SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800HX

33,875 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-12800HX + Intel Arc A770M — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 16-core Alder Lake-HX mobile processor with Intel's Arc A770M discrete GPU, the flagship Alchemist mobile part built on TSMC's 6 nm process. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined system percentile of 73. This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") aimed at mobile workstations and high-performance gaming notebooks, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded throughput and the GPU offering 16 GB of VRAM and hardware ray tracing support.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². This is a large, power-hungry mobile GPU with a 120 W TDP, and its slot width is listed as "IGP," indicating it is integrated into the motherboard rather than a replaceable MXM module.

Memory configuration is a standout feature: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), producing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial VRAM pool for a mobile GPU, well-suited for high-resolution textures, large 3D scenes, and compute workloads that exceed the 8 GB or 12 GB capacities common in rival mobile parts. The 256-bit bus width and 512 GB/s bandwidth allow the GPU to feed its 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units without severe bottlenecks.

Clock speeds are moderate for the class: a base clock of 1650 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. These clocks, combined with the massive shader count, yield 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 33.59 TFLOPS of FP16 (via 2:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 262.4 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 524.8 GTexel/s, both respectable figures that scale well with the memory bandwidth available.

For ray tracing, the A770M includes 32 dedicated RT cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray traversal and intersection. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern rendering APIs. There is no tensor core field in the data, so AI acceleration features are not quantified here; however, the FP16 performance suggests reasonable compute capability for workloads that can use it.

Benchmark results show the GPU's compute and graphics strengths. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2278, which is a modern, demanding test. Geekbench OpenCL score is 89494, and Vulkan score is 74422, indicating strong general-purpose compute and graphics API performance. PassMark G3D score is 11774, while G2D is 711. DirectX 12 PassMark score is 70, DirectX 11 is 69, and DirectX 9 is 178, showing that the GPU performs better in legacy APIs relative to its modern DX12 result — an interesting inversion that suggests driver overhead or architectural preferences. GPU compute (PassMark) is 4778, which is modest compared to the G3D score, hinting that raw compute throughput is not the primary strength. The average benchmark score is 18383, placing it at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the A770M is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct 0.1%), the AMD FirePro D500 (deltaPct -0.8%), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (deltaPct 1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct 1.2%). This means the A770M's average score is within 1.2% of the RTX 3060 Mobile, a well-known mainstream laptop GPU. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are the key advantages; the raw compute scores suggest it can handle moderate 3D rendering, but it will not outpace higher-tier mobile GPUs in pure rasterization.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark profile is strong across the board. In 3DMark tests, the Core i7-12800HX scores 7889 in 16-thread, 1943 in 2-thread, 3636 in 4-thread, 6292 in 8-thread, 9119 in max-thread, and 999 in single-thread. The scaling from 2 to 16 threads is nearly linear (1943 to 7889, roughly 4x), and max-thread improves further to 9119, indicating the 16-core/24-thread configuration is well utilized.

Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore is 3383, R15 singlecore is 260; R20 multicore is 11111, R20 singlecore is 1568; R23 multicore is 22456, R23 singlecore is 1812. The R23 multicore score of 22456 is particularly strong for a mobile processor, suggesting sustained multi-core performance under load. The single-core score of 1812 is respectable, though not class-leading, which is typical for a high-core-count mobile chip.

PassMark tests show a wide range: data compression 387535, data encryption 21972, extended instructions 23760, find prime numbers 108, floating point math 82122, integer math 109968, multithread 31585, physics 1743, random string sorting 42453, and single-thread 3711. The integer math and floating point scores are high, indicating strong compute for both general and scientific workloads. The multithread score of 31585 and single-thread 3711 place the CPU at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33875.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all very close: Intel Xeon 6353P (avgScore 33844, deltaPct 0.1%), Intel Core Ultra 5 338H (avgScore 33989, deltaPct -0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (avgScore 33736, deltaPct 0.4%), and AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX (avgScore 33668, deltaPct 0.6%). The Core i7-12800HX is within 0.6% of all these parts, meaning it sits squarely in a competitive tier with both server and desktop-class CPUs.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 18383, at the 62nd percentile. Combined with the CPU's 84th percentile, the system achieves a combined percentile of 73. This gap — 84 for CPU versus 62 for GPU — suggests the processor is the stronger component relative to its peer group. The GPU is not weak, but it is a mid-tier mobile part, while the CPU is a high-end mobile part. In practical terms, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming or rendering; the GPU will typically determine frame rates and render times.

The combined picture is a laptop that excels at CPU-bound tasks — compilation, video encoding, multi-threaded productivity — while providing adequate but not exceptional GPU performance. The 16 GB VRAM is a differentiator, but the raw GPU compute is comparable to an RTX 3060 Mobile, which is a mainstream part.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a ball-grid-array package soldered to the motherboard. This means the processor is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; the laptop's motherboard and CPU are a single unit. The production status is "Active," and the release date is 2022-05-09, with a launch MSRP of $457. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with no ECC support. Memory bandwidth is not listed in the data, but the dual-channel bus is standard for mobile platforms.

PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward-compatible and does not bottleneck the A770M's 16 GB VRAM or 512 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 120 W, giving a combined 175 W for the two primary components. There is no suggested PSU listed, and no power connector details for the GPU, so the laptop's power delivery system is not specified. Given the 120 W GPU TDP, the system requires a substantial power adapter and cooling solution, typical for a high-performance gaming or workstation laptop.

For upgrades, the practical path is limited to memory and storage. The CPU and GPU are soldered, so the only user-replaceable components are likely SODIMM memory (if the laptop uses socketed modules rather than soldered LPDDR) and M.2 NVMe drives. Given the dual-channel memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes, a sensible upgrade would be to install the maximum supported DDR5 memory capacity (though the exact capacity is not in the data) and a high-speed NVMe SSD to take advantage of the PCIe Gen 5 interface. The GPU's end-of-life production status means it will not be replaced by a newer part in this chassis; the next upgrade would be a completely new laptop.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance with adequate GPU acceleration. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22456 make it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running multi-threaded scripts, and engineers using simulation tools that scale across 16 cores and 24 threads.

Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 31585 and integer math score of 109968, which indicate fast rendering and encoding times in CPU-based workflows. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth support large 4K video timelines and GPU-accelerated effects, though the A770M's 62nd percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier GPU for heavy 3D rendering.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolution will find the GPU adequate for most titles, given its similarity to the RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct 1.2%), but those seeking high-refresh 4K gaming will be limited by the GPU's compute. Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance for productivity suites, virtual machines, and database queries, as indicated by the PassMark data compression score of 387535.

The laptop class (buildClass: "laptop") means this is a portable system, so mobile professionals — field engineers, on-site consultants, traveling developers — are the primary audience. The 55 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP indicate a power-hungry laptop that requires frequent charging, but the performance justifies the trade-off for users who need desktop-class CPU power on the move.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's 84th percentile versus the GPU's 62nd percentile creates a clear imbalance: the processor is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, rendering with software rasterizers, physics simulations, and multi-threaded office tasks — the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will not bottleneck these tasks.

In GPU-bound workloads — gaming at high resolutions, GPU-accelerated rendering, and compute-heavy graphics — the A770M will be the limiting factor. The GPU's average benchmark score of 18383 is within 1.2% of the RTX 3060 Mobile, meaning frame rates in games will be comparable to that mainstream part. The CPU can easily feed the GPU with data, but the GPU's rasterization and compute throughput will cap performance.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this: the CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 9119 indicates it can handle high frame-rate scenarios without becoming a bottleneck, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11774 is modest for a modern gaming GPU. The combined percentile of 73 is lower than the CPU's 84, confirming that the GPU drags the system down in graphics-intensive tasks.

For FPS scaling, no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty. This means all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. Given the GPU's proximity to the RTX 3060 Mobile, users can expect similar frame rates in most titles, but exact numbers cannot be stated. At 1080p, the GPU will likely deliver playable frame rates in most games, while at 4K, the 16 GB VRAM helps with texture memory but the compute throughput will limit performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 18383 and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct 1.2%), the A770M is expected to perform within a few percent of that well-known laptop GPU. For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the A770M should handle most titles at 60+ FPS, given the 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth. At 1440p, frame rates will drop, and more demanding games may require medium or high settings to maintain 60 FPS. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for textures, but the compute throughput will limit performance to 30-50 FPS in less demanding titles, and lower in AAA games.

The CPU's strong single-thread score (3DMark single-thread 999, Cinebench R23 single-core 1812) ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 2-thread score of 1943 and 4-thread score of 3636 indicate solid performance in games that use fewer cores, while the max-thread score of 9119 supports games that scale to many cores. Overall, the gaming experience will be consistent with a mid-range mobile GPU: good at 1080p, acceptable at 1440p, and limited at 4K.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS and 512 GB/s bandwidth should support 100+ FPS in esports titles, though the lack of measured data means this is an estimate. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 6292 and 16-thread score of 7889 ensure that even CPU-intensive games will not be severely bottlenecked at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and PassMark multithread score of 31585 can handle software encoding while gaming, though the GPU's lack of a dedicated tensor core field means hardware encoding capabilities are not quantified. The 16 GB VRAM helps when running a game and streaming software simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22456 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports large 4K and 8K projects. The GPU's OpenCL score of 89494 indicates decent compute acceleration for effects, but the 62nd percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier editor's GPU.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores and PassMark floating point score of 82122 handle CPU-based rendering well, and the GPU's 32 RT cores support ray-traced rendering in compatible software. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong asset for large scenes, but the GPU's overall compute (PassMark GPU compute 4778) will limit final-frame render times compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 109968 and data compression score of 387535 make compilation and data processing fast. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 84th percentile CPU ranking places it above most mobile processors for developer workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3711 and Cinebench R23 single-core 1812 provide responsive everyday performance, while the 16 cores handle multi-tasking, virtual machines, and large spreadsheets. The GPU is overkill for office tasks but supports external displays and light graphics work.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 62nd percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12800HX compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT?

A: The Core i7-12800HX has an average benchmark score of 33875, while the Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 33736, a deltaPct of 0.4% in favor of the Intel part.

Q: What is the GPU's nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc A770M's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 460, with an average score of 18373 versus 18383 for the A770M, a deltaPct of 0.1%.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A770M have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable in this laptop?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered ball-grid-array package, so it is not user-upgradeable.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Core i7-12800HX scores 22456 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1812 in single-core.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing; all gaming performance figures are estimates from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-12800HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with the codename Alder Lake-HX. It is manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2000 MHz (2.00 GHz) and the boost clock is 4.80 GHz, which is a wide frequency range indicating good single-core headroom and multi-core efficiency.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The total L3 of 25 MB is shared across all cores, which is generous for a mobile processor and helps with multi-threaded workloads that access shared data. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with no ECC. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is ahead of most mobile platforms and enables high-bandwidth storage and GPU connections.

The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provides a basic display output capability, but the discrete Arc A770M handles graphics duties in this build. The multiplier is unlocked, indicating overclocking potential, though in a laptop this is typically constrained by thermal and power limits. The part number is SRLGL, and the launch MSRP is $457.

Benchmark scores shed light on real workloads. The 3DMark max-thread score of 9119 and 16-thread score of 7889 show strong scaling from 8 to 16 threads (6292 to 7889, about 25% improvement), but the jump to max threads (9119) suggests the 24 threads provide additional throughput beyond 16 cores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22456 is excellent for a mobile CPU, rivaling desktop parts from a few years prior.

PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math at 109968 is very high, indicating strong performance in databases, encryption, and general arithmetic. Floating point math at 82122 supports scientific computing and physics simulations. Data compression at 387535 is exceptional, benefiting file archiving and data-heavy applications. The extended instructions score of 23760 suggests good SIMD performance for multimedia and vectorized code.

The single-thread performance is solid but not class-leading: PassMark single-thread 3711, Cinebench R23 single-core 1812, and 3DMark single-thread 999. This is sufficient for everyday responsiveness and games that rely on one or two cores, but it does not match the highest single-core performers. The 2-thread score of 1943 and 4-thread score of 3636 show that lighter workloads scale well, which is important for office applications and browser-based tasks.

The nearest rival comparisons show the CPU is well-positioned: it is within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX and within 0.1% of the Intel Xeon 6353P. This means the i7-12800HX offers server-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile form factor, making it suitable for heavy compute tasks that previously required desktop or workstation systems.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This build pairs a high-end mobile CPU with a mid-range mobile GPU in a laptop-class system. The Intel Core i7-12800HX is a 16-core Alder Lake-HX processor that ranks at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33875. The Intel Arc A770M is a 16 GB GDDR6 GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, ranking at the 62nd percentile with an average score of 18383. The combined system percentile is 73.

The CPU is the dominant component. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6353P (deltaPct 0.1%), Intel Core Ultra 5 338H (deltaPct -0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (deltaPct 0.4%), and AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX (deltaPct 0.6%) — all within a fraction of a percent. This places the i7-12800HX in a competitive tier with both server and desktop-class processors, delivering exceptional multi-threaded performance for a mobile chip.

The GPU is a mid-tier part, with its nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct 0.1%), AMD FirePro D500 (deltaPct -0.8%), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (deltaPct 1.1%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct 1.2%). The A770M's 16 GB VRAM is its standout feature, but its compute and rasterization performance are comparable to a mainstream RTX 3060 Mobile.

Overall, this is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity, development, and content creation, with adequate GPU performance for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The 73rd combined percentile places it in the upper-mid tier of systems, excelling in CPU-bound workloads while being limited by the GPU in graphics-intensive scenarios. The production status of the GPU is "End-of-life," meaning this is a mature platform, but the CPU remains "Active." This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize multi-threaded compute over raw gaming frame rates, and who value the portability of a laptop with desktop-class CPU capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800HX

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

FAQ

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds