SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HE + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800HE

6,467 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800HE and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop pairing that targets a specific niche: high-efficiency mobile computing with a strong CPU foundation and a modest, modern GPU. The data indicates this is a 14-core Alder Lake-H processor built for sustained multi-threaded work, paired with a 25 W entry-level Arc graphics solution. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU performs at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards, with a combined system percentile of 66. This is not a high-refresh gaming beast, but rather a balanced mobile workstation and productivity platform where the processor clearly outclasses the graphics component in raw capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800HE is a mobile processor based on the Alder Lake-H architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a hybrid design with 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that allows for significant parallel processing in demanding applications like video rendering and code compilation. The base clock sits at 2.40 GHz, which can scale up to a 4.60 GHz boost clock for single-threaded tasks, providing a wide dynamic range for both efficiency and peak performance. This chip is built for the Intel BGA 1744 socket, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard in a laptop form factor.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in complex workloads. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus. The CPU also provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, offering solid bandwidth for modern NVMe SSDs and the discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the i7-12800HE scores 22,360 points in the multi-core test and 3,156 in single-core. The multi-core score is particularly telling—it places the CPU in a competitive position against much older desktop HEDT parts. The nearest rivals listed include the Intel Xeon D-2796TE (avg score 6,510) and the Intel Xeon W-2191B (avg score 6,531), with the i7-12800HE trailing by only 0.7% and 1% respectively. The data shows a 1.2% lead over the AMD EPYC 7551 (avg score 6,391). This suggests the i7-12800HE holds its own against server-class silicon from previous generations, which is impressive for a 45 W mobile part.

For real-world workloads, this translates to excellent performance in tasks that can utilize all 20 threads, such as 3D rendering, batch photo processing, and software compilation. The single-core score of 3,156 in R23 indicates strong responsiveness in everyday applications and moderate gaming performance, where single-thread speed is often a bottleneck. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,467, combined with its 62nd percentile ranking, positions it as a solid mid-to-high-tier mobile processor, capable of handling heavy productivity tasks without breaking a sweat.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i7-12800HE?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Alder Lake-H architecture.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is listed at 4.60 GHz, while the base clock is 2.40 GHz.

Q: What type of memory does the i7-12800HE support?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Arc A350M sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Xeon W-2191B?

A: The i7-12800HE has an average score of 6,467, which is 1% lower than the Xeon W-2191B's average score of 6,531.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Iris Xe 96EU integrated graphics, though the system also has the discrete Arc A350M.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture reveals a system that is stronger in CPU-bound tasks than in GPU-bound ones. The CPU's average benchmark score is 6,467, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon D-2796TE, scores 6,510, which is only 0.7% higher, indicating the i7-12800HE is effectively trading blows with a server-oriented Xeon. The gap to the Intel Xeon W-2191B is also narrow at 1%, while the i7-12800HE holds a 1.2% advantage over the AMD EPYC 7551.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc A350M achieves an average benchmark score of 24,647, with specific scores of 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan. This places the GPU at the 70th percentile, which is notably higher than the CPU's percentile. The nearest GPU rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which scores 24,744, a mere 0.4% difference. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24,763, trailing by 0.5%, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24,442, which is 0.8% lower. The data shows the Arc A350M performs in the same band as these desktop-class and high-end mobile GPUs in compute benchmarks, despite its modest 25 W TDP and 4 GB memory allocation.

The combined percentile for the system is 66, reflecting that while the CPU is above average and the GPU is above average, neither is a top-tier component. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,360 is a standout figure, indicating that the CPU is the clear workhorse of this pairing. For gaming, the GPU's compute scores suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in less demanding titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means this is an estimation based on its 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense—it is soldered to the motherboard. This is typical for mobile platforms where the entire system is designed around a specific processor. The memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, providing flexibility depending on the laptop's design. The CPU offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU like the Arc A350M (which uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface) and at least one Gen 4 NVMe SSD.

The power delivery is modest: the CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W, totaling 70 W for the core components. There is no suggested PSU listed, and no power connector data for the GPU, which indicates this is a low-power design typical of thin-and-light laptops. The GPU is marked as "IGP" in slot width, suggesting it is a compact chip, likely soldered or using a minimal board footprint. This means the entire system is designed for efficiency rather than massive power headroom.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to improving the GPU rather than the CPU, as the i7-12800HE is already a strong performer. The CPU's 62nd percentile shows it is competitive, while the GPU's 70th percentile, though decent, may be a limiting factor in graphically intensive tasks. However, since this is a laptop platform, upgrades are generally limited to adding more RAM or swapping the SSD. The lack of a launch MSRP and the "End-of-life" status for the GPU suggest this is a mature platform, so users should focus on maximizing the current configuration rather than planning major changes.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a high-refresh gaming laptop. The Arc A350M, with its 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, is positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming. The CPU's single-core score of 3,156 in Cinebench R23 is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking, but the GPU will likely cap frame rates below 144 FPS in modern titles. Expect smooth 60 FPS gaming in esports titles at medium settings, but not high-refresh experiences in AAA games.

Streaming: The i7-12800HE's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The CPU's 45 W TDP suggests it can sustain high multi-core loads, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,360 indicates it can handle simultaneous game and stream encoding without significant frame drops. The GPU's 25 W TDP and lack of dedicated encoder data mean CPU-based encoding is the primary option, which is feasible given the core count.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this pairing. The CPU's multi-core prowess, evidenced by the 22,360 score in R23, will handle timeline rendering and export tasks efficiently. The 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads help with preview rendering. The GPU's 70th percentile compute scores (24,647 average) can accelerate effects and color grading in software that leverages OpenCL or Vulkan, though the 4 GB memory may limit complex 4K projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here. With a score of 22,360 in Cinebench R23, the i7-12800HE will render 3D scenes at a pace comparable to desktop Xeon processors from a few generations ago. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles, but its 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so final frame renders will be CPU-dominant.

Software Development: The 14-core/20-thread configuration and 24 MB L3 cache make this an excellent choice for code compilation. The CPU's 62nd percentile ranking indicates it is faster than 62% of all CPUs, which means build times for large projects will be short. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides sufficient memory bandwidth for most development workloads, and the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for fast NVMe storage to reduce I/O bottlenecks.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity. The CPU's single-core performance (3,156 in R23) ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking, while the GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are more than enough for spreadsheet, document, and web browsing tasks. The 45 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP contribute to a system that should offer good battery life, though the specific battery capacity is not listed in the data.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as expectations, not measured results.

Given the Intel Arc A350M's average benchmark score of 24,647 and its 70th percentile ranking, it is competitive with desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 590 (avg score 24,744) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (avg score 24,277). In practical terms, this suggests the GPU can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in titles released before 2023. The 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the key indicators here—they point to a GPU that can push 60 FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends, but will struggle to maintain that in AAA games with demanding graphics.

The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor. At 1080p with high textures, some modern games will exceed this capacity, causing stuttering or reduced texture quality. The 64-bit memory bus further restricts bandwidth, making this a poor candidate for 1440p or 4K gaming. The CPU's strong single-core performance (3,156 in R23) means it will not be the bottleneck at lower resolutions, but the GPU will cap frame rates. For a lighter gaming load, such as indie titles or older games, this system is perfectly adequate.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows an unbalanced pairing where the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,467 places it at the 62nd percentile, while the GPU's average score of 24,647 places it at the 70th percentile. However, these percentile figures are relative to each component's own pool—the CPU is competing against all CPUs, and the GPU against all GPUs. In absolute terms, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide far more raw compute power than the GPU's 768 shading units and 3.379 TFLOPS.

In multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, the CPU will be the primary driver, with the GPU playing a supporting role. In gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. Even with the CPU's strong single-core score of 3,156, the Arc A350M's modest FP32 throughput will limit frame rates. The FPS scaling in games will be determined by the GPU's ability to fill pixels, not the CPU's ability to feed it. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are further constraints that will cause the GPU to be the limiting factor in most graphically intensive scenarios.

The combined percentile of 66 reflects this tension. The system is balanced in the sense that both components are above the 50th percentile, but for gaming, the GPU is the weak link. For productivity, the CPU is the star, and the GPU's compute capabilities (24,647 average score) are a bonus for accelerated workflows.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i7-12800HE with the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-H processor with a 45 W TDP, designed for high-performance mobile computing. The GPU is an Intel Arc A350M with a 25 W TDP, based on the Xe-HPG architecture, and is listed as "End-of-life" production status. The combined system percentile is 66, indicating it outperforms 66% of all tracked configurations.

The overall tier is solidly mid-range. The CPU's 62nd percentile places it in the upper half of all processors, and the GPU's 70th percentile is even better. This is not a flagship gaming rig, nor is it a budget office machine. It is a capable mobile workstation with a decent graphics component for light gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The 10 nm CPU process node and 6 nm GPU process node are modern, and the memory support for DDR4/DDR5 provides flexibility. The total power draw of 70 W (45 W CPU + 25 W GPU) suggests a thin-and-light chassis with a compact power delivery system.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for mobile professionals who need substantial CPU power without a desktop-class power draw. The i7-12800HE's 22,360 score in Cinebench R23 makes it a strong choice for video editors working on 1080p timelines and software developers compiling large codebases. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel tasks efficiently, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency in complex data sets.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU's compile times and the GPU's ability to accelerate CUDA-independent compute tasks. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for CAD modeling and light simulation work, though users doing heavy 3D rendering should look for a higher-tier GPU. Small business workstations running virtual machines, database queries, or financial modeling will find the 20 threads and dual-channel memory support adequate for most workloads.

For gamers, this is a 1080p machine for esports and older titles. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking means it is competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 590, so users should expect 60+ FPS in games like Fortnite or Rocket League at medium settings, but not high-refresh 144 FPS experiences. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound tools like Premiere Pro (without heavy GPU effects) will find this a capable system, while those relying on GPU rendering should look elsewhere. This is a practical, balanced laptop for users who prioritize processing power and efficiency over gaming performance.