SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800H

32,121 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800H and Intel Arc A350M represent a specific pairing found in thin-and-light laptops, combining a high-end hybrid CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. Based on the benchmark data, this build sits in the 76th percentile overall, indicating it outperforms a majority of common systems. The data shows that this is a configuration where the processor is the dominant component, while the graphics solution provides a baseline level of gaming and rendering capability that is suitable for casual use rather than high-end performance. This analysis will break down the strengths and limitations of this pairing based on the provided benchmark scores and technical specifications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a formidable mobile processor built on the Alder Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a hybrid design with 14 cores and 20 threads, allowing it to handle heavily multithreaded workloads with ease. The processor operates at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and can boost up to 4.80 GHz, providing strong single-thread performance when needed. With a 24 MB shared L3 cache and a TDP of 45 W, this chip is designed for performance-intensive laptops.

The benchmark results for the CPU are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 15283 points indicates a high level of sustained computational throughput, making it capable of handling demanding tasks like video rendering and software compilation. The single-core score of 1828 points is also robust, which translates to quick, responsive performance in everyday applications and games that are not heavily threaded. The PassMark multithread score of 24346 further confirms its strength in parallel workloads, while the single-thread score of 3440 shows that it does not sacrifice single-core agility for multi-core power.

In comparison to its nearest rivals, the data shows a nearly identical performance envelope. The average benchmark score of 32121 places it within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-14450HX and 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-13705H. It also matches the desktop Intel Core i5-14400 and is only 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-11900. This indicates that the i7-12800H delivers desktop-class performance in certain workloads, making it an excellent choice for users who need significant processing power in a mobile form factor. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs underscores its position as a high-end mobile processor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is the entry point into Intel's Arc Alchemist lineup, built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process. It is a compact GPU with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The GPU is equipped with 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output pipelines. It also includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is notable for an entry-level part, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4.

The clock speeds are set at a base of 1150 MHz with a boost of 2200 MHz, allowing the GPU to reach a peak FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. While the memory bandwidth is limited by the 64-bit bus, the architecture is designed for efficiency. The benchmark scores show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747, giving it an average benchmark score of 24647 and a 70th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

The Arc A350M's performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590, which has a benchmark score of 24744, and it is only 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile. It is also 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This places the A350M in a performance tier that can handle 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles, though its 4 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor in textures and high-resolution workloads. It is a capable GPU for light gaming and hardware-accelerated encoding, but it is not designed for high-refresh or high-fidelity gaming. The production status is end-of-life, indicating that this is a component from a previous generation.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of this build is one of a strong CPU paired with an entry-level GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32121, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, which is a high ranking for a mobile processor. In contrast, the GPU's average score of 24647 puts it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This discrepancy illustrates that the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU in relative terms.

The Cinebench R20 results show a multicore score of 8463 and a single-core score of 1194, which are strong numbers for a laptop processor. The PassMark data encryption score of 16234 and the floating point math score of 60961 are also indicative of a processor that can handle complex calculations quickly. The combined percentile for this build is 76, which is a weighted average that reflects the overall system capability.

Since there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures must be estimated from the benchmark scores. The data suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the high single-thread score of 3440 will provide a smooth foundation, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will cap the frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios. The system is well-balanced for general productivity and light gaming, but it is not optimized for high-end gaming due to the GPU's limitations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The i7-12800H is a high-performance processor that can handle demanding computational tasks, while the Arc A350M is an entry-level GPU that is best suited for casual gaming and basic graphics acceleration. This creates a scenario where the GPU will be the bottleneck in most gaming and graphically intensive workloads.

The 82nd percentile CPU ranking versus the 70th percentile GPU ranking quantifies this imbalance. In a game with high graphical settings, the GPU will reach its utilization limit long before the CPU does, capping the frame rate. Conversely, in tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that rely heavily on the CPU, the processor will work at its full potential, while the GPU's role is more limited. The data indicates that the GPU will limit performance in modern games, and the CPU's power will go underutilized in those scenarios. For workloads like software compilation or data analysis, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the system will perform exceptionally well.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12800H compare to its closest rivals?

A: The i7-12800H has an average benchmark score of 32121, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-14400 (score 32115), the Intel Core i7-13705H (score 32076), and the Intel Core i5-14450HX (score 32040). It is 0.3% ahead of the i5-14450HX and only 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-11900 (score 32226).

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (score 24744) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (score 24763), and it is 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (score 24442).

Q: Does the system support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics features, including ray tracing, though the hardware is limited.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800H supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for flexibility in system configuration, though the specific bandwidth is not provided.

Q: Is the CPU's single-core performance sufficient for gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU's single-thread score of 3440 in PassMark is robust, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1828 indicates strong performance that will not hold back gaming frame rates in most scenarios, but the GPU will.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 217 mm², while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 157 mm² and contains 7,200 million transistors.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 76, which indicates it performs better than 76% of all systems in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a mobile processor that uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform. This means that the CPU is permanently attached to the motherboard, and any future upgrade would require replacing the entire laptop. The system supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, but the maximum capacity is not specified in the data. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which allows for fast NVMe storage and a dedicated GPU.

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile GPU with a TDP of 25 W and is classified as an IGP (Integrated Graphics Package) in terms of slot width, meaning it is soldered onto the motherboard. The suggested PSU is not listed, but given the low TDP of both components (45 W CPU and 25 W GPU), the power supply headroom is adequate for the existing hardware. However, since the system is a laptop, the upgrade path is essentially non-existent for the core components. A sensible next upgrade would be a new laptop with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's performance is already strong and would pair well with a higher-end graphics solution in a future system.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is targeted at users who require strong CPU performance but have modest graphics needs. The data shows that the CPU is in the 82nd percentile, making it ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development, as these tasks are often CPU-bound. The benchmark scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283, support its use in these fields.

For gamers, the system is suited for 1080p gaming at lower settings, as indicated by the GPU's 70th percentile ranking. It is not intended for high-refresh or high-fidelity gaming but can handle esports titles and older games. Students and small business workstations will benefit from the fast CPU for productivity applications like spreadsheets, programming, and multitasking. The system is a good fit for professionals who need a responsive and powerful processor for their daily tasks but do not rely heavily on advanced graphics processing.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system that pairs the Intel Core i7-12800H processor with the Intel Arc A350M graphics solution. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor from the Core 12th Gen Alder Lake-H series, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads. The GPU is an entry-level discrete part from Intel's Arc Alchemist line, based on the Xe-HPG architecture with 768 shading units and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The overall tier of this build is high for productivity and general use, reflected by the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and the combined 76th percentile score. However, the GPU's 70th percentile ranking indicates that it is a lower-tier component in the graphics space. This is a configuration that prioritizes processing power over graphical fidelity, making it a balanced choice for a professional or student who needs a fast computer for work and can play games occasionally.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark score of 3440, ensures that it will not bottleneck game logic and physics calculations.

The GPU's estimated performance is where the limits lie. With a benchmark score of 24647 and FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS, the Arc A350M is capable of running most games at 1080p with low to medium graphical presets. For example, esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends will likely run smoothly at high frame rates. However, for modern AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will force lower texture quality and resolution. The GPU's performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is an older desktop card. Therefore, users should expect a playable but not high-quality gaming experience, with frame rates varying significantly depending on the optimization of the specific game.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh Gaming

This scenario is not recommended for this build. The GPU's performance tier, estimated from its average benchmark score of 24647, is too low to sustain high frame rates at high settings. While the CPU can keep up, the Arc A350M will limit the system to lower frame rates, making a high-refresh monitor unnecessary.

Streaming

The system can handle streaming, but with caveats. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by a solid Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283, can handle the encoding workload. However, the GPU's performance will be taxed by both the game and the encoding process, potentially leading to frame drops. The presence of hardware encoders on the Arc A350M could offload some work, but the overall experience will be best for less demanding games.

Video Editing

This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's high multicore performance (8463 in Cinebench R20) will accelerate video rendering and export times significantly. The GPU can assist with effects and previews, though its 4 GB VRAM may be a constraint for very complex projects. The system is well-suited for 1080p video editing and light 4K work.

3D Rendering

The CPU will be the primary workhorse here, and it excels at this task. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283 shows that the processor can handle complex rendering tasks efficiently. The GPU's limited VRAM and compute power (3.379 TFLOPS) means it will not be useful for GPU-accelerated rendering engines, but for CPU-based rendering, this system is a capable mobile workstation.

Software Development

This is an ideal use case. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3440 and multicore power will make compilation times quick and running multiple virtual machines or containers smooth. The GPU is sufficient for displaying IDEs and basic graphics, making this a productive development environment.

Student and Office Work

This build is more than capable for this scenario. The CPU's responsiveness, driven by a high PassMark single-thread score of 3440, ensures that office applications, web browsing, and multitasking will feel snappy. The integrated and discrete GPUs handle 2D and 3D UI acceleration without issue. The primary benefit is the CPU's speed for intensive tasks like data analysis in Excel or programming assignments.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds