SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop pairing with a combined percentile rank of 88, placing it ahead of 88% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone sits at the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 90th percentile of all graphics cards, so the two components are closely matched in relative performance. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from benchmark scores and should be treated as a projection, not a test result.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these two components is nearly even, with the GPU slightly stronger relative to its peer group than the CPU. The GPU's 90th percentile versus the CPU's 85th percentile means that, in most gaming workloads, the CPU is likely to be the first component to reach its ceiling, especially at lower resolutions where the graphics card has spare capacity. The CPU's 3DMark scores show a clear scaling pattern: 2-thread score of 2065, 4-thread of 4011, 8-thread of 7211, and 16-thread of 9282. The jump from 8 threads to 16 threads is substantial, but the further step to max threads (9983) adds only about 7% performance, indicating that the CPU has strong multi-thread scaling but reaches diminishing returns beyond 16 threads. For gaming, this means the 20 threads handle background tasks and physics, while the single-thread score of 1043 in 3DMark and 4071 in Cinebench R23 single-core are what drive frame pacing in lightly-threaded game engines.

The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a decisive advantage in texture-heavy scenes. At 1080p, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock will likely be the limiting factor in titles that rely on a single core; at 1440p, the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate take over, and at 4K the 16 GB VRAM becomes the dominant asset. The data suggests a balanced build where neither component dominates across all resolutions. In CPU-intensive workloads like data compression, the PassMark data compression score of 441960 and integer math score of 113521 show the CPU is capable, but the GPU's 90th percentile rank means it will handle the most demanding graphics tasks without holding the CPU back.

The bottleneck shifts based on the workload. For CPU-bound scenarios — such as 1080p gaming with a low draw distance, physics simulations, or software compilation — the 12-core, 20-thread CPU is the limiting factor. For GPU-bound scenarios — such as 4K gaming, ray tracing, or video rendering — the Arc A770 becomes the constraint. The combined percentile of 88, with the CPU at 85 and GPU at 90, indicates the pairing is slightly GPU-heavy, so users who prioritize low-resolution high-refresh gaming may want a stronger CPU, while those targeting higher resolutions are well served.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i7-12700KF use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A770 have?

A: The Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is enough for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The Arc A770 has a 225 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 550 W. It requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector.

Q: Is the Arc A770 still in production?

A: No, the Arc A770 is marked as end-of-life. Its successor is Battlemage, and the card was released on 2022-10-11.

Q: Which graphics APIs does the Arc A770 support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the i7-12700KF compare to the i7-12700K?

A: The i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, while the i7-12700K scores 35287, a delta of 0.2%. They are effectively identical in performance.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 88, with the CPU at 85 and the GPU at 90. This means the pairing outperforms 88% of all tested combinations.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, using a 6 nm process from TSMC. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray-tracing cores. It operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, which is a major strength for texture-heavy and compute-heavy workloads.

The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 19.66 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. These numbers place the GPU in the 90th percentile of all graphics cards, meaning it outperforms 90% of the GPUs in the benchmark database. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2969, while the Geekbench OpenCL score is 109175 and the Vulkan score is 94284. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at 69000 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68562 (+0.4%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69870 (-1.5%), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 69986 (-1.7%). The Arc A770 sits within a narrow band of these professional cards, slightly below the WX 8200 and Quadro P6000, but within 2% of the higher-end options.

The 32 ray-tracing cores provide hardware support for DirectX 12 Ultimate ray tracing. With 16 GB of VRAM, the GPU is well equipped for large 3D scenes, AI inference, and high-resolution texture sets. The 512 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the 4096 shading units without starvation. The GPU is a dual-slot card, requires a 6-pin plus 8-pin power connector, and has a 225 W TDP. It offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The GPU is end-of-life, but its performance in the 90th percentile shows it remains a capable card.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for users who want a high-performance desktop for both gaming and productivity. The CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 90th percentile make it a well-rounded combination for a gaming rig at 1080p and 1440p. At 1080p, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost and single-core performance will drive high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth provide headroom for modern AAA games. For 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, and the 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for most titles at high settings. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM is an advantage, but the raw compute may struggle with the most demanding games; the data suggests a balanced 1440p gaming experience.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 and single-core of 4071 indicate strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark multithread score of 34092 and floating-point math score of 87449 support this. The GPU's 109175 OpenCL score and 512 GB/s bandwidth make it useful for GPU-accelerated effects in video editors and for rendering tasks that use large textures. Developers working on game engines or data processing will find the 20 threads and 16 GB of VRAM useful for iterative compilation and testing. Students and small business workstations can use the build for a mix of office productivity, light video editing, and general-purpose compute, with a 550 W PSU suggestion covering the power requirements.

The GPU's end-of-life status means buyers should consider that a successor exists, but the current performance is still competitive, and the CPU remains active with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S family, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache layout is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing manual overclocking. It was released on 2021-11-03 with a launch MSRP of $384.

Benchmark scores show a strong multi-threaded performer. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 9282 in the 16-thread test, 2065 in the 2-thread test, 4011 in the 4-thread test, 7211 in the 8-thread test, 9983 in the max-thread test, and 1043 in the single-thread test. Cinebench R20 multicore is 12111, and single-core is 1709; R23 multicore is 28838, single-core is 4071. Geekbench multicore is 14367, single-core is 2255. PassMark scores include 441960 for data compression, 23181 for data encryption, 28650 for extended instructions, 87449 for floating-point math, 113521 for integer math, 34092 for multithread, and 3984 for single-thread.

The 85th percentile places the CPU above 85% of all processors. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13700T (avg score 35403, delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, +0.2%), the Intel Core 5 213PE (35428, -0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, +0.2%). All four are within 0.2% of the 12700KF, indicating the 12700KF is effectively tied with its most modern competitors. The 20 threads provide a significant advantage in multi-threaded workloads, and the 5.0 GHz boost clock delivers strong single-thread performance. The 3DMark thread scaling from 2 threads (2065) to 16 threads (9282) shows linear growth, but the max-thread score of 9983 is only about 7% higher than the 16-thread score, meaning the CPU reaches its practical limit at 16 threads for most games and many productivity tasks.

The CPU's memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, which gives builders flexibility in platform choice. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for a single GPU and NVMe storage. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking to extract more performance, though the TDP of 125 W means a capable cooler is required.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The data does not contain per-game FPS numbers, so the following analysis is qualitative.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1043, Cinebench R23 single-core 4071) and the GPU's 90th percentile rank suggest the pairing is strong for high-refresh gaming. The 5.00 GHz boost clock will handle most game engines' main thread, while the 12-core/20-thread configuration ensures background tasks do not cause frame stutter. The GPU's 4096 shading units and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are more than enough for 1080p in most titles, and the 16 GB VRAM means texture streaming is not a concern.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. The 90th percentile GPU rank, with 32 RT cores and 512 GB/s bandwidth, should deliver smooth gameplay in most games, but the most demanding titles may require settings adjustments. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong asset for high-resolution textures and future game releases. At 4K, the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS is stretched, and the 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate will be the bottleneck in scenes with heavy geometry and effects. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, but the compute power may not hold 60 FPS in the newest titles without upscaling. Since no measured FPS data is available, these are estimates based on the GPU's 90th percentile and the CPU's 85th percentile.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35365, with a percentile rank of 85. The GPU's average score is 68809, with a percentile rank of 90. The combined percentile is 88. The CPU's nearest rivals are the i7-13700T (35403, -0.1%), i5-13600T (35305, +0.2%), Core 5 213PE (35428, -0.2%), and i7-12700K (35287, +0.2%). The GPU's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (69000, -0.3%), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68562, +0.4%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (69870, -1.5%), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (69986, -1.7%). These deltas show the CPU is within 0.2% of its closest competitors, and the GPU is within 1.7% of the high-end professional cards. The combined picture is a build that is 85th percentile for CPU and 90th for GPU, meaning the GPU is a stronger asset than the CPU in the overall balance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build with a combined percentile of 88, putting it in the top 10% of all tracked CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU is an Intel Core i7-12700KF, a 12th-generation Alder Lake-S processor with 12 cores and 20 threads. The GPU is an Intel Arc A770 with 16 GB GDDR6 memory, based on the Xe-HPG Alchemist architecture. The CPU was released on 2021-11-03 and is still active; the GPU was released on 2022-10-11 and is now end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and the GPU a TDP of 225 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The build is a high-end desktop pairing that ranks in the 88th percentile overall, with the GPU as the slightly more capable component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking to extend its lifespan. The GPU has a 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W PSU, leaving headroom for additional components. Since the GPU is end-of-life, the most sensible next upgrade would be its successor, Battlemage, though the current card still holds the 90th percentile performance. The CPU remains active, so a user could upgrade the GPU first and keep the CPU for a longer time. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the platform can be built with either memory type, though the FACT PACK does not specify which is faster. The dual-channel memory controller is adequate for both types, and the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide enough for a GPU and a fast NVMe drive. The PSU suggestion of 550 W is appropriate for the current build; if a more powerful GPU is added later, a higher-wattage PSU would be required, but the current setup has no headroom issues.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds