SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

76 Score

Top 24% Ranking

76 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 24% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Raptor Lake architecture at Intel's 10 nm process node. It combines performance and efficiency cores in a hybrid layout, with a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The chip carries 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The processor fits Intel Socket 1700 and was released on January 3, 2023, with production status marked active.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 64th percentile among all processors. In Cinebench R23, it scores 27,941 in multi-core and 3,944 in single-core. The R20 run shows 11,735 multi-core and 1,656 single-core. Geekbench results are 12,728 multi-core and 2,437 single-core. The average benchmark score is 7,957. Compared to nearest rivals, the i7-13700E sits 0.1% above the AMD EPYC 7551P (7,952) and 0.6% above the Intel Core i9-10980XE (7,910). It trails the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 by 1.4% (8,071) and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M by 1.9% (8,110). These deltas are tight, meaning the i7-13700E trades blows with server-class silicon in aggregate scores, though its real strength lies in the multi-core throughput for desktop workloads.

The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 16-core part, indicating efficient power delivery for sustained workloads. The single-core score of 3,944 in R23 suggests strong per-thread performance for lightly threaded applications, while the multi-core score of 27,941 shows substantial parallel capability. The architecture's hybrid design allows the OS to schedule tasks across performance and efficiency cores, which benefits mixed workloads like background tasks alongside foreground applications.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13700E support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on compatible Intel Socket 1700 motherboards.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this CPU?

A: The i7-13700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the i7-13700E?

A: The processor has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 16-core, 24-thread chip.

Q: How does the i7-13700E compare to the Intel Core i9-10980XE?

A: In average benchmark score, the i7-13700E is 0.6% ahead of the i9-10980XE, with scores of 7,957 versus 7,910.

Q: What integrated graphics does this CPU include?

A: It features UHD Graphics 770, which can handle basic display output and light graphics tasks without a discrete GPU.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The processor offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, plus additional lanes likely routed through the chipset.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A310E still in production?

A: No, the Arc A310E is marked as end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. No rows exist in measuredFpsUltraByGame, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct testing. Treat these figures as directional expectations, not measured results.

The Intel Arc A310E is a low-tier discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation, built on the Xe-HPG architecture at TSMC's 6 nm process. It has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 6 ray tracing cores. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU runs at a fixed 2000 MHz clock for both base and boost, delivering 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. This is entry-level compute power, and the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which means it is exactly average in the database's ranking.

The i7-13700E's strong single-core score of 3,944 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can feed frames effectively to the GPU in most scenarios. However, the Arc A310E's modest FP32 throughput and 64-bit memory interface will likely bottleneck at lower resolutions. At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing would struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern titles, as the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS is far below what demanding games need for high-refresh play. Expect playable but not smooth performance in esports titles, and significant compromises in AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor more severely, with the 4 GB memory capacity potentially causing texture streaming issues in larger open-world games. The CPU's 64th percentile ranking is substantially higher than the GPU's 50th, so the Arc A310E will be the primary constraint in gaming workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The i7-13700E delivers excellent single-core performance with a 3,944 R23 single-core score, which is well suited for driving high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. However, the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well below what high-refresh monitors need, particularly at 1080p ultra. This pairing is not ideal for high-refresh gaming beyond esports at lowered settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by a 27,941 R23 multi-core score, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The 65 W TDP means thermal headroom exists for sustained encode workloads. However, the GPU's limited performance will constrain the gaming side of streaming, making this a poor fit for serious streamers who also want high game quality.

Video Editing: Multi-core performance is strong, as shown by the 12,728 Geekbench multi-core score and 11,735 R20 multi-core result. The CPU can handle timeline rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus are limiting for effects-heavy timelines, but for basic cuts and color grading, the i7-13700E carries the load. The 65 W TDP suggests sustained rendering sessions remain thermally manageable.

3D Rendering: The 27,941 Cinebench R23 multi-core score places this CPU in a competitive position against server chips like the AMD EPYC 7551P (0.1% ahead) and Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M (1.9% behind). For CPU-based rendering, this is a capable workhorse. GPU rendering would be slow with the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS, so rely on CPU rendering for this build.

Software Development: The high single-core score of 3,944 in R23 and 2,437 in Geekbench single-core help with compiler latency and IDE responsiveness. The 24 threads handle parallel builds effectively. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during long compile sessions, and ECC memory support is a plus for stability-sensitive development environments.

Student and Office Work: This CPU is overkill for typical office tasks, but the efficiency is notable. The 65 W TDP and 16 cores mean the system stays cool and quiet under light loads. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle display output without the discrete GPU, making the Arc A310E optional for office workloads. The 64th CPU percentile ensures snappy performance for spreadsheets, browsers, and document editing.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 7,957, placing it in the 64th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD EPYC 7551P scores 7,952 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core i9-10980XE scores 7,910 (0.6% behind), the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 scores 8,071 (1.4% ahead), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 8,110 (1.9% ahead). This means the i7-13700E performs nearly identically to those server-grade chips in aggregate benchmarks, which is remarkable for a desktop part with a 65 W TDP.

In individual tests, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,941 demonstrates strong parallel scaling from the 16 cores and 24 threads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12,728 corroborates this. Single-core performance is equally solid: 3,944 in R23 and 2,437 in Geekbench, both indicating fast per-thread execution for everyday tasks.

The GPU presents a different picture. The Intel Arc A310E has no benchmark entries in the FACT PACK and an average benchmark score of 0, yet its percentile is 50 among all GPUs. This likely reflects its position as an average performer relative to the full GPU database, but the lack of direct scores means precise comparisons are unavailable. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the key quantitative indicators of its capability.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 57, which sits between the CPU's 64th and the GPU's 50th percentile. This suggests the pair is slightly above average overall, pulled down by the GPU's mid-pack ranking. The CPU is the stronger component, with the GPU trailing in relative performance.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute power over graphics performance. The i7-13700E's 64th CPU percentile makes it suitable for developers compiling large codebases, students running simulations or data analysis, and small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and multitasking. The 65 W TDP and ECC memory support make it an efficient choice for always-on systems or office environments where reliability matters.

Content creators working with CPU-bound tasks, such as video encoding or 3D rendering in CPU-based renderers, will benefit from the 27,941 R23 multi-core score. The 16 cores handle parallel workloads effectively, and the 0.1% advantage over the AMD EPYC 7551P shows it competes with enterprise silicon.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations might find the Arc A310E adequate for older titles or esports at lowered settings, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is not a gaming-focused component. The 4 GB VRAM limits texture quality in modern games, and the 64-bit memory bus constrains bandwidth. This is not a build for high-refresh or high-detail gaming.

The GPU's end-of-life status and 75 W TDP make it a low-power option for basic graphics acceleration, but its 3.072 TFLOPS are best suited for light workloads like video playback, 2D applications, or entry-level CAD. For users who need occasional GPU acceleration without heavy gaming, this pairing works. For anyone expecting AAA gaming performance, look elsewhere.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the GPU limits gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads, while the CPU excels in compute tasks. The CPU's 64th percentile versus the GPU's 50th percentile shows a 14-point gap in favor of the processor. In gaming, this means the Arc A310E will be the constraint, with its 3.072 TFLOPS and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth capping frame rates regardless of the CPU's strength.

The CPU's 27,941 R23 multi-core score indicates it can feed data to the GPU faster than the GPU can process it in most scenarios. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the GPU's limited pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s will be the limiting factors. At higher resolutions, the 4 GB memory capacity and 64-bit bus become additional constraints, potentially causing stutter in memory-intensive scenes.

For CPU-bound workloads like rendering or compilation, the GPU plays a minimal role, and the i7-13700E's performance is the determining factor. The 65 W TDP means the CPU can sustain high clocks without excessive heat, allowing consistent multi-core performance. The balance is therefore workload-dependent: CPU-heavy tasks see excellent performance, while GPU-heavy tasks are severely constrained.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700E with the Intel Arc A310E. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 Arc A310E with a 75 W TDP. The combined percentile is 57, meaning this pairing ranks slightly above average in the database's overall distribution.

The CPU is a current, active product with strong multi-core performance, while the GPU is end-of-life with average relative performance. This creates an asymmetric pairing: a high-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU. The CPU's 64th percentile indicates it is better than most processors, while the GPU's 50th percentile is exactly average. The combined 57th percentile reflects this mix, with the CPU pulling the pair above the midpoint.

This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a CPU-centric workstation with just enough GPU capability for basic graphics tasks. The 65 W CPU and 75 W GPU together draw modest power, making this a low-heat, low-noise desktop solution for productivity-focused users.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so there is bandwidth headroom for future upgrades. The platform supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation reliability. The CPU's 65 W TDP means most Socket 1700 motherboards can handle it easily, leaving thermal and power headroom for more demanding components.

The suggested PSU for this build is 250 W, which is modest given the 65 W CPU and 75 W GPU. This leaves limited headroom for upgrades. A more powerful GPU would require a higher-capacity power supply, as the 250 W suggestion is tuned for the current components. The GPU requires no power connectors and is single-slot, so physical space is not a constraint.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A310E with a stronger GPU, as the CPU can clearly handle more graphics throughput. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and 4 GB memory are the GPU's current bottlenecks, and a newer GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth would unlock the CPU's potential. However, the 250 W PSU would likely need upgrading alongside the GPU. The CPU itself has headroom—its 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier mean it can be pushed further with a better cooler, though the stock configuration already performs well. For users who want more CPU power, the Socket 1700 platform offers upgrade options, but the i7-13700E's 64th percentile means it is already a strong performer relative to the field.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700E

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds