SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12850HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12850HX

41,779 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12850HX is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on the Alder Lake architecture (Alder Lake-HX codename) using Intel's 10 nm process node. This hybrid design combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The CPU's die size is 215 mm², and it carries 25 MB of shared L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and the processor also supports ECC memory, which is notable for a mobile part. The chip uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket and is marked as actively in production, with a launch MSRP of $428.

In terms of raw compute, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16301.5 points places this CPU in a strong position for heavy threaded workloads. The single-core score of 1720.5 in Cinebench R23 is equally telling, as it indicates solid per-thread performance that matters for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The Passmark multithread score of 30627 and the single-thread score of 3683 reinforce this picture. The CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 88, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The average benchmark score of 41779 further confirms its position.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-12850HX sits within a tight cluster. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core 7 251TE (avg score 41650), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (avg score 41621), and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-14700T (avg score 41914), as well as 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (avg score 41963). These deltas are marginal, meaning that in real-world multi-core tasks, the i7-12850HX trades blows with these alternatives within a rounding error. However, the i7-12850HX's advantage lies in its high boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which helps in single-threaded and lightly threaded scenarios where frequency matters more than core count.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output and light acceleration, but the primary graphics work is handled by the discrete GPU in this pairing. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes (CPU only) ensures high bandwidth for the latest storage and expansion options, though the laptop form factor limits practical use of that bandwidth. For workloads like data compression, the Passmark data compression score of 365829 shows strong throughput, while data encryption at 21120 and extended instructions at 22227 indicate capable AES and AVX performance. Floating point math at 79337 and integer math at 108076 are robust figures for scientific and financial computations. The find prime numbers score of 111 is a more specialized test, but the physics score of 1813 and random string sorting at 40327 round out a comprehensive compute profile.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this CPU+GPU combination shows a clear split between processor and graphics capabilities. The CPU's average benchmark score of 41779 places it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, which is a high-tier result for a mobile processor. The GPU, an Intel Arc A370M, achieves an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 81, reflecting that the CPU is the stronger component relative to the GPU.

Looking at specific GPU benchmarks, the Arc A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores indicate that the GPU is capable of handling compute workloads through both OpenCL and Vulkan APIs, with the Vulkan score being slightly lower but still in the same ballpark. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (avg score 29197, delta -0.1%), AMD FirePro W8000 (avg score 29211, delta -0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 470 (avg score 28996, delta 0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (avg score 28874, delta 1%). The Arc A370M is essentially neck-and-neck with these parts, being 0.1% behind the RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000, while 0.6% ahead of the RX 470 and 1% ahead of the RX 6800M. This is a noteworthy result, as the RX 6800M is typically considered a higher-tier mobile GPU, but the benchmark averages place them within 1% of each other.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that leads the pairing, with the GPU providing adequate but not exceptional graphics performance. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and heavy multitasking, the i7-12850HX will shine. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor. The percentile gap of 14 points between CPU (88th) and GPU (74th) quantifies this imbalance. The data indicates that this is a system designed for productivity and content creation where the CPU does the heavy lifting, with the GPU handling moderate graphics loads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i7-12850HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture with a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-12850HX is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core 7 251TE and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, while being 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-14700T and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS in average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A370M includes 8 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The Arc A370M ranks at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29175 from Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop component set?

A: This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the build class field, with the CPU using the Intel BGA 1964 socket and the GPU being an IGP slot width (integrated for mobile).

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for mobile processors.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Intel Core i7-12850HX provides strong single-thread performance with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1720.5, which helps maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound games. However, the Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU ranking and 4 GB VRAM will limit resolution and detail settings; this pairing is more suited to 1080p competitive gaming at medium settings rather than pushing high refresh rates at maximum quality.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16301.5 indicates ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 30627 further supports this, allowing simultaneous game encoding and video capture without significant frame drops, though the GPU's limited VRAM may constrain streaming with high-bitrate overlays.

Video editing is a strong suit for this combination. The CPU's high multicore performance (Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10907) accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 provides hardware acceleration for effects and transitions. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for 1080p editing timelines but may struggle with 4K multi-layer projects.

3D rendering benefits primarily from the CPU's compute power. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2679 and R20 multicore score of 10907 indicate that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or KeyShot will be efficient. The GPU's Vulkan score of 28673 suggests it can assist with viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated previews, but it will not replace a dedicated workstation GPU for final frame renders.

Software development is where this CPU excels. The Passmark data compression score of 365829 and integer math score of 108076 point to fast code compilation and data processing. The 16 cores and 24 threads allow parallel builds to complete quickly, and the single-thread score of 3683 ensures responsive IDE interactions and quick syntax checking.

For student and office work, this pairing is overkill in CPU terms but practical in GPU terms. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across documents, spreadsheets, and web browsers, while the GPU's 74th percentile handles basic graphics acceleration and video playback without strain. The 55 W TDP of the CPU means this is not an ultraportable option, but it provides substantial compute headroom for future academic or professional tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear bottleneck pattern: the CPU is the dominant component, with a 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads such as code compilation, data analysis, and 3D rendering, the i7-12850HX will perform near its full potential, as the GPU is not a limiting factor. The CPU's average benchmark score of 41779, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, indicates that this processor can handle the most demanding compute tasks without being the constraint.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions, video encoding with GPU acceleration, or machine learning inference, the Arc A370M becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause performance ceilings in texture-heavy scenes or large datasets. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, is only 1% ahead in average benchmark score, which suggests that the Arc A370M is not far behind a more established mobile GPU, but this still places it firmly below the CPU's performance tier.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that frame scaling must be estimated from benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1720.5) will support high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU's pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s constrain how many pixels and textures can be processed per frame. In practice, this means that at 1080p, the GPU will be the bottleneck in most modern games, while at lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU may become the limiting factor in highly threaded titles.

The combined percentile of 81 reflects this imbalance, positioning the system as a CPU-first build. For users who prioritize compute tasks over graphics, this is a beneficial pairing. For those who want balanced gaming performance, the GPU should be upgraded or the system should be configured with a stronger GPU relative to the CPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The Intel Core i7-12850HX provides a strong foundation for gaming with its high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1720.5) and 4.80 GHz boost clock, which will support high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

For the Arc A370M, the GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus translate to modest gaming capabilities. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 suggest it can handle esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant at 1080p with high frame rates, likely exceeding 100 FPS on medium settings. For more demanding AAA titles, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate that 1080p at low-to-medium settings would be the realistic target, with frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range depending on the title's optimization.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle significantly, as the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture loading and memory bandwidth for higher-resolution assets. Frame rates would drop considerably below 60 FPS in most modern games, making this resolution impractical for gaming on the Arc A370M. At 4K, the pairing is not viable for gaming, as the GPU's memory and compute resources are insufficient for the pixel load.

The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide headroom for background tasks like Discord or web browsers during gaming, but the GPU remains the primary constraint. The 8 ray tracing cores in the Arc A370M offer some RT capability, but the limited compute throughput (4.198 TFLOPS FP32) means that ray tracing effects should be disabled for playable frame rates in most titles. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming setup for esports and older or less demanding games, not a high-end gaming machine.

Who Should Build It

This laptop pairing targets users who need substantial CPU compute power but can tolerate moderate graphics performance. Gamers at 1080p who favor esports titles or are willing to lower settings for AAA games will find the system adequate, supported by the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1720.5 (Cinebench R23) and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking. However, gamers seeking 1440p or high-refresh (144Hz+) experiences should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors.

Content creators, specifically video editors and 3D renderers, are the primary beneficiaries of this build. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16301.5 and Passmark multithread score of 30627 enable fast exports and rendering, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 provides acceleration in compatible software. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's data compression score of 365829 and integer math score of 108076 for fast builds and data processing, making this a strong choice for programming workstations.

Students in engineering, data science, or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU's compute capabilities for simulations and analysis, while the GPU handles basic visualization and graphics tasks. Small business workstations that run heavy productivity suites, database applications, or financial modeling will find the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads more than sufficient, with the GPU providing capable display output and acceleration. The ECC memory support is an additional advantage for workstation reliability in professional environments.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-12850HX (mobile CPU) and Intel Arc A370M (mobile GPU). The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake-HX processor with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is a 35 W part based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) with 4 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile rank of 81 places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, though the CPU's 88th percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 74th percentile.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 41779 is competitive with desktop-class alternatives, and the GPU's average score of 29175 is respectable for a mobile part. The pairing is well-suited for productivity and content creation workloads where CPU compute is paramount, but it is less ideal for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The system's overall tier is high-midrange, with the CPU providing near-flagship performance and the GPU delivering midrange graphics capabilities. The 10 nm process node for the CPU and 6 nm for the GPU (TSMC foundry) indicate a modern, power-efficient design, though the CPU's 55 W TDP means this is not an ultraportable configuration.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a notable limitation for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The base clock is 1550 MHz, boosting to 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Compute resources include 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The GPU has 8 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the compute throughput is limited. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a 35 W TDP, making it a power-efficient option for thin-and-light laptops. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility.

In benchmark terms, the Arc A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 29175. This places it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% higher), AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% lower). The close margins to these parts indicate that the Arc A370M delivers competitive compute performance for its class.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan scores suggest it can handle GPU-accelerated effects and renders in applications that support these APIs. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits the complexity of ray-traced scenes. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p rendering tasks but will bottleneck on larger projects or higher-resolution textures. The production status is end-of-life, indicating that this GPU is no longer in active production, though it remains a capable option for existing laptop designs.