SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX paired with the Intel Arc A350M represents a laptop configuration with a significant performance disparity between its central processor and graphics solution. This pairing combines a high-end, 14-core mobile CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU, resulting in a system where the processor is the dominant component in most workloads and the GPU acts as a limiting factor for graphically intensive tasks. The data indicates a combined percentile ranking of 77, placing this configuration above the majority of tested systems, driven largely by the CPU's strong performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance profile of this system is characterized by a pronounced CPU-centric balance. The Core i7-13650HX demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capability, scoring 8,741 in the 3DMark max threads test and 24,580 in Cinebench R23 multicore. This places the processor in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of mobile processors. In stark contrast, the Arc A350M GPU, with an average benchmark score of 24,647, sits in the 70th percentile against all GPUs. This 13-point gap in percentile ranking clearly establishes the CPU as the system's primary performance engine.

The bottleneck dynamics shift depending on the workload. In CPU-bound tasks such as data compression (383,943 in Passmark), integer math (102,929), and floating-point math (75,643), the i7-13650HX operates near its peak potential, and the GPU remains idle. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming or 3D rendering, the Arc A350M becomes the limiting factor. Its 4 GB of VRAM and 64-bit memory bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to fully utilize the CPU's processing power. The CPU's 2,480-point advantage in Cinebench R20 multicore over its single-core score (10,731 vs 1,514) further highlights its multi-threaded strength, while the GPU's lower relative standing means the system will frequently be waiting on graphics data. The combination results in a system where the CPU has substantial headroom in gaming applications, but the GPU will cap frame rates well before the processor is stressed.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. Its memory configuration is a notable constraint: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest figure that will limit texture loading and high-resolution performance. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and its memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

In terms of compute resources, the Arc A350M provides 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. It includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing features. The GPU's raw compute capability is rated at 3.379 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 6.758 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747. The average benchmark score of 24,647 places the GPU in the 70th percentile overall. Comparison with nearest rivals shows it is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (deltaPct of -0.4%) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (deltaPct of -0.5%), while being 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This indicates the A350M delivers performance in the range of older desktop mid-range cards, which is respectable for its 25 W TDP but insufficient for demanding modern titles at high settings.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The Core i7-13650HX achieves an average benchmark score of 33,089, placing it in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs. Its multi-threaded performance is particularly strong: it scores 8,060 in 3DMark 16 threads, 8,741 in 3DMark max threads, and 24,580 in Cinebench R23 multicore. Single-threaded performance is also solid, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,015 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,470. The Passmark multithread score of 30,704 further corroborates its strong multi-core capability.

The Intel Arc A350M, with an average benchmark score of 24,647, sits in the 70th percentile against all GPUs. Its Geekbench scores (24,546 OpenCL, 24,747 Vulkan) are closely matched, indicating consistent performance across different APIs. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (deltaPct of 0%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (deltaPct of 0%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (deltaPct of 0%), which shows that the i7-13650HX is performance-equivalent to these desktop-class parts. The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (-0.4%), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (-0.5%), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5%).

The overall system, with a combined percentile of 77, reflects the strong CPU pulling up the average. The data suggests that in CPU-intensive tasks, this system will perform comparably to systems with much more powerful GPUs. However, in graphics-bound workloads, the system's overall performance will be anchored by the GPU's capabilities. The 14-core, 20-thread CPU provides substantial headroom for background tasks, streaming, and content creation, but the GPU is the defining factor for frame rates in modern games.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is suited for users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who require only moderate graphics capability. The target user is a mobile professional or student who needs strong multi-threaded performance for productivity, software development, and content creation, but does not prioritize high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and high multi-core scores (24,580 in Cinebench R23, 102,929 in Passmark integer math) make it an excellent choice for compiling code, running virtual machines, data analysis, and office productivity suites. The 14 cores and 20 threads allow for efficient parallel processing in these tasks.

For content creators, the system is viable for 1080p video editing and photo manipulation, where the CPU's strong single-thread (3,470 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and multi-thread performance will accelerate encoding and effects. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit work with large textures or high-resolution video. Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings will find the system playable, but those seeking high-refresh-rate or high-detail gaming will be disappointed. The system is not suitable for 3D rendering or machine learning workloads that rely heavily on GPU compute, as the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest. Students and small business workstations will benefit from the CPU's efficiency (55 W TDP) and the system's overall responsiveness, making it a capable machine for general-purpose computing, coding, and document work.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process and has a die size of 257 mm². The CPU features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and it provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The integrated graphics is the UHD Graphics 710.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark scores scale well with thread count: 1,988 for 2 threads, 3,698 for 4 threads, 5,871 for 8 threads, 8,060 for 16 threads, and 8,741 for max threads. This scaling indicates good thread management and minimal contention. In Cinebench, the R23 multicore score of 24,580 is 7.1 times the single-core score of 3,470, demonstrating excellent parallel efficiency. The Passmark scores are equally impressive, with a multithread score of 30,704, and strong performance in specific tasks like data compression (383,943), integer math (102,929), and floating-point math (75,643). The processor's average benchmark score of 33,089 places it in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, and it is performance-equivalent to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Ryzen 7 7745HX, and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, with a deltaPct of 0% for all three.

