SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the Intel Arc A350 is a desktop build that combines a high-core-count 12th Gen processor with one of Intel’s most modest discrete GPUs. This is a configuration where the CPU is clearly the dominant component, and the GPU is positioned for entry-level graphics tasks. The data in this FACT PACK shows a clear split between strong processing performance and limited graphics throughput, which shapes every use case discussed below.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 uses the DG2-128 chip on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective. Base and boost clocks are both set at 2000 MHz.

Compute performance is modest. The GPU delivers 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6.144 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has no display outputs, which means this card is intended for compute or auxiliary tasks rather than driving a monitor directly. The TDP is 25 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W.

The Arc A350 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero in this dataset—meaning no GPU-specific scores are recorded. In practice, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth limit texture-heavy workloads, and the 6 RT cores provide only a baseline level of ray tracing capability. For rendering tasks, the 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput is far below what a modern mid-range GPU offers, so expect long render times in 3D applications. The 48 GTexel/s texture rate suggests it can handle lighter shading workloads, but the 24 ROPs cap pixel throughput for high-resolution output.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12700KF delivers strong multi-threaded results. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 9282 in the 16-thread test, 7211 in the 8-thread test, 4011 in the 4-thread test, and 2065 in the 2-thread test. The max-thread score is 9983, and the single-thread score is 1043. Cinebench results are equally robust: R15 multicore scores 2906, R20 multicore scores 12111, and R23 multicore scores 28838. Single-core Cinebench scores are 410, 1709, and 4071 for R15, R20, and R23 respectively. Geekbench shows a multicore score of 14367 and a single-core score of 2255.

Passmark results reinforce the CPU’s strength. The multithread score is 34092, single-thread is 3984, integer math scores 113521, floating point math scores 87449, extended instructions score 28650, data encryption scores 23181, data compression scores 441960, random string sorting scores 45150, find prime numbers scores 112, and physics scores 1780.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35365, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700T (average score 35403, delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13600T (average score 35305, delta 0.2%), the Intel Core 5 213PE (average score 35428, delta -0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-12700K (average score 35287, delta 0.2%). This puts the 12700KF effectively within 0.2% of its closest competitors, meaning its performance is indistinguishable from the i7-12700K and only fractions behind newer low-power parts.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 68. Since the GPU has no recorded benchmark scores and no measured FPS data exists for this combination, the overall picture is heavily weighted by CPU performance. The Arc A350’s 50th percentile GPU position relative to all GPUs suggests it is an average performer among all graphics cards, but the lack of specific scores means it is difficult to place precisely.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 9983 max-thread 3DMark score and 28838 Cinebench R23 multicore result indicate it can feed frames quickly, but the Arc A350’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates in modern titles. At 1080p with lower settings, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU will likely cap performance well below what the CPU can deliver. Expect 60 fps in less demanding games, but not sustained high-refresh 144 fps gaming.

Streaming: The 12-core, 20-thread CPU handles encoding workloads well. The Passmark multithread score of 34092 and data encryption score of 23181 suggest it can manage software x264 encoding alongside gaming. The GPU’s lack of display outputs means it cannot drive a capture output directly, but the CPU’s headroom makes software encoding viable. The 200 W suggested PSU also leaves ample power for capture cards.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 and Passmark floating point math score of 87449 support smooth timeline editing and effect rendering in 1080p projects. The GPU’s 96 GTexel/s texture rate and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate accelerate some effects, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit working with high-resolution footage or multiple layers. Export times will be CPU-bound, which is a positive given the processor’s strength.

3D rendering: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s 12111 Cinebench R20 multicore and 9983 3DMark max-thread scores are excellent for CPU-based rendering, such as in Blender’s Cycles engine or similar software. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores provide some acceleration, but the 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus are significant bottlenecks for scene complexity. CPU rendering will outperform GPU rendering here.

Software development: The CPU’s 14367 Geekbench multicore score and 113521 Passmark integer math score indicate fast compilation times for C++ or Rust projects. The 85th percentile CPU ranking means it outpaces most desktop processors. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, though its Vulkan 1.4 support and compute capabilities could aid in graphics debugging or testing.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 3984 Passmark single-thread score and 2255 Geekbench single-core result handle everyday productivity tasks with ease. The GPU’s 50th percentile position among all GPUs is sufficient for basic desktop rendering, office suites, and web browsing. The 25 W GPU TDP keeps power draw low, making this a quiet and efficient setup for academic or office environments.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and strong multi-thread results suggest it can sustain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s 50th percentile position, 3.072 TFLOPS FP32, and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate it will be the limiting factor in most games.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A350 would likely deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, possibly in the 40-60 fps range. For competitive shooters or esports titles, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1043 in 3DMark and 4071 in Cinebench R23 could allow frame rates above 60 fps if settings are lowered. At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus would likely cause performance to drop significantly, with many modern games exceeding the memory capacity or bandwidth. At 4K, the GPU’s pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s is insufficient for playable frame rates in most titles. These are estimates only—the lack of measured data means actual performance could vary by game and driver optimization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates the GPU is the bottleneck in most workloads. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. In gaming, the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 9282 and single-thread score of 1043 show it can process game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 is roughly an order of magnitude below what mid-range GPUs typically offer, making it the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive task.

In CPU-heavy workloads like rendering or video encoding, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 34092 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 28838 mean it can saturate its cores effectively, while the GPU’s 25 W TDP and 4 GB VRAM make it nearly irrelevant for compute tasks. For 3D rendering, the CPU would complete tasks faster than the GPU, so the bottleneck is the GPU’s limited compute and memory bandwidth. In office or productivity scenarios, the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking exceeds requirements, and the GPU’s 50th percentile is adequate, so neither component bottlenecks the other.

The FPS scaling pattern, if it were measured, would show frame rates flatlining due to GPU limits while CPU utilization remains moderate. The lack of measured FPS data prevents precise quantification, but the percentile gap and relative compute figures make the GPU bottleneck obvious.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with the Alder Lake architecture. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lane allocation.

The suggested PSU for this build is 200 W, which is modest given the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 25 W TDP. This leaves substantial headroom for a future GPU upgrade. A sensible next step would be replacing the Arc A350 with a more capable GPU—one with higher FP32 throughput and more VRAM—since the CPU’s 85th percentile performance can support much faster graphics cards. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier also allows overclocking to extract more performance, though the data does not specify overclocking results.

The platform itself is mature, with support for both memory types. Users who chose DDR4 can keep costs down, while those with DDR5 can take advantage of newer memory technology. The 20 PCIe lanes are sufficient for most configurations, though multi-GPU setups would be constrained. The CPU’s production status is active, meaning replacements are available if needed.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. The die size is 215 mm². It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a 25 MB shared L3 cache. Base clock is 3.60 GHz, and boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 125 W, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. It has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The release date is 2021-11-03, with a launch MSRP of $384.

Benchmark results show the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks. The 3DMark max-thread score of 9983 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 28838 put it in the top 15% of all CPUs (85th percentile). The single-thread score of 1043 in 3DMark and 4071 in Cinebench R23 are competitive, indicating strong responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. Passmark results further illustrate the balance: integer math scores 113521, floating point math scores 87449, and extended instructions score 28650, showing solid performance across varied workloads.

The nearest rivals include the i7-13700T (delta -0.1%), i5-13600T (delta 0.2%), Core 5 213PE (delta -0.2%), and i7-12700K (delta 0.2%). These tiny deltas mean the 12700KF is effectively identical in performance to the i7-12700K and within a fraction of a percent of newer low-power parts. This makes it a reliable choice for users who need consistent multi-threaded performance without the power efficiency of newer architectures.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compared to its closest rivals?

A: The Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T, scores 35403, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 12700KF is essentially tied. The i5-13600T scores 35305 (delta 0.2%), the Core 5 213PE scores 35428 (delta -0.2%), and the i7-12700K scores 35287 (delta 0.2%).

Q: Does the Arc A350 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The GPU has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. Its performance is only characterized by its 50th percentile position among all GPUs and its compute specifications.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 68, indicating this build performs better than 68% of all desktop configurations, though this is heavily weighted by the CPU’s 85th percentile since the GPU has no scores.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350 has 6 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features. However, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM limit the practical use of ray tracing in modern games.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Core i7-12700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, but the FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacities or speeds for either memory type.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, based on the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 25 W TDP. This leaves considerable headroom for additional components or a future GPU upgrade.

Q: Is this configuration suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The Arc A350’s 4 GB VRAM, 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 make 4K gaming impractical. Estimated frame rates at 4K would be well below playable levels, and no measured FPS data exists for this combination.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance and need only light GPU acceleration. Gamers playing at 1080p with lower settings or older titles will find the CPU’s 85th percentile performance sufficient, while the GPU’s 50th percentile position handles less demanding games. Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering will benefit most from the CPU’s 28838 Cinebench R23 multicore score, using CPU-based rendering for complex scenes. Software developers will appreciate the 14367 Geekbench multicore score and 113521 Passmark integer math score for fast builds and test runs.

Students and office workers gain from the CPU’s 3984 Passmark single-thread score and the GPU’s ability to drive basic desktop compositing, all within a 200 W PSU budget. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded productivity software, such as database processing (Passmark data compression 441960) or encryption (23181), will see strong performance. The build is not suited for high-refresh competitive gaming or AAA titles at high settings, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are insufficient. For users who plan to upgrade the GPU later, the CPU’s strong scores and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes make it a capable foundation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds