SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12850HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12850HX

41,779 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12850HX and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific type of laptop configuration: a high-core-count mobile CPU paired with an entry-level discrete GPU. The data shows a system that is heavily skewed toward processing power, with the GPU serving as a secondary component. The processor is a mobile part on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard, and the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth connection for the era, though the Arc A350M itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 25 W, which together suggest a system that requires a modest power delivery solution; the absence of a suggested PSU figure in the data indicates a reliance on the laptop’s internal power adapter rather than a discrete desktop power supply. The launch MSRP for the CPU alone is $428, and the GPU has no launch MSRP listed. Given the soldered nature of both components, a sensible next upgrade is not a component swap; it is a full system replacement, likely targeting a newer mobile platform for better efficiency, as the CPU is from the Core 12th Gen series and the GPU is marked as End-of-life.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is defined by the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is exclusive to mobile Alder Lake-HX processors. This is not a user-upgradeable socket; the processor is permanently attached. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5, both running in dual-channel mode, which gives system builders flexibility if the laptop’s motherboard supports both types, though most will use one or the other. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are a forward-looking feature, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface means it does not utilize the full Gen 5 bandwidth; it runs at the older standard’s lane width. The CPU’s 55 W TDP is relatively high for a mobile part, indicating sustained multi-core performance requires adequate cooling. The GPU’s 25 W TDP is very low, suggesting it is designed for basic acceleration rather than high-end gaming. The data shows no suggested PSU, which is typical for mobile systems where the power adapter is proprietary. A sensible next upgrade from this configuration is a new laptop with a newer generation of both CPU and GPU; the CPU is from 2022 and the GPU from the same era, and the GPU is already at its end-of-life production status.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a stark imbalance. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, which is a strong result, while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This 18-point gap indicates that the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU in relative terms. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor, as it has only 4 GB of VRAM and 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which are modest figures. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score is 30627, and its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 16301.5, both indicating strong multi-threaded throughput. In contrast, the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546 and Vulkan score is 24747. The combined picture is that the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios, the GPU will cap the frame rate. For productivity tasks like data compression, the CPU’s Passmark score of 365829 shows a strong capability, but the GPU is not heavily involved in those workloads. The bottleneck is the GPU in gaming and the CPU in light tasks where the GPU is unused; there is no single component that limits all workloads, but the GPU is the primary constraint for graphics-heavy applications.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for the CPU are extensive and consistently show a high-performance mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16301.5 points in multi-core and 1720.5 points in single-core. The single-core score is particularly relevant for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 10907 multi-core and 1539 single-core. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41779, placing it at the 88th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 251TE with an average score of 41650 (a 0.3% difference), the Intel Core i7-14700T with 41914 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H with 41621 (0.4%). This means the i7-12850HX is effectively tied with these parts, differing by less than half a percent in either direction. For the GPU, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546 and Vulkan is 24747, with an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 with an average score of 24744 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile with 24763 (-0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT with 24442 (0.8%). The Arc A350M is within 1.5% of these parts, showing that its raw compute performance is comparable to a desktop GPU from a previous generation. The combined percentile for the entire build is 79, which is lower than the CPU’s 88 but higher than the GPU’s 70, reflecting the CPU-heavy nature of the system.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is not for gamers seeking high-refresh-rate experiences. The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM limit it to older titles or lower settings. Instead, this build targets users who need CPU horsepower in a mobile form factor. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads, as compilation is highly parallel. Students in engineering or data science fields running simulations or heavy spreadsheet calculations would see strong performance. Small business workstations handling database queries or financial modeling would also fit, given the CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 21120 and integer math score of 108076. Content creators doing light photo editing may find the GPU sufficient, but video rendering is more CPU-bound in many applications, which is a strength here. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation reliability, though it requires motherboard support. The GPU can handle basic display output and desktop acceleration, but it is not a gaming part; the data shows no measured FPS for any game, so all gaming expectations are estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12850HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-HX codename. It uses a hybrid architecture, which is typical of 12th Gen Core parts, with performance cores and efficiency cores, though the data does not specify the exact split. The base clock is 2.10 GHz and the boost clock is 4.80 GHz, which is a wide frequency range for a mobile chip. The process node is 10 nm, manufactured by Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 is beneficial for multi-threaded workloads that share data. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the memory controller is dual-channel. The Passmark single-thread score is 3683, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1720.5, both indicating strong per-core performance. The multithread score of 30627 in Passmark and 16301.5 in Cinebench R23 show that scaling to 24 threads is effective. The data compression score of 365829 and floating-point math score of 79337 further demonstrate its throughput. The CPU is unlocked, as indicated by the multiplierUnlocked field, though overclocking in a laptop is typically limited by thermals. The 55 W TDP is a baseline; the processor can likely boost beyond that under load, but the data does not specify a max turbo power.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, which is a low count, but the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1150 MHz and the boost clock is 2200 MHz. Memory operates at 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective speed. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.758 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The GPU’s TDP is 25 W, which is very low, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops but limiting sustained performance. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for this GPU’s bandwidth needs. The benchmark results show an OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747. These scores place it near the AMD Radeon RX 590, a desktop GPU from 2018, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which is a professional mobile GPU with much more memory. The deltaPct values show it is within 1.5% of these rivals, indicating that the Arc A350M’s raw compute is competitive with those older or professional parts, but the 4 GB VRAM will be a significant limitation in modern games.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the GPU’s benchmark scores and its percentile position. The Arc A350M’s 70th percentile ranking and its proximity to the GTX 1630 (1.5% higher average score) suggest that it can handle esports titles at 1080p with medium to high settings, but it will struggle with AAA games at high settings. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for texture quality at higher resolutions; 1440p gaming is likely to exceed the VRAM buffer in modern titles, leading to stuttering. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS is modest, and the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for data-heavy scenes. For competitive shooters like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are not in the data, the estimated performance would be playable at 1080p with high frame rates, but the CPU’s strong single-core score of 1720.5 in Cinebench R23 suggests it will not be the limiting factor. For graphically intensive games, the expectation is low settings at 1080p to maintain playable frame rates. The lack of measured data means these are estimates, and the actual performance will vary by title and driver optimization, but the benchmark scores indicate a GPU that is entry-level for gaming.

Build Overview

This build combines a high-end mobile CPU with an entry-level mobile GPU in a laptop chassis, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is from the Core 12th Gen series, a top-tier mobile processor with 16 cores and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. The GPU is an Intel Arc A350M, which is the lowest tier in the Arc 3 Mobile lineup. The combined percentile is 79, which is above the GPU’s 70 but below the CPU’s 88. This suggests that the overall system is better than average for a laptop, but the GPU drags down the gaming potential. This is a workstation-leaning configuration: the CPU is the star, and the GPU is a secondary addition for basic graphics acceleration. The CPU’s ECC memory support and high multi-thread scores make it suitable for professional workloads, while the GPU is sufficient for video playback and light photo editing. The system is not a gaming laptop by any measure; the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are clear indicators of its entry-level status. For a user who prioritizes CPU performance in a mobile form factor and does not need high-end gaming, this pairing makes sense. For anyone expecting to play modern games at high settings, the data shows this GPU will be a disappointment.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-12850HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Alder Lake-HX architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41779, which is within 0.4% of the Intel Core 7 251TE, Intel Core i7-14700T, and Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, showing it is statistically tied with those parts.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU good for modern gaming?

A: The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM indicate it is entry-level; no measured FPS data exists, but the benchmarks suggest it is comparable to a GTX 1630, making it suitable for esports at 1080p but not demanding AAA titles.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU’s memory support indicates ECC memory is supported, though this requires motherboard support in the specific laptop.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 79, reflecting a CPU-heavy system where the GPU is the weaker component.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is listed as End-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production, while the CPU is still marked as Active.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12850HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12850HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds