SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800H

32,121 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Alder Lake-H architecture using a 10 nm process. This hybrid design combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The processor features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics provide a fallback display option, though the system pairs this CPU with a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results place this chip in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32121. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 15283 in multi-core and 1828 in single-core tests. The single-core result is particularly strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications such as web browsing, office suites, and legacy software. The multi-core score reveals substantial parallel throughput, making the chip suitable for video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation workloads.

The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The processor achieves 24346 in multithreaded tests, 3440 in single-thread tests, and 86488 in integer math. Floating-point performance reaches 60961, while data compression scores 273247 and encryption hits 16234. Extended instruction performance is 16408. These figures suggest balanced capabilities across integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads. The physics score of 1682 indicates adequate performance for physics simulations in games and engineering applications.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i7-12800H sits within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-14400 (deltaPct 0), within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-13705H, and within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-14450HX. It trails the Intel Core i9-11900 by 0.3%. This clustering means the i7-12800H delivers performance essentially equivalent to a recent desktop i5 and a newer mobile i7, while slightly trailing a previous-generation desktop i9. For real workloads, this translates to smooth 1080p gaming, fast productivity application performance, and capable content creation for a laptop platform.

The 45 W TDP classifies this as a high-performance mobile processor, designed for thicker gaming laptops and mobile workstations rather than ultraportables. The 217 mm² die size reflects the complexity of the hybrid architecture. The processor remains in active production, indicating ongoing availability in new systems.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-512 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, effectively 14 Gbps.

The GPU includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The pixel rate reaches 131.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is 8.397 TFLOPS in FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU draws 60 W, making it relatively efficient for a discrete mobile graphics solution.

In Geekbench compute benchmarks, the Arc A550M scores 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 49737, placing the GPU in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This is a strong showing for a mobile part. Comparing to nearest rivals, the Arc A550M trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 0.4%, trails the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 0.5%, and trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4%. It leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6%. These deltas position the Arc A550M in the same performance tier as high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations, which is remarkable for a 60 W mobile component.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS provides a solid foundation for 3D modeling, CAD, and GPU-accelerated effects in video editing. The 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and DCC applications, though the relatively modest RT core count compared to desktop flagships means ray-traced scenes will require careful settings management. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high texture quality, and sufficient for most content creation tasks, though extremely large scenes or 4K texture packs may exceed this capacity.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12800H compare to the Intel Core i5-14400?

A: The i7-12800H has an average benchmark score of 32121, while the i5-14400 scores 32115, a delta of 0%. The two processors deliver statistically identical performance in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Arc A550M and the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Arc A550M averages 49737 in benchmark scores, while the RTX 5070 Ti averages 49957. The RTX 5070 Ti leads by 0.4%, which is a negligible margin in real-world usage.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A550M have and what bandwidth does it provide?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory speed is 1750 MHz, effectively 14 Gbps.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800H has a TDP of 45 W, and the Intel Arc A550M has a TDP of 60 W. Combined, the two components draw approximately 105 W under load, before accounting for other system components.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i7-12800H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The specific memory type used depends on the laptop motherboard design.

Q: What API features does the Arc A550M support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This includes hardware ray tracing via its 16 RT cores and advanced DirectX 12 Ultimate features.

Q: Is the i7-12800H overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The processor has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, but users cannot adjust the multiplier beyond factory settings.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12800H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket. This means the CPU is not user-upgradeable; it is permanently attached to the motherboard. Similarly, the Intel Arc A550M is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) in terms of slot width, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard rather than being a replaceable MXM module. Consequently, neither component can be swapped independently in a typical laptop chassis.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus. Users should verify the specific memory type supported by their laptop model before upgrading. The PCIe interface for the GPU is Gen 4 with x16 lanes, while the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for other devices such as NVMe SSDs and expansion cards. This ensures adequate bandwidth for modern storage and peripheral connectivity.

The combined TDP of the CPU (45 W) and GPU (60 W) totals 105 W. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU or power connector requirements for the GPU, so power delivery specifications must be inferred from the laptop's design. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the CPU's memory bandwidth is dual-channel and benefits from populated slots. Adding a high-speed NVMe SSD via the available PCIe Gen 4 lanes would also improve storage performance for large files and game loading times.

For users seeking higher performance, the nearest CPU rival, the Intel Core i7-13705H, offers a 0.1% improvement in average score, which is not a meaningful upgrade. The Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.3% faster but is a desktop part and incompatible with this socket. Given the soldered nature of both the CPU and GPU, the practical upgrade path is limited to memory and storage. Users should plan for a full system replacement when higher performance is needed, rather than expecting component-level upgrades.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets mobile professionals and enthusiasts who need desktop-class performance in a portable form factor. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking combine for an overall 84th percentile build, indicating a well-balanced system that excels across a wide range of tasks.

Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find the Arc A550M sufficient for high-quality settings in most titles, given its performance parity with the Radeon RX 6800 XT (2.6% faster) and near-parity with the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% slower). Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's 15283 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which accelerates timeline rendering and export encoding. The 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 GPU performance also supports GPU-accelerated effects and color grading.

Software developers will appreciate the 20 threads for parallel compilation and the 86488 integer math score for code processing. The 273247 data compression score aids in packaging and deployment tasks. Students and small business users handling office productivity, web applications, and data analysis will find the 3440 single-thread score delivers responsive day-to-day interaction. The 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance is particularly useful for machine learning inference and certain scientific computing tasks that leverage half-precision arithmetic.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 49737 and its 86th percentile ranking, the Arc A550M should deliver smooth gaming at 1080p with high to ultra settings in most modern titles. The GPU's performance parity with the Radeon RX 6800 XT (2.6% faster than the A550M) and near-parity with the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% faster) suggests that frame rates will be comparable to those desktop GPUs at similar settings and resolutions.

At 1080p, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth may become a limiting factor in bandwidth-intensive scenarios, but for standard rasterized gameplay, the GPU should maintain high frame rates. At 1440p, performance will remain playable but may require adjusting settings from ultra to high for demanding titles. The 16 RT cores enable ray tracing, but ray-traced scenes will likely require reduced resolution or lower quality settings to maintain smooth frame rates.

The CPU's 1828 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 3440 PassMark single-thread score ensure that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 20 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks such as streaming, recording, or voice chat while gaming. For competitive esports titles at 1080p, this pairing should deliver frame rates well above 144 Hz, provided the display supports high refresh rates.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12800H achieves an average benchmark score of 32121, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R15, the processor scores 2222 multi-core and 265 single-core. Cinebench R20 results are 8463 multi-core and 1194 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results of 15283 multi-core and 1828 single-core indicate strong sustained multi-threaded performance for a 45 W mobile processor.

The PassMark suite reinforces this assessment. The processor scores 24346 in multithreaded tests and 3440 in single-thread tests. Integer math reaches 86488, floating-point math hits 60961, and extended instructions score 16408. Data compression scores 273247, data encryption scores 16234, random string sorting scores 30453, physics scores 1682, and prime number finding scores 102. These results show no significant weaknesses across different workload types.

The Intel Arc A550M achieves an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. In Geekbench OpenCL, the GPU scores 49894, and in Vulkan, it scores 49580. The consistency between OpenCL and Vulkan results suggests stable driver performance across different APIs.

The combined build percentile is 84, which reflects the balanced pairing of an 82nd-percentile CPU with an 86th-percentile GPU. The nearest CPU rivals (i5-14400, i7-13705H, i5-14450HX, i9-11900) all fall within 0.3% of the i7-12800H, while the nearest GPU rivals (RTX 5070 Ti, RX Vega 64, RX 6900 XT, RX 6800 XT) span a range from 2.6% faster to 2.4% slower. This positions the build as a high-midrange to upper-midrange mobile platform.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i7-12800H mobile processor with the Intel Arc A550M mobile GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-H part with a 45 W TDP, while the GPU is a 60 W Xe-HPG architecture part with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. Both components are soldered to the motherboard, making this a sealed, non-upgradeable platform.

The overall tier of this build is solidly upper-midrange to high-end for mobile systems. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking means it outperforms 82% of all CPUs in the benchmark database, and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking means it outperforms 86% of all GPUs. The combined 84th percentile further confirms that this is a well-matched pair with no major imbalance between the two primary components.

The production status of the CPU is Active, indicating ongoing availability, while the GPU is listed as End-of-life. This suggests that systems with this GPU configuration may become less available over time, though existing units remain supported. The build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and solid GPU compute capabilities in a portable form factor, without the power consumption of higher-TDP desktop replacements.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i7-12800H and the Arc A550M is well matched, as evidenced by the narrow gap between their percentile rankings (82 for CPU, 86 for GPU) and the combined percentile of 84. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation, data compression, and integer math, the processor's 82nd-percentile performance ensures adequate headroom. In GPU-bound workloads such as OpenCL compute and Vulkan rendering, the GPU's 86th-percentile performance provides corresponding capability.

For gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 3440 and the GPU's 49737 average benchmark score indicate that neither component is likely to be a consistent bottleneck at 1080p. The CPU can feed the GPU with sufficient draw calls and game logic updates, while the GPU can render frames at high rates. At lower resolutions (1080p or below), the CPU may become the limiting factor in highly CPU-intensive games, given that the GPU's performance tier is closer to high-end desktop parts. At higher resolutions (1440p or above), the GPU will become the primary bottleneck, as the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM capacity will constrain texture throughput and scene complexity.

For content creation, the CPU's multi-core performance (15283 in Cinebench R23) will drive rendering and encoding workloads, while the GPU's FP32 and FP16 throughput (8.397 and 16.79 TFLOPS, respectively) accelerates effects, compositing, and AI-assisted tools. The 60 W GPU TDP means sustained GPU compute workloads will generate less heat than higher-power desktop alternatives, potentially allowing longer sustained performance in thin-and-light laptop chassis.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this pairing should deliver frame rates suitable for 144 Hz displays in most esports and competitive titles, based on the GPU's near-parity with the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% slower) and the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3440 PassMark). At 1440p, high refresh rates will be achievable in less demanding games, while AAA titles may require medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads provide ample capacity for encoding and streaming simultaneously with gameplay. The 86488 integer math score and 273247 data compression score support the CPU overhead of software encoding, while the GPU can handle the rendering workload without contention.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15283 accelerates timeline preview and export rendering. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance supports GPU-accelerated effects, color grading, and AI-based tools in editing suites. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing projects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will leverage the 14 cores and 20 threads effectively, with the 8463 Cinebench R20 multi-core score indicating strong throughput. GPU-based renderers will utilize the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 RT cores for ray-traced output, though complex scenes may require iterative refinement.

Software development: The 20 threads accelerate parallel compilation, and the 16234 data encryption score supports secure communication and package signing. The 30453 random string sorting score indicates efficient handling of text processing and data structures.

Student and office work: The 3440 single-thread score delivers responsive performance for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet calculations. The 60961 floating-point math score handles scientific and financial computations with ease. The integrated Iris Xe 96EU provides a backup display output, though the discrete GPU handles all demanding graphics tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds