SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13620H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13620H

24,911 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, Bandwidth, Clocks, RT/Tensor Hardware, and What the Scores Mean for Rendering

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile discrete GPU built on TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die. It belongs to the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile) and uses the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip. The GPU's memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a modest figure that suits 1080p-class workloads but will constrain higher-resolution or texture-heavy scenarios. Memory clocks run at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective.

The GPU operates with a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. For compute, the A370M delivers 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). Ray tracing hardware is present with 8 dedicated RT cores. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully modern on the API front.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 29175, derived from Geekbench OpenCL (29676) and Geekbench Vulkan (28673) tests. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29197 (0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29211 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28874 (1.0% behind). The data indicates that the A370M sits in a performance band where small percentage differences separate competitors — the deltaPct values are all within ±1%, suggesting that real-world differences will be marginal in most workloads.

For rendering, the FP32 figure of 4.198 TFLOPS is the key metric for traditional rasterization, while the 8 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is the primary bottleneck for GPU compute tasks that stream large datasets, such as high-resolution texture loading or complex scene geometry. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming and light content creation but will limit extreme texture packs or multi-monitor productivity setups. The 74th percentile ranking indicates this is a mid-range mobile GPU — capable of smooth 1080p gameplay in many titles, but not a high-end part.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU in this pairing is the Intel Core i7-13620H, which uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket — a mobile platform, meaning the CPU and GPU are typically soldered onto the motherboard. The system is classified as a laptop (buildClass: "laptop"), so traditional desktop-style upgrades like swapping a GPU or adding RAM are generally not possible. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, though no memory bandwidth figure is provided. ECC memory is not supported.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 8 lanes available from the CPU. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is sufficient for the A370M's bandwidth needs. The CPU has an integrated GPU (UHD Graphics 770), which can serve as a fallback for display output or light workloads when the discrete GPU is idle. The CPU's TDP is 45 W, while the GPU's TDP is 35 W — combined, they represent a modest power envelope suitable for thin-and-light laptops. No suggested PSU is listed, and no power connector details are provided, consistent with the mobile form factor.

The production status of the GPU is "End-of-life" (released 2022-03-29), while the CPU is "Active" (released 2023-01-03). This means the GPU is older and may be harder to find in new systems, but the platform itself is current. Given the BGA 1744 socket, a sensible next upgrade would be a new laptop with a more powerful GPU, as the A370M is not replaceable. Alternatively, users could pair this CPU with a more capable discrete GPU in a future system build — the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads (discussed in the next section) provide headroom for faster graphics hardware. The dual-channel memory controller and Gen 5 PCIe lanes indicate the platform is not the limiting factor for most workloads.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13620H is a mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-H) using Intel's 10 nm process node. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is 45 W, typical for high-performance mobile CPUs. The launch MSRP is $502, though this is a single data point and not indicative of system pricing.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 7056 with 16 threads, 5443 with 8 threads, 3621 with 4 threads, 1963 with 2 threads, and 1008 in single-thread. The max-threads score is 7178, slightly higher than the 16-thread score. Cinebench results follow a similar pattern: R15 multicore scores 2281, R20 multicore scores 8305, and R23 multicore scores 15176. Single-core scores are 263 (R15), 1172 (R20), and 1833 (R23). PassMark tests show a multithread score of 24192, a single-thread score of 3589, and specific workloads: data compression at 281335, data encryption at 15568, extended instructions at 17513, find prime numbers at 99, floating point math at 59762, integer math at 80948, physics at 1671, and random string sorting at 29395.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 24911, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: the Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24822 (0.4% behind). The deltaPct values are all under 0.5%, meaning the i7-13620H is statistically tied with these competitors. For real workloads, this translates to near-identical performance in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, compilation, and spreadsheet processing.

The single-thread score of 3589 in PassMark is respectable, indicating strong responsiveness in everyday tasks. The multi-thread score of 24192 shows the CPU can handle heavy parallel workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176 is a solid figure for a 45 W mobile part, suggesting sustained performance under load. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz is high for a mobile chip, which helps in lightly-threaded applications.

# Who Should Build It

The i7-13620H + Arc A370M combination targets users who need balanced performance in a laptop form factor without extreme GPU demands. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking indicate a system that handles both processor-intensive and graphics-intensive tasks competently, but neither component is top-tier.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this setup suitable for medium to high settings in most titles, based on the GPU's benchmark position near the RX 470 and RX Vega M GH. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads — the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176 shows it can chew through render tasks. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 RT cores provide additional acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's high single-thread score (3589 PassMark, 1833 Cinebench R23 single-core) for compilation and code editing, while the multi-thread performance handles parallel builds. Students and small business users get a capable all-rounder: the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 24192 handles office suites and multitasking, while the GPU's 74th percentile ensures smooth UI rendering and light graphics work.

The 45 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP make this a power-efficient pairing, suitable for laptops that balance performance with battery life. The production status of the GPU (End-of-life) and CPU (Active) suggests this is a current-generation CPU paired with a previous-generation GPU — a common configuration in mid-range laptops.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined system sits at the 76th percentile (combinedPercentile: 76), reflecting a balanced pairing of a 77th-percentile CPU and a 74th-percentile GPU. There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows — so all frame rates discussed later are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 24911, with the nearest rival being the Intel Core i7-11850H at 24935 (0.1% ahead). The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24822 (0.4% behind). This places the i7-13620H in a dead heat with four other CPUs — no single rival is more than 0.4% away.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29197 (0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29211 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28874 (1.0% behind). Again, the differences are minimal — the A370M is essentially tied with its nearest rivals.

The combined picture is a system where both components perform near the middle of their respective performance bands. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile are close, indicating no severe imbalance. The CPU's strongest results are in multi-threaded workloads (Cinebench R23 multicore 15176, PassMark multithread 24192), while the GPU's scores are consistent across OpenCL and Vulkan (29676 and 28673, respectively).

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-13620H + Intel Arc A370M combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All gaming figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

The GPU's 74th percentile ranking, with scores near the Radeon RX 470 and RX Vega M GH, suggests 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is achievable in most titles. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 1080p textures without issue, but 1440p or 4K will strain the memory subsystem. The 8 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS limits the complexity of RT workloads.

For esports titles like Fortnite or Counter-Strike 2, the GPU's 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate suggest high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM may force lower texture quality at 1080p. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3589 PassMark single-thread) ensures the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

The CPU's 3DMark scores provide additional context: a single-thread score of 1008 and a 2-thread score of 1963 indicate solid gaming performance in lightly-threaded game engines. The 8-thread score of 5443 suggests modern games that use multiple cores will perform well. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with the expectation of 60+ FPS in less demanding titles and 30-60 FPS in AAA games.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles (77th and 74th, respectively) are closely matched, indicating a well-balanced system for most workloads. However, the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the task.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (PassMark score 281335), encryption (15568), and integer math (80948), the i7-13620H's performance is the limiting factor. The CPU's 77th percentile means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs, so these tasks will run quickly but not at flagship levels. The GPU is largely irrelevant in these scenarios.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the A370M becomes the bottleneck. The GPU's 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM limit texture quality and resolution. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is notably lower than what high-end GPUs offer, which will cause frame rate drops in texture-heavy scenes. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1008 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, so the GPU will be the primary constraint in gaming.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this: at 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS will cap performance in demanding games. At higher resolutions, the GPU's VRAM and bandwidth become even more limiting. The CPU's 24 MB of L3 cache and 10 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming, so streaming or recording (which uses CPU resources) will not significantly impact game performance.

The combinedPercentile of 76 is slightly lower than the CPU's individual percentile (77), reflecting the GPU's slightly weaker position. This suggests the GPU is the more likely upgrade target, though the BGA 1744 socket prevents such upgrades in the same system.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i7-13620H has an average benchmark score of 24911, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A370M scores 29175 on average. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is 0.1% ahead (29197), the AMD FirePro W8000 is 0.1% ahead (29211), the AMD Radeon RX 470 is 0.6% behind (28996), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M is 1.0% behind (28874).

Q: What memory does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is this system suitable for gaming?

A: Based on the GPU's 74th percentile and scores near the RX 470, the system is suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so these are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's core configuration and boost clock?

A: The CPU has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. It uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the system?

A: The combined percentile is 76, reflecting the CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU's 74th percentile and CPU's strong single-thread score (3589 PassMark) suggest frame rates above 60 FPS in esports titles, though the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit higher resolutions. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1963 indicates good performance in games that use two threads.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176, provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 24192 supports concurrent streaming and game workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (PassMark multithread 24192, Cinebench R23 multicore 15176) handles timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 accelerate effects and rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads will dominate CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 8 RT cores and Vulkan 1.4 support GPU-accelerated ray tracing. The 4 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 3589 (PassMark) and 1833 (Cinebench R23 single-core) ensure fast compilation of individual files, while the multithread score handles parallel builds. The 24 MB L3 cache aids in code caching.

Student and office work: The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile provide smooth multitasking, document editing, and web browsing. The 45 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP make this a power-efficient option for all-day use.