SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing that sits in the 72nd percentile overall, a strong mid-to-upper tier configuration. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, with a 65 W TDP and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The GPU is a RDNA 3.0-based Navi 32 chip with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. This combination targets users who need substantial multi-threaded compute for productivity and content creation while retaining solid 1080p and 1440p gaming capability, though the data indicates the GPU is the primary constraint in high-resolution gaming scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². Its configuration of 16 cores and 24 threads is a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not delineate performance versus efficiency cores; it simply lists the core and thread counts. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, which ramps up to a 5.20 GHz boost clock, indicating strong single-thread capability for lightly threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 30 MB shared L3 cache, which supports high-bandwidth data access for multi-threaded tasks.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in heavily threaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the i7-13700 scores 25369 in multi-core and 2008.5 in single-core. The multi-core score is roughly 12.6 times the single-core score, which is a typical ratio for a 16-core part and indicates excellent scaling across the full thread count. In 3DMark, the max-threads score of 11737 is nearly 5.4 times the 2-thread score of 2176, further confirming that the processor leverages its many cores effectively. The PassMark multithread score of 36387 places it in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, showing that it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors in parallel workloads. The single-thread PassMark score of 4101 is also strong, ensuring that everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications do not feel slow.

The processor’s performance profile suggests it is well-suited for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the multi-core scores directly translate to reduced render times and faster build processes. The 16-core design is a significant step up from mainstream 6-core and 8-core parts, and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12806 reinforces this. For data-heavy tasks, the PassMark data compression score of 443900 and integer math score of 138974 indicate strong throughput for archiving and scientific computing. The presence of ECC memory support and a 65 W TDP suggests this is a productive workstation-grade part, not just a gaming chip, though it is more than capable in gaming as well.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4101 in PassMark and 1092 in 3DMark single-thread tests ensure that it can feed frames to a GPU without being a bottleneck in most titles. However, the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking means it will be the limiting factor for achieving very high frame rates in demanding AAA games.

Streaming: The 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding workloads without compromising game performance, making it a viable choice for a single-PC streaming setup.

Video Editing: Multi-threaded performance is critical for timeline rendering and export. The 3DMark max-threads score of 11737 and PassMark multithread score of 36387 suggest that 4K video exports and effects processing will be significantly faster than on lower-core-count parts. The PassMark floating-point math score of 97723 also helps with color grading and filter applications.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based renderers like Blender or V-Ray, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 is a direct indicator of performance. This processor can handle complex scenes with high polygon counts, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with texture and geometry data reuse, making it a solid choice for architectural visualization or product design.

Software Development: Compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the PassMark data compression score of 443900 and integer math score of 138974 will reduce build times for large codebases. The 24 threads allow for parallel compilation of multiple modules, and the strong single-thread score ensures that the editor and IDE remain responsive during builds.

Student and Office Work: For standard productivity, the CPU is massively overprovisioned. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2176 and PassMark single-thread score of 4101 ensure snappy performance in spreadsheets, web browsers, and document editing. The 65 W TDP also means it can be cooled quietly in an office environment, though the bundled cooling solution is not specified.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37135, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This is a high-tier result, though its nearest rivals are extremely close: the AMD Ryzen 7 160 has an average score of 37117 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112 with a 0.1% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161 with a -0.1% delta. The performance difference between these parts is negligible, meaning the i7-13700 is effectively tied with these alternatives in aggregate CPU performance, despite different core configurations and architectures.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15852, landing in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-pack result. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (score 15862, -0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (score 16014, -1% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (score 16129, -1.7% delta). The RX 7700 is slightly slower than the RTX 3060 Ti in aggregate GPU benchmarks, which is a notable comparison point for gamers. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2865, while its PassMark G3D score is 20974, showing strong DirectX 12 performance but lower DirectX 11 scores (186 in PassMark DX11).

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is in the top 15% of processors, while the GPU is in the upper-middle tier. This creates an imbalance: the CPU has significant headroom to drive a more powerful GPU, but the current pairing is limited by the GPU in graphics-intensive workloads. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this blend of a high-end CPU and a mid-range GPU, resulting in a well-rounded but not top-tier gaming or rendering system.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical results. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20974 and its 58th percentile ranking suggest that it is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming card, but it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K in demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1092) ensures that it will not be the bottleneck in most games, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential.

Based on the GPU’s performance class, relative to the RTX 3060 Ti (which is 1.7% faster in aggregate), gamers can expect similar frame rates to that card. The RX 7700 should handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at high refresh rates (144Hz or higher) at 1080p, but for AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, players will likely need to adjust settings to high rather than ultra to maintain 60 FPS at 1440p. The 16 GB VRAM is a future-proofing advantage, but the raw compute power (25.18 TFLOPS FP32) limits its ability to use that memory effectively at very high resolutions. The GPU’s ray tracing capabilities (40 RT cores) are present, but performance in ray-traced titles is likely to be modest, as the PassMark scores for DirectX 12 (96) suggest a middle-of-the-road implementation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing for most gaming and graphics workloads. The CPU’s 85th percentile versus the GPU’s 58th percentile means the processor has far more headroom than the graphics card can utilize. In CPU-bound scenarios like high-frame-rate esports at 1080p, the CPU can push well beyond what the GPU can render, but in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the GPU will be at 100% utilization while the CPU remains underutilized. For productivity tasks like 3D rendering or video editing, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU’s compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute score of 10963) are secondary but still helpful for GPU-accelerated effects.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the performance gap. If a user upgrades the GPU to a higher-tier card, the CPU would likely support it without becoming a new bottleneck, given its high single-thread and multi-thread scores. Conversely, the current GPU would not bottleneck a weaker CPU in most games, but it would be the first component to reach its limits. The system is balanced for productivity where the CPU dominates, but unbalanced for gaming where the GPU is the weaker link.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks but also want solid gaming performance. Content creators who edit 4K video, render 3D scenes, or compile code will benefit from the i7-13700’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369, which is significantly higher than lower-tier CPUs. Software developers will appreciate the PassMark data compression score of 443900 for faster build times. Students and small business users will find the system overkill for office work, but it will handle any academic software or business analytics without breaking a sweat.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the RX 7700 adequate for most titles, especially with 16 GB of VRAM for texture-heavy games. However, enthusiasts seeking 4K gaming or maximum ray tracing performance should look at a higher-tier GPU. The system is also suitable for small business workstations where the 65 W CPU TDP allows for a quieter, more power-efficient build compared to higher-TDP parts, and the GPU’s 200 W TDP is manageable with a 550 W suggested PSU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

Clock speeds are moderate, with a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The memory runs at 2438 MHz, effective 19.5 Gbps. The FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, which is solid for a mid-range card, and the FP16 performance is identical at 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating strong compute throughput for AI and scientific workloads. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s.

In benchmark terms, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 is a modern DirectX 12 measure, while the PassMark G3D score of 20974 places it in the 58th percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 shows robust general-purpose compute. However, its DirectX 11 and 12 PassMark scores (186 and 96, respectively) are lower relative to its G3D score, suggesting that the GPU performs better in modern APIs. The 40 RT cores provide ray tracing hardware, but the modest overall performance means it is not a top-tier ray tracing card, likely requiring upscaling to maintain playable frame rates in ray-traced games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The fact pack lists ECC memory support as true, which is valuable for workstation stability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, offering high bandwidth for future GPUs or NVMe SSDs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 200 W and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, with two 8-pin power connectors. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so the total system power draw is manageable. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which is 1.7% faster in aggregate benchmarks, or a more modern card, since the CPU has ample headroom. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking means it can support a GPU that is significantly faster without becoming a bottleneck. For memory, users can choose between DDR4 for cost savings or DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the fact pack does not specify which memory type the benchmarks were run with. The platform is mature, but the Socket 1700 is likely at the end of its upgrade path, meaning future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s overall performance ranking?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has an average score of 15852, which is 1.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti’s score of 16129.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700, a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake desktop processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7700, a RDNA 3.0 GPU with 16 GB of VRAM. The system is classified as a desktop build, and its combined percentile is 72, indicating a configuration that is well above average but not at the enthusiast extreme. The CPU is the dominant component, sitting in the 85th percentile, while the GPU is in the 58th percentile, making this a productivity-first machine with capable gaming performance. The 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP make it a relatively power-efficient desktop for its performance class. The build is well-suited for content creators, developers, and gamers at 1080p and 1440p, though it is not optimized for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing. The CPU has strong headroom for future GPU upgrades, making this a balanced starting point for a high-performance workstation or gaming rig.