The architecture's efficiency is notable, as it achieves these scores within a 55 W TDP envelope. This makes it suitable for laptops where thermal and power constraints are significant. The support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 ensures that the CPU will not be a bottleneck for future storage and memory upgrades. The launch MSRP is $485, reflecting its position as a high-end mobile processor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The gaming performance of this system will be dictated by the Intel Arc A350M, as the CPU's performance is more than sufficient for most gaming workloads. Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 24,647 and its 70th percentile ranking, which is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, the system is expected to handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with high settings, achieving smooth frame rates. For modern AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be limiting, requiring reduced settings to 1080p medium or low to maintain playable frame rates.

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,015 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,470 indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming scenarios. The system is expected to deliver consistent performance in CPU-bound games, but GPU-bound titles will see frame rates capped by the A350M's compute throughput. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores provide some capability for ray-traced effects, but the low compute power (3.379 TFLOPS) means ray tracing should be disabled for acceptable performance. The 70th percentile GPU ranking suggests the system will outperform integrated graphics solutions significantly, but it will not compete with dedicated mid-range or high-end gaming GPUs. Users should expect a 1080p gaming experience with medium settings as the baseline, with esports titles potentially running at high or ultra settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system achieves a combined percentile of 77, indicating it outperforms 77% of tested configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Core i7-13650HX compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 33,089, which is exactly equal to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX (deltaPct of 0%), and it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, delivered via 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus. This bandwidth is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and high-detail gaming.

Q: Does the system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Is the GPU's performance comparable to any known desktop cards?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 24,647 is 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, indicating similar performance levels.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is marked as "End-of-life," while the CPU is listed as "Active" in production status.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, designed for performance-intensive tasks. The GPU is an entry-level discrete part from Intel's Arc Alchemist generation, intended for light gaming and basic graphics acceleration. The system's combined percentile of 77 places it in the upper tier of tested configurations, but this ranking is heavily skewed by the CPU's strong performance (83rd percentile). The GPU, at the 70th percentile, is competent but not exceptional. This pairing represents a workstation-oriented laptop where the CPU is the primary investment, and the GPU provides adequate, though not high-end, graphics capability. The overall tier is a "high-performance CPU with entry-level GPU" system, suitable for productivity and light gaming rather than hardcore gaming or professional GPU rendering.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: Not recommended. The Arc A350M's performance, indicated by its 70th percentile ranking and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, will likely not sustain high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. Esports games may approach high refresh rates, but AAA titles will require low settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, with a strong Passmark multithread score of 30,704, can handle game capture and encoding without significant performance hits. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures smooth streaming performance, though the GPU will limit the in-game visuals.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,580 will accelerate video encoding and rendering in software. The 24 MB of L3 cache and high integer math score (102,929) support smooth timeline editing. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit effects and color grading, but basic 1080p editing is feasible.

3D Rendering: The CPU will perform admirably in CPU-based renderers, as evidenced by its 8,741 3DMark max threads score. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the A350M's 24,647 average benchmark score is a bottleneck, making this system unsuitable for complex GPU-rendered scenes.

Software Development: The processor's high multi-threaded performance (24,580 in Cinebench R23) is ideal for compiling large codebases. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 83rd percentile CPU ranking ensures snappy responsiveness in IDEs and virtual machines.

Student and Office Work: The system excels in this scenario. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,470 in Cinebench R23 handles office applications with ease, while the 55 W TDP contributes to battery efficiency. The 4 GB GPU is sufficient for dual-monitor setups and basic productivity tasks, making this a robust and reliable workstation for academic or administrative work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing for memory capacity and speed upgrades provided the laptop's BIOS and physical slots permit. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature that could support very fast NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures, although the laptop's implementation will dictate actual bandwidth. The system's overall performance can be improved by upgrading the memory to the fastest supported DDR5 speed, which would benefit the CPU's memory bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

The GPU, with a TDP of 25 W and a bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x8, is not upgradeable in a laptop. The suggested PSU is not listed, but given the combined TDP of the CPU (55 W) and GPU (25 W) is 80 W, a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. The primary upgrade path for this system is memory and storage. Users can add high-capacity NVMe drives to leverage the PCIe Gen 5 support for faster data access. The CPU's strong benchmark scores, particularly its 24,580 Cinebench R23 multicore result, suggest it will remain relevant for several years. The GPU is the limiting factor; a future upgrade would require a new laptop with a more powerful GPU. The platform is at the end of its GPU lifecycle, as the Arc A350M is marked as end-of-life, so users should plan for a full system replacement if they require significantly better graphics performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds