SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop configuration that presents a clear asymmetry in capability. The CPU is a high-performance 16-core processor that sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a more modest entry-level Ampere part that lands at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This combination results in a system where the processor is the dominant component, capable of handling heavy multi-threaded workloads with ease, but the graphics card will be the limiting factor in any visually intensive task. The data indicates a machine built for productivity and CPU-bound applications first, with gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering as secondary, more constrained capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this configuration is mismatched. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4101 in PassMark and 1092 in 3DMark single-thread is more than capable of driving high frame rates in esports titles, but the RTX 3050 OEM’s 57th percentile standing means it will struggle to reach the frame rates necessary for 144Hz or 240Hz displays at higher resolutions. Expect frame rates to be dictated by the GPU, not the CPU, in most modern titles.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s substantial thread count. With 24 threads and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369, the i7-13700 can handle both game encoding and streaming software simultaneously without becoming a bottleneck. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10075 indicates that the processor has ample headroom for background tasks, making it a solid choice for a single-PC streaming setup, though the GPU’s encoding capabilities are not the primary strength here.

Video editing is a strong suit for this build. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17025 show significant processing power for timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks. The RTX 3050 OEM’s 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU will carry the bulk of the workload in most non-linear editors.

3D rendering workloads will be heavily CPU-bound, which is a positive for this processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 places it in a strong position for CPU-based rendering engines. However, for GPU-accelerated renderers like those using CUDA, the RTX 3050 OEM’s FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS will be a limiting factor, making this a less ideal choice for serious 3D artists relying on GPU compute.

Software development is an ideal use case. The high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the PassMark integer math score of 138974 and data compression score of 443900, allows for fast compilation times and efficient parallel builds. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide the headroom needed for running virtual machines, containers, and multiple development services concurrently, making this a very practical workstation for coders.

Student and office work is more than adequately served. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures snappy application loading and responsive productivity suites. The PassMark single-thread score of 4101 handles typical office tasks with ease, while the 16-core design means that background antivirus scans, system updates, and browser tabs will not cause noticeable slowdowns. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not required.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture and utilizes the GA106 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is rated at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. These specifications place it as an entry-level discrete GPU in the current landscape.

The GPU’s compute resources include 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It also incorporates 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, which provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, though the raw throughput is limited. The base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz, resulting in a pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.087 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 8.087 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The PassMark G3D score is 11857, which is a moderate result, placing the GPU at the 57th percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 60740, and the Vulkan score is 57103, suggesting reasonable compute performance for general-purpose tasks. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 86 are low, indicating that raw gaming performance in modern APIs is not a strong point. The GPU compute score of 5779 is also modest, reflecting its limitations in compute-heavy rendering workloads.

For rendering, the RTX 3050 OEM’s 8 GB of VRAM is a practical minimum for modern textures and models, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause bottlenecks in high-resolution texture streaming. The RT cores are present but their performance is not sufficient for demanding ray-traced scenes at playable frame rates. This GPU is best suited for 1080p gaming with medium to high settings, or as a basic compute accelerator for light tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37135, which places it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 160 with an average score of 37117 (deltaPct 0), the Intel Core i9-12900T at 37112 (deltaPct 0.1), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161 (deltaPct -0.1). This indicates the i7-13700 is essentially performance-neutral against these parts, trading blows within a 0.1% margin.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15199, putting it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 with an average score of 15171 (deltaPct 0.2), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (deltaPct -0.5), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283 (deltaPct -0.5). The RTX 3050 OEM is competitive with these parts, showing a 0.2% lead over the RX 7600 but a 0.5% deficit against the Radeon 680M.

The combined percentile for this pair is 71, reflecting a system that is better than average overall but dragged down by the GPU. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU sits in the middle of the pack. The combined picture is of a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks such as compilation, encoding, and multi-threaded productivity, but is average at best in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering with GPU acceleration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance. The i7-13700’s 85th percentile ranking vastly outpaces the RTX 3050 OEM’s 57th percentile. In gaming, this means the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where the pixel throughput of the RTX 3050 OEM becomes the constraining resource. The CPU’s high single-thread performance will rarely be a bottleneck in games, but the GPU’s modest frame rendering capabilities will cap the overall FPS.

In productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts. For tasks like video editing and 3D rendering that utilize GPU acceleration, the RTX 3050 OEM will limit performance. However, for pure CPU workloads like data compression, encryption, and code compilation, the i7-13700 operates at full capacity, and the GPU is mostly idle. The PassMark data compression score of 443900 and encryption score of 25653 highlight the CPU’s dominance in these areas.

FPS scaling is directly tied to the GPU’s capabilities. In less demanding esports titles, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU’s 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap the output. In AAA titles, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, and the CPU will have significant headroom remaining. This imbalance means that users will not be able to fully utilize the CPU’s potential in gaming scenarios, making it a poor pairing for high-refresh gaming but a good one for CPU-intensive work.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S design. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz, which boosts up to 5.20 GHz. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, a feature often beneficial for workstation reliability.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that require frequent data sharing between cores. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, and it includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 is strong, and the 3DMark max threads score of 11737 indicates robust scaling with thread count. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 reinforces this, with the integer math score of 138974 and floating point math score of 97723 showing balanced compute capabilities across different instruction types. The single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2008.5 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4101.

These scores translate to real-world performance. The high multi-core scores mean that video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation will be completed quickly. The strong single-thread performance ensures that everyday tasks like web browsing and office applications are responsive. The data encryption score of 25653 and extended instructions score of 26578 also suggest that the CPU handles security-related and vectorized workloads efficiently, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of professional applications.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Gamers playing at 1080p with moderate settings will find the RTX 3050 OEM adequate, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming will be disappointed. The target gamer is one who plays esports and older titles where the CPU’s strong single-thread performance can help reach high frame rates, but they should not expect to max out modern AAA titles.

Content creators focusing on CPU-heavy tasks, such as video editors who work with long timelines or software developers compiling large codebases, will benefit most from this build. The i7-13700’s 24 threads and high multi-core scores will significantly reduce render and compile times. The GPU can handle light GPU-accelerated effects, but it is not the primary driver of performance in these scenarios.

Students and small business users who need a responsive system for general productivity, data analysis, and light programming will find this to be a robust workstation. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures smooth operation of office suites and web applications, while the multi-threaded capabilities allow for efficient batch processing of spreadsheets or data sets. For these users, the RTX 3050 OEM is more than sufficient for occasional light gaming or basic photo editing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility in choosing memory kits. It also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing for future high-bandwidth storage or GPU upgrades. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a functional fallback if the discrete GPU is removed.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 16-core processor, making it manageable with a capable air cooler. The GPU has a TDP of 130 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 300 W. This leaves significant headroom for a more powerful GPU upgrade in the future, as a 300 W power supply can typically support a higher-end card if the rest of the system’s power draw is low.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. Given the CPU’s high performance, replacing the RTX 3050 OEM with a more capable graphics card would balance the system and unlock its full gaming and GPU-compute potential. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the current GPU is a limitation, but a newer card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface would be fully supported by the platform. Memory and storage can also be upgraded to take advantage of the dual-channel DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700 a good processor for multi-tasking?

A: Yes. With 16 cores and 24 threads, it scores 25369 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 36387 in PassMark multi-thread, indicating strong parallel processing capabilities for running multiple demanding applications simultaneously.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM compare to its nearest rival, the RX 7600?

A: The average benchmark score is 15199 for the RTX 3050 OEM, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600’s score of 15171. This makes them essentially performance equivalents in overall benchmarks.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3050 OEM?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting code memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability and data integrity.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The processor has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and can boost up to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Is the GPU’s ray tracing performance suitable for modern games?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has 18 RT cores, but its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58 and 57th percentile overall indicate limited performance. Ray tracing will be challenging at high settings, and frame rates will suffer.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: Yes, the CPU’s high multi-core performance, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 17025, is well-suited for video editing. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM can assist with effects, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of the Intel Core i7-13700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct testing.

Based on the GPU’s 57th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 11857, 1080p gaming at high settings is expected to be playable in most titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark score of 4101, will not hinder frame rates in typical scenarios. Estimated frame rates for esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends could exceed 144 FPS at 1080p, as these games are often CPU-bound and the i7-13700 excels here. However, the RTX 3050 OEM’s limitations will cap performance in more demanding games.

For AAA titles at 1080p, frame rates are estimated to fall into the 60-80 FPS range on medium to high settings. Games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Shadow of the Tomb Raider will likely see averages around 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 performance become the limiting factors, and frame rates are estimated to drop to 40-50 FPS on medium settings. At 4K, the system would struggle to maintain playable frame rates, with estimates below 30 FPS in most modern titles.

The RTX 3050 OEM’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but at 1440p, high-resolution texture packs may cause stuttering due to memory capacity limitations. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 58 suggests that newer API-based games will not perform optimally. The CPU’s high core count will not provide any additional gaming benefit beyond ensuring stable frame pacing, as most games do not utilize more than 8 cores effectively. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming configuration, with performance scaling down significantly as resolution increases.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds