SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU that sits in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, making it a top-tier option for professional rendering workloads. Its 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus delivers 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for large texture sets and complex scenes. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate, and the GPU boosts to 2175 MHz from a 1500 MHz base clock — a 45% boost headroom that allows sustained performance in demanding tasks.

The AD104 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process, packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die. This density enables 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS matches the FP16 rate at a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for AI-accelerated rendering and mixed-precision workloads.

Ray tracing is handled by 48 RT cores, and AI acceleration by 192 tensor cores. These are the hardware blocks that make modern rendering features practical. The RT cores offload ray-intersection calculations, while the tensor cores accelerate denoising and DLSS-style upscaling. For a workstation GPU, this combination means real-time ray-traced previews in DCC applications are feasible without sacrificing interactivity. The 12 Ultimate DirectX support, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API coverage ensure broad application compatibility.

Benchmark scores reinforce the rendering focus. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842 place it ahead of the vast majority of GPUs. In comparison to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is essentially tied with the NVIDIA A10M (deltaPct 0%), slightly behind the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 by 0.1%, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. The deltaPct values are all within 1%, indicating the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is at the very top of its performance class, with no single rival holding a meaningful lead.

The 20 GB VRAM capacity is a key differentiator for rendering. Large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-frame rendering buffers can exceed 16 GB quickly. The 360.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures the GPU can feed its 6,144 shading units without stalling. The single-slot design and 130 W TDP with a suggested 300 W PSU make it feasible for workstation builds where multiple GPUs or dense configurations are common.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system percentile is 90, placing this build in the top 10% of all desktop configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score is 37,135, which lands in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 135,218, which is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The combination of an 85th-percentile CPU and a 95th-percentile GPU creates a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is strong across several test suites. In Cinebench R23, the Core i7-13700 scores 25,369 in multi-core and 2,008.5 in single-core. The R20 results are 12,806 multi-core and 1,807 single-core. R15 shows 3,692 multi-core and 285 single-core. The 3DMark tests scale predictably: 2,176 for 2 threads, 4,279 for 4 threads, 7,649 for 8 threads, 10,075 for 16 threads, and 11,737 for max threads. This scaling from 2 to 24 threads shows the CPU is well-balanced for both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

Geekbench results are 17,025 multi-core and 2,329 single-core. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 36,387 and a single-thread score of 4,101. The data compression score of 443,900, data encryption of 25,653, and extended instructions of 26,578 indicate strong throughput for data-heavy tasks. Floating-point math scores 97,723, integer math 138,974, and random string sorting 46,418. The prime number finding score of 147 is the weakest result, which is typical for processors without specialized prime-number acceleration.

The nearest CPU rivals are all within 0.1% of the Core i7-13700's average score. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 matches at 37,117 (deltaPct 0%), the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112 (deltaPct 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37,161 (deltaPct -0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093 (deltaPct 0.1%). This tight clustering means the Core i7-13700 is exactly at the expected performance level for its class, with no standout advantage or deficit.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a similar pattern. The NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 (deltaPct 0%), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (deltaPct -0.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 (deltaPct -0.9%). The RTX 4000 Ada Generation trails these rivals by fractions of a percent, confirming it is a top-tier workstation GPU with no meaningful performance gap to its closest competitors.

The combined picture shows a system that is CPU-balanced at the 85th percentile and GPU-strong at the 95th percentile. The GPU will not be the bottleneck in most workloads, while the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU in gaming and rendering tasks. The 90th combined percentile reflects a configuration where both components are above average, with the GPU standing out as the more exceptional part.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W. ECC memory support is included, which is a valuable feature for workstation reliability.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing memory latency. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for basic display output or as a fallback.

The benchmark scores indicate strong performance across a wide range of workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 is the headline number for rendering. This score translates to fast CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinebench itself. The single-core score of 2,008.5 shows the boost clock of 5.20 GHz delivers excellent per-thread performance, which matters for legacy applications and lightly-threaded tasks.

The PassMark scores provide insight into specific workload types. The integer math score of 138,974 and floating-point math of 97,723 indicate balanced arithmetic performance. Data compression at 443,900 and random string sorting at 46,418 suggest the CPU handles data manipulation tasks efficiently. The extended instructions score of 26,578 reflects SIMD and vector processing capability, which is important for scientific computing and multimedia codecs.

The 3DMark thread scaling is informative. The score of 2,176 for 2 threads scales to 4,279 for 4 threads (a 1.97x increase), 7,649 for 8 threads (a 1.79x increase from 4 threads), 10,075 for 16 threads (a 1.32x increase from 8 threads), and 11,737 for max threads (a 1.16x increase from 16 threads). This shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, which is typical for the 16-core design with 24 threads. The performance-per-thread remains high even at full load, indicating efficient scheduling.

Nearest rival comparison shows the Core i7-13700 is statistically indistinguishable from the AMD Ryzen 7 160, Intel Core i9-12900T, AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, with all deltaPct values at 0.1% or less. This means the Core i7-13700 delivers exactly the expected performance for its position in the market. The 85th percentile ranking confirms it is above average but not at the very top of the CPU performance hierarchy.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional who needs strong GPU compute for rendering and AI-accelerated workloads, paired with a capable CPU for general productivity. The 95th-percentile GPU and 85th-percentile CPU make this system suitable for content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, and large-scale image processing. The 20 GB VRAM is particularly attractive for 3D artists who work with complex scenes that exceed 8 GB or 12 GB of video memory.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's high percentile ranking, though the lack of measured FPS data means performance expectations must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest strong high-resolution gaming performance, but the workstation-class nature of the RTX 4000 Ada Generation means it is not optimized for gaming-specific features like broadcast encoding.

Developers and AI researchers will find the 192 tensor cores useful for machine learning inference and training. The 20 GB VRAM allows for larger batch sizes and bigger models than consumer GPUs with 8 GB or 12 GB. The CPU's 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache provide ample support for data preprocessing and multi-threaded development tasks.

Students in engineering, architecture, or media programs will benefit from the ECC memory support and workstation-class GPU. Small business workstations in fields like CAD, architectural visualization, or scientific computing will find the combination of a 65 W TDP CPU and 130 W TDP GPU manageable in terms of cooling and power infrastructure. The single-slot GPU design is an advantage for compact workstation chassis.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th-percentile ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS compute suggest strong performance at high refresh rates for most games. However, the workstation driver focus and lack of measured FPS data mean this is an estimate. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,101 in PassMark and 2,008.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core will keep frame pacing consistent in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding on the CPU while gaming. The GPU's 192 tensor cores could accelerate AI-based features, but the lack of consumer-grade NVENC specifics in the data means streaming performance is not quantified. The 2,176 score in 3DMark 2-thread test suggests light tasks like chat and overlays will not tax the system.

Video editing: The 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth handle large timelines and 4K or 8K footage. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 accelerates effects rendering and export. The PassMark data compression score of 443,900 indicates fast codec operations. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency during scrubbing.

3D rendering: The GPU's 6,144 shading units and 48 RT cores deliver strong GPU rendering performance. The 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 rate is the key metric for unbiased render engines. The CPU's multi-core score of 25,369 in R23 supports CPU-based rendering when needed. The 20 GB VRAM allows rendering scenes that exceed consumer GPU limits.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark extended instructions score of 26,578 indicates strong SIMD performance for optimized code. The 2,329 Geekbench single-core score ensures fast compilation of single-threaded projects. The ECC memory support reduces crash risk during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output for office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance of 4,101 in PassMark handles spreadsheet and document workloads responsively. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during light use. The 85th-percentile CPU ranking ensures the system will not feel slow for typical academic workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of Intel Core i7-13700 and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 95th-percentile ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest it should handle most games at high settings in 1440p and 4K. The 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 417.6 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong fill-rate performance.

The CPU's 85th-percentile ranking and 2,008.5 Cinebench R23 single-core score suggest it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,649 indicates good multi-threaded game performance. The 24 threads provide headroom for background tasks while gaming.

At 1080p, the CPU may become the limiting factor in very high-refresh-rate scenarios, as the single-core boost of 5.20 GHz is strong but not the absolute fastest. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and its 95th-percentile ranking suggests it will deliver high frame rates at these resolutions. The 20 GB VRAM ensures texture-heavy games will not exceed memory capacity.

The workstation-class drivers and single-slot design suggest this GPU is not optimized for gaming-specific features. However, the raw compute performance is sufficient for most games. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, and actual gaming performance may vary based on driver optimization and game-specific requirements.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the GPU is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The platform supports ECC memory, which is an upgrade consideration for workstation users.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and its TDP is 130 W. The CPU's TDP is 65 W. This combined thermal envelope of 195 W is modest, leaving significant headroom in most power supplies. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, provided the motherboard supports it. The socket 1700 platform is mature, and the 30 MB L3 cache and 16 cores currently installed provide a strong baseline.

Memory upgrades are straightforward. The dual-channel memory bus supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users can choose based on motherboard support. The 30 MB shared L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU allow future NVMe storage upgrades with higher bandwidth. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is well-matched to the current platform, and a future GPU upgrade would not require a platform change.

The single-slot GPU design and 245 mm length make it compatible with most ATX and mATX cases. The 1x 16-pin power connector is the modern standard. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor workstation setups. The 300 W suggested PSU means even a modest 500 W power supply provides ample headroom for the entire system.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all desktop configurations.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation have and what is its bandwidth?

A: It has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135,218 in average benchmark score, while the A10M scores 135,230, a deltaPct of 0% — they are statistically identical.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute throughput?

A: The FP32 throughput is 26.73 TFLOPS, which matches the FP16 rate at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W, and the GPU's TDP is 130 W.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The system exhibits a GPU-favored balance, with the GPU at the 95th percentile and the CPU at the 85th percentile. This means the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering and high-resolution gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, which is the desired scenario for most users. The CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

In CPU-bound workloads, the 85th-percentile CPU will be the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 is strong but not top-tier. The 3DMark max-thread score of 11,737 shows the CPU's ceiling, and workloads that scale beyond 24 threads would benefit from a higher-core-count CPU. The 2,008.5 single-core R23 score is solid but not the absolute fastest, so single-threaded performance could be a bottleneck in some scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available due to the lack of measured FPS data. However, the benchmark scores indicate that at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance may become the bottleneck in very high-refresh-rate gaming. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 95th-percentile ranking makes it the primary performance driver. The 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure the GPU is not memory-limited in typical gaming or rendering workloads.

The deltaPct values for both CPU and GPU rivals are all within 1%, meaning neither component has a meaningful performance gap to its closest competitors. This creates a balanced system where the performance is predictable and consistent across workloads. The 90th combined percentile reflects the overall capability of the system, with the GPU being the standout component and the CPU providing solid support without being a significant bottleneck in most professional workloads.