SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + Intel Arc B370

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

76%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B370

1,184 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing built around a strong modern CPU and a very weak integrated GPU. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a high-performance mobile processor, while the Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution with a benchmark showing it at the bottom of the performance scale. The data indicates a severely unbalanced system where the CPU's capabilities are far ahead of what the GPU can render.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, manufactured on Intel's 3 nm process node. Its memory configuration is entirely "System Shared," meaning it uses the laptop's main system memory for both capacity and bandwidth. The bandwidth is described as "System Dependent," which means performance will vary significantly based on the type and speed of the DDR4 or DDR5 memory installed in the host system. The GPU's memory clock is also listed as "System Shared," reinforcing that it has no dedicated video memory of its own.

The graphics core operates at a base clock of 300 MHz and can boost up to 2400 MHz. It contains 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 20 raster operation units (ROPs). For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, it includes 10 dedicated RT cores. Tensor core information is not provided in the data. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The raw floating-point performance is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, with FP16 performance at 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU's thermal design power is a minimal 25 W.

The only benchmark score available for this GPU is from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it achieves a score of 1184. This result places the Arc B370 in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, meaning 95% of tested graphics processors perform better. The nearest rivals in the data are all older, low-end parts: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186, deltaPct -0.2), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190, deltaPct -0.5), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (score 1192, deltaPct -0.7), and the AMD FirePro M2000 (score 1168, deltaPct 1.4). The Arc B370 is effectively tied with these legacy components, trailing the HD 5570 by just 0.2% and leading the FirePro M2000 by 1.4%. This is not a rendering powerhouse; it is a basic display adapter.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU, an Intel Core i7-13650HX, delivers robust benchmark results across the board. Its average benchmark score is 33089, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong position, indicating the processor is capable of handling demanding multi-threaded workloads. In single-thread performance, it scores 1015 in 3DMark single-thread, 3769 in Passmark single-thread, and 3470 in Cinebench R23 single-core. Multi-threaded performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 8741. The data shows it is a well-rounded performer, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 30704 and a Passmark integer math score of 102929, indicating strong computational throughput.

The GPU, by contrast, scores 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, sitting in the 5th percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 44, a figure that sits between the strong CPU percentile and the very weak GPU percentile, reflecting the massive gulf between the two components. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (avgScore 33089, deltaPct 0), AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (avgScore 33091, deltaPct 0), and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (avgScore 33079, deltaPct 0), showing it is directly competitive with those desktop and mobile parts. The GPU's nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770, as noted above. The combined picture is a system with considerable processing potential that is completely hamstrung by its graphics subsystem for any visual task.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of Intel Core i7-13650HX and Intel Arc B370. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game or resolution. Consequently, all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The GPU's 5th percentile ranking and its proximity to the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 in the Steel Nomad DX12 test suggest it is only suitable for very light gaming.

For modern 3D titles at ultra settings, the data indicates the Arc B370 would be inadequate. Its 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 compute are far below what contemporary games require. At 1080p, users should expect playable framerates only in esports or older titles with low graphical demands. The system's overall combined percentile of 44, dragged down by the GPU, reinforces this assessment. Estimates for high-refresh gaming at 1080p are not favorable; the GPU would struggle to maintain high frame rates in any graphically intensive scene. For 1440p or 4K gaming, the performance would be severely limited, likely resulting in very low frame rates even at reduced settings. The data suggests this is not a gaming platform.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system's balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Intel Core i7-13650HX sits in the 83rd percentile for all CPUs, while the Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile for all GPUs. This is an extreme disparity. For any workload that involves graphics rendering, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The CPU is capable of feeding a far more powerful graphics processor, but the Arc B370 cannot keep up with the data the CPU can generate.

In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's high multi-thread score of 24580 in Cinebench R23 and 8741 in 3DMark max-threads means it can handle game logic and physics calculations easily, but the GPU's 1184 Steel Nomad score means it will not be able to translate that into high frame rates. The FPS scaling is constrained entirely by the GPU. Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data encryption (Passmark score 21649), or integer math (Passmark score 102929), the CPU is the star, and the GPU is irrelevant. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: the GPU limits all visual and graphics tasks, while the CPU dominates compute tasks.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a member of the Core 13th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-HX codename) for mobile platforms. It is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The processor has 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration typical of high-performance mobile chips with a mix of performance and efficiency cores. Its base clock is 2.60 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.90 GHz. The thermal design power is 55 W. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support. It connects to the rest of the system via Intel BGA 1964 socket and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. It also includes integrated UHD Graphics 710.

The benchmark data shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 is strong, and the 3DMark max-threads score of 8741 confirms this capability. For real workloads, this translates to smooth performance in video editing (Cinebench R15 multi-core 2477), 3D rendering, and software development tasks like compiling code. Single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3470 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3769, is also excellent for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark data compression score of 383943 and floating-point math score of 75643 indicate strong performance in data-heavy and scientific computing tasks. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking puts it ahead of most processors on the market, making it a capable heart for a workstation-class laptop.

FAQ

Q: What is the benchmark percentile for the Intel Core i7-13650HX?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, based on an average benchmark score of 33089.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13650HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G?

A: The two processors have identical average benchmark scores of 33089, with a deltaPct of 0, indicating they are statistically tied in performance.

Q: What is the Intel Arc B370's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B370 have dedicated video memory?

A: No, the Arc B370 uses "System Shared" memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system-dependent and shared with the main system memory.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-13650HX and Intel Arc B370 pairing is 44, reflecting the weak GPU score pulling down the strong CPU score.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has a TDP of 55 W, while the Intel Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13650HX's memory controller dual-channel?

A: Yes, the CPU supports dual-channel memory, and it can utilize both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU compute power and have minimal to no graphics requirements. The data shows a clear target user: a developer or engineer working on code compilation, data analysis, or virtualization, where the CPU's 24580 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 102929 Passmark integer math score provide substantial throughput. Students in computer science or engineering fields would find the CPU performance advantageous for their coursework, but they must be aware that the GPU is not for gaming or graphic design.

For content creators, the CPU is strong enough for video encoding and 3D rendering in software that uses the CPU. The 8741 3DMark max-threads score indicates it can handle complex rendering tasks, but the Arc B370 cannot accelerate GPU-based effects or rendering in modern applications. Small business workstations running office productivity software, databases, or financial modeling would benefit from the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread scores (3769 Passmark single-thread, 30704 Passmark multi-thread). Gamers should avoid this build entirely, as the GPU's 5th percentile score is far too low for modern titles.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a high-end mobile processor with an entry-level integrated GPU. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is the primary component, delivering an 83rd percentile performance rank that makes it a top-tier mobile CPU for productivity. The Intel Arc B370, on the other hand, is a 5th percentile GPU, placing it at the very bottom of the graphics performance chart. The overall tier of this system, as defined by its 44th combined percentile, is mid-range, but this is an average that obscures the extreme imbalance. It is effectively a powerful CPU with a placeholder for graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile socket that is typically soldered to the motherboard, meaning the CPU is not user-upgradeable. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for memory upgrades within the laptop's constraints. It offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU for connecting high-speed storage or other devices.

The Intel Arc B370 is an IGP with a 25 W TDP and no dedicated power connectors, so its power draw is minimal. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, and no suggested PSU is listed, but for a laptop this is handled by the internal power supply. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a laptop model with a discrete GPU, as the current graphics solution is the clear limiting factor. Upgrading the system memory to faster DDR5 would improve the Arc B370's performance, as its bandwidth is "System Dependent," but the GPU's core architecture will remain the bottleneck. The data suggests the only meaningful upgrade path is to a different system with a dedicated graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: Not viable. The Intel Arc B370's 1184 Steel Nomad score and 5th percentile ranking are far too low to drive high frame rates. The CPU's 83rd percentile is irrelevant here because the GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU can handle the encoding workload with its 20 threads and 24580 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, but the GPU cannot handle the game rendering. Streaming software would run, but the gameplay experience would be poor or restricted to very old games.

Video Editing: The CPU is very capable for this task. The 8741 3DMark max-threads score and 75643 Passmark floating-point math score will accelerate timeline editing and export. However, the GPU cannot accelerate effects, color grading, or preview rendering, which will slow down the workflow.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will perform well given the 24580 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. GPU-based renderers will be unusable due to the Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is too low for complex scenes.

Software Development: Excellent for this scenario. The CPU's 102929 Passmark integer math score and 383943 Passmark data compression score are ideal for compiling large codebases and handling data structures. The GPU is sufficient for a basic desktop interface.

Student and Office Work: The system excels here. The 3769 Passmark single-thread score ensures snappy application loading and responsiveness for spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The CPU's performance is overkill for these tasks, but the system will never feel slow. The GPU is adequate for standard 2D desktop output and video playback.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + Intel Arc B370

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

Intel Arc B370

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds