SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700E + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700E

7,957 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700E + Intel Arc A310: Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines a 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with Intel's entry-level Arc A310 graphics card, creating a system where the CPU's substantial compute capability vastly outstrips the GPU's modest rendering throughput. The Core i7-13700E sits at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A310 ranks at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, with the combined platform landing at the 52nd percentile overall. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the available benchmark scores rather than direct gaming measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it within the 13th Gen Raptor Lake desktop family. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between established and newer memory technologies. ECC memory support is present, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented builds that require data integrity. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards.

The CPU's thermal design power is rated at 65 watts, which is modest for a 16-core part. This low TDP means the processor can be adequately cooled by a capable air cooler without requiring elaborate liquid cooling solutions. The GPU's power demands are even more restrained, with the Arc A310 rated at just 30 watts and requiring no external power connectors. The suggested power supply for this combination is 200 watts, indicating that even a modest PSU provides ample headroom for the entire system.

For a sensible next upgrade, the motherboard socket compatibility allows users to move to other Socket 1700 processors without changing the board. Given that the CPU's 65-watt TDP leaves substantial thermal and power headroom, a builder could later install a higher-tier Raptor Lake processor with more aggressive clock speeds. The GPU, however, represents the more critical upgrade path. The Arc A310's 30-watt power draw and lack of external power connectors mean that upgrading to a higher-performance graphics card would require a PSU with additional PCIe power cables, though the 200-watt suggested PSU would likely need to be replaced for anything beyond entry-level graphics.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, the following frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct gaming measurements. The Arc A310's PassMark G3D score of 5433 places it at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, with its nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 at a 1% delta. This positions the GPU as an entry-level part capable of handling esports titles and older games at lower settings, but it will struggle with modern AAA releases at high detail levels.

The CPU's gaming potential is significantly higher than what the GPU can deliver. The i7-13700E's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3944 and multi-core score of 27941 indicate strong processing capability that would not bottleneck most games. However, the Arc A310's modest shading units (768), texture mapping units (32), and render output units (16) limit the system's overall gaming throughput. At 1080p resolution, the system might deliver playable frame rates in competitive titles like esports shooters, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would become severe constraints.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs, but the low PassMark DirectX scores (29 for DirectX 12, 33 for DirectX 11) suggest that actual gaming performance will be modest. The 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 28.00 GPixel/s pixel rate place this GPU firmly in entry-level territory. For gaming, this system would be best suited to older titles, indie games, or competitive games at reduced settings rather than demanding modern releases.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at modern settings. The Arc A310's 40th percentile GPU ranking and its nearest rival comparison to the GTX 1650 indicate that achieving 144 Hz or higher frame rates in most games would require significant graphical compromises. The CPU could easily feed high frame rates, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance that could handle both game and encoder workloads. However, the GPU's limited rendering capability means the gameplay being streamed would be at lower quality settings.

Video editing: The i7-13700E's multi-core performance is well-suited for video editing workloads. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11735 and Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 indicate strong processing power for timeline operations and rendering. The GPU's 4 GB memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would limit GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU could handle many editing tasks independently.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would perform respectably given the 27941 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. However, GPU-accelerated rendering would be severely limited by the Arc A310's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB memory capacity. The GPU's PassMark compute score of 2157 confirms its limited compute capability.

Software development: The 16-core/24-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock makes this an excellent development workstation. Compilation tasks benefit from the multi-core score of 27941 in Cinebench R23, while the single-core score of 3944 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache provides substantial data locality for build pipelines.

Student and office work: This system is overqualified for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's 65-watt TDP and the GPU's 30-watt power draw make for an energy-efficient system that handles office applications, web browsing, and document processing with ease. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running academic workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The i7-13700E ranks at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A310 sits at only the 40th percentile among GPUs. This 24-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU will bottleneck the system in graphics-intensive workloads, preventing the CPU from reaching its full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated applications.

The CPU's benchmark scores consistently show strong performance across both single-core and multi-core tests. The Cinebench R23 scores of 3944 single-core and 27941 multi-core demonstrate balanced capabilities that would serve most workloads well. In contrast, the GPU's PassMark scores reveal its limitations: the G3D score of 5433 is respectable for entry-level parts, but the DirectX 12 score of 29 and DirectX 11 score of 33 are notably low, indicating weak gaming performance.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated rather than measured, supports this bottleneck analysis. The CPU's single-core performance could drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 768 shading units and 16 ROPs would cap achievable frame rates well below what the CPU could support. For productivity workloads that rely on the CPU, the system performs well; for graphics workloads, the GPU is the clear limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1750 MHz with a boost clock of 1750 MHz, indicating that the card runs at a fixed frequency without dynamic boosting.

Memory configuration consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz with an effective data rate of 15.5 Gbps. This memory subsystem is modest by modern standards, limiting performance in memory-intensive workloads and high-resolution textures. The 64-bit bus width is particularly restrictive, capping the amount of data that can be transferred between the GPU and memory.

The GPU features 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is rated at 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate at 56.00 GTexel/s. Compute performance includes 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's benchmark scores paint a clear picture. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and Vulkan score of 28964 indicate moderate compute capability, while the PassMark GPU compute score of 2157 is low. The PassMark DirectX scores (29 for DirectX 12, 33 for DirectX 11, 69 for DirectX 9) suggest that older DirectX 9 titles might actually perform better than modern ones. The 40th percentile GPU ranking and nearest rival comparisons to the GTX 1650 (1% delta) and Radeon R7 250 (0.1% delta) confirm this is an entry-level graphics solution.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. The i7-13700E's 16 cores and 24 threads make it an excellent choice for developers compiling large codebases, students running computational workloads, and professionals using CPU-intensive productivity applications. The ECC memory support adds appeal for users who require data integrity in their computing tasks.

For gamers, this build would suit those playing at 1080p with modest settings, particularly in esports titles or older games where the CPU's strong single-core performance can compensate for the GPU's limitations. The system is not recommended for gamers seeking high frame rates in modern AAA titles at high detail settings, as the Arc A310's 40th percentile GPU ranking and limited 4 GB memory would become immediate constraints.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering would find value in this system. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 and Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 demonstrate substantial processing capability for video encoding, 3D rendering, and batch processing tasks. However, those relying heavily on GPU acceleration would be better served by a more powerful graphics card.

Small business workstations and office environments would benefit from the system's energy efficiency. The CPU's 65-watt TDP and GPU's 30-watt power draw with a 200-watt suggested PSU make this a low-power solution that reduces electricity costs while providing ample performance for productivity software.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700E delivers a comprehensive benchmark suite that showcases its capabilities. In Cinebench R15, the processor scores 2816 in multi-core and 397 in single-core tests. The Cinebench R20 results show 11735 multi-core and 1656 single-core, while Cinebench R23 demonstrates 27941 multi-core and 3944 single-core. Geekbench results include 12728 multi-core and 2437 single-core.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 7957, placing it at the 64th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7551P with an average score of 7952 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i9-10980XE at 7910 (0.6% delta), the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 at 8071 (-1.4% delta), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M at 8110 (-1.9% delta). This positioning indicates the i7-13700E performs comparably to enterprise server processors in average benchmark terms.

The Intel Arc A310's benchmark results include Geekbench OpenCL at 30607 and Vulkan at 28964. PassMark scores show 31 for DirectX 10, 33 for DirectX 11, 29 for DirectX 12, 69 for DirectX 9, 625 for G2D, 5433 for G3D, and 2157 for GPU compute. The GPU's average benchmark score is 7550, placing it at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 at 7557 (-0.1% delta), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 at 7580 (-0.4% delta), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 at 7472 (1% delta), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M at 7447 (1.4% delta).

The combined system percentile of 52 reflects the imbalance between the strong CPU and modest GPU. The CPU's 64th percentile ranking boosts the overall score, but the GPU's 40th percentile ranking pulls it down from what a more balanced pairing would achieve.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core i7-13700E support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to adjust clock speeds beyond the stock 5.10 GHz boost clock, provided the motherboard and cooling solution support it.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this CPU?

A: The i7-13700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support available for error-correcting workloads.

Q: How does the Arc A310 compare to the GeForce GTX 1650?

A: The Arc A310 has an average benchmark score of 7550 compared to the GTX 1650's 7472, making the A310 approximately 1% faster in average benchmark terms.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 watts, which accounts for the CPU's 65-watt TDP and the GPU's 30-watt power draw without external power connectors.

Q: Is the Arc A310 still in production?

A: No, the Arc A310 is marked as end-of-life production status, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Arc A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A310 includes 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing capabilities.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series and uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface. The processor is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², and the base clock runs at 1900.00 MHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial cache configuration helps maintain high performance in workloads with significant data reuse. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 for basic display output.

The CPU's benchmark performance is strong across all tests. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27941 demonstrates excellent parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 3944 shows strong per-thread performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12728 and single-core score of 2437 reinforce this balanced performance profile. The average benchmark score of 7957 places it at the 64th percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rival comparisons to server processors like the AMD EPYC 7551P and Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M showing deltas of 0.1% and -1.9% respectively.

For real workloads, the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide substantial multi-tasking capability. The 65-watt TDP is notably low for this core count, making it an efficient choice for systems that run continuously. The 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance, while the 30 MB L3 cache supports data-intensive applications. The CPU's production status is active, and it was released on 2023-01-03.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700E with the Intel Arc A310, creating a system with a significant performance disparity between its two main components. The CPU ranks at the 64th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 52.

The Core i7-13700E represents the high-performance compute core of this system. Its 16 cores, 24 threads, and 5.10 GHz boost clock provide substantial processing power for productivity tasks, development workloads, and CPU-based rendering. The 65-watt TDP makes it an energy-efficient choice that runs cool under typical workloads.

The Intel Arc A310 serves as the graphics solution, offering 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its 768 shading units and 6 ray tracing cores provide entry-level gaming and compute capabilities, but the GPU's 40th percentile ranking indicates it will limit graphics-intensive applications. The 30-watt power draw and single-slot design make it easy to integrate into compact systems.

Overall, this build occupies a desktop class position with a tier level around the 52nd percentile. It excels in CPU-heavy workloads such as software development, video editing, and office productivity, while gaming performance is limited to lower resolutions and settings. The system represents a sensible choice for users who prioritize processing power over graphics performance and who may plan to upgrade the GPU in the future while keeping the strong CPU foundation.