SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Its hybrid design combines performance cores and efficiency cores, but the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution; what the data shows is a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that suggests strong efficiency for a 16-core part.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37135. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161 (0.1% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093 (0.1% ahead). This clustering indicates that the i7-13700 sits in a competitive performance band where small percentage differences separate it from flagship mobile and lower-tier desktop parts.

Single-threaded performance is strong, as evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2008.5. The Geekbench single-core score of 2329 reinforces this, suggesting excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software. The PassMark single-thread score of 4101 confirms this trend.

Multi-threaded performance scales impressively with core count. The 3DMark scores progress from 2176 at 2 threads to 4279 at 4 threads, 7649 at 8 threads, 10075 at 16 threads, and peak at 11737 at max threads. This near-linear scaling from 2 to 16 threads indicates the architecture efficiently utilizes additional cores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 and Geekbench multicore score of 17025 place it in solid productivity territory.

The cache hierarchy is noteworthy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial L3 cache benefits workloads with large working sets, such as database queries and compilation tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 443900 and data encryption score of 25653 suggest strong throughput for these specific workloads, while the extended instructions score of 26578 indicates good SIMD performance.

The i7-13700 supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not provide memory bandwidth figures. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides modern connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 37135 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals within a 0.1% margin. This tight clustering means the i7-13700 is statistically indistinguishable from the AMD Ryzen 7 160, the Intel Core i9-12900T, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H in overall compute performance. The deltaPct values are all within ±0.1%, indicating that real-world differences would be negligible in most workloads.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, achieves an average benchmark score of 19765, placing it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are older professional/workstation cards: the NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 19885 (0.6% behind), the AMD FirePro D300 scores 19637 (0.7% ahead), the AMD FirePro W7000 scores 19905 (0.7% behind), and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19602 (0.8% ahead). This is a curious comparison set — the RX 6650 XT is a modern gaming GPU competing with older compute-focused cards, suggesting its raw compute performance is roughly equivalent to those parts despite being architecturally different.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 75, indicating a system that outperforms three-quarters of all benchmarked configurations. The CPU's 85th percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 65th percentile, suggesting the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 1859, which is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark reflecting current gaming API demands. The Geekbench scores show 97969 for Metal, 10111 for OpenCL, and 81306 for Vulkan. The low OpenCL score relative to Metal and Vulkan suggests the GPU performs better in gaming-oriented APIs than in general-purpose compute via OpenCL. The PassMark G3D score of 17166 and GPU compute score of 7532 provide additional context, with the compute score being notably lower than the graphics score, indicating the card is optimized for rasterization rather than compute-heavy tasks.

The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 36387 and floating-point math score of 97723 (with integer math at 138974) reveal a processor that excels at integer operations but is relatively weaker at floating-point, which could impact certain scientific and financial workloads. The find prime numbers score of 147 is surprisingly low, suggesting the architecture is not optimized for this specific algorithm.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160?

A: The two CPUs have nearly identical average benchmark scores: 37135 for the i7-13700 and 37117 for the Ryzen 7 160, a delta of 0%. In practical terms, this means the performance difference is negligible across most workloads, though individual benchmarks may favor one or the other depending on the task.

Q: What is the GPU's 65th percentile ranking indicative of?

A: The RX 6650 XT outperforms 65% of all GPUs in the benchmark database. This places it in the mid-to-upper tier, meaning it should handle most modern games at 1080p with high settings, but it is not an enthusiast-class card for 4K or extreme refresh rates.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory as supported. This makes the i7-13700 suitable for entry-level workstation builds where data integrity is critical, such as small business servers or financial analysis systems, though the platform must also support ECC via the motherboard.

Q: What is the significance of the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus?

A: The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus provides 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming and most 1440p titles, but it may become a limiting factor in texture-heavy games at higher resolutions or with large modded asset packs.

Q: How does the CPU's single-threaded performance compare to its multi-threaded performance?

A: The single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 shows strong per-core performance, while the max-thread score of 11737 in 3DMark and 25369 in Cinebench R23 multicore demonstrates excellent scaling. The ratio suggests the CPU is balanced for both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

Q: Is the RX 6650 XT a good match for the i7-13700?

A: The combined percentile of 75 indicates a well-balanced pairing, but the CPU's 85th percentile versus the GPU's 65th percentile suggests the processor has more relative headroom. In CPU-bound games or productivity tasks, the CPU will not bottleneck; in GPU-bound scenarios at high resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU performance tiers. The i7-13700 sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 6650 XT sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. This 20-percentage-point gap indicates that the CPU is substantially more capable relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers. In a balanced system, these percentiles would be closer.

For CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (443900 PassMark score), encryption (25653), and integer math (138974), the i7-13700 will not be the limiting factor. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample parallelism for heavily-threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 confirms this capability.

The GPU becomes the bottleneck in graphical workloads, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17166 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1859 indicate solid 1080p performance, but the 65th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1440p or 4K in demanding titles. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 10.79 TFLOPS is respectable for its class but not exceptional.

The 8 GB VRAM is another potential bottleneck for modern games at high texture settings. With memory bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s, the GPU can feed its 2048 shading units adequately, but the 128-bit bus limits total bandwidth compared to wider-bus cards. This means texture-heavy scenes or high-resolution assets could cause frame drops as the GPU runs out of memory.

In CPU+GPU combined workloads like gaming, the balance depends on the specific title and settings. At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the CPU will often be the limiting factor, as the GPU can produce frames faster than the CPU can process game logic. At 1440p with high settings, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as its pixel fill rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s are tested more heavily.

# Gaming Performance

Note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 65th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1859, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming. At this resolution, the RX 6650 XT should deliver smooth frame rates in most titles at high settings, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1092 in 3DMark single-thread) ensuring minimal frame pacing issues.

At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors in demanding titles. Players should expect to lower settings to high or medium to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 62 (a relative benchmark, not FPS) suggests modern API performance is adequate but not outstanding.

At 4K, the system will struggle. The GPU's 65th percentile and limited VRAM make high-resolution, high-detail gaming impractical. Players seeking 4K performance would need a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile ranking indicates it would not be the limiting factor at this resolution.

Esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, which are typically CPU-bound, should benefit from the i7-13700's strong single-threaded performance. The 5.20 GHz boost clock and 1092 single-thread 3DMark score suggest high frame rates in these titles, even with the GPU not being pushed to its limits.

For ray tracing, the GPU has 32 RT cores, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores (null in the FACT PACK) means there is no hardware acceleration for AI-based upscaling like DLSS. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern ray-traced games, but performance will be limited by the GPU's 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance while accepting mid-range graphical capabilities. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates (144 Hz or above) will find the pairing well-suited, as the CPU can keep frame rates high in CPU-bound scenarios while the GPU handles the rendering load.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the i7-13700's 16 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 and Geekbench multicore score of 17025 indicate strong performance in these tasks, though the GPU's compute performance (PassMark GPU compute score of 7532) is less impressive for GPU-accelerated rendering.

Developers and students working on code compilation, data analysis, or virtualization will appreciate the CPU's threading capabilities and ECC memory support. The PassMark data compression score of 443900 and encryption score of 25653 suggest efficient handling of data-intensive workloads.

Small business workstations running office productivity suites, database applications, or financial modeling software will find the CPU's 85th percentile ranking more than sufficient. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed, though the FACT PACK does not provide benchmark scores for this iGPU.

Users seeking a balanced system for both work and play at 1080p will find this build adequate. The combined percentile of 75 indicates the system outperforms three-quarters of tested configurations, making it a solid mid-range choice.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i7-13700's single-thread score of 1092 (3DMark) and boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide the CPU horsepower needed for high frame rates at 1080p. The RX 6650 XT, with its 2635 MHz boost clock and 10.79 TFLOPS FP32, can drive high refresh rates in esports and moderately demanding titles, though the 65th percentile ranking means very demanding games may require settings adjustments.

Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread CPU can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without bottlenecking, given its 85th percentile ranking. The GPU's lack of tensor cores means no AI-based encoding acceleration, but the CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369) suggests x264 encoding is viable.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 36387 and Geekbench multicore score of 17025 support smooth timeline scrubbing and export in non-GPU-accelerated editors. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate acceleration for effects and color grading in GPU-accelerated editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 indicates strong CPU-based rendering performance, suitable for Blender's Cycles engine or similar CPU renderers. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the RX 6650 XT's 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 and PassMark GPU compute score of 7532, which are mid-range figures.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores, 24 threads, and 30 MB L3 cache accelerate compilation and test runs. The PassMark integer math score of 138974 and extended instructions score of 26578 indicate strong integer and SIMD performance, beneficial for code execution and build tools.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2329) ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a capable fallback for basic display output, and the 65 W TDP allows for efficient operation in typical office environments.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700 with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process. It features a 65 W TDP, dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity.

The GPU is an AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT from the RX 6000 series, built on the Navi 23 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture on a 7 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, 2048 shading units, and 32 RT cores. The GPU has a 176 W TDP and requires a 450 W power supply.

The combined percentile of 75 indicates this system outperforms 75% of all benchmarked configurations. The CPU's 85th percentile is the stronger component, while the GPU's 65th percentile is the weaker link. This creates a system that is well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads and 1080p gaming, but not for high-resolution or compute-heavy GPU tasks.

The CPU was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $384, while the GPU was released on 2022-05-09 with a launch MSRP of 399 USD. The CPU is still in active production, while the GPU is marked as end-of-life. This suggests the pairing is a cost-conscious choice that leverages a current-generation CPU with a previous-generation GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the Navi 23 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2190 MHz with 17.5 Gbps effective data rate.

The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, providing a pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 10.79 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 21.59 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The base clock is 2055 MHz, game clock is 2410 MHz, and boost clock is 2635 MHz.

The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the lack of tensor cores (null in the FACT PACK) means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 indicates modern gaming API performance. The Geekbench scores reveal API-dependent performance: 97969 for Metal (Apple's API), 10111 for OpenCL, and 81306 for Vulkan. The low OpenCL score compared to Vulkan suggests the GPU is better suited for gaming workloads than general-purpose compute via OpenCL.

The PassMark G3D score of 17166 places it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals being older professional cards like the NVIDIA Tesla K40m (19885, 0.6% behind) and AMD FirePro W7000 (19905, 0.7% behind). This comparison to workstation cards is unusual and suggests the RX 6650 XT's raw compute performance is comparable to older pro-grade hardware, though its gaming-specific features and drivers make it more suitable for consumer use.

The GPU is end-of-life, with the Navi III as its successor. It uses a dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector and requires a 450 W power supply. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th Gen Core processors. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), allowing for high-bandwidth GPU and NVMe storage connectivity.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU is modest for a 16-core part, meaning most motherboards with adequate VRM cooling will handle it without issue. The GPU has a 176 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 450 W, which provides headroom for the combined system power draw.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU could be swapped for a higher-tier 13th Gen part on the same socket, though the FACT PACK does not specify which models are compatible. The GPU could be upgraded to a more powerful card, as the CPU's 85th percentile ranking suggests it has headroom to drive faster graphics hardware without becoming a bottleneck.

The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows builders to choose memory based on budget and performance needs. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for next-generation GPUs and storage devices, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Given the GPU's end-of-life status, the most impactful upgrade path is to replace the RX 6650 XT with a newer, more powerful GPU. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369) and high percentile ranking suggest it will not need upgrading for several years. The 65 W TDP also leaves thermal headroom for potential overclocking, though the CPU's multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false).

The platform supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation use where data integrity is critical. However, ECC support requires a motherboard with ECC capability and registered DIMMs, which may limit memory speed options. The dual-channel memory bus is sufficient for most workloads, though memory-intensive tasks like large database operations might benefit from a quad-channel platform.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds