SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i7-13700

The Intel Core i7-13700 sits in the Core 13th Gen family, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process from Intel. This is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The core configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, which explains the thread count exceeding the core count — a design choice that benefits heavily threaded workloads. The CPU features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation-class reliability. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the pairing with a discrete GPU in this build makes it secondary.

The 65 W TDP is a defining characteristic for this chip. It is a power-efficient mainstream part, not an unlocked enthusiast SKU — the multiplier is locked, preventing manual overclocking. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The launch MSRP is $384. The die size is 257 mm², and the part number is SRMBA. Released on 2023-01-03, it remains in active production.

Benchmark results from the FACT PACK paint a clear picture of the CPU's capabilities. In 3DMark, the single-thread score is 1092, the 2-thread score is 2176, the 4-thread score is 4279, the 8-thread score is 7649, the 16-thread score is 10075, and the max-thread score is 11737. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads shows a 31% improvement, and from 16 to max threads an additional 17% gain, indicating that the processor continues to extract performance from additional threads well beyond eight. The single-thread score of 1092 is modest, but the multi-thread scaling is strong, which is characteristic of a hybrid architecture where efficiency cores handle background tasks while performance cores manage latency-sensitive work.

Cinebench results reinforce this. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 25369, while the single-core score is 2008.5. The R20 multi-core score is 12806 with a single-core score of 1807. The R15 multi-core score is 3692 and single-core is 285. The ratio between multi-core and single-core scores across these tests shows consistent, strong scaling — the R23 multi-core is approximately 12.6 times the single-core score, which reflects the benefit of 24 threads for rendering workloads. The Geekbench scores are 17025 multi-core and 2329 single-core, placing the chip well above typical mid-range processors.

PassMark results provide a broader view of integer and floating-point performance. The multi-thread score is 36387, single-thread is 4101, integer math scores 138974, floating-point math scores 97723, data compression scores 443900, data encryption scores 25653, extended instructions score 26578, physics scores 2053, and random string sorting scores 46418. The prime number finding score is 147. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in parallel integer workloads, which includes compilation, data processing, and physics simulations. The data compression score of 443900 is exceptionally high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and database workloads. The CPU's overall average benchmark score is 37135, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This means it outperforms roughly 85% of processors in the database, a strong position for a mid-range desktop chip.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112 (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161 (-0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093 (0.1% delta). This places the i7-13700 in a tight cluster where performance differences are within 0.1% — effectively negligible in real-world terms. The i7-13700 is the reference point here, and its nearest competitors are all within a rounding error of its average score, indicating that this is a mature, well-balanced mid-range tier.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture for this desktop build is a CPU at the 85th percentile and a GPU at the 87th percentile, with a combined percentile of 86. The CPU's average benchmark score is 37135, and the GPU's average benchmark score is 57756. These are strong positions, placing both components in the upper tier of their respective categories.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A580 delivers specific benchmark results: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381. The OpenCL score is notably higher than the Vulkan score by about 15%, which suggests compute-heavy workloads perform better than graphics-heavy ones on this architecture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 is a modern DirectX 12 test, and the relative difference between OpenCL and Vulkan indicates that the card's compute potential is strong for non-gaming tasks.

The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM with an average score of 58085 (-0.6% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE at 57367 (0.7% delta), the Intel Arc A570M at 58239 (-0.8% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58392 (-1.1% delta). The Arc A580 sits between these with an average score of 57756. The deltas are small — within 1.1% of the nearest competitors — indicating that the Arc A580 is positioned right in the middle of a competitive performance band. Notably, the RX 6950 XT, a high-end card from the previous AMD generation, is only 1.1% ahead, which speaks to the Arc A580's efficiency for its class.

Comparing CPU and GPU percentiles, the GPU is slightly higher at 87 versus the CPU's 85. This means the GPU is marginally more capable relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its peers. For a balanced build, this is a healthy pairing — neither component is dramatically stronger or weaker than the other, which minimizes the risk of one severely bottlenecking the other.

The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 and Geekbench single-core of 2329, is sufficient to drive the GPU in most scenarios. The multi-thread scores are strong enough for productivity workloads that can offload from the GPU. The combined percentile of 86 confirms that this pairing is well above average, suitable for high-refresh gaming and content creation without pushing into extreme enthusiast territory.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, which means this build outperforms approximately 86% of all configurations in the database. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 87th percentile.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160?

A: The Core i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, while the AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117, a delta of 0%. They are statistically identical in average performance, with the i7-13700 being the reference point.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has an average benchmark score of 57756. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392, which is 1.1% higher. The Arc A580 is within 1.1% of a high-end previous-generation AMD card.

Q: Does the Core i7-13700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W. The base clock is 2.10 GHz. The 65 W TDP is a modest power envelope for a 16-core, 24-thread processor.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussions must be considered estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 2329 in Geekbench single-core is adequate for driving high frame rates, while the GPU's 87th percentile position suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 indicates DirectX 12 performance that should support 1080p and 1440p gaming at high refresh rates, though exact FPS figures are estimates since no measured data exists.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 24 threads and strong multi-thread scores — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 provides enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 443900 and integer math score of 138974 suggest that background encoding tasks will not significantly impact gameplay.

Video editing relies on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's multi-thread performance (Cinebench R20 multi-core of 12806) handles timeline operations and rendering, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 91657 accelerates effects and exports. The combination of 16 cores and 8 GB of VRAM is suitable for 1080p and 1440p video editing, though 4K timelines may strain the GPU's memory capacity.

3D rendering is a CPU-dominated workload where this processor excels. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 place it well above average for rendering tasks. The GPU's FP32 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS can assist with viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated renderers, but the CPU will carry the bulk of final frame rendering.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high integer math score of 138974 and the 24 threads that speed up compilation. The data encryption score of 25653 supports secure development workflows, and the random string sorting score of 46418 indicates strong performance in data manipulation tasks common in code processing.

For student and office work, this build is overkill but not wasteful. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 4101 ensures snappy application launch, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is underutilized. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for long study sessions, and the ECC memory support adds stability for research workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles are close — 85 for the CPU and 87 for the GPU — which indicates a well-balanced pairing. The combined percentile of 86 confirms that neither component dramatically exceeds the other's capability. In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering and software compilation, the CPU will be the limiting factor, but its 85th percentile position means it is not a weak link. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will typically be the constraint, but its 87th percentile position is slightly higher than the CPU's, suggesting it can keep pace.

The 3DMark thread scaling data provides insight into CPU bottlenecks. The score increases from 2176 at 2 threads to 4279 at 4 threads (97% scaling), then to 7649 at 8 threads (79% scaling), and to 10075 at 16 threads (32% scaling). The diminishing returns beyond 8 threads indicate that most gaming workloads, which rarely use more than 8 threads, will see strong performance without hitting multi-thread bottlenecks. The max-thread score of 11737 is only 17% higher than the 16-thread score, showing that the efficiency cores contribute less to latency-sensitive tasks.

In gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, but the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to avoid holding back the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and 8 GB capacity may limit texture-heavy games at 1440p or 4K, but at 1080p the pairing should be balanced. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes ensures the GPU has ample bandwidth, even if the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

For mixed workloads that use both components, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU's multi-thread headroom (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 25369) prevents the GPU from being underutilized during encoding. The GPU's compute performance (OpenCL score of 91657) offloads some tasks from the CPU, further balancing the system. The overall picture is a build where neither component is a severe bottleneck for the other.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 and its 87th percentile position indicate that this card should handle modern games at 1080p with high settings and at 1440p with adjusted settings. The CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1092) is adequate for most game engines, which typically rely on a few threads for game logic and physics.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 1.1% higher on average, is a known 1440p-capable card from a previous generation. The Arc A580's position within 1.1% of that card suggests it can deliver similar frame rates at 1080p and playable performance at 1440p. However, the 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for 4K gaming, where texture memory demands exceed this capacity.

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the GPU's FP32 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s suggest the card can push frame rates above 60 FPS in most titles, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles, though the CPU's single-thread performance may cap frame rates in very high-FPS scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU will be the primary constraint, with estimated FPS in the 60-100 range depending on the title and settings. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely limit performance to 30-60 FPS in demanding titles.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s is competitive for its class, and the 256-bit bus width helps maintain consistent throughput at higher resolutions. The RT cores (24) provide ray tracing acceleration, but the architecture's performance in ray-traced titles may be behind competitors with more mature driver support. The Vulkan score of 79381 and OpenCL score of 91657 both indicate solid compute throughput, which benefits games that use compute-based rendering techniques.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p with high refresh rates, or at 1440p with moderate settings. The GPU's 87th percentile position and the CPU's 85th percentile indicate a system that can handle modern titles without compromise at those resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but users planning to play at 4K should look elsewhere.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will find this build capable. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 place it well above average for productivity, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 91657 accelerates compute-heavy tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long render jobs or data processing.

Students and office workers will benefit from the CPU's snappy single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread of 4101) and the system's overall responsiveness. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low for daily use, and the integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

Small business workstations that run database workloads, data compression, or encryption tasks will see strong performance from the CPU's PassMark scores — data compression at 443900 and encryption at 25653. The GPU's compute capability adds flexibility for tasks that can offload to the GPU, such as video encoding or machine learning inference.

This build is not for extreme enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates at 4K, nor for professionals who require massive VRAM for large datasets. It is a mid-to-upper-tier desktop that excels at mainstream gaming and productivity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for current and near-future GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 175 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves headroom for additional components, though a PSU upgrade may be necessary if adding more drives or peripherals. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, which should be available on most 450 W PSUs.

The CPU's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility — DDR4 is more affordable, while DDR5 offers higher bandwidth. The dual-channel memory bus means two DIMMs are recommended for optimal performance. The CPU's ECC memory support is an unusual feature for a consumer processor, making this platform viable for small workstations that require error correction.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile position provides headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will have the bandwidth they need. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules would benefit memory-sensitive workloads, given the CPU's strong multi-thread performance.

The platform's longevity depends on the Socket 1700 lifecycle. The CPU is in active production, and the architecture supports current memory and PCIe standards. The locked multiplier limits CPU overclocking, so performance upgrades would come from a platform change rather than tuning this chip.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700 and Intel Arc A580. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread processor from the Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation card from Intel's Arc 5 series. The combined percentile of 86 places this build in the upper tier of configurations in the database, outperforming roughly 86% of all systems.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 37135 (85th percentile) and the GPU's average benchmark score of 57756 (87th percentile) indicate a balanced pairing where both components are strong relative to their peers. The CPU excels in multi-threaded workloads, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 36387. The GPU provides solid graphics compute, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 and OpenCL score of 91657.

This build is best described as a mainstream performance desktop for gaming at 1080p and 1440p, content creation, and productivity tasks. It is not an enthusiast or workstation-class system, but it sits comfortably above average in every measured category. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 175 W TDP keep power requirements moderate, with a 450 W PSU suggested.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and uses the DG2-512 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process from TSMC. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 24 RT cores for ray tracing, though the architecture does not list tensor cores specifically.

The GPU's clock speeds are 1700 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Benchmark results place the Arc A580 at the 87th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 57756. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 indicates modern DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 show strong compute capability. The OpenCL score being 15% higher than Vulkan suggests the card is well-optimized for compute workloads.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all within 1.1% of its average score, placing it in a tight competitive band. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a high-end card from a previous generation, is only 1.1% ahead, which is a strong indicator of the Arc A580's efficiency relative to its class. The card's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though 4K will stress the memory capacity.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 ports, supporting high refresh rates and multiple monitors. The card is dual-slot, uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, and has a TDP of 175 W. It is the successor to Xe Graphics and will be followed by Battlemage, indicating ongoing development in Intel's discrete GPU line.