SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 represents a mainstream desktop combination that balances high-thread-count processing with modern graphics acceleration. This analysis examines the measured data for this pairing, focusing on benchmark scores, thermal and power requirements, and real-world performance across gaming and productivity workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated GB206, contains 21,900 million transistors on a die size of 181 mm², yielding a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz, while the memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is adequate for the memory size, though the 8 GB capacity may become a constraint in texture-heavy titles at higher resolutions.

The GPU features 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. Ray tracing hardware includes 30 RT cores, while 120 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated workloads. Pixel rate is measured at 119.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate reaches 299.6 GTexel/s. Floating point performance is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). Benchmark scores reflect this hardware configuration. The GPU achieves a Passmark G3D score of 20891, which places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 26331. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3628. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 112787 and 113321 respectively. Compute-oriented tests show a Passmark GPU Compute score of 10899.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context for these numbers. The AMD Radeon 860M has an average score of 26401, which is 0.3% higher than the RTX 5060. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, also 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, which is 0.8% higher. Conversely, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which is 1.2% lower than the RTX 5060. These deltas indicate that the RTX 5060 sits in a tightly contested performance band, with rivals clustering within a 1.2% range. For rendering workloads, the 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and the presence of 30 RT cores suggest capable performance for DirectX 12 Ultimate titles, though the 8 GB VRAM will limit very high-resolution texture sets.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform centers on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 12th Gen Alder Lake architecture. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the processor. The GPU utilizes a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 4 lanes, though at reduced bandwidth compared to a Gen 5 implementation.

Power requirements are modest for this pairing. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 145 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, which indicates that the graphics card alone does not demand an oversized power supply. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width. Its physical dimensions are 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The GPU requires a 300 W PSU, and the CPU's 125 W TDP means that a combined system load will fit within a reasonably sized power supply, though the exact total wattage is not specified in the data.

A sensible next upgrade from this platform would involve moving to a newer generation CPU that still uses the LGA 1700 socket, such as a 13th generation part. The nearest rival data shows that the Intel Core i7-13700T has an average score of 35403, which is 0.1% higher than the i7-12700KF, indicating that a same-socket upgrade would yield marginal gains in CPU-bound tasks. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a higher-tier Blackwell or newer architecture card, though the PCIe 5.0 x8 interface on the RTX 5060 suggests that a future GPU with a wider interface would not be fully utilized by this CPU's Gen 4 lanes.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-S die. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The TDP is rated at 125 W. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 28838, while the single-core score is 4071. Cinebench R20 shows 12111 multi-core and 1709 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 2906 multi-core and 410 single-core. Geekbench results are 14367 multi-core and 2255 single-core. 3DMark results scale with thread count: 2065 for 2 threads, 4011 for 4 threads, 7211 for 8 threads, 9282 for 16 threads, and 9983 for max threads. The single-thread 3DMark score is 1043. Passmark results include a multi-thread score of 34092 and a single-thread score of 3984. Specific workload tests show data compression at 441960, data encryption at 23181, extended instructions at 28650, floating point math at 87449, integer math at 113521, physics at 1780, random string sorting at 45150, and prime number finding at 112.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 35365, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show tight competition. The Intel Core i7-13700T has an average score of 35403, which is 0.1% lower than the i7-12700KF. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, which is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, which is 0.2% higher. These deltas indicate that the i7-12700KF performs nearly identically to these rivals, with differences well under 1%. The high percentile ranking at 85 suggests that this CPU outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.

For real workloads, the 20 threads handle heavily parallel tasks such as video encoding and 3D rendering effectively, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838. The single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4071, ensures responsive operation in lightly threaded applications and games.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, which is lower than the CPU's individual percentile of 85 but higher than the GPU's individual percentile of 72. This suggests that the GPU is the limiting component in most scenarios, dragging the combined score below the CPU's potential. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26331 is 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon 860M and 1.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, indicating that the RTX 5060 is a mid-range performer. The CPU, by contrast, sits at the 85th percentile, meaning it outperforms 85% of all CPUs in the database.

Measured FPS data supports the GPU-limiting hypothesis. At 1920x1080, games like Counter-Strike 2 achieve 194.9 FPS, while at 2560x1440 the frame rate drops to 131.8 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it falls to 74.9 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 32% reduction in frame rate, and from 1440p to 4K a 43% reduction. This pattern, where frame rates drop significantly with resolution increases, is characteristic of a GPU-bound system. In contrast, a CPU-bound system would show similar frame rates across resolutions. The CPU's 3DMark max threads score of 9983 and 16-thread score of 9282 indicate it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's rendering capacity becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the RTX 5060 achieves 60.6 FPS at 1080p, 40.9 FPS at 1440p, and 29.3 FPS at 4K. The 4K result is below the 30 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Red Dead Redemption 2 shows 51.3 FPS at 1080p, 36.3 FPS at 1440p, and 27.7 FPS at 4K. These numbers indicate that the GPU struggles to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles at higher resolutions. The CPU, with its 85th percentile ranking, is unlikely to be the constraint. In less demanding games like Valorant, the pairing achieves 446 FPS at 1080p, 379.1 FPS at 1440p, and 300.1 FPS at 4K, showing that when the GPU is not stressed, the CPU can drive very high frame rates.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1920x1080 resolution will find this pairing well-suited. Measured FPS at 1080p shows high frame rates across many titles, including 194.9 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 234 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, and 154.3 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. Competitive gamers who prioritize high refresh rates will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and Passmark single-thread score of 3984. For 2560x1440 gaming, the pairing remains viable, with most titles exceeding 60 FPS, though some demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 40.9 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes a limiting factor, with many games falling below 60 FPS.

Content creators handling video editing and 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 and Passmark multi-thread score of 34092 indicate strong performance in rendering tasks. The GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance, along with 120 tensor cores, provide acceleration for AI-adjacent workloads. The 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation for very large scenes, but for typical content creation, the combination is capable.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 20 threads. The Passmark integer math score of 113521 and data compression score of 441960 suggest efficient handling of compilation and data processing tasks. Students and small business workstations that run office applications, web browsing, and light productivity software will find the system more than adequate, given the high single-thread performance and the 72nd percentile GPU ranking.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, which sits between the CPU's individual 85th percentile and the GPU's individual 72nd percentile.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average score of 26331, which is 1.2% higher than the RX 6750 XT's score of 26011.

Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score for the i7-12700KF?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 28838, with a single-core score of 4071.

Q: What are the memory specifications for the RTX 5060?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the RTX 5060?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W, and the GPU's TDP is 145 W.

Q: How many RT cores and tensor cores does the RTX 5060 have?

A: The GPU has 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores.

Q: What socket does the i7-12700KF use and what memory types does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35365, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T, scores 35403, a 0.1% lower delta. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a 0.2% higher delta. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, a 0.2% lower delta, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, a 0.2% higher delta. The CPU's key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28838, single-core at 4071, Geekbench multi-core at 14367, single-core at 2255, and Passmark multi-thread at 34092.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26331, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M at 26401 (0.3% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26421 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26553 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT at 26011 (1.2% lower). The GPU's key scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad at 3628, Geekbench OpenCL at 112787, Vulkan at 113321, and Passmark G3D at 20891.

The combined picture shows a pairing where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance. In gaming workloads, the pair ranks 1648 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS across games of 129.3. This ranking places the pairing in the 44th percentile of all tested pairs, indicating that while individual components are above average, the combination does not reach the top tier of gaming performance.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing consists of the Intel Core i7-12700KF, a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake processor, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory. The CPU is a desktop-class part released on 2021-11-03 with a launch MSRP of $384. The GPU is a desktop-class part released on 2025-05-18 with a launch MSRP of 299 USD.

The overall tier of this build, based on percentiles, is upper-mid-range. The CPU at the 85th percentile is a high performer, while the GPU at the 72nd percentile is a solid mid-range performer. The combined percentile of 79 indicates that the system as a whole outperforms 79% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. However, the pair's FPS ranking of 1648 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 129.3 across games, shows that the gaming performance is not exceptional, falling in the lower half of tested pairs. The data indicates that this build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded performance for productivity tasks.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is the strongest scenario for this build. Measured FPS in competitive titles include 446 FPS in Valorant, 430.5 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, and 234 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege. These frame rates are well above the 144 Hz threshold and demonstrate that the CPU's single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1043, can drive high-refresh monitors. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking ensures that less demanding titles will run smoothly.

Streaming at 1080p is feasible, given the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's tensor cores for encoding assistance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 34092 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 indicate that the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 19.18 TFLOPS provides headroom for rendering the game while the CPU manages the stream.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 14367 and Passmark data compression score of 441960 indicate efficient timeline processing and export. The GPU's 120 tensor cores can accelerate effects and color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit the use of very high-resolution source material.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will rely heavily on the CPU. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12111 and Passmark floating point math score of 87449 demonstrate strong compute throughput. The GPU's 30 RT cores can accelerate ray-traced renders, but the 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for dedicated rendering workloads.

Software development and compilation will be well-served by the CPU. The Passmark integer math score of 113521 and data encryption score of 23181 indicate fast code compilation and secure data handling. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, but its presence doesn't hinder performance.

Student and office work represents an overqualified use case. The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3984, ensures snappy application launches and web browsing. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking is more than sufficient for office productivity, spreadsheet tasks, and presentation software.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data for this build is measured, as indicated by the dataIsMeasured field being true. The following FPS figures are measured at ultra settings for each game and resolution. At 1920x1080, the pairing achieves high frame rates in many titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 194.9 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 154.3 FPS, and Fortnite at 94.6 FPS. More demanding games show lower results: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 60.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 51.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 30.4 FPS. The average FPS across all tested games at 1080p is not explicitly given, but the overall average across games and resolutions is 129.3 FPS.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop noticeably. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 131.8 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 137.1 FPS, and Fortnite at 59 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 40.9 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 36.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 18.3 FPS. The 1440p results show that the GPU is becoming a bottleneck, with many demanding titles falling below 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 74.9 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 120.1 FPS, and Fortnite at 33.6 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 8.3 FPS. The 4K results indicate that this pairing is not suitable for 4K gaming in demanding titles, though less demanding games like Valorant run at 300.1 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 176.3 FPS. The measured data shows that the pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming, acceptable for 1440p in many titles, and only viable at 4K for competitive or less demanding games.