SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13620H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13620H

24,911 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13620H and Intel Arc A350M represent a mobile pairing designed for balanced mainstream laptop performance. The processor, a 13th-generation Raptor Lake-H chip, delivers strong multi-threaded capabilities, while the dedicated graphics card targets efficient 1080p gaming and accelerated content creation. The combined system percentile of 74 places this configuration above the majority of laptop hardware, though the pairing exhibits a distinct skew toward CPU-heavy workloads rather than high-end gaming. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark data provided, which shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all gaming discussion is therefore framed as an estimation derived from the synthetic scores.

Benchmark Performance

The data presents a clear picture: this is a CPU-dominant pairing. The Intel Core i7-13620H posts an average benchmark score of 24911, placing it in the 77th percentile against all CPUs. This positions it significantly ahead of the typical mobile processor, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX at a 0.4% advantage for the AMD part. The Intel Core i7-11850H is effectively tied at a -0.1% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F trails by 0.2%. The multi-threaded performance is particularly notable; the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176 and the Passmark multithread score of 24192 indicate a processor that can handle demanding parallel workloads, such as video rendering and software compilation, with ease.

Single-thread performance is equally robust. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1833 demonstrate strong per-core efficiency, which translates to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and solid performance in lightly-threaded applications. The scaling from 2 threads (1963) to max threads (7178) in 3DMark shows a healthy linear progression, indicating that the 10-core, 16-thread configuration is well-utilized across varying thread counts. The Passmark integer math score of 80948 and floating-point math score of 59762 further underscore the processor's computational breadth.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc A350M achieves an average benchmark score of 24647, landing in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows it trading blows with the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which is only 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is 0.4% faster. The Arc A350M holds a 1.5% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and a 0.8% lead over the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. With a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747, the GPU demonstrates competent compute capabilities for a mobile part, but its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus (112.0 GB/s bandwidth) will inherently limit performance at higher resolutions and texture settings.

The combined picture reveals a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU relative to their respective markets. The CPU sits 7 percentile points higher than the GPU, suggesting that in gaming scenarios where the graphics card is the primary bottleneck, the processor will frequently be waiting on the Arc A350M to catch up. This is not a flaw, but rather a design point: the platform is optimized for productivity tasks that leverage the powerful CPU, while still offering a meaningful discrete GPU upgrade over integrated graphics.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13620H compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX?

A: The average benchmark scores are virtually identical, with the Ryzen 9 5900HX holding a marginal 0.4% lead. The Intel chip scores 24911, while the AMD part scores 24822, making them effectively interchangeable in overall performance.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A350M suitable for modern gaming?

A: Based on its 70th percentile ranking and average score of 24647, it is positioned as an entry-level discrete GPU. It outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5% and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT by 0.8%, but its 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings rather than high-fidelity or high-resolution play.

Q: What is the memory configuration of this CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13620H supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It has an L3 cache of 24 MB shared across the cores, with 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the processor?

A: The launch MSRP is $502.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. This provides a fallback display output and basic graphics capability when the discrete Arc A350M is not in use or for quick-sync video encoding tasks.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU remains active in production. This suggests the GPU is an older part in Intel's lineup, even though it still performs competitively in its class.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The Passmark single-thread score is 3589, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1833. This level of performance is strong for a mobile chip and ensures fast application launch times and fluid performance in older or less-parallel software.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which means the processor is soldered to the motherboard. This fundamentally restricts upgradeability; users cannot swap the CPU for a newer model. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides some flexibility, but the bus is dual-channel, limiting bandwidth compared to quad-channel workstation platforms. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth connection for the primary storage device, while the GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8. This is a standard configuration for mobile platforms, ensuring the Arc A350M has adequate bandwidth for its memory pool.

The power envelope is modest: the CPU has a 45 W TDP, and the GPU has a 25 W TDP. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined thermal design power of 70 W indicates that this is an efficient pairing. A laptop equipped with these components will not require an oversized power adapter; a standard 100-130 W unit typical for thin-and-light gaming notebooks will be sufficient. The upgrade path for this system is therefore less about swapping internal components and more about external peripherals: adding a high-refresh-rate external monitor, a fast NVMe SSD via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, or a docking station for additional connectivity.

Given the end-of-life status of the Arc A350M, the most sensible upgrade for users seeking more graphics performance would be a new laptop rather than attempting to modify this one. The CPU, however, remains a capable piece of hardware that will not be the limiting factor in most tasks for several years. The platform's strength lies in its balance; it offers a high-performance CPU with a competent, efficient GPU that together deliver a smooth experience for mainstream applications without the thermal and power demands of a high-end gaming rig.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance gap between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 70th percentile indicate that the graphics card is the constraining component in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the Arc A350M will be the primary bottleneck, as its 4 GB memory capacity and 64-bit bus will limit texture loading and frame rates at high settings. The CPU's robust multi-threaded scores—such as the 3DMark max-threads score of 7178 and the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8305—mean it will rarely be the cause of frame dips in CPU-bound scenarios like physics calculations or AI pathfinding.

Conversely, in productivity tasks, the CPU dominates the workload profile. The Passmark data compression score of 281335 and data encryption score of 15568 indicate that archival and security tasks will fly through the processor, while the GPU remains underutilized. The bottleneck shifts based on the application: for 3D rendering, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the ceiling, but for software compilation or video encoding, the CPU's 16 threads will be the workhorse. The system is inherently unbalanced toward CPU tasks, but this is not necessarily a negative. It means the platform excels in professional and academic scenarios where computational throughput is more valuable than pixel-pushing power, while still offering enough graphics capability to handle casual gaming and GPU-accelerated effects in creative software.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for users who prioritize CPU performance over gaming frame rates. It targets students and professionals in engineering, data science, and software development who require a powerful processor for compiling code, running simulations, or processing large datasets. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176 and the Passmark multithread score of 24192 provide the muscle for such tasks, while the Arc A350M offers hardware acceleration for CUDA-less workflows, such as OpenCL-based compute in scientific applications. For content creators, the CPU's strong encoding capabilities, evidenced by the extended instructions score of 17513, make it a solid choice for video editing and streaming, though the GPU will not handle high-end 3D rendering efficiently.

The system is less suited for dedicated gamers seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K play, given the GPU's 4 GB frame buffer. However, for a user building a portable workstation or a mainstream laptop for mixed use—productivity, web development, and occasional 1080p gaming—this configuration strikes a practical balance. Small business owners would benefit from the CPU's responsiveness in office suites and database management, with the discrete GPU providing extra display outputs and acceleration for presentation graphics. The combination is a sensible choice for anyone who values a fast, responsive system for demanding CPU workloads over a specialized gaming machine.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of the Intel Core i7-13620H and Intel Arc A350M. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and the GPU's hardware specifications, not from direct game testing. The Arc A350M's average benchmark score of 24647, which places it in the 70th percentile, suggests it can handle modern titles at 1080p with medium to low settings. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraints, limiting texture quality and causing potential stuttering in games with high VRAM demands. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3589 in Passmark ensures that frame pacing will be smooth, as the processor can easily feed frames to the GPU.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's rapid single-core performance and the GPU's 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate should allow for high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For triple-A games, the estimate is more conservative; a frame rate of 30-60 FPS at 1080p on low or medium presets is plausible for games released before 2023, but newer, more demanding titles will likely require reduced resolution scaling or significant setting compromises. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 indicates good driver-level API support, which is crucial for modern games, but the hardware limitations of a 64-bit bus and 768 shading units will cap overall performance. Users should expect a 1080p gaming experience that is playable but not exceptional, with the CPU ensuring that the system never feels sluggish outside of the most GPU-heavy scenes.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13620H is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration allows for high burst performance in single-threaded tasks, evidenced by the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 263, while the 16 threads provide ample throughput for multi-threaded applications, as shown by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7056.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a mobile processor that rivals desktop parts from a few generations ago. The Passmark single-thread score of 3589 is particularly strong, ensuring that legacy software and games that rely heavily on one or two cores will run smoothly. Meanwhile, the Passmark physics score of 1671 indicates strong computational physics capabilities, which is relevant for scientific computing and older game engines. The processor's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives laptop manufacturers flexibility in cost and performance tuning, though the dual-channel bus limits absolute memory bandwidth. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking against all CPUs confirms that it is a high-end mobile part, and its performance in data encryption (15568) and random string sorting (29395) suggests it is well-rounded for a variety of tasks beyond raw number crunching.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing a high-performance mobile CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. The Intel Core i7-13620H is the centerpiece, delivering desktop-like multi-threaded performance in a 45 W envelope. The Intel Arc A350M is a dedicated graphics solution with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, designed to provide a significant boost over integrated graphics while maintaining low power consumption at 25 W. The combined system percentile of 74 indicates that this configuration outperforms roughly three-quarters of all laptop systems in the benchmark database.

The pairing is best described as a "productivity-first" laptop platform. The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 70th percentile create a system that excels in CPU-bound workloads such as software development, data analysis, and video encoding, while offering sufficient graphics power for light gaming and GPU-accelerated applications. It is not a high-end gaming laptop, but it is a versatile machine for users who need a powerful processor for work or study and occasional gaming capability. The build class is explicitly "laptop," confirming that this is a mobile solution, not a desktop replacement in terms of raw graphics power.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is limited by the Arc A350M. While the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3589 can push high frame rates, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance. Estimated 1080p gaming is viable at medium settings, but achieving high-refresh 144Hz+ rates in demanding titles is unlikely; esports games are a better fit.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. The Passmark data compression score of 281335 enables efficient x264 encoding at high bitrates, and the 16 threads can handle both the game and the encode simultaneously. The GPU can offload some work via its fixed-function media block, but the CPU is the primary asset here.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15176 provides substantial processing power for 1080p video timelines and effects. The Arc A350M offers hardware acceleration in compatible editing software via OpenCL, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546, but its 4 GB memory may limit complex 4K compositions.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance are modest for rendering. The CPU will be the primary renderer in most CPU-based engines, and its 24 MB L3 cache and 16 threads will handle moderate scenes well, but long render times are expected for complex projects.

Software Development: This is a prime scenario for this build. The Passmark multithread score of 24192 and the integer math score of 80948 indicate rapid code compilation and test execution. The processor's high single-thread score ensures a responsive IDE, and the 16 threads allow for parallel builds.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Passmark 3589) makes everyday applications like web browsers, word processors, and spreadsheets feel instantaneous. The discrete GPU is overkill for this use case, but it provides additional display outputs and smooth rendering of charts and diagrams. The 45 W CPU TDP ensures long battery life under light loads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13620H + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13620H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds