SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and Intel Arc A380 form a desktop pairing that presents a stark contrast in capability. The CPU is a high-performance 12th-generation Alder Lake processor, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist graphics card. The benchmark data shows a significant imbalance, where the processor's substantial multi-threaded throughput far outpaces the graphics card's rendering capacity. This analysis examines the individual components, their combined performance profile, and the practical implications for various workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 125 W. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a 25 MB shared L3 cache. The processor has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Benchmark results indicate a powerful multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 28,838 points in multicore and 4,071 in single-core. The 3DMark tests show a clear scaling pattern: 2,065 with 2 threads, 4,011 with 4 threads, 7,211 with 8 threads, 9,282 with 16 threads, and 9,983 with max threads. This scaling suggests the processor efficiently utilizes its hybrid core design for heavily threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 34,092 and Geekbench multicore score of 14,367 reinforce the CPU's strength in parallel processing tasks.

The CPU's single-thread performance is also solid, as evidenced by a PassMark single-thread score of 3,984 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,255. The processor's overall average benchmark score is 35,365, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-13700T, with an average score of 35,403, a mere 0.1% difference. This indicates the 12700KF is essentially neck-and-neck with a newer-generation chip in aggregate performance, making it a formidable processor for its class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is adequate for a modern graphics card and a fast NVMe SSD. The integrated graphics are not present on this "KF" variant, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The suggested power supply for this pairing is 250 W, which is quite modest given the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP. This low PSU requirement suggests the system will not be power-hungry in total, but it also hints at the GPU's limited performance ceiling. The upgrade path from the 12700KF is straightforward: one could move to a higher-tier 12th-gen or 13th-gen CPU on the same socket, but the platform is not forward-compatible with newer sockets. A sensible next upgrade would be to pair this CPU with a significantly more powerful GPU to match its compute capabilities, as the current Arc A380 is the primary bottleneck in most scenarios.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimated based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The Arc A380's PassMark G3D score of 6,252 places it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, indicating entry-level performance. Its DirectX 12 score of 35 in PassMark is notably low, suggesting that modern API-based games may struggle.

Based on these scores, the Arc A380 is likely to provide playable frame rates at 1080p with low to medium settings in less demanding titles. For high-refresh-rate gaming or AAA titles, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,071, ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions. However, the GPU's raw compute power, at 4.198 TFLOPS FP32, is insufficient for pushing high frame rates in graphically intensive games. In summary, this is not a high-refresh-rate gaming system; it is more suited for esports titles or older games at 1080p.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU compute power but have minimal graphics requirements. The primary audience is software developers and content creators who work with code compilation, data processing, or CPU-based rendering, where the 12700KF's 20 threads and strong multi-core scores (e.g., 28,838 in Cinebench R23) are highly beneficial. Students in computer science or engineering fields would also benefit from the CPU's performance for parallel computing tasks and virtual machines.

For small business workstations, the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 23,181 and integer math score of 113,521 indicate strong performance for database work and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and 2D applications, with a PassMark G2D score of 610. However, it is not a suitable choice for gamers seeking modern titles, 3D modelers, or video editors who rely on GPU acceleration, as the Arc A380's compute scores are too low for such workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is severely GPU-limited in graphics-centric workloads. The CPU's percentile ranking (85th) is nearly double that of the GPU (44th), creating a clear imbalance. In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck at any resolution above 720p, as its FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and 6 GB of VRAM are modest. The GPU's bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s over a 96-bit bus is also a limiting factor for texture-heavy scenes.

Conversely, the CPU is the dominant component in tasks like software compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 441,960), and floating-point math (87,449). The GPU's compute score of 2,762 in PassMark is a fraction of the CPU's capabilities, confirming that any workload leveraging GPU compute (e.g., rendering, machine learning inference) will be severely constrained. The CPU's performance is also well ahead of its nearest rivals, with a 0.2% lead over the Intel Core i5-13600T, suggesting it will handle any CPU-bound task without issue.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 65.

Q: Does this system require a discrete graphics card?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-12700KF is a "KF" variant with no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for display output.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has a memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s, using 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T?

A: The 12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35,365, which is 0.1% lower than the 13700T's score of 35,403.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, which accounts for the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data available for this specific CPU and GPU pairing.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and architecture?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process using the Alder Lake architecture.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35,365, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its performance is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with a delta of -0.1% compared to the Intel Core i7-13700T and a +0.2% delta versus the Intel Core i5-13600T. In specific tests, the CPU achieves 9,983 points in 3DMark max threads, 28,838 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and 14,367 in Geekbench multicore.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 8,558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. It trails its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, by 0.4% (8,595 vs. 8,558). The GPU's best showing is in Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 38,224, but its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 35 is notably weak. The combined picture is a system where the CPU performs at a high tier, while the GPU performs at a mid-to-low tier, creating a large performance gap that defines the system's overall character.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing a high-end 12-core processor with an entry-level graphics card. The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a top-tier CPU for its generation, evidenced by its 85th percentile ranking and performance parity with the newer Core i7-13700T. In contrast, the Intel Arc A380 is a budget GPU, sitting in the 44th percentile, with performance comparable to mobile-class chips like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which it leads by 1.2%.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 65, reflecting the dominant CPU's high score pulling up the weaker GPU. The system's overall tier is therefore defined by its CPU: it is a high-performance computing workstation with basic graphics capability. The launch MSRP is $384 for the CPU and $149 for the GPU. This is a build for compute-heavy tasks, not for graphics-intensive applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6,252 and low DirectX 12 score (35) indicate it cannot deliver high frame rates in modern titles at any resolution. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will cap performance far below the 144 Hz or higher mark.

Streaming: CPU-based streaming is feasible. The 12700KF's 20 threads and strong multi-core scores (e.g., 9,983 in 3DMark max threads) can handle encoding via x264 while gaming, but the game's frame rate will still be limited by the Arc A380's modest rendering power.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will be smooth. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,838 ensures fast rendering of effects and timeline processing. However, GPU-accelerated effects and export will be slow due to the Arc A380's limited FP32 and compute performance.

3D rendering: This is a mixed bag. CPU-based renderers (e.g., Blender Cycles) will perform well, as the CPU's 20 threads are fully utilized. GPU-based renderers will be severely bottlenecked by the Arc A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, making this a poor choice for GPU rendering.

Software development: Excellent for development. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 113,521 and data compression score of 441,960 indicate fast code compilation and data processing. The GPU is sufficient for multiple monitors and general desktop use.

Student and office work: Overkill for the CPU, but adequate overall. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,984 ensures snappy application response. The GPU's G2D score of 610 is sufficient for 2D productivity apps, but the system is far more powerful than needed for this use case.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors. It has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. Its clock speeds are 2000 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The GPU's memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. Its texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS. These specifications place the GPU in the entry-level segment, as confirmed by its 44th percentile ranking.

In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 38,224 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 36,736 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 6,252, but its DirectX 11 and 12 scores are notably low at 38 and 35, respectively. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5170M, which scores 8,595, a 0.4% difference. For rendering tasks, the low FP32 throughput and minimal VRAM will limit the GPU to light workloads or older titles, making it a poor match for the CPU's high compute capability.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A380

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds