SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HE + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800HE

6,467 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800HE and Intel Arc A770M form a laptop platform that sits squarely in the upper-midrange of the performance spectrum. The CPU, a 14-core Alder Lake-H part with 20 threads, is a hybrid design that balances heavy multi-threaded work with responsive single-core tasks. The GPU, Intel’s Arc A770M, is the flagship mobile Alchemist part, built on a 6 nm TSMC process with a substantial 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. Together, they place this build at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs and GPUs, which signals a capable machine that outperforms the majority of existing hardware but does not sit at the absolute top tier. The data indicates a system designed for high-refresh 1080p gaming, content creation, and professional workloads that benefit from a high core count and generous video memory, though it is not without its compromises in raw rasterization power.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800HE is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake-H architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 217 mm². Its hybrid layout combines performance and efficiency cores, a design that allows the chip to scale from light background tasks to demanding rendering jobs. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 4.60 GHz, providing a wide dynamic range for workload bursts. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration is well-suited for applications that can utilize many threads, such as video encoding and 3D scene compilation.

Benchmark results from Cinebench illustrate the CPU’s capability. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 22,360 points in multi-core and 3,156 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is the standout, reflecting the benefit of 14 physical cores. For context, the average benchmark score for this CPU is 6,467, which places it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-2796TE with an average score of 6,510 (a 0.7% delta), the Intel Xeon W-2191B at 6,531 (a 1% delta), and the Intel Core i9-7960X at 6,533 (a 1% delta). The data shows that the i7-12800HE is essentially neck-and-neck with these older high-core-count server and desktop parts, trailing them by roughly one percent. On the other side, it leads the AMD EPYC 7551, which scores 6,391, by a 1.2% margin. This positioning suggests that the i7-12800HE offers performance comparable to a multi-threaded workstation CPU from a few generations back, but in a mobile form factor with a 45 W TDP.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 scores of 9,391 multi-core and 1,325 single-core indicate that the CPU can handle sustained all-core loads without significant throttling issues, given adequate cooling. The single-core score of 3,156 in R23 is strong enough for responsive daily use and gaming, where per-thread performance often matters more than raw core counts. The L3 cache of 24 MB shared across the cores helps with data reuse in complex simulations and large dataset manipulations. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which offers flexibility in system design, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The integrated Iris Xe graphics with 96 execution units provides a fallback display output, but the presence of the discrete Arc A770M makes it largely irrelevant for demanding tasks. Overall, the CPU is a strong performer for its class, punching above its mobile segment weight in multi-threaded tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 score of 3,156, is adequate to feed a high-refresh-rate display in most titles. The GPU’s performance, however, will be the limiting factor. The Arc A770M’s Passmark G3D score of 11,774 places it at the 62nd percentile, which is competitive with mid-range desktop cards, suggesting it can drive 1080p at high refresh rates in esports titles, but demanding AAA games may struggle to hit very high frame rates at maximum settings.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU is well-equipped for concurrent gaming and encoding. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,360, there is ample headroom for software x264 encoding while the GPU handles rendering. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory also provides a buffer for high-bitrate streams and multiple application overlays without running out of video memory.

Video Editing: The combination of a high core count and a GPU with 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth makes this platform suitable for timeline editing and effects work. The CPU’s multi-core strength will accelerate export and rendering tasks, while the GPU’s 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can handle GPU-accelerated effects in modern editing software. The 62nd percentile GPU ranking indicates it will be faster than a majority of mobile GPUs, though not a top-tier professional card.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the i7-12800HE is a workhorse. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,360 is a strong indicator of performance in applications like Blender’s Cycles engine or V-Ray. The GPU also contributes via its 32 ray tracing cores, which are part of the Xe-HPG architecture, and its Vulkan score of 74,422 in Geekbench suggests solid compute capability for GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software Development: The 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache are beneficial for compiling large codebases, where parallelism is key. The CPU’s single-core performance ensures fast iteration for linting and IDE responsiveness. The support for DDR5 memory (though not measured) allows for fast memory access, which is a plus for large in-memory databases or build caches.

Student and Office Work: This platform is overpowered for basic productivity. The CPU’s single-core score of 3,156 in R23 makes spreadsheet and document work instantaneous, while the GPU’s presence is wasted on such tasks. The 45 W CPU TDP, however, means this is not a low-power ultrabook; it is a performance laptop that will require a robust cooling solution and a charger. For students in engineering or data science, the multi-core performance will be a boon for simulations and data processing, but for general use, it is more than sufficient.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results show a consistent pattern of strong multi-core performance and respectable single-core performance. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 2,253 multi-core and 318 single-core. In R20, the scores are 9,391 and 1,325, respectively. The R23 scores of 22,360 and 3,156 confirm the trend. The average benchmark score of 6,467 places the CPU at the 62nd percentile, with nearest rivals showing a spread of just over two percentage points, from -1% to +1.2%. This indicates that the i7-12800HE is a well-balanced performer, trading blows with older Xeon and Core i9 parts.

The GPU’s benchmark results are more varied. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 2,278. In Geekbench, it scores 89,494 in OpenCL and 74,422 in Vulkan. The Passmark suite shows scores of 11,774 in G3D, 711 in G2D, and 4,778 in GPU compute. The DirectX tests in Passmark are low, with scores of 56 for DX10, 69 for DX11, and 70 for DX12, which are likely indicative of driver overhead or specific test limitations rather than raw hardware capability. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 18,383, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 460 with a score of 18,373 (a 0.1% delta), the AMD FirePro D500 at 18,533 (a -0.8% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at 18,189 (a 1.1% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile at 18,159 (a 1.2% delta). This is a critical finding: the Arc A770M is statistically equivalent to an RTX 3060 Mobile, a popular mid-range laptop GPU, with the data showing a 1.2% performance advantage for the Intel part.

The combined picture is a platform that is consistently at the 62nd percentile for both CPU and GPU. This symmetry means that neither component is dramatically overpowered or underpowered relative to the other, which is a sign of a balanced system. The CPU’s multi-core strength will not be bottlenecked by the GPU in compute-heavy tasks, and the GPU’s memory bandwidth will not be starved by the CPU’s memory controller. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means these benchmark scores are the primary quantitative evidence for performance expectations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-matched pairing, but the bottleneck characteristics vary by workload. In gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor. The CPU’s single-core score of 3,156 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 11,774, while respectable, is not top-tier. The GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 3060 Mobile, is a known quantity for 1080p gaming, and the Arc A770M’s 1.2% advantage over it suggests similar performance. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or heavy strategy games, the CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking will be the constraint, but its multi-core muscle means it will handle most titles without issue.

In compute and rendering workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s R23 multi-core score of 22,360 is a dominant figure, meaning it will rarely be the bottleneck in GPU-accelerated tasks. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS and its 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide a solid foundation for compute, but its 62nd percentile ranking suggests it is not a specialist compute card. The bottleneck in 3D rendering will likely be the GPU for ray tracing tasks, given its 32 RT cores, while the CPU handles the scene preparation and BVH building. The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to lack of measured data, but the percentile positions imply that in a balanced workload, the CPU will wait on the GPU in graphics-heavy scenes, and the GPU will wait on the CPU in logic-heavy scenes. The 45 W CPU TDP versus the 120 W GPU TDP also indicates that the GPU consumes more power and will generate more heat, potentially leading to thermal throttling in a thin laptop chassis, which could make the GPU the practical bottleneck in sustained gaming sessions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable. The memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration offers some flexibility, but the bus interface for the GPU is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is standard. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs. The GPU is listed as End-of-life in production status, which is a consideration for future driver support, though the architecture is current enough to receive updates for a while.

The TDP figures are 45 W for the CPU and 120 W for the GPU. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the combined thermal envelope of 165 W means a laptop power adapter in the 200 W range would be necessary, though this is not stated. The upgrade path is limited by the mobile form factor. The CPU cannot be changed, but the GPU is also typically soldered in laptops, so neither component is user-upgradeable. The sensible next upgrade for this platform would be external storage via the PCIe lanes, such as adding a Gen 4 NVMe drive, or increasing system memory to the maximum supported by the dual-channel controller. For a user looking to improve performance, the data suggests that the GPU is the weaker link relative to the CPU, but replacing it is not feasible. The platform’s longevity will depend on driver optimization for the Arc GPU, which is a known area of development for Intel.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at users who need a mobile workstation with strong multi-threaded CPU performance and a competent GPU for moderate gaming and compute. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this adequate, given the GPU’s similarity to the RTX 3060 Mobile, but those seeking 1440p ultra settings or high refresh rates in AAA titles will be disappointed. Content creators, specifically video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the 14-core CPU and the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM, which is ample for large textures and complex scenes. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the 20 threads, and the single-core speed ensures a snappy IDE. Students in engineering or data science fields will find the multi-core performance useful for simulations, while general office work is trivial for this hardware. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database servers will also be well-served by the core count, though the mobile form factor may not be ideal for always-on server use. The build is not suited for enthusiasts seeking top-tier frame rates or professionals requiring certified GPU drivers for specialized software, as the Arc GPU is not listed with any professional driver support.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12800HE compare to its nearest rivals in multi-core performance?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 6,467, which is 0.7% lower than the Intel Xeon D-2796TE, 1% lower than the Intel Xeon W-2191B and Core i9-7960X, and 1.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 7551.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to a common mobile GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has an average benchmark score of 18,383, which is 1.2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, making it statistically a direct competitor to that popular mobile GPU.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: Both the CPU and GPU are at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs and GPUs, respectively, and the combined percentile for the build is also 62.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all FPS discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though the memory bandwidth is not specified.

Q: What is the socket type, and can the CPU be upgraded?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the Intel Core i7-12800HE with the Intel Arc A770M. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor from the Core 12th Gen series, based on Alder Lake architecture, with a 45 W TDP. The GPU is Intel’s Arc A770M, a mobile discrete graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 120 W TDP. The overall tier of this build is upper-midrange, as indicated by the 62nd percentile ranking for both components and the combined system. This places it ahead of the majority of existing hardware but behind the top 38% of systems. The pairing is balanced, with the CPU’s multi-threaded strength complementing the GPU’s solid mid-range compute and graphics capabilities. It is not a flagship gaming or rendering machine, but it is a versatile platform for a wide range of demanding tasks.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 18,383 places it at the 62nd percentile, and its 1.2% advantage over the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile suggests that gaming performance will be similar to that well-known mobile GPU. At 1080p resolution with high settings, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, with esports games likely exceeding 100 FPS due to the CPU’s strong single-core score of 3,156 in Cinebench R23. For more demanding AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 11,774 indicates that frame rates will be in the 60-80 FPS range for many titles, though the lack of measured data means this is speculative. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will help, but the raw compute of 16.79 TFLOPS will likely limit performance to medium or high settings for 60 FPS targets. The CPU is not expected to be a bottleneck at these resolutions, given its high multi-core and single-core scores. The GPU’s DirectX 12 support (12 Ultimate) and Vulkan 1.4 API support are modern, but the low Passmark DirectX scores (56-70) hint at potential driver overhead that could reduce performance in some API-specific tests. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is solid for 1080p high-refresh gaming, adequate for 1440p with adjusted settings, and not recommended for 4K ultra gaming.