SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 and AMD Radeon RX 6400 pairing is a study in contrasts: a high-end 16-core desktop processor from Intel’s Raptor Lake generation, coupled with a modest entry-level GPU from AMD’s RDNA 2 lineup. The data shows a combined percentile of 60, placing this desktop build above the median of all tested configurations, but the CPU and GPU occupy vastly different tiers of the performance spectrum. The processor sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card languishes at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. This guide analyzes the platform, expected performance, and use cases strictly from the provided benchmark data, with the clear caveat that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the foundation for 12th and 13th generation Core processors. The CPU itself is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, running on a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support enabled. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, more common DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, depending on motherboard selection and budget constraints.

The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering substantial bandwidth for modern storage devices and graphics cards. However, the Radeon RX 6400 GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 bus interface, which limits its connection to the CPU. This means the graphics card operates at a fraction of the available lanes, a factor that can influence performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. The CPU’s integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 770, provides a fallback display output and basic compute capability if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

Power requirements are notably asymmetric. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 16-core part, while the GPU has a TDP of 53 W and draws power directly from the motherboard with no external power connectors. The suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 250 W, which provides ample headroom for the entire system. A typical desktop power supply in the 300-400 W range would comfortably support this pairing, given the combined TDP of 118 W plus motherboard, storage, and fan loads. The single-slot GPU and lack of power connectors make this an easy installation in compact cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the GPU. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking indicates it has substantial headroom for more demanding graphics hardware. A user could pair the i7-13700 with a significantly more powerful GPU without the processor becoming a bottleneck in most workloads, given its high multi-threaded and single-threaded scores. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules could improve performance in memory-sensitive tasks, though the current dual-channel configuration is already standard.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and the dataIsMeasured flag is set to false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not observed results. The GPU’s overall benchmark score of 6001 and its 35th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate that this is a low-tier graphics solution, capable of running games at modest settings and resolutions.

The Radeon RX 6400 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a limiting factor for modern games, particularly at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 7673 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 suggest that 1080p gaming is the realistic target. At 1080p with medium to low settings, the GPU could likely deliver playable frame rates in many titles, but at 1440p or 4K, the 4 GB VRAM and limited bandwidth would cause severe stuttering or outright failure to load assets.

The CPU’s 3DMark multi-threaded scores, such as 10075 for 16 threads and 11737 for max threads, indicate that the processor is far more capable than the GPU in gaming workloads. The GPU becomes the limiting factor in almost every gaming scenario. For esports titles with low graphical demands, the RX 6400 might achieve high frame rates, but for AAA releases, the estimates point to 30-60 FPS at 1080p with reduced settings. The data does not provide specific game benchmarks, so these figures remain qualitative estimates based on the GPU’s percentile position.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700 delivers strong benchmark results across the board. In 3DMark tests, it scores 1092 in single-thread, 2176 in 2-thread, 4279 in 4-thread, 7649 in 8-thread, 10075 in 16-thread, and 11737 in max-thread tests. These scores show excellent scaling from 2 to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads due to the hybrid architecture. Cinebench results reinforce this picture: R15 multicore scores 3692, R20 multicore scores 12806, and R23 multicore scores 25369, while single-core scores are 285, 1807, and 2008.5 respectively. Geekbench reports 2329 single-core and 17025 multi-core. PassMark tests show 4101 single-thread, 36387 multi-thread, and a total average benchmark score of 37135. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 85, meaning it outperforms 85% of all processors in the database.

The GPU’s benchmark results are far more modest. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 176. Geekbench OpenCL scores 32011, and Vulkan scores 16372. PassMark tests show G3D at 7673, GPU compute at 2812, and DirectX scores of 93 for DX9, 70 for DX11, 54 for DX10, and 30 for DX12. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 6001, with a percentile vs all GPUs of 35. The nearest rivals to the GPU include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M with a score of 6000 and a delta of 0%, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 5996 with a delta of 0.1%, and the AMD FirePro W4100 at 5987 with a delta of 0.2%. This places the RX 6400 at the level of a mid-range laptop GPU from several generations ago.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is entry-level. The combined percentile of 60 reflects this imbalance, dragging the overall system performance down from what the CPU alone would suggest. The average benchmark score of the CPU is 37135, while the GPU’s is 6001, a difference of over 6x, highlighting the massive gap in compute capability.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over graphics-intensive tasks. The i7-13700’s 85th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers, data analysts, and students running virtual machines, compiling code, or processing large datasets. The 16 cores and 24 threads excel in multi-threaded applications, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 and PassMark multi-thread score of 36387. These users would benefit from the CPU’s performance without needing a high-end GPU.

Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering could also use this build, but only if their workloads are CPU-bound and they do not require GPU acceleration. The CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 97723 and integer math score of 138974 indicate strong computational throughput for rendering tasks, but the GPU’s low compute score of 2812 limits GPU-accelerated effects. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, or office productivity would see responsive performance from the CPU, with the GPU providing basic display output.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings could use this build for older or less demanding titles, but the GPU’s 35th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM make it unsuitable for modern AAA gaming. Users who prioritize high-refresh gaming or 1440p+ resolutions should look elsewhere, as the GPU would bottleneck the CPU severely. The build is also unsuitable for machine learning or AI workloads that rely on GPU compute, given the RX 6400’s limited FP32 throughput of 3.565 TFLOPS.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a severe bottleneck in this pairing, with the GPU being the limiting factor in almost every workload. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 35th percentile creates a massive imbalance. In gaming, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth would limit frame rates and texture quality, regardless of the CPU’s capability. The FPS scaling would be flat across resolutions, with 1080p being the only viable option, and even then, settings would need to be reduced.

In compute workloads, the CPU dominates. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 indicates that the CPU can handle heavy parallel processing, while the GPU’s compute score of 2812 is negligible by comparison. For tasks like video encoding, the CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 could provide Quick Sync acceleration, but the discrete GPU would offer little benefit. The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface of the GPU further compounds the bottleneck, as it limits data transfer between CPU and GPU, though this is less impactful in gaming than in compute.

The only scenario where the CPU might become a limiting factor is in single-threaded games, where the GPU could theoretically keep up at very low settings. However, the GPU’s 35th percentile ranking suggests it would struggle even there. The combined percentile of 60 indicates that the system as a whole is above average, but this is almost entirely due to the CPU’s strength. Users should expect the GPU to be the first component to require an upgrade.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU’s 35th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM limit it to 1080p with low settings, and even then, high-refresh rates above 60 FPS would be challenging in demanding titles. The CPU could easily feed the GPU, but the GPU would be the bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 36387, can handle software encoding for streaming while gaming. However, the GPU’s low performance would limit game quality, making this scenario viable only for less demanding titles at 1080p.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this scenario, with Cinebench R23 multicore scores of 25369 and Geekbench multi-core of 17025. Timeline scrubbing, rendering, and export would be fast on the CPU, but GPU-accelerated effects and 4K playback would suffer due to the RX 6400’s limited compute and VRAM.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would benefit from the i7-13700’s strong multi-threaded performance, as shown by the 3DMark max-thread score of 11737. GPU rendering would be impractical, given the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 3.565 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM.

Software development: Ideal for compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and high integer math score of 138974 provide ample performance for build processes, while the GPU’s basic output is sufficient for development tasks.

Student and office work: More than sufficient. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4101 ensures responsive daily tasks, while the GPU handles basic display output for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The low TDPs of both components (65 W CPU, 53 W GPU) keep power consumption and heat manageable.

FAQ

Q: Does this build support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s.

Q: What PCIe version does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 bus interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: What is the CPU’s thread count?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is at the 35th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 6001, comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M.

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 37135, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700 processor with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 graphics card. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread part from the Raptor Lake architecture, with a TDP of 65 W and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 card from the Radeon RX 6000 series, based on the Navi 24 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, a TDP of 53 W, and a boost clock of 2321 MHz. The combined percentile of this pairing is 60, placing it above the median of all builds in the database. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking indicates a high-tier processor, while the GPU’s 35th percentile ranking indicates an entry-level graphics solution. The overall tier is mid-range, held back significantly by the GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with L1 cache of 80 KB per core, L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with ECC support. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The TDP is 65 W, and the launch MSRP was $384.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 25369, while single-core scores 2008.5. Geekbench multi-core is 17025, and single-core is 2329. PassMark multi-thread is 36387, with single-thread at 4101. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 37135 places it at the 85th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (score 37117, delta 0%) and the Intel Core i9-12900T (score 37112, delta 0.1%). The CPU’s 3DMark multi-threaded scaling from 2176 at 2 threads to 11737 at max threads demonstrates efficient utilization of its hybrid core layout, making it well-suited for parallel workloads like rendering, compilation, and scientific computing.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a 4 GB GDDR6 graphics card based on the Navi 24 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process node with 5,400 million transistors and a die size of 107 mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1923 MHz, a game clock of 2039 MHz, and a boost clock of 2321 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. The memory bus is 64-bit, providing a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. Its FP32 performance is 3.565 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 53 W, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. The GPU is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 1x DisplayPort 1.4a, with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a low-tier GPU. The PassMark G3D score is 7673, with GPU compute at 2812. 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 176, and Geekbench OpenCL scores 32011. The average benchmark score is 6001, placing it at the 35th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (score 6000, delta 0%) and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (score 5996, delta 0.1%). The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth severely limit its ability to handle modern game textures or large compute workloads. The ray tracing cores are present but offer minimal practical benefit given the low overall throughput. The GPU is end-of-life, with a launch MSRP of 159 USD, and its performance aligns with entry-level 1080p gaming or basic display output rather than demanding graphical tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds