SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13620H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13620H

24,911 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13620H and Intel Arc A570M pairing represents a mobile platform engineered for high-throughput parallel processing, combining a 10-core Raptor Lake processor with a dedicated Xe-HPG graphics solution. This configuration sits in the 83rd percentile against all laptop and desktop pairings, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database. The CPU, positioned in the 77th percentile among all processors, handles complex multi-threaded workloads with authority, while the GPU, in the 88th percentile, provides rendering muscle that rivals discrete desktop cards from previous generations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13620H is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It contains 10 physical cores and 16 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores to balance power consumption against throughput. The base clock sits at 2.40 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 4.90 GHz, providing substantial headroom for bursty single-threaded tasks. This mobile chip uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket and carries a 45 W TDP, classifying it as a high-performance part for laptops rather than a low-power ultrabook chip.

Cache hierarchy is generous: each core gets 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, while 24 MB of shared L3 cache provides a large pool for frequently accessed data. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though the FACT PACK does not specify bandwidth figures. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, enabling fast communication with the GPU and NVMe storage. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, but it is secondary to the dedicated Arc A570M.

Benchmark data reveals the chip's multi-threaded strength. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 15176 dwarfs the single-core score of 1833, a ratio of over 8:1, indicating that the processor scales exceptionally well when all threads are utilized. The 3DMark thread scaling is similarly telling: the max-thread score of 7178 is only 1.7% higher than the 16-thread score of 7056, suggesting that the scheduler effectively saturates all available resources at 16 threads. However, the jump from 8 threads (5443) to 16 threads (7056) is a 29.6% improvement, demonstrating that the core count is not wasted.

PassMark results reinforce this profile. The multithread score of 24192 is nearly seven times the single-thread score of 3589. Integer math (80948) and floating-point math (59762) both show strong absolute numbers, while data compression (281335) is particularly impressive — a workload that benefits heavily from the large L3 cache and high memory bandwidth. Data encryption (15568) and extended instructions (17513) are more moderate, suggesting that AES-NI and SIMD workloads are handled competently but not at the level of dedicated server chips. The processor's average benchmark score of 24911 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, firmly in the upper quartile.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i7-13620H is essentially tied. It sits -0.1% behind the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24935), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core 5 210H (24872), -0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24964), and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (24822). These deltas are within noise, meaning that for general-purpose compute, any of these chips would deliver nearly identical results. The i7-13620H's advantage lies not in raw score supremacy but in its mobile efficiency and feature set.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 83rd combined percentile suggests a well-matched pairing, but the data indicates that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The GPU's 88th percentile versus the CPU's 77th percentile means that in graphics-bound scenarios, the Arc A570M is likely the performance ceiling, while the CPU has headroom to spare. This is typical for gaming laptops where resolution and detail settings determine frame rates.

The CPU's thread scaling data provides insight into where bottlenecks might emerge. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1963 is 28.0% of the max-thread score, and the 4-thread score of 3621 is 50.4% of max. These figures indicate that the chip does not have unusually strong per-core performance; it relies on core count to win. In lightly threaded games that only use 2-4 cores, the i7-13620H will underperform its multi-threaded reputation. Conversely, games that leverage 8 or more threads — modern AAA titles, for instance — will see near-peak CPU performance, reducing the likelihood that the processor becomes a bottleneck.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s over a 128-bit bus is a potential constraint. At 1080p ultra settings, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most titles, but bandwidth-limited scenarios such as high-resolution textures or ray tracing could expose this weakness. The FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS is modest by desktop standards but competitive for a 75 W mobile part. The CPU's 45 W TDP combined with the GPU's 75 W TDP suggests a total package that fits within standard gaming laptop thermal envelopes, but the balance tilts toward the GPU when both are under sustained load.

In CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the i7-13620H's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176 will drive performance, and the GPU will sit idle. In GPU-heavy workloads like gaming or GPU rendering, the Arc A570M's OpenCL score of 58239 will dominate, and the CPU will have spare capacity. This asymmetry is not a flaw but a design choice: the system can excel at either extreme without one component dragging the other down.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 24911, placing it in the 77th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, scores 24935, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the i7-13620H is statistically identical to that older flagship. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24822, 0.4% lower. These figures place the i7-13620H in a tight cluster of high-performance chips where no single model has a decisive advantage in aggregate workloads.

The GPU has only one benchmark in the FACT PACK: Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 58239. This places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58392, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the mobile Arc A570M is within a rounding error of a desktop flagship card from AMD's previous generation. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.3% lower), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.7% higher). This is remarkable company for a 75 W mobile GPU — it suggests that the Arc A570M delivers desktop-class compute performance in a laptop form factor.

Combined, the CPU and GPU land in the 83rd percentile of all pairings. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile create a synergistic effect where the stronger GPU lifts the overall score above either component's individual percentile. The data shows a system that is more capable than its CPU percentile alone would suggest, but slightly less capable than its GPU percentile alone would imply.

Who Should Build It

The 77th percentile CPU and 88th percentile GPU target users who need serious multi-threaded compute and high-end graphics without moving to a desktop. Content creators working with video editing software that scales across 16 threads will see near-flagship performance — the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176 is comparable to desktop chips from a few years ago. Data scientists and researchers running compression or encryption workloads will benefit from the PassMark data compression score of 281335, which is exceptionally high.

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays will find the GPU's 88th percentile positioning adequate for most titles, though the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at 1440p or with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's 77th percentile ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited in modern titles that use 8 or more threads. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 10-core, 16-thread configuration, as compilation is typically parallelized.

Students and small business users are not the primary audience — the 45 W CPU and 75 W GPU are power-hungry for a laptop, and the lack of ECC memory support rules out mission-critical servers. However, for a mobile workstation that needs to handle CAD, 3D modeling, or scientific computing, this pairing offers a compelling balance. The system is also suitable for streamers who need to encode video while gaming, as the CPU has enough headroom to handle both tasks simultaneously.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13620H compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX in multi-threaded performance?

A: The i7-13620H scores 0.4% higher on average benchmarks (24911 vs 24822), putting the two chips in a statistical tie for multi-threaded workloads, with neither having a meaningful advantage.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A570M faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the Arc A570M scores 58239, which is 0.3% lower than the RX 6950 XT's 58392. The cards are effectively identical in raw compute, despite the Arc being a mobile part.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The pairing sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database, meaning it outperforms roughly 83% of systems.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the memory support lists both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though the specific bandwidth is not provided in the data.

Q: How many threads does the CPU have for multitasking?

A: The i7-13620H has 16 threads across 10 cores, with a max-thread 3DMark score of 7178, indicating strong scaling for heavily threaded applications.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A570M has 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 128-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics usable for gaming?

A: The UHD Graphics 770 is present, but the dedicated Arc A570M is far more capable, and the data does not include benchmarks for the integrated solution.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 11,500 million transistors across a 269 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. This is a substantial chip for a 75 W mobile part, reflecting Intel's ambition to compete in the discrete GPU market.

The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 16 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective on 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus. The resulting bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s is the most likely performance limiter in high-resolution scenarios.

Compute capabilities are respectable: FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 10.65 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for gaming but could theoretically limit bandwidth in compute workloads.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places the GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, is a desktop card with a much higher power budget, yet the Arc A570M trails by only 0.3%. This indicates that Intel's architecture is highly efficient, delivering near-desktop performance at a fraction of the power. The NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon PRO V710 are similarly close, showing that the Arc A570M competes with a wide range of mid-to-high-end GPUs.

For rendering tasks, the FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS is the key metric. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate 3D rendering, but professionals using GPU-accelerated renderers may find it lacking compared to higher-end desktop cards. The 16 ray tracing cores provide entry-level RT performance, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely bottleneck RT workloads that require heavy data movement. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures but may be insufficient for 4K texture packs or large datasets.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not observed results.

The GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score of 58239 suggests it can handle modern AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, though the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause frame drops in texture-heavy scenes. The CPU's 77th percentile ensures that it will not be the bottleneck in most titles, particularly those that use 8 or more threads. At 1080p, the combination should deliver smooth gameplay in esports titles and playable frame rates in demanding single-player games.

At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become limiting factors. The pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s is sufficient for 1440p, but the bandwidth may cause stuttering in open-world games with large streaming assets. Ray tracing is possible with the 16 RT cores, but performance will likely be lower than the rasterized equivalent, and DLSS-style upscaling is not mentioned in the data.

The CPU's single-thread score of 1008 in 3DMark and 1833 in Cinebench R23 suggests that older games relying on 1-2 cores may not run at maximum frame rates. However, the boost clock of 4.90 GHz provides enough single-thread headroom for most modern engines. The lack of measured data means these are projections, and actual frame rates could vary by 10-20% depending on game optimization and driver maturity.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13620H with the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-H processor with a 45 W TDP, positioned in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a 75 W mobile part based on the Xe-HPG architecture, positioned in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system sits in the 83rd percentile of all pairings, indicating a high-end mobile platform.

The pairing is notable for its balance: the CPU is strong but not the fastest, and the GPU is similarly strong but not the fastest. Neither component is a weak link, and the 83rd combined percentile is higher than either individual percentile, suggesting that the two components complement each other well. The system is capable of handling both compute-heavy and graphics-heavy workloads without significant compromise.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $502, though this is a mobile part typically sold inside complete laptops rather than as a standalone purchase. The GPU has no launch MSRP in the data, consistent with it being an OEM component. The build class is explicitly laptop, so users should not expect to assemble this in a desktop chassis.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile and the CPU's 77th percentile combine to support 1080p high-refresh gaming, particularly in esports titles where frame rates above 144 FPS are achievable. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit peak frame rates in the most demanding titles, but the overall package is well-suited for competitive play.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176 indicates that simultaneous encoding and rendering will not cause significant frame drops, though dedicated hardware encoders are not mentioned in the data.

Video editing: The PassMark multithread score of 24192 and data compression score of 281335 indicate strong performance in video editing workloads that use multi-core CPUs. The GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 also accelerates effects and exports in GPU-accelerated editors, making this a viable mobile editing station.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8305 and the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide a dual-path rendering solution. CPU-based renderers will utilize all 16 threads, while GPU-based renderers will leverage the Arc A570M's compute capabilities, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The 10-core, 16-thread configuration accelerates compilation and testing cycles. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code, and the high single-thread boost of 4.90 GHz handles interactive development tools responsively.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for standard productivity tasks, but the high core count and GPU compute ensure that even demanding academic workloads like simulation or data analysis run smoothly. The 45 W CPU and 75 W GPU draw significant power, so battery life may be short, but for plugged-in workstations, the performance is excellent.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13620H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13620H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds