SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HE + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800HE

6,467 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800HE paired with the Intel Arc A370M represents a specific laptop configuration that balances a high-core-count mobile CPU with a modest entry-level discrete GPU. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, which includes no measured frame rates for this exact combination. All FPS-related discussion is therefore estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores, not from direct gaming tests.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile package. This means the CPU is not user-replaceable, and upgrades are limited to what the laptop chassis allows, such as memory and storage. The Core i7-12800HE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving system integrators flexibility in memory choice, though the user cannot swap between these types after purchase. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, which is sufficient for the Arc A370M’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and one or two NVMe SSDs.

The CPU’s thermal design power is 45 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 35 W. Combined, the two primary compute components draw roughly 80 W under sustained load, before accounting for memory, storage, and display. This is a modest total for a laptop, meaning the system can likely be cooled by a capable air cooler and powered by a standard mobile power adapter. The FACT PACK provides no suggested PSU wattage for the GPU, but the combined 80 W figure suggests that this pairing is well within the range of typical thin-and-light gaming laptops or mobile workstations.

A sensible next upgrade would not involve the CPU or GPU, as both are soldered and end-of-life for the GPU. Instead, the user should focus on expanding memory to the maximum supported capacity and installing the fastest NVMe SSD the PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow. Since the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, a system with DDR5 will have higher memory bandwidth, which can help the integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics and the Arc A370M in memory-sensitive workloads, though the discrete GPU has its own 4 GB GDDR6. For users needing more graphics performance, the only real path is a different laptop with a higher-tier GPU, as the BGA 1744 socket offers no discrete graphics upgrade path.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks place the Core i7-12800HE in a competitive position for mobile processors. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the chip scores 22360 points, which is a strong result for a 45 W part. Single-core performance in the same test is 3156 points, showing solid per-thread capability. The Cinebench R20 scores follow the same pattern: 9391 multi-core and 1325 single-core. In the older R15 test, the CPU scores 2253 multi-core and 318 single-core.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6467, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all server or high-end desktop parts: the Intel Xeon D-2796TE scores 6510 (0.7% higher), the Intel Xeon W-2191B scores 6531 (1% higher), and the Intel Core i9-7960X scores 6533 (1% higher). The AMD EPYC 7551 scores 6391, which is 1.2% lower. This indicates that the i7-12800HE delivers performance comparable to much larger, higher-power workstation CPUs, making it an excellent choice for multi-threaded mobile workloads.

The GPU benchmarks show a different story. The Intel Arc A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 29175. This places it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, which is surprisingly high for a 35 W mobile part. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% higher), the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% lower). The proximity to the RX 6800M, a high-end mobile GPU, is notable, though the average scores mask substantial differences in specific workloads.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a high-tier mobile processor (62nd percentile) and the GPU is a slightly higher-ranked part (74th percentile). The combined percentile for the pairing is 68, indicating that this configuration sits above the median laptop in overall compute capability, driven largely by the strong CPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for mobile. It uses the DG2-128 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a narrow memory interface, which will limit performance in high-resolution textures or large datasets, but it is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings.

Clock speeds are a base of 1550 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, which is a modest count for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 indicate that the GPU performs best in compute-heavy tasks, such as OpenCL rendering or Vulkan-based workloads. For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint; scenes that exceed this capacity will spill to system memory, causing significant slowdowns. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but will bottleneck at higher resolutions or with heavy post-processing. The presence of 8 ray tracing cores allows for basic RT effects, but the low FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS means that full ray-traced rendering will be slow. For rasterized rendering, the Arc A370M is competitive with mid-range desktop GPUs from several generations ago, as evidenced by its similarity to the Radeon RX 470.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 62nd percentile rank and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22360 indicate that it can handle extremely demanding multi-threaded workloads, from video encoding to 3D scene compilation. The GPU’s 74th percentile rank is respectable for a mobile part, but its absolute compute capabilities are far below what the CPU can feed in gaming scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation or spreadsheet number-crunching, the GPU is largely irrelevant, and the system will perform at the CPU’s level, which is near the top of the mobile range. In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at 1080p with high settings, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to rasterize frames, and the system’s FPS will be dictated by the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The estimated FPS scaling follows this bottleneck pattern. In esports titles with low graphical demands, the GPU can push high frame rates, but the CPU’s strong single-core score of 3156 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even the fastest GPU-bound frames are not held back by processor stalls. In modern AAA games with heavy post-processing, the GPU’s memory bandwidth will become the primary constraint, and the CPU’s advantage will be wasted. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this compromise: the system is better than average for productivity, but gaming performance is limited by the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i7-12800HE scores 22360 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with an average benchmark score of 6467. This is 0.7% lower than the Intel Xeon D-2796TE, 1% lower than the Intel Xeon W-2191B, and 1% lower than the Intel Core i9-7960X, but 1.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 7551.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A370M have, and what bandwidth does it offer?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming but will limit performance with high-resolution textures.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard. Overclocking is not possible.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A370M includes 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, with only 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray-traced workloads will be slow.

Q: Is the memory dual-channel?

A: Yes, the CPU supports dual-channel memory, with both DDR4 and DDR5 options. The memory bus is dual-channel, which benefits both the integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics and the discrete GPU.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022. The CPU is still active in production.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800M?

A: The Arc A370M’s average benchmark score is 29175, which is 1% higher than the RX 6800M’s 28874. However, this is a synthetic average, and real-world gaming performance will differ significantly due to memory bandwidth and driver optimizations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M’s 74th percentile rank and 4.198 TFLOPS are sufficient for 1080p esports titles at high refresh rates, but the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will cap quality settings. Users can expect smooth gameplay in games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, where the CPU’s 3156 single-core score ensures minimal frame drops.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22360, can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously. The GPU’s idle resources during CPU-bound encoding mean that streaming overhead will not impact gaming performance, though the GPU’s limited VRAM may require lower game settings to free memory for the encoder.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this role, with an R20 multi-core score of 9391 and an R23 score of 22360. Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering will be smooth. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 29676 can accelerate effects and color grading in supported software, but the 4 GB VRAM limits the size of 4K projects that can be worked on in real time.

3D rendering: This is a mixed workload. The CPU will handle geometry and scene graph processing at a level comparable to workstation CPUs like the Xeon W-2191B. The GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance can accelerate some render engines, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause out-of-core rendering spills on complex scenes. For simple scenes, the GPU is usable; for production work, it is a bottleneck.

Software development: The CPU’s 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache make it an excellent choice for compiling large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload, but the PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast NVMe drives that reduce build times. The 62nd percentile CPU rank places it above many desktop parts.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for document editing and web browsing. The CPU’s single-core score of 3156 in R23 ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the GPU’s idle power draw is negligible. The Iris Xe 96EU integrated graphics can handle video playback and light photo editing when the discrete GPU is disabled to save battery.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets mobile professionals who need substantial CPU power but only require entry-level discrete graphics. The CPU’s 62nd percentile rank and multi-core scores that rival workstation Xeons make it ideal for engineers running simulations, data analysts processing large datasets, and content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes that are not GPU-heavy. The GPU’s 74th percentile rank, despite its modest specs, means that users can expect decent performance in OpenCL-based compute tasks.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations will find the Arc A370M sufficient for medium settings in most titles, especially those that are CPU-bound. The combined 68th percentile indicates that this system sits above the median laptop, but it is not a high-end gaming rig. Students in STEM fields will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance for MATLAB, Python, or CAD workloads, while the GPU handles visualization tasks. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or compile code will see excellent responsiveness from the 14-core CPU.

The GPU is end-of-life, so this is not a future-proof platform for gaming. However, for users whose primary workload is CPU-bound, this pairing offers a rare combination of mobile efficiency and desktop-class compute performance. The 45 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP make it suitable for laptops that prioritize portability over raw graphics power.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing of an Intel Core i7-12800HE with an Intel Arc A370M creates a system that is CPU-dominant, with the processor outperforming the GPU in relative terms. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and the GPU’s 74th percentile combine to a 68th percentile overall, placing this configuration in the upper-mid range of all laptop systems.

The Alder Lake-H architecture CPU brings 14 cores and 20 threads, which is unusual for a 45 W mobile part, and the Arc A370M provides a baseline of discrete graphics that is superior to integrated solutions. This is not a balanced gaming laptop, nor is it a dedicated workstation. It is a hybrid that prioritizes compute throughput, making it suitable for professionals who need heavy CPU performance on the go without the weight and power draw of a full gaming GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800HE is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-H mobile variant. It operates at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts up to 4.60 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The chip is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 217 mm². Cache is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22360 is within 1% of the Intel Xeon W-2191B and Core i9-7960X, both of which are desktop parts with much higher power envelopes. The single-core score of 3156 in R23 is also strong, indicating that the Alder Lake architecture delivers good per-thread performance despite the mobile power constraints.

In real workloads, this CPU can handle 20 concurrent threads, which is sufficient for video encoding, 3D scene compilation, and large-scale data processing. The 24 MB L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing memory latency. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory means that system builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the dual-channel memory bus will limit the absolute bandwidth available to the cores. The integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics provide a fallback display output and can handle basic tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, which is useful for extending battery life in this laptop configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HE + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800HE

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds