SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800HX

33,875 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M is a laptop configuration that presents a distinct performance profile. The CPU is a high-core-count mobile processor, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete part. Benchmark data indicates a significant imbalance, with the processor's capabilities far outstripping the graphics solution. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark scores and specifications, as no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear and substantial bottleneck in this system, with the GPU being the limiting factor for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 33875 places it in the 84th percentile of all processors, while the GPU's average score of 29175 places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. While both are above average, the nature of their workloads and the delta between their capabilities in specific tasks tell the more important story.

The CPU demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded strength. Its 3dmark_max_threads score of 9119 is more than four times its 3dmark_2_threads score of 1943, showing excellent scaling across its 16 cores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22456 is over 12 times the single-core score of 1812, further confirming that the processor's performance is heavily weighted toward parallel workloads. This indicates that in tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will have ample headroom.

Conversely, the GPU's specifications and benchmark scores position it as a modest performer. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 are respectable for an entry-level mobile GPU, but its physical resources are limited. With only 4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus, it is not designed for high-resolution or high-detail gaming. The data suggests that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary constraint, preventing the CPU from reaching its full potential. The CPU's high frame generation capability will be wasted if the GPU cannot render frames fast enough.

The 3dmark_16_threads score of 7889 indicates that the CPU's gaming-related performance is robust, but this is an estimate of its potential. The actual gaming experience will be dictated by the Arc A370M's ability to process the graphical output. This pairing is akin to a powerful engine connected to a modest transmission; the engine can produce power, but the transmission limits how much of it reaches the wheels. For general productivity, the CPU will dominate the experience, but for gaming, the GPU sets the ceiling.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a suitable platform for high-refresh gaming. The Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are primary limiting factors. Benchmark results indicate the GPU is a capable entry-level part, but it lacks the resources for the high frame rates required at 1080p or above with high settings. The CPU's 3dmark_8_threads score of 6292 shows it can handle game logic, but the GPU will not be able to keep pace.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for the encoding side of streaming. Its Passmark multithread score of 31585 and data compression score of 387535 provide ample power for software encoding (x264) without significantly impacting game performance, which is already GPU-limited. However, the overall streaming experience will be constrained by the GPU's ability to render the game at acceptable quality and frame rates.

Video Editing: This system offers a mixed bag for video editing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22456 will make short work of exporting and encoding timelines. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit its effectiveness for real-time previews of high-resolution or heavily color-graded footage. Simple edits and exports will be fast, but complex projects may struggle on the GPU side.

3D Rendering: This is a strong workload for the CPU. Its Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11111 and R15 multicore score of 3383 indicate excellent performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not negligible, but its limited VRAM will restrict the complexity of scenes that can be rendered on it. For GPU rendering, the 4 GB frame buffer is a significant hurdle.

Software Development: The CPU is a powerhouse for compilation and multi-threaded development tasks. Its Passmark integer math score of 109968 and find prime numbers score of 108 are strong indicators of raw processing power. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a solid, if somewhat unbalanced, platform for coding, running virtual machines, and building large projects.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively over-provisioned for office tasks. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3711 ensures snappy application responsiveness, and its 24 threads will handle any multitasking with ease. The discrete GPU is unnecessary for document editing, web browsing, or spreadsheet work, but it does not detract from the experience. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 would likely be sufficient for these tasks, making the A370M a superfluous addition.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK confirms that no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows are present, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and the known specifications of the components.

Based on the GPU's Geekbench scores and its specifications, the Intel Arc A370M is best considered a 1080p entry-level gaming solution. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint, limiting texture quality and resolution. The 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause performance dips in memory-intensive scenes. The GPU's 8 RT cores are present, but ray tracing performance will be limited by the overall low compute power.

The CPU will not be a limiting factor in most games. Its 3dmark_single_thread score of 999 and 3dmark_2_threads score of 1943 are strong, ensuring that game logic and physics calculations are handled efficiently. In lighter eSports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive or League of Legends, the system could potentially hit high frame rates at low to medium settings. For more demanding AAA titles, the expectation should be 30-60 FPS at 1080p with low to medium settings. The GPU's performance is the limiting factor, and the CPU's power will remain largely untapped in this scenario.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a specific, narrow user group: those who require maximum CPU performance for productivity but have minimal graphics demands. The target user is a professional or student who works heavily with multi-threaded applications such as software compilation, data analysis, or CPU-based 3D rendering, and plays only light or older games on the side.

For content creators, the CPU is a boon. Video editors who rely on CPU-based encoding will see excellent performance in the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22456. Software developers who build large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads. The GPU is sufficient for driving a desktop environment and accelerating some basic tasks, but it is not a gaming GPU.

This is not a system for gamers. Even at 1080p, the Arc A370M will struggle with modern titles, and the high CPU performance will not translate into high frame rates. A user looking for a gaming laptop would be better served by a configuration with a weaker CPU and a stronger GPU. The target builder is someone who prioritizes compute performance and sees graphics as a secondary, non-critical feature.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800HX is the dominant component in this build. It is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 25 MB L3 cache. This configuration is designed for heavy parallel workloads.

Benchmark scores confirm this focus. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22456 is exceptionally high for a mobile processor, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The Passmark multithread score of 31585 and integer math score of 109968 reinforce this. The single-core performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1812 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3711, ensuring good responsiveness in everyday tasks.

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon 6353P and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, with delta percentages of 0.1% and 0.4% respectively. This indicates that the i7-12800HX is competitive with desktop processors from a previous generation. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, which is high for a laptop part, indicating that it is designed for larger, higher-powered laptops that can dissipate the heat. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present but is far less capable than the discrete Arc A370M.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is the limiting component. It is based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) and is built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It features 8 RT cores for ray tracing and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with a TDP of 35 W.

The memory subsystem is a major limitation. The GPU is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a narrow and small memory configuration that will bottleneck performance in modern games. The GPU's FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, which is in line with other entry-level mobile GPUs. The transistor count is 7,200 million on a 157 mm² die.

Benchmark data shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673. These scores place the GPU in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, which is surprisingly high, but this is reflective of a broad database that includes many older and weaker integrated graphics. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and the AMD Radeon RX 470, with delta percentages of -0.1% and 0.6% respectively. The GPU is listed as end-of-life, which is a consideration for long-term support. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface is adequate for this class of GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark scores is one of a high-performance CPU paired with a mid-to-low-range GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 33875, placing it in the 84th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 79.

The CPU's performance is defined by its multi-core might. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11111 is a strong indicator of rendering and encoding capability. The Passmark data encryption score of 21972 and extended instructions score of 23760 show proficiency in specialized tasks. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 9119 versus the 3dmark_single_thread score of 999 shows a 9x scaling factor, demonstrating excellent core utilization.

The GPU's performance is respectable for its class but is not in the same league as the CPU. The Geekbench scores are its primary benchmarks. While the GPU's 74th percentile ranking is decent, it is important to note that the CPU is in the 84th percentile. This 10-point difference in percentile ranking underscores the imbalance. The data suggests that in any workload that uses both components, the GPU will finish its tasks well before the CPU, or the CPU will be waiting for the GPU to catch up.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12800HX a fast processor?

A: Yes. It has an average benchmark score of 33875, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 22456, which is a very strong result for a mobile processor.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A370M have?

A: The GPU is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is a limiting factor for modern games at high resolutions and texture settings.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The memory bandwidth is 112.0 GB/s, which is a consequence of its 64-bit memory bus. This is a relatively low figure and can be a bottleneck in memory-intensive tasks.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket designed for laptops.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-12800HX is $457.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M still in production?

A: No, the production status of the Intel Arc A370M is listed as "End-of-life".

Build Overview

This build is a laptop configuration featuring the Intel Core i7-12800HX processor and the Intel Arc A370M graphics card. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor from the Core 12th Gen series, built on the Alder Lake architecture. The GPU is an entry-level mobile discrete part from Intel's Arc Alchemist generation.

The combined percentile for this build is 79, which places it in the upper quartile of all systems. However, this figure is heavily influenced by the CPU. The CPU is in the 84th percentile, while the GPU is in the 74th percentile. This creates an unbalanced system where the processor's capabilities are not matched by the graphics solution. The build is a high-performance productivity machine with modest gaming capabilities. It is best suited for users who need significant CPU power for tasks like software development, video encoding, or 3D rendering, and who have minimal needs for discrete GPU performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket. This means the CPU is not upgradable. The user is locked into the i7-12800HX for the life of the laptop. The GPU is also a mobile part and is not upgradable. This is a closed platform with no user-serviceable upgrades for the core components.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Upgrading the system memory is a potential avenue for improvement. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, but the GPU is connected via PCIe 4.0 x8. The GPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W. There is no suggested PSU provided, but the combined TDP is relatively low for a laptop, suggesting that the power delivery system is adequate for the stock configuration.

Since the CPU and GPU are soldered, the only sensible upgrade path is to a new laptop. The data indicates that the weakest link is the GPU. A future upgrade to a system with a more powerful GPU would be the most logical step for a user who wants to improve gaming performance, as the CPU is already a high-performance part. The memory is the only component that could be upgraded, potentially increasing system performance in memory-sensitive applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds