SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 paired with two NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPUs forms an unusual desktop configuration: a 16-core Raptor Lake processor driving workstation-class mobile-derived graphics hardware. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay data. This pairing sits at the 68th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU configurations, indicating a solidly above-average system, though the GPU’s individual 50th percentile standing suggests the two RTX 5000 units are the more modest contributors relative to the processor’s 85th percentile CPU rank.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a pronounced imbalance: the Core i7-13700 ranks in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while each RTX 5000 Embedded Ada GPU lands exactly at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. In a dual-GPU configuration, the combined graphics throughput does not double the percentile—it remains anchored by each individual card’s mid-pack performance. The CPU’s multi-threaded strength, evidenced by a 3dmark_max_threads score of 11737 and a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 25369, far outstrips what two mid-tier GPUs can feed in most gaming workloads. This suggests the GPUs, not the CPU, will be the limiting factor in frame generation, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput matters more than draw-call processing.

Single-thread performance tells a similar story: the 3dmark_single_thread score of 1092 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2008.5 place the CPU well above the GPU pair’s capabilities for latency-sensitive tasks. For productivity workloads like data compression (Passmark score 443900) or encryption (25653), the CPU’s 24 threads (16 cores with Hyper-Threading) will dominate, leaving the GPUs idle. Conversely, in GPU-bound rendering tasks—ray tracing, 3D scene compositing—the CPU will wait on the RTX 5000 units, whose 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 each is respectable but hardly top-tier. The dual-GPU setup does not scale linearly in all applications; many games and creative tools either ignore the second GPU or use it only for specific compute passes, meaning real-world bottleneck analysis depends heavily on software support.

The 65W TDP of the CPU, contrasted with each GPU’s 150W TDP, further highlights the balance: the system draws far more power through the graphics subsystem than the processor. In CPU-bound scenarios—physics simulation (Passmark physics score 2053), integer math (138974), or floating-point math (97723)—the processor will reach its performance ceiling quickly, but the GPUs will remain underutilized. For mixed workloads like video encoding while gaming, the CPU’s 16 cores can handle encoding threads while the GPUs manage rendering, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact scaling remains speculative. Benchmark results indicate a system where the CPU is capable of driving far more graphics horsepower than the current GPU pair provides, making the GPUs the primary constraint in graphics-heavy tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4101 and 3dmark_8_threads score of 7649 suggest strong per-core performance for game logic, AI, and physics. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada GPU, with 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, should handle 1080p and 1440p gaming comfortably in most titles, but the lack of measured data prevents precise FPS claims.

At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU’s high single-core score (Cinebench R23 single-core 2008.5) would likely prevent most CPU bottlenecks, allowing the GPU pair to operate near their limits. Each GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 is roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop card, so dual-GPU scaling—where supported—could push frame rates higher. However, many modern games do not scale well with multiple GPUs, and the RTX 5000’s 50th percentile GPU ranking implies average 1080p performance, not exceptional. At 1440p, the 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth per GPU becomes more relevant, but again, the dual-GPU setup may yield diminishing returns without explicit SLI or NVLink support, which the FACT PACK does not list for this GPU.

For 4K gaming, the 16 GB VRAM per GPU is ample for textures, but the 150W TDP and 930 MHz base clock (1680 MHz boost) suggest each card is thermally and power-limited compared to full-size desktop GPUs. The pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s per GPU indicate each card can handle 4K rasterization at moderate settings, but ultra settings at 4K would likely strain the GPU pair. The CPU’s 30 MB shared L3 cache and 5.20 GHz boost clock would not be the limiting factor at 4K; the GPU’s raw throughput would dominate. In esports titles like CS2 or Valorant, the CPU’s 2-thread score of 2176 and 4-thread score of 4279 suggest high frame rates, but the GPU pair’s mid-pack percentile means even those games might see GPU limits at high refresh rates. Overall, the data indicates a system capable of 1080p ultra and 1440p high gaming, with 4K requiring settings reductions—but these are estimates, not measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 16 cores and 24 threads, combining 8 performance cores and 8 efficient cores (the FACT PACK does not specify the core split, but the thread count confirms Hyper-Threading on the performance cores). The base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide a wide operating range, with the 65W TDP indicating efficient power delivery for a desktop part. The 30 MB shared L3 cache, alongside 2 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core, gives the processor substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a strong all-rounder. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 places it well above many older workstation CPUs, while the single-core score of 2008.5 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance for legacy or lightly-threaded applications. Geekbench scores of 17025 (multi-core) and 2329 (single-core) corroborate this balance. The Passmark multithread score of 36387 and integer math score of 138974 show robust compute capability, while the floating-point score of 97723 indicates strong scientific and engineering performance. The 16-thread 3dmark score of 10075 versus the max-threads score of 11737 shows that scaling beyond 16 threads yields only about 16.5% more performance, suggesting diminishing returns for workloads that cannot utilize all 24 threads.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel architecture, gives builders flexibility, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum speeds or capacities. ECC memory support is listed as true, making this CPU suitable for error-sensitive workstation tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes allows high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe drives, though the RTX 5000 Embedded GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPUs. The unlocked multiplier is false, meaning overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments, but the stock boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high. The release date of 2023-01-03 and launch MSRP of $384 position this as a mainstream enthusiast chip, and its 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms it as a top-tier performer for its class.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong CPU throughput but do not require top-tier GPU performance in every scenario. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates would benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 2008.5), but they must accept the GPU pair’s mid-pack 50th percentile standing, which may limit frame rates in demanding titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would find the CPU’s 24 threads and 25369 Cinebench R23 multicore score invaluable for encoding and simulation, while the dual GPUs could accelerate GPU-accelerated effects—provided the software supports multi-GPU. Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the integer math score of 138974 and data compression score of 443900, which indicate fast build times and archive handling.

Students and small business users running office productivity suites, web development, or data analysis would find this system overpowered in CPU terms but adequate in graphics. The 16 GB VRAM per GPU allows large dataset visualization or machine learning inference without swapping, though the 150W TDP per GPU means the system requires robust cooling. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a plus for workstation reliability, but the FACT PACK does not confirm whether the GPU pair supports ECC. The desktop build class and 68th combined percentile suggest a system that is not a top-tier gaming rig but excels in mixed-use scenarios. Builders who already own high-refresh displays and play undemanding esports titles would see the CPU’s 2-thread score of 2176 shine, while those targeting 4K ultra would be better served by a single more powerful GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37135, placing it in the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, all within a 0.1% deltaPct, include the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (avgScore 37117), Intel Core i9-12900T (37112), AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093). This clustering shows the i7-13700 sits in a dense performance band where small differences of 0.1% separate competitors—meaning the CPU’s exact ranking is less meaningful than its overall percentile. The GPU, however, has an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking, with no nearest rivals listed, indicating it is an average performer with no close comparisons in the database.

The combined percentile of 68 reflects the CPU’s strength pulling up the GPU’s mediocrity. In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12806 and R15 multicore score of 3692 show consistent scaling across versions. The Passmark single-thread score of 4101 (listed twice in the FACT PACK) confirms the CPU’s per-core capability. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same rate (1:1) indicate balanced compute, but the lack of any GPU benchmark scores means no direct comparison to other graphics cards is possible. The 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die (121.1M / mm² density) show a dense, power-efficient design at 5 nm TSMC process, but the 50th percentile suggests this efficiency does not translate to top-tier performance. The pair’s combined picture is one of a CPU that outperforms its peers while the GPUs sit exactly at the median, resulting in a system that is better than average but not exceptional.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 3dmark_2_threads score of 2176 and 4_threads score of 4279 indicate strong low-thread performance for esports titles, while the GPU’s 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate per card could support 144Hz at 1080p in less demanding games. However, the 50th GPU percentile means AAA titles at high refresh may not hit 144 FPS consistently, and dual-GPU scaling is unverified.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369, allow simultaneous game encoding and streaming without significant frame drops. The GPU’s 304 tensor cores per unit could accelerate NVENC-like encoding, though the FACT PACK does not list encoder hardware explicitly.

Video editing: The Passmark data compression score of 443900 and integer math score of 138974 suggest fast timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM per card handles 4K or 8K preview buffers, while the 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large frame transfers.

3D rendering: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 97723 and the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 per card combine for substantial render throughput, but the 50th GPU percentile means each card is average; dual-GPU rendering in Blender or Octane would help, but scaling is not guaranteed.

Software development: The CPU’s 3dmark_max_threads score of 11737 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12806 indicate fast compilation times for parallel builds. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and ECC memory support improves stability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4101 (Passmark) handles spreadsheet calculations and document rendering quickly, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can drive displays without the discrete GPUs, saving power. The 65W CPU TDP keeps idle power low, though the GPUs draw 150W each when active.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is listed as unlocked: false, meaning the clock speed is locked to the factory boost of 5.20 GHz.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: Each RTX 5000 Embedded Ada GPU has a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, provided by 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is ECC memory supported by the CPU?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700 has ECC memory support listed as true, though the FACT PACK does not specify which motherboard chipsets enable this feature.

Q: What is the GPU’s process node and transistor count?

A: The GPU is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, containing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160?

A: The Core i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, while the Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117, a deltaPct of 0%—effectively a tie.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Can this system use DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, per the FACT PACK.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which limits motherboard upgrades to 12th and 13th generation Core processors (Raptor Lake and Alder Lake). The 65W TDP means most LGA1700 boards can handle the power draw without exotic VRM cooling. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, so existing DDR4 kits can be retained to save costs, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum speeds. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes provides future-proofing for next-generation SSDs and GPUs, but the RTX 5000 Embedded GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which will run at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU’s suggested PSU is null, but each card’s 150W TDP combined with the CPU’s 65W suggests a quality 500W or higher power supply would be prudent, though no specific wattage is provided.

For a sensible next upgrade, replacing the dual RTX 5000 Embedded GPUs with a single higher-performance desktop GPU would likely improve gaming and rendering performance, given the CPU’s 85th percentile standing. The CPU’s 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache have headroom to drive stronger graphics. Alternatively, adding more RAM (the FACT PACK does not list capacity limits) or faster NVMe storage via the Gen 5 lanes would reduce load times. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a backup display output if the discrete GPUs are removed for troubleshooting. The socket’s active production status means replacement CPUs are available, but the unlocked multiplier being false limits overclocking potential, so upgrading to a K-series chip would require a new CPU, not just a BIOS change. The 16 GB VRAM per GPU is generous, but if workloads demand more, a single 24 GB or 32 GB GPU would be a better fit than two 16 GB cards, given multi-GPU scaling uncertainties.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system combining the Intel Core i7-13700 with two NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPUs. The CPU’s 85th percentile rank among all CPUs and the GPU’s 50th percentile rank yield a combined percentile of 68, placing this system in the upper third of all configurations in the database. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 65W TDP, while each GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture chip with 16 GB GDDR6, 9728 shading units, and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32. The pairing is unusual—a high-end CPU with mid-pack GPUs—making it more suited to CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, simulation, or video encoding than to pure gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means the gaming performance is estimated, not verified, which introduces uncertainty. The 68th combined percentile suggests the system outperforms the majority of builds but falls short of top-tier gaming rigs, which typically pair high-percentile CPUs with high-percentile GPUs. The dual-GPU configuration adds complexity without guaranteed scaling, and the 150W TDP per GPU means the system runs hot under load. Overall, this build represents a workstation-oriented configuration where the processor does the heavy lifting, and the GPUs provide adequate but not exceptional graphics acceleration.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is built on the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. Each GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth at 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective). The base clock is 930 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz. The GPU contains 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), indicating no FP16 acceleration advantage. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s.

The 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0, indicates this is a median performer—adequate for mainstream gaming and compute but not a leader. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for 4K textures or large datasets, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most workloads, though high-end desktop GPUs often exceed 800 GB/s. The 76 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the 150W TDP and 1680 MHz boost clock suggest thermal and power limits compared to full-size desktop GPUs that can boost higher. The 304 tensor cores support DLSS and AI acceleration, but the 50th percentile implies these features perform at an average level. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs are portable-device dependent, meaning this GPU is designed for embedded or mobile workstations, not standard desktop chassis. The dual-GPU setup doubles VRAM to 32 GB total and bandwidth to 1152 GB/s aggregate, but software must explicitly support multi-GPU to benefit. The predecessor is Ampere-MW and successor is Blackwell-MW, but the FACT PACK provides no benchmark scores for this GPU, limiting direct comparisons.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds