reasonable for the performance on offer, and the dual-slot design with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors fits standard desktop cases.