SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800HX

33,875 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800HX paired with the Intel Arc A530M represents a mobile computing configuration aimed at balancing high-thread-count CPU work with dedicated graphics acceleration. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark database records, which contain no measured frame-rate data for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are therefore estimates derived from the CPU and GPU’s individual benchmark scores, relative to their nearest rivals and percentile rankings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-HX variant, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a thermal design power of 55 W. The chip integrates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 cache. Its memory controller supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, though the system also includes a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 84th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 33875. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6353P (avg score 33844, delta 0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H (avg score 33989, delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (avg score 33736, delta 0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX (avg score 33668, delta 0.6%). These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the i7-12800HX sits in a tightly contested performance band, neither leading nor trailing its closest competitors by a meaningful margin.

Looking at specific workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22456 highlights strong sustained throughput for rendering tasks, while the single-core score of 1812 shows respectable per-thread performance. The 3DMark results reveal scaling: 2 threads score 1943, 4 threads score 3636, 8 threads score 6292, 16 threads score 7889, and max threads score 9119. This progression shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, suggesting the hybrid architecture’s efficiency cores contribute meaningfully but with less scaling than the performance cores alone. Passmark integer math scores 109968 and floating-point math scores 82122, indicating robust general computation. Data compression scores 387535, while encryption scores 21972, and extended instructions score 23760. The multithread Passmark score is 31585, with a single-thread score of 3711.

For real-world workloads, the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads make it well-suited for parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 25 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy applications, and the DDR5 support allows high memory bandwidth if paired with compatible modules. The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The near-tie with the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 5 7645HX suggests that users upgrading from those desktop or mobile parts would see little raw CPU performance change, but the i7-12800HX benefits from a newer platform with PCIe Gen 5 support.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i7-12800HX with the Intel Arc A530M. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of both components, not direct measurements. Users should treat these as rough expectations rather than verified results.

The GPU’s benchmark scores, Geekbench OpenCL at 49735 and Vulkan at 43492, place it in the 85th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 46614. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (avg score 46601, delta 0%), the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (avg score 46702, delta -0.2%), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (avg score 46043, delta 1.2%), and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (avg score 45972, delta 1.4%). The GPU is essentially tied with the RX 5600M and RX 6550M, while slightly ahead of the RTX A2000 and RTX 5880 Ada Generation. This places the Arc A530M in the mid-range mobile GPU tier.

Given the CPU’s 84th percentile and the GPU’s 85th percentile, the pairing is well-balanced for 1080p gaming at high settings, with the CPU capable of feeding the GPU without creating a significant bottleneck. For esports titles that rely heavily on single-thread performance, the i7-12800HX’s single-core score of 1812 in Cinebench R23 and 999 in 3DMark single-thread suggests adequate headroom for high refresh rates, though exact FPS depends on the game engine. For AAA titles at ultra settings, the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle 1080p textures, but 1440p ultra may strain the memory bus width of 128 bit. The estimated FPS at 1080p ultra would likely range from 60 to 90 frames per second in modern titles, based on the GPU’s parity with the RX 5600M, which historically delivers such performance. At 1440p, expect 40 to 60 FPS, with lower settings required for smoother play.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 85, indicating that the configuration outperforms 85% of all laptop builds in the benchmark database. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33875, and the GPU’s average score is 46614. These figures are not directly comparable due to different test suites, but they both sit in the upper quartile of their respective categories.

The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11111 and R15 multi-core score of 3383 confirm strong rendering capability, while the Passmark physics score of 1743 suggests moderate physics simulation performance. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7889 relative to max threads of 9119 shows that 16 threads capture 86.5% of the maximum score, meaning the additional 8 threads (from 16 to 24) contribute roughly 13.5% more performance. This is typical for hybrid architectures where efficiency cores handle background tasks.

The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 43492 is lower than its OpenCL score of 49735, indicating that Vulkan-based applications may see slightly reduced performance compared to OpenCL workloads. The GPU’s 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) place it in the entry-to-mid range for mobile graphics. The texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s are modest, limiting fill-rate-heavy effects at high resolutions. The 12 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but the low FP32 throughput suggests ray tracing will be limited to lower resolutions or settings.

Overall, the benchmark picture shows a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outperforms the other. The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 85th percentile are nearly identical, meaning the system is unlikely to have a severe bottleneck in either direction. The combined 85th percentile reflects a coherent mid-high-end laptop configuration.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets laptop users who need substantial multi-core CPU performance for professional workloads without sacrificing dedicated graphics capability. The 16-core, 24-thread CPU with a 55 W TDP is suited for content creators who render videos, compile code, or run virtual machines, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22456 and Passmark multithread score of 31585. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 85th percentile ranking make it viable for entry-level 3D modeling and CAD work, though not for high-end simulation.

Gamers at 1080p resolution who prioritize medium-to-high settings over maximum fidelity will find this pairing adequate, based on the GPU’s parity with the Radeon RX 5600M. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures smooth frame pacing in most titles. Students in engineering or computer science programs can benefit from the CPU’s threading for compilation and simulation tasks, while the GPU handles basic graphics assignments. Small business workstations requiring multi-monitor output and moderate GPU acceleration for office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, or light video conferencing would find the UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback and the Arc A530M for accelerated tasks.

The mobile form factor (buildClass: laptop) means this is not a desktop replacement for extreme workloads, but rather a portable workstation for users who travel. The 55 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP indicate a cooling solution designed for sustained loads, though the exact thermal design is not specified.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and the GPU’s Vulkan score of 43492 suggest the system can drive 120 Hz panels in esports titles, though 144 Hz may require lowering settings. The GPU’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth limits high-texture scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads handle encoding via x264 or similar software, with Passmark integer math at 109968 indicating strong compression throughput. The GPU’s 12 RT cores can offload some encoding tasks, but the lack of tensor cores (null) means no dedicated AI acceleration for stream enhancement.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22456 supports 4K timeline scrubbing and export, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM accelerates effects and color grading. The 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 performance helps with half-precision processing in some editors.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 16 cores deliver strong CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R20 multi-core at 11111. GPU rendering via OpenCL (score 49735) is viable for simple scenes, but the 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 limits complex renders.

Software development: The 16 cores and 24 threads accelerate parallel builds, with Passmark data compression at 387535 helping with large codebases. The 25 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3711 in Passmark ensures snappy word processing and spreadsheet interactions. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled, and the 65 W GPU TDP keeps power draw reasonable for battery operation.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A530M’s average benchmark score of 46614 is 0% different from the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46601), -0.2% from the RX 6550M (46702), and 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-12800HX supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with no ECC support.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The i7-12800HX ranks in the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33875.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: The Arc A530M includes 12 ray tracing cores, but its low FP32 throughput (3.994 TFLOPS) suggests RT performance will be modest.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 85th percentile indicate a well-matched pairing, with neither component dramatically outperforming the other. In multi-threaded workloads like rendering, the CPU’s 24 threads can fully utilize the GPU’s OpenCL capabilities, but the GPU’s 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 may limit compute-heavy tasks. Conversely, in single-threaded games, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 999 could become the limiting factor if the GPU is underutilized.

The 3DMark scaling from 2 threads (1943) to max threads (9119) shows the CPU scales well with thread count, meaning CPU-bound scenarios are unlikely at 1080p. However, at 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become bottlenecks, as texture streaming and memory bandwidth requirements increase. The GPU’s pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s are moderate, so high-resolution, high-detail games will strain the GPU first.

For mixed workloads like gaming while streaming, the CPU’s 24 threads can handle both encoding and game logic without significant contention, as the Passmark multithread score of 31585 suggests ample headroom. The CPU’s 55 W TDP and GPU’s 65 W TDP together indicate a total system draw that is manageable for laptop power delivery, but the lack of a suggested PSU figure means power headroom is unspecified.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded independently. The GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) soldered to the board, so the discrete GPU is also non-upgradable. The system’s memory supports DDR4 and DDR5, allowing upgrades to higher-capacity or faster modules, but the dual-channel configuration means adding more sticks will not increase bandwidth beyond dual-channel operation.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the GPU is not bandwidth-limited. The 10 nm process for the CPU and 6 nm process for the GPU are fixed. The production status for both components is Active, indicating availability. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing RAM to maximum supported capacity, as the CPU’s 25 MB L3 cache and memory bandwidth benefit from more system memory. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes are possible, allowing fast NVMe SSDs. The 55 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP suggest the cooling solution is designed for these loads, so repasting or improved cooling could allow slightly higher sustained clocks, but the boost clock of 4.80 GHz is already fixed.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration combining the Intel Core i7-12800HX (16 cores, 24 threads, Alder Lake-HX architecture) with the Intel Arc A530M (8 GB GDDR6, Xe-HPG architecture). The combined percentile is 85, meaning it outperforms 85% of all builds in the database. The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 85th percentile place this in the upper-mid range of mobile systems. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6353P, is within 0.1% performance, while the GPU’s closest competitor, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, is exactly tied at 0% delta. This pairing is designed for users who need balanced CPU and GPU performance in a portable form factor, with strengths in multi-threaded productivity and 1080p gaming.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-256 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The GPU has 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. It runs at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.994 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 7.987 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are 49735 in Geekbench OpenCL and 43492 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 46614 and an 85th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46601, 0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46702, -0.2% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043, 1.2% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972, 1.4% delta). The GPU is effectively tied with the RX 5600M and RX 6550M, while slightly ahead of the RTX A2000 and RTX 5880 Ada Generation. This places it in the mid-range mobile GPU tier, suitable for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings and light creative work.

For rendering, the GPU’s 12 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, but the 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 limits ray tracing to lower resolutions or reduced ray counts. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures and moderate 1440p, but the 128-bit memory bus may cause performance drops in memory-intensive scenes. The OpenCL score of 49735 indicates strong compute capability for GPU-accelerated applications, while the Vulkan score of 43492 suggests slightly lower performance in Vulkan-based games. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and APIs. The 65 W TDP is modest for a laptop GPU, allowing for thinner designs, but the IGP slot width means it is soldered and non-upgradeable.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800HX

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds