SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a desktop pairing that targets the upper-midrange of the benchmark spectrum. The CPU, with an 85th percentile ranking among all processors, provides the multi-threaded muscle for demanding workloads, while the GPU, at the 72nd percentile, delivers solid rasterization performance. The combined system percentile of 79 indicates a balanced, capable platform, though the data confirms that no measured frame rate data exists for this specific combination; all gaming performance assessments are therefore estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 5060’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 suggest it is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p competitive titles, where the CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2176 and single-thread score of 1092 ensure minimal frame pacing issues. The i7-13700’s Passmark single-thread score of 4101 is particularly strong, indicating that the processor can handle the high instruction-per-clock demands of esports engines without becoming a limiting factor.

For streaming, the 16 cores and 24 threads of the i7-13700 provide ample headroom for concurrent game encoding and broadcast software. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 36387 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 demonstrate that it can manage the background workloads of streaming software while the RTX 5060 handles the primary rendering task. The GPU’s 120 Tensor Cores and 30 RT Cores also support hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based enhancement features that offload work from the CPU.

Video editing workflows benefit significantly from this pairing. The i7-13700’s Geekbench multicore score of 17025 and Passmark integer math score of 138974 indicate rapid timeline scrubbing and effect application, while the RTX 5060’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787 accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and export rendering. The combination of 30 MB of shared L3 cache and the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that large video files and preview buffers are handled efficiently, with the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 443900 suggesting swift codec operations.

For 3D rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12806 and R15 multicore score of 3692 position it as a competent workhorse for CPU-based render engines, though the RTX 5060’s FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS makes GPU-accelerated rendering the faster path. The GPU’s 19.18 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) performance is particularly relevant for workloads that leverage mixed-precision computing, common in modern renderers and denoisers.

Software development tasks are well-served by the i7-13700’s balanced architecture. The Passmark extended instructions score of 26578 and data encryption score of 25653 indicate strong performance in compilation, code analysis, and cryptographic operations. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, while the 2.10 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock provide responsive single-threaded performance for IDE interactions and debugging, as reflected in the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 285.

For student and office work, this configuration is arguably overpowered, but the headroom ensures longevity. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 2053 and floating point math score of 97723 handle any academic simulation or data analysis task, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display output if the discrete GPU is ever disabled. The 65 W TDP of the CPU also means that even under sustained office workloads, the system remains thermally modest.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. As such, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores, not observed gameplay data. The data clearly indicates that the RTX 5060’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 and the i7-13700’s 3DMark 4-thread score of 4279 form a capable gaming foundation, but precise FPS numbers cannot be verified.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 5060’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 77 suggest that most modern titles should achieve playable frame rates, likely exceeding 60 FPS in well-optimized games. The GPU’s pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s provide sufficient fill rates for high-detail scenes at this resolution, while the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7649 ensures adequate feeding of the GPU.

At 1440p ultra, the performance picture changes. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a constraint in texture-heavy titles, as the 128-bit bus width limits the total memory throughput available to the renderer. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 200 suggests that older API titles will perform well, but the lower DirectX 12 score of 77 indicates that newer, more demanding engines may require settings reductions to maintain smooth frame pacing.

At 4K ultra, this pairing is not recommended. The RTX 5060’s 72nd percentile ranking and the combined system percentile of 79 indicate that the GPU lacks the raw compute throughput and memory capacity for consistent 4K ultra gaming. The FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS, while respectable for midrange, falls short of what is typically required for 4K high-detail rendering. The CPU’s performance would not be the primary issue; the GPU would be the definitive bottleneck at this resolution.

The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4101 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 suggest that frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, such as open-world games with heavy simulation logic, will be consistently high. The i7-13700’s 30 MB of L3 cache also helps maintain stable frametimes by keeping frequently accessed game data close to the cores, reducing memory latency stalls that can cause micro-stutters.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration is a hybrid design, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split; the base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz apply to the overall processor. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for the performance level, indicating that this chip can be cooled with a capable air cooler rather than requiring exotic liquid solutions.

The benchmark data reveals a processor with strong scaling from 2 to 16 threads. The 3DMark scores progress from 2176 at 2 threads to 11737 at max threads, showing excellent multi-threading efficiency. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 is particularly strong, placing the chip in the upper echelon of desktop processors for rendering workloads. The single-core score of 2008.5 in the same test confirms that the architecture does not sacrifice single-threaded performance to achieve its multi-core capabilities.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel configuration, provides flexibility for builders. The L1 cache of 80 KB per core, L2 of 2 MB per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache create a substantial cache hierarchy that reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The Passmark data compression score of 443900 and random string sorting score of 46418 both indicate that the cache and memory subsystem are well-tuned for data-intensive operations.

The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes (CPU only) ensures that the processor does not bottleneck modern GPUs or NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and hardware acceleration for media playback, useful for troubleshooting or office builds that do not require a discrete GPU. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation use, allowing error correction in professional environments.

The 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs places the i7-13700 ahead of the vast majority of processors. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i9-12900T, all have average scores within 0.1 percent of each other, indicating that the i7-13700 is at the center of a very tight competitive cluster. The deltaPct values of 0 to 0.1 percent against these rivals show that the chip is effectively tied with them in overall performance, meaning real-world application selection will determine the winner.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh monitors (144Hz or higher) will find this pairing well-suited, as the RTX 5060’s 72nd percentile GPU ranking combined with the i7-13700’s 85th percentile CPU ranking provides the necessary frame generation capacity for competitive titles. The CPU’s 3DMark 4-thread score of 4279 is particularly relevant for games that rely on a few heavily loaded threads, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 handles the rasterization load.

Content creators who work in video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the i7-13700’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 for CPU-based tasks and the RTX 5060’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787 for GPU-accelerated workloads. The combination of 24 threads and 3840 shading units provides a balanced platform that can handle both preview rendering and final exports without requiring a separate workstation-class build.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 138974 and multithread score of 36387, which translate to faster build times. The 30 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allow for flexible system configuration based on budget and performance needs. The ECC memory support is an additional bonus for developers working on mission-critical applications.

Students and small business workstations that require occasional gaming or light creative work will find this build capable, though arguably over-specified. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 2053 and the GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1154 ensure that even 2D-heavy office applications run smoothly, while the headroom allows for future software requirements. The 65 W CPU TDP and 145 W GPU TDP keep the overall system power draw manageable for standard office power outlets.

Benchmark Performance

The i7-13700 achieves an average benchmark score of 37135, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This places it in the upper tier of desktop processors, with its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (score 37117, deltaPct 0), Intel Core i9-12900T (score 37112, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (score 37161, deltaPct -0.1), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (score 37093, deltaPct 0.1) — all within a tenth of a percent. This indicates that the i7-13700 is competitively positioned in a dense performance band where architectural differences matter more than raw score deltas.

The RTX 5060 achieves an average benchmark score of 26331, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a broader performance spread: the AMD Radeon 860M (score 26401, deltaPct -0.3), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (score 26421, deltaPct -0.3), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (score 26553, deltaPct -0.8), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (score 26011, deltaPct 1.2). The RTX 5060 is 1.2 percent faster than the RX 6750 XT but 0.8 percent slower than the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, showing that the GPU is positioned in a competitive midrange segment.

The combined percentile of 79 for the system indicates that this pairing is better than the majority of all possible CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU’s 85th percentile is notably higher than the GPU’s 72nd percentile, suggesting that the processor has more headroom relative to the current GPU. This is consistent with the CPU being a stronger component in the pairing, able to support future GPU upgrades without becoming a bottleneck.

The individual benchmark scores paint a detailed picture. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 36387 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12806 are strong for productivity, while the 3DMark max threads score of 11737 shows excellent scaling. The GPU’s geekbench vulkan score of 113321 and passmark gpu compute score of 10899 indicate solid compute performance, though the passmark directx 12 score of 77 is lower than the directx 11 score of 200, suggesting that the GPU may not be fully optimized for the latest API features in synthetic tests.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process node with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. The transistor density of 121.0M / mm² is high, indicating a dense, modern design. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

The compute configuration consists of 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s are respectable for the midrange class, providing sufficient fill rates for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1) indicate that the GPU does not sacrifice compute throughput for the sake of power efficiency, which is notable given the 145 W TDP.

The 30 RT Cores and 120 Tensor Cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-based workloads. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 113321 and OpenCL score of 112787 suggest that the GPU can handle compute-heavy tasks, though the Passmark GPU compute score of 10899 is lower, indicating potential driver-level inefficiencies in certain workloads. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support ensures compatibility with the latest gaming features, while Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 provide broad application coverage.

The 72nd percentile ranking places the RTX 5060 in the upper-middle tier of GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M (deltaPct -0.3), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.3), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (deltaPct -0.8), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (deltaPct 1.2). The fact that the RTX 5060 is only 1.2 percent faster than the older RX 6750 XT suggests that while the newer architecture brings efficiency and feature improvements, raw performance gains over previous generations are modest.

The dual-slot design with a 241 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width makes it compatible with most mid-tower cases. The single 8-pin power connector and 300 W suggested PSU indicate that this GPU is power-efficient and does not require a high-end power supply. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface provides ample bandwidth for the GPU’s performance class, and the display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b) support modern high-refresh monitors.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 79, indicating that this pairing performs better than 79 percent of all possible CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160?

A: The i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, while the Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117, resulting in a deltaPct of 0, meaning they are effectively tied in overall performance.

Q: What is the RTX 5060’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5060 features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Core i7-13700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i7-13700 has ECC memory support, which is beneficial for professional applications requiring error correction.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5060 is at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 72 percent of the GPU market.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, the GPU has a TDP of 145 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 300 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific pairing; all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU, based on Raptor Lake architecture with 16 cores and 24 threads, is a high-end processor that achieves an 85th percentile ranking. The GPU, based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 3840 shading units and 8 GB GDDR7 memory, achieves a 72nd percentile ranking. The combined system percentile of 79 places this build in the upper-midrange tier of all possible configurations.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 37135 is significantly higher than the GPU’s average score of 26331, indicating that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. The 65 W CPU TDP and 145 W GPU TDP result in a total system power draw that is manageable with a 300 W suggested PSU, making this a power-efficient build by modern standards. The i7-13700’s launch MSRP is $384, and the RTX 5060’s launch MSRP is 299 USD.

This build is best characterized as a high-performance productivity platform with solid gaming capabilities. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensures that it will not become obsolete quickly, while the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking provides adequate performance for current games and applications. The overall tier, as indicated by the 79th combined percentile, is that of a capable midrange-to-upper-midrange system that can handle most tasks with ease.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows an imbalance between the CPU and GPU performance tiers. The i7-13700’s 85th percentile ranking is notably higher than the RTX 5060’s 72nd percentile ranking, indicating that the CPU has more performance headroom than the GPU can currently utilize. In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary driver of performance, and the GPU will not be a limiting factor.

In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions and GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5060 will be the limiting component. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 suggest that it can drive high frame rates at 1080p, but the 8 GB memory capacity and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may become constraints at 1440p and above. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7649 and single-thread score of 1092 indicate that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, suggests that the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming workloads. The RTX 5060’s 72nd percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking means that in any game that is not heavily CPU-bound, the GPU will be the first component to reach its limits. Conversely, in multi-threaded productivity tasks, the CPU’s 11737 3DMark max threads score will be the determining factor, and the GPU will be underutilized.

The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2176 and 4-thread score of 4279 for the CPU show that it excels in lightly-threaded scenarios, which are common in gaming. This means that even if the GPU is the primary bottleneck, the CPU will maintain high frame pacing and avoid stutters that can occur with weaker processors. The overall balance is acceptable, but users prioritizing gaming above all else may find the GPU to be the limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility for builders on different budgets, as DDR4 is generally more affordable while DDR5 offers higher bandwidth. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), ensuring that the current RTX 5060, which uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, is not bandwidth-limited.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 145 W TDP of the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 300 W, leave significant headroom for upgrades. The motherboard’s PCIe Gen 5 support means that a future GPU upgrade to a higher-tier card would be fully supported without requiring a platform change. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking suggests that it will remain relevant for several generations, making it a sensible foundation for a long-term build.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the RTX 5060’s 72nd percentile ranking is the lower of the two components. The 300 W suggested PSU provides enough headroom for a GPU with a higher TDP, and the PCIe Gen 5 x8 interface ensures that the data path will not be a bottleneck. The CPU’s 30 MB of L3 cache and 24 threads will continue to support higher-end GPUs without becoming a limiting factor in most workloads.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can upgrade their memory without changing the motherboard, though the dual-channel configuration limits the maximum bandwidth compared to quad-channel platforms. The ECC memory support is a feature that is uncommon in consumer platforms and adds value for professional users. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, which is a useful redundancy for workstation users.