SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800H

32,121 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800H paired with the Intel Arc A370M represents a specific configuration within the mobile computing landscape, aimed at balancing a high-performance processor with a more modest graphics solution. This analysis is based exclusively on the provided benchmark data. Notably, the FACT PACK contains no measured frame rate data for this exact combination; therefore, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores. The combined performance of this pairing places it at the 78th percentile among all assessed systems.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data indicates a significant imbalance. The Intel Core i7-12800H, with its multi-core score of 15283 in Cinebench R23, is more than capable of feeding a high-end GPU, but the Intel Arc A370M is the limiting factor. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and modest 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest that achieving high frame rates at high refresh rates (144Hz+) in demanding titles would be challenging, and such performance would likely be limited to esports titles at lower graphical presets. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking versus all GPUs supports this, indicating it is not positioned for top-tier high-refresh gaming.

Streaming workloads are a mixed scenario. The 14-core, 20-thread CPU with a Passmark multithread score of 24346 provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The data shows the CPU is far more powerful than the GPU, allowing the i7-12800H to handle the x264 encoding workload without significantly impacting game performance, as the CPU is not the bottleneck in gaming. However, the resulting gameplay experience would still be constrained by the Arc A370M's ability to render the game itself, meaning streamers would be limited to less demanding games or lower settings for a smooth broadcast.

For video editing, the combination offers a solid foundation for non-4K workloads. The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 score of 15283 and Passmark integer math score of 86488, will accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export times. The GPU's 4 GB of VRAM and 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth can assist with hardware-accelerated decoding and encoding of certain codecs, but its 64-bit memory bus and lower compute throughput may cause it to struggle with complex, multi-layer effects sequences or high-resolution timelines where more VRAM is required.

3D rendering is a scenario where the CPU takes the lead role. The i7-12800H's performance, which places it 0% behind the Intel Core i5-14400 and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13705H in average benchmark score, will deliver capable CPU-based rendering performance. The Arc A370M's 8 ray tracing cores and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can provide some acceleration, but for a dedicated 3D rendering workstation, the GPU is underpowered relative to the CPU. The data suggests that render times would be more dependent on the CPU's 24 MB of L3 cache and core count, with the GPU offering limited assistance for interactive viewport rendering.

Software development workflows are strongly supported by the processor. The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 273247 and data encryption score of 16234 indicate swift compilation times and efficient handling of cryptographic operations. The 20 threads are well-suited for parallel builds, and the 3440 Passmark single-thread score ensures responsive UI and fast code indexing. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, except for UI rendering and possibly local testing of GPU compute code, where the Arc A370M's Vulkan 1.4 and OpenCL 2.0 support would be adequate.

For student and office work, this configuration is exceptionally powerful. The CPU's single-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R20 score of 1194, ensures snappy application launches and fluid multitasking in productivity suites. The Passmark single-thread score of 3440 is more than sufficient for web browsing, document creation, and spreadsheet analysis. The Arc A370M is more than capable of driving multiple 1080p displays for increased productivity, making this system highly effective for any academic or general office task, though the power consumption of the 45W TDP CPU may be a consideration for all-day battery life.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates a CPU-centric system where the processor is the dominant component. The i7-12800H sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A370M is at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. This 8-point gap in percentile ranking suggests that in many workloads, particularly gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, preventing the full potential of the CPU from being realized.

In gaming scenarios, this imbalance is particularly acute. The CPU's high multi-core and single-core scores mean it can calculate game logic and physics easily, but the GPU's lower relative performance will cap the frame rate. The data shows the GPU is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in average benchmark score, a comparison that, while on the surface suggests similar performance, in practice means the GPU will struggle with modern game engines at high details. The CPU will be waiting on the GPU to finish rendering frames, resulting in a GPU-bound scenario in most graphically intensive titles.

For content creation and productivity, the bottleneck shifts to the CPU. In tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, the GPU's limited 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a constraint for large datasets, but the CPU's processing power is the main driver of performance. The data shows a Passmark multithread score of 24346, which is a strong result, but it is the limiting factor when compared to the GPU's compute capabilities in specific acceleration tasks. The system is not balanced; it is a high-performance CPU paired with a mid-range mobile GPU, and the workload dictates which component is the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12800H delivers strong benchmark results, with an average benchmark score of 32121, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14400, has an average score of 32115, indicating a 0% performance delta, meaning the i7-12800H is statistically identical in this metric. It is also 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13705H and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14450HX, while being 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-11900. In specific tests, the CPU achieves a multi-core score of 15283 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 1828 in the same test.

The Intel Arc A370M shows more modest performance, with an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, with a delta of -0.1%, and the AMD FirePro W8000, also at -0.1%. It is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in this specific benchmark. In compute tests, it achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673.

The combined picture is that of a system with a high-performing CPU and a mid-range GPU. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking indicates it can compete with modern desktop processors, while the GPU's 74th percentile places it in the upper-mid range of available graphics solutions. This makes the system highly capable for CPU-intensive tasks but only moderately capable for graphics-intensive tasks like high-detail gaming or GPU rendering.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is best suited for users who prioritize processor-heavy workloads and require a capable but not top-tier graphics solution in a laptop form factor. The data shows the CPU is a powerhouse for productivity, making this an excellent choice for software developers who need fast compilation times and parallel processing for builds. The Passmark integer math score of 86488 and multithread score of 24346 support this, indicating strong performance in code compilation and testing environments.

Students and professionals in engineering, finance, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R20 score of 1194, for responsive application use, and its multi-core might for simulations or large dataset processing. The GPU is sufficient for standard productivity tasks and can handle light 3D modeling or CAD work, but it is not designed for heavy rendering. Content creators working with 1080p video will find the CPU's encoding capabilities and the GPU's hardware acceleration useful for a smooth editing workflow.

Gamers who primarily play esports titles or less demanding games at 1080p will find this system adequate, as the CPU will ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will limit the graphics settings in more demanding AAA titles. This is not a system for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus would be a significant constraint. It is a mobile workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level discrete GPU, targeting users who need processing power over graphical fidelity.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture and built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The processor features a hybrid architecture, combining performance and efficiency cores. It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU's multi-core performance is its primary strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15283 is strong for a mobile processor, and its Passmark multithread score of 24346 confirms its ability to handle heavily threaded workloads like video rendering and code compilation. The data shows it performs on par with the Intel Core i5-14400, a newer desktop chip, which highlights the i7-12800H's capability. Its single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1828, is also robust, ensuring good responsiveness in daily tasks.

The CPU's memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 means system builders have flexibility, though the actual bandwidth is not specified. The 24 MB of L3 cache is shared across all cores, which helps in multi-threaded applications where data is shared between cores. The integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics provide a fallback display output, but the system also has the discrete Arc A370M GPU. Overall, the CPU's performance is a standout feature of this configuration, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, making it a suitable choice for demanding professional workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile graphics processor built on the Xe-HPG architecture and is part of the Alchemist generation. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process and contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with a TDP of 35 W. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores.

The GPU is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a limiting factor for modern games, as the bandwidth is relatively low and the 4 GB capacity can be insufficient for high-resolution textures. The GPU's compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16. The data shows its average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile, which is a mid-range position.

In terms of API support, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 suggests it can handle modern graphics APIs, but its performance is limited by the memory bus and bandwidth. The GPU's pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. For rendering, the 8 ray tracing cores provide some level of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the overall GPU performance is not sufficient for high-end ray-traced gaming. It is a capable entry-level discrete GPU, with performance close to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD FirePro W8000, as indicated by the rival data.

Gaming Performance

As stated, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the components. The Intel Arc A370M's performance, as measured by its Geekbench and average scores, suggests it is capable of running esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends at high frame rates at 1080p with medium-to-high settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3440 in Passmark ensures that these games are not CPU-limited.

For more demanding AAA titles, the GPU is expected to be the limiting factor. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely require lowering texture quality and other settings to maintain playable frame rates at 1080p. Games released in recent years, which are often optimized for 8 GB or more of VRAM, may experience stuttering or reduced performance on this GPU. The estimated performance would place this configuration in the range of a 1080p medium-settings machine for modern games.

The CPU's high performance, while not directly translating to higher FPS in GPU-bound scenarios, does ensure that the system can handle the background tasks and game logic without causing frame hitches. The data shows the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU, which is a positive for frame pacing, but the overall gaming experience will be defined by the Arc A370M's capabilities. For users expecting high-refresh 1440p gaming, this system would likely fall short, and a lower resolution or lower graphical settings would be necessary to achieve smooth frame rates. These figures are estimates and actual performance may vary depending on the specific game and drivers.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined performance of the Intel Core i7-12800H and Intel Arc A370M places it at the 78th percentile among all assessed systems.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 32121, which is 0% different from the Intel Core i5-14400's score of 32115, indicating essentially identical performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this configuration have measured frame rate data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on component benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800H is based on the Alder Lake architecture (codenamed Alder Lake-H) and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has an FP32 compute performance of 4.198 TFLOPS.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800M?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, which is 1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800M's score of 28874.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a mobile processor that uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for connecting to other devices. This makes the system's platform tied to the laptop's motherboard, limiting upgrade potential to memory and storage.

The GPU, the Intel Arc A370M, is also a mobile component with a TDP of 35 W. It is not swappable in most laptop designs. The system's upgrade path is therefore constrained to increasing RAM and swapping out the storage drive. The CPU's TDP is 45 W, and the GPU's TDP is 35 W, giving a combined TDP of 80 W for these core components, which is a moderate power draw for a laptop.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to maximize the memory capacity and ensure the fastest supported memory speed is installed, as the CPU's performance can be sensitive to memory bandwidth. Additionally, upgrading to a high-capacity NVMe SSD would improve load times and overall system responsiveness. The PCIe Gen 4 support ensures that the latest storage devices can be utilized at full speed. The platform's support for DDR5 memory means that, if the laptop supports it, upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 would provide a performance boost, though this is dependent on the specific motherboard design.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a high-end mobile processor with an entry-level discrete mobile GPU. The Intel Core i7-12800H is a 14-core processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, designed for high-performance computing in a portable form factor. The Intel Arc A370M is a discrete GPU from Intel's Alchemist generation, targeted at providing a better-than-integrated graphics experience.

The pairing is characterized by a significant performance disparity, with the CPU ranking at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile. This results in a combined percentile of 78, placing the system in the upper-mid range of overall performance. The system is best described as a performance-focused mobile workstation or a high-end productivity laptop, rather than a dedicated gaming machine. The CPU's benchmark scores are comparable to modern desktop processors like the Intel Core i5-14400, while the GPU's performance is similar to older desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 470. This configuration is ideal for users who require substantial processing power for complex tasks such as software development, video editing, and 3D modeling, and who also need a functional GPU for general graphics and light gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds