SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX and Intel Arc A370M form a laptop-class configuration with a combined percentile of 79. The CPU reaches the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU reaches the 74th percentile against all GPUs. The FACT PACK contains no measured game FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured game data.

FAQ

Q: What class of system is this?

A: The build class is "laptop". It pairs the mobile Intel Core i7-13650HX with the Intel Arc A370M, and the combined percentile is 79.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 33089. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is exactly tied at 33089, the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is effectively tied at 33091, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is effectively tied at 33079, and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is 0.3% ahead at 33201.

Q: What is the GPU memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes. The Arc A370M has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No. The measuredFpsUltraByGame table is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate statements are estimates based on CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Core i7-13650HX supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support. The CPU also has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 33089, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 24580, and its single-core score is 3470. PassMark multithread score is 30704, data compression is 383943, integer math is 102929, floating-point math is 75643, and encryption is 21649. 3DMark thread scaling runs from 1015 single-thread, 1988 for two threads, 3698 for four threads, 5871 for eight threads, 8060 for sixteen threads, and 8741 at max threads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 28673. The nearest-rival table shows a tight cluster: the Arc A370M trails the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH by 0.1%, trails the AMD FirePro W8000 by 0.1%, leads the AMD Radeon RX 470 by 0.6%, and leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800M by 1.0% in this database's aggregate score.

The combined picture is a configuration whose CPU is stronger relative to its own field than the GPU is relative to its field. The CPU's 83rd percentile sits above the GPU's 74th percentile, and the combined 79th percentile falls between them. This indicates a CPU-leaning laptop: the processor has substantial headroom for multi-threaded and single-threaded work, while the GPU is the more modest component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, a mobile package consistent with the laptop build class. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Arc A370M itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Because this is a laptop-class configuration and the GPU slot width is listed as IGP, component-level upgrades are constrained by the integrated nature of the platform. The clearest upgrade lever in the data is memory: the memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so selecting DDR5 will make full use of the dual-channel memory architecture.

No suggested PSU figure is provided in the pack, so PSU headroom cannot be quantified from a recommended value. The CPU TDP is 55 W and the GPU TDP is 35 W, which points to a modest total draw for a laptop. There is no suggested power supply to use as a headroom reference, so the safest statement is that the power data is limited to the CPU and GPU TDP figures.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 83rd percentile is clearly above the GPU's 74th percentile. In graphics-heavy workloads, the GPU is the lower-rated component and therefore the more likely performance constraint. In CPU-heavy workloads, the 14-core, 20-thread processor has enough multi-threaded throughput to avoid being the primary limit; its 3DMark thread scaling rises from 1988 at two threads to 8060 at sixteen threads and 8741 at max threads.

No measured FPS scaling data exists for this pairing, and pairRankByFps is null, so frame-rate scaling cannot be read directly from game results. Instead, the benchmark percentiles provide the bottleneck signal: the CPU is in the top 17% of CPUs, while the GPU is in the top 26% of GPUs. In gaming, the CPU should have enough single-thread and multi-thread capacity to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit how far settings and resolution can be pushed.

In mixed workloads, the balance favors CPU compute. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 and PassMark multithread score of 30704 make it the dominant processor-side resource, while the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is the more limited graphics-side resource.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor. Base clock is 2.60 GHz, boost clock is 4.90 GHz, and TDP is 55 W. The architecture is Raptor Lake, produced on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache layout is 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, includes ECC support, carries 20 CPU PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and includes UHD Graphics 710 as integrated graphics. The CPU is listed as Active in production status, with a launch MSRP of $485.

Benchmark results indicate strong scaling across the thread count range. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1015, two-thread is 1988, four-thread is 3698, eight-thread is 5871, sixteen-thread is 8060, and max-thread is 8741. The jump from single-thread to sixteen-thread is roughly four times, which is in line with a high-core-count mobile part that still maintains strong single-thread performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24580 and single-core of 3470 reinforce that split: the CPU is capable of heavy multi-threaded workloads while remaining responsive in lightly threaded tasks.

The PassMark results add workload-specific detail. Integer math at 102929 indicates strong general compute throughput. Floating-point math at 75643 is lower but still substantial. Data compression at 383943 is very high, suggesting archiving, compression, and data-heavy tasks run well. Extended instructions score 23146, and encryption scores 21649. The CPU's average score of 33089 places it in the same performance band as the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Ryzen 7 7745HX, and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is 0.3% above it in this database.

Who Should Build It

This configuration suits laptop buyers who need strong CPU performance more than top-tier GPU performance. The CPU's 83rd percentile and 20-thread capacity make it a fit for content creation, software development, and multi-tasking workloads, while the GPU's 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM point to a more moderate gaming and graphics role.

Gamers at 1080p-class settings are the most plausible target. The CPU's high single-thread scores should keep frame pacing stable, while the GPU's bandwidth and VRAM limit the ceiling for high-detail or high-resolution gaming. Content creators can use the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 and PassMark multithread score of 30704 for rendering and compilation-style workloads. Software developers will find the integer math score of 102929, extended instructions score of 23146, and data compression score of 383943 directly relevant to build tasks and large source trees. Students and office users benefit from the laptop form factor, the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3470, and the relatively low 55 W CPU TDP. Small business workstations can use the ECC memory support and the multi-threaded throughput for database and analysis workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame table is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false, so the following is an estimate from benchmark scores rather than a report of measured frames.

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1015 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3470 indicate strong CPU-side frame pacing. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 and OpenCL score of 29676, combined with its 74th percentile, place it in a moderate mobile graphics tier. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the most likely limits for texture-heavy and high-resolution rendering. For esports and less demanding titles, the CPU can plausibly drive high refresh rates if the GPU is not overloaded; for ultra-detail presets and demanding games, the GPU is the component that will cap performance. No per-game FPS values are present, so specific title-by-title estimates are not possible from the pack.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the Intel Arc A370M. The CPU is at the 83rd percentile, the GPU is at the 74th percentile, and the combined configuration is at the 79th percentile. The CPU is the stronger component, while the GPU sits one tier below it in aggregate benchmark terms. The GPU is listed as End-of-life, while the CPU is listed as Active. The slot width for the Arc A370M is IGP, consistent with a laptop-integrated graphics solution. Overall, this is a CPU-forward mobile configuration in the upper-middle part of the benchmark distribution.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread 3DMark score of 1015 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3470 point to strong CPU-side responsiveness. The GPU's 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM are the limiting factors, so high-refresh gaming is plausible in lighter titles at lower detail settings, but no measured FPS confirms the exact ceiling.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24580 and PassMark multithread of 30704, provides substantial CPU headroom for running a game while streaming software captures and compresses the feed. The GPU has no measured FPS data, so its contribution to streaming workloads is inferred from its average score of 29175.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30704 and data compression score of 383943 make it well suited for asset handling and timeline-heavy work. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 adds a moderate compute resource for effects and previews.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24580 indicates strong CPU-based rendering throughput. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is a more modest rendering resource, so heavy rendering workloads will lean on the CPU.

Software development: Integer math of 102929, extended instructions of 23146, and data compression of 383943 all support compile-heavy and data-intensive development tasks. The 20 threads provide parallel capacity for multi-core build systems.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3470 keeps everyday applications responsive. The laptop class, 55 W CPU TDP, and 35 W GPU TDP point to a portable system that should handle productivity tasks without demanding extreme power delivery.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an Alchemist-generation Arc 3 mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. It uses the DG2-128 chip, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors and a die size of 157 mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective). The memory interface is narrow, and the 4 GB capacity is the clearest constraint for modern high-resolution rendering.

The compute configuration includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. No tensor core count is listed. Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and its bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark results show an average score of 29175, with Geekbench OpenCL at 29676 and Vulkan at 28673. The GPU is at the 74th percentile. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: the A370M is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, 0.1% behind the AMD FirePro W8000, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470, and 1.0% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M. For rendering, the FP32 throughput and 8 RT cores mean ray tracing is supported but likely limited in practice; the FP16 2:1 ratio provides some headroom for mixed-precision workloads. The overall GPU picture is a capable mid-tier mobile graphics solution constrained by VRAM and bus width rather than by architecture features.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds