SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, using the 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The chip's die measures 257 mm² and carries the Raptor Lake-S codename, positioning it as a mainstream high-core-count part rather than a flagship HEDT or server chip. Base clock sits at 1900 MHz, with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz—a substantial 3.2 GHz headroom between idle and maximum turbo, indicating aggressive single-thread scaling. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 16-core part, suggesting the E-series variant is tuned for power efficiency over peak sustained all-core performance.

Cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. This layered cache design favors workloads with large working sets, such as video encoding, database queries, and complex multi-threaded code compilation. The dual-channel memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility on platform cost versus bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, which is unusual for a consumer-tier chip and opens the door to entry-level workstations where data integrity matters more than raw frame rates. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, which is sufficient for basic display output and media decode but not intended for serious gaming.

Benchmark data from Cinebench and Geekbench reveal a lopsided profile. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 27,941, while single-core reaches 3,944. The multicore-to-singlecore ratio of roughly 7.1:1 shows strong parallel scaling, but the single-core result is modest compared to contemporary high-end parts. Cinebench R20 scores are 11,735 multicore and 1,656 single-core; R15 scores are 2,816 multicore and 397 single-core. Geekbench results are 12,728 multicore and 2,437 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 7,957, placing the chip at the 64th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The nearest rival comparisons are telling. The AMD EPYC 7551P scores 7,952 on average, a delta of just 0.1%—essentially identical overall performance despite the EPYC being a server-focused part with different memory and core topology. The Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7,910, only 0.6% behind, meaning the i7-13700E matches a previous-generation 18-core HEDT processor. Against Intel Xeon Gold 6326, the i7-13700E is 1.4% behind, and against Xeon Platinum 8180M it trails by 1.9%. These deltas are all within noise; the practical takeaway is that the i7-13700E delivers mid-2010s server-grade multi-threaded throughput in a 65 W desktop package.

For real workloads, the Raptor Lake architecture brings a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not break out core types explicitly. The strong multicore scores suggest that heavily threaded tasks like 3D scene rendering, video transcoding, and software builds will see near-linear gains. The single-core scores, while not class-leading, are more than adequate for responsive desktop use, web browsing, and lightly threaded applications. The 64th percentile overall means this CPU sits above the median but well below the top-tier 96-core server parts or the fastest 24-core consumer chips.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across 406 mm², yielding a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². This is a large, power-hungry die for a mid-range GPU, reflecting Intel's first serious foray into discrete graphics. The GPU's base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost of 2400 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure is competitive for the class and positions the card well for 1440p gaming and 1080p high-refresh workloads, where memory throughput often becomes the bottleneck in modern titles. The 256-bit bus width is wider than typical mid-range cards, hinting at strong raw fill-rate capability. Shading units number 3,584, with 224 texture mapping units and 112 render output units. Pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, indicating balanced rasterization throughput.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 28 RT cores, which is a modest count but sufficient for entry-level ray-traced effects at lower resolutions or with upscaling. Tensor cores are not listed, which is notable—Intel's Xe-HPG architecture relies on XeSS, a software-based upscaler, rather than dedicated tensor hardware. FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS via 2:1 ratio. These numbers place the A750 in the upper-mid range of GPU compute capability, roughly matching some previous-generation high-end cards.

The 225 W TDP is substantial, requiring a 550 W suggested power supply and dual connectors: one 6-pin and one 8-pin. The card is dual-slot and uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0, making it future-proof for high-refresh monitors and multi-display setups. API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a mixed bag. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,612, which is a modern, demanding test. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98,554, while Vulkan scores 85,631. Passmark results are peculiar: DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 72, DirectX 12 scores 70, DirectX 9 scores 181, G2D scores 732, G3D scores 12,534, and GPU compute scores 5,368. The low DX10/DX11/DX12 Passmark scores relative to the G3D score suggest driver overhead in legacy APIs, while the compute score is healthy. The average benchmark score is 20,582, placing the GPU at the 66th percentile of all GPUs.

Nearest rivals are instructive. The Intel Arc B570 scores 20,556, just 0.1% behind—meaning the A750 is essentially equivalent to its successor in average performance, which is unusual for a generational gap. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534, only 0.2% behind, indicating the A750 matches a mobile high-end GPU in aggregate benchmarks. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662, 0.4% ahead, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480, 0.5% behind. All deltas are within 0.5%, so the A750 sits in a tightly clustered performance band. For rendering, the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 512 GB/s bandwidth suggest strong rasterization and compute potential, though the lack of tensor cores means AI-accelerated workloads will rely on shader-based implementations.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 65 out of 100, placing it above the median but not in enthusiast territory. The CPU's average benchmark score of 7,957 and GPU's average of 20,582 provide the raw numbers. The CPU sits at the 64th percentile, the GPU at the 66th percentile—a well-matched pair where neither component dramatically overpowers the other.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,941 is the headline figure. This translates to serious multi-threaded capability: video editing timelines, 3D scene renders, and software compilation will complete in reasonable time. The single-core score of 3,944 in R23 is less impressive but still competent for everyday responsiveness. Geekbench multicore of 12,728 and single-core of 2,437 reinforce the pattern: strong parallel, moderate serial performance.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612 is the most modern benchmark and indicates the card handles current DX12 titles at reasonable settings. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 shows strong compute throughput, which benefits tasks like video encoding and physics simulations. The Passmark G3D score of 12,534 is solid for a mid-range card, while the G2D score of 732 reflects adequate 2D acceleration for desktop work.

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the i7-13700E plus Arc A750 pairing. All frame rate discussions must therefore be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements. The combined picture is a balanced mid-range desktop system: the CPU and GPU percentiles are within two points of each other, suggesting neither is a bottleneck in most workloads. The CPU's 64th percentile and GPU's 66th percentile mean the system as a whole should deliver consistent, predictable performance across a wide range of applications.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E uses Socket 1700, which is the LGA1700 platform shared with 12th and 13th generation Intel Core processors. This socket is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, as the CPU's memory controller supports both types. Builders can choose cheaper DDR4 for budget builds or faster DDR5 for higher bandwidth; the dual-channel bus means memory bandwidth is limited to two channels regardless of type. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is current-generation and sufficient for high-end GPUs and NVMe SSDs.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a 16-core part. This means a capable air cooler will suffice, and the system does not demand exotic liquid cooling. The GPU, however, has a 225 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 550 W. When combined, the system's total power draw is dominated by the GPU, so the PSU choice should prioritize headroom for GPU spikes. The suggested PSU of 550 W is the minimum recommendation; the data does not indicate a higher figure, so builders should treat 550 W as the baseline requirement.

The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, with the successor being Intel Battlemage. The CPU is still active in production. For a sensible next upgrade, the platform is the primary constraint: Socket 1700 supports 13th generation and some 14th generation parts, so a future CPU upgrade within the same socket is possible without changing the motherboard. The GPU's end-of-life status means a replacement will eventually be necessary, but the A750's performance is still competitive in its class.

Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the motherboard choice locks in the memory type. ECC memory support is a differentiator that may justify a workstation-oriented motherboard for specific use cases. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are backward compatible with Gen 4 and Gen 3 devices, so existing GPUs and SSDs will work without issue.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 66th percentile and the CPU's 64th percentile suggest this system can drive 1080p high-refresh monitors in most titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612 is indicative of current DX12 game performance, but without measured FPS data, the estimate is that esports titles will run well above 144 FPS at 1080p, while AAA games will land in the 60-100 FPS range depending on settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding at reasonable quality, while the GPU's compute performance (OpenCL score of 98,554) can assist with hardware encoding. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p streaming buffers, though 4K streaming may strain memory capacity.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,941 indicates strong timeline rendering and export performance. The GPU's 512 GB/s bandwidth and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 help with effects and color grading. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means editors can choose a memory configuration that balances cost and speed.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads will handle CPU-based renderers efficiently, as evidenced by the R20 multicore score of 11,735. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 28 RT cores can accelerate GPU-based renderers and ray-traced previews, though the absence of tensor cores limits AI-accelerated denoising.

Software development: The CPU's 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache are excellent for code compilation, which is often cache- and thread-bound. The 64th percentile overall means build times will be respectable, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for critical work.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core scores (R23 single of 3,944, Geekbench single of 2,437) are more than adequate for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs low for always-on systems.

# FAQ

Q: What is the thermal design power of the Intel Core i7-13700E?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 16-core processor. This allows for efficient cooling solutions and lower system power draw.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A750 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 28 RT cores dedicated to ray-traced workloads, enabling ray-traced effects in supported games and applications.

Q: What memory types does the i7-13700E support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, which is uncommon for consumer desktop CPUs.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the Arc A750?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W. The card has a 225 W TDP and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the Arc A750 compare to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20,582, while the Arc B570 scores 20,556, a delta of only 0.1%. The two are effectively equal in average performance.

Q: What is the socket type for the i7-13700E?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both 12th and 13th generation Intel Core processors. It offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Q: Is the Arc A750 still in production?

A: No, the GPU is marked as end-of-life, with Intel Battlemage listed as its successor. The CPU remains in active production.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need balanced multi-threaded CPU performance and solid mid-range GPU capability. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will find the pairing suitable for high-refresh play in competitive titles and playable frame rates in AAA games, based on the GPU's 66th percentile and the CPU's 64th percentile. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,941 and the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache, which reduce build times compared to lower-core-count parts.

Students and office workers building a general-purpose machine will find the system overkill in the best way: the 65 W CPU TDP keeps electricity costs low, the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display solution, and the ECC memory support adds data integrity for academic research or financial work. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded productivity software, such as accounting suites or database applications, will benefit from the CPU's strong multicore scores and the GPU's compute capability for acceleration. The system is not aimed at enthusiasts chasing maximum frame rates at 4K ultra settings—the GPU's percentile, while above median, does not suggest top-tier performance. Similarly, users needing extreme single-threaded speed for legacy software may find the CPU's single-core scores adequate but not exceptional.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700E with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 225 W Xe-HPG discrete card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile is 65, meaning the system outperforms roughly two-thirds of all recorded desktop configurations in the database. The CPU's 64th percentile and GPU's 66th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a well-balanced pairing where components are matched in relative capability. This is not a budget build nor a flagship system; it sits in the upper-middle tier of desktop performance, suitable for a wide range of productive and recreational tasks.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles are within two points of each other (64 vs 66), suggesting a balanced pairing in aggregate terms. However, workload-specific bottlenecks will emerge. In lightly threaded tasks like web browsing or office productivity, the CPU's single-core performance (R23 single of 3,944) is the limiting factor, but it is more than sufficient for these workloads, so no practical bottleneck exists.

In multi-threaded CPU-bound workloads like video rendering or code compilation, the CPU will be the primary performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,941 indicates the CPU can saturate its 24 threads effectively, and the GPU will likely be underutilized. Conversely, in GPU-bound gaming at 1440p or higher, the Arc A750's 66th percentile will determine frame rates, and the CPU will sit partially idle. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612 suggests the GPU handles modern DX12 loads, but the CPU's single-core scores may limit frame rates in CPU-heavy simulation games that don't scale well across 24 threads.

Memory bandwidth is a potential shared bottleneck. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 bus is not as wide as the GPU's 256-bit memory interface, but the CPU's 30 MB L3 cache mitigates memory latency in many workloads. The GPU's 512 GB/s bandwidth is ample for its class and unlikely to be the limiting factor in most games. Overall, the system is balanced for mixed workloads but will show CPU limitation in thread-heavy productivity and GPU limitation in high-resolution gaming.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core i7-13700E paired with the Intel Arc A750. All frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements.

Based on the GPU's 66th percentile and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612, the system should handle 1080p gaming with high settings in most modern titles. The CPU's single-core scores (Geekbench single of 2,437) are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p in most games, though very CPU-intensive titles may see reduced frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary determinants, and the system should deliver playable frame rates in the 50-70 FPS range for AAA games with medium-to-high settings. Esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs should exceed 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, given the GPU's throughput.

At 4K, the system will struggle with modern AAA games, as the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 is below the threshold typically needed for smooth 4K ultra settings. Ray tracing will require significant settings reductions due to the modest 28 RT cores. The Passmark DirectX scores (DX9 at 181, DX10 at 65, DX11 at 72, DX12 at 70) suggest that older DirectX titles may perform unpredictably, with DX9 showing relatively better results. For a reliable gaming experience, 1080p high-refresh or 1440p medium settings are the realistic targets for this pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + Intel Arc A750

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds