SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the Intel Arc A310E is a desktop combination that presents a stark contrast in processing and graphics capabilities. The CPU is a high-performance 12th Gen Alder Lake-S part with a strong 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU is an entry-level, end-of-life Alchemist part that sits exactly at the 50th percentile. This pairing is not about balance; it is about a powerful compute core driving a modest visual output, a fact that will define every workload discussed below.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is built on the Alder Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 12 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that leverages a hybrid design to balance performance and efficiency. The processor has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, allowing it to scale from power-efficient operation to high-frequency bursts for demanding tasks. The multiplier is unlocked, meaning the "KF" designation confirms the absence of integrated graphics while retaining overclocking headroom for users who want to push beyond the factory boost frequency.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a 12th Gen part. Each core gets 80 KB of L1 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 cache, while a 25 MB shared L3 cache pools resources across the entire chip. This layout is designed to keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, which is critical for the multi-threaded performance that the benchmark scores reflect. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance, though the specific memory bandwidth is not detailed in the data.

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in both lightly and heavily threaded workloads. In the 3DMark suite, the single-thread score is 1043, which scales up to 2065 with two threads, 4011 with four, 7211 with eight, and 9282 with 16 threads. The max-threads score reaches 9983, indicating that the scaling is efficient as more cores are engaged. The Cinebench scores reinforce this: R15 multicore hits 2906, R20 multicore reaches 12111, and R23 multicore achieves a strong 28838. Single-core Cinebench scores of 410 (R15), 1709 (R20), and 4071 (R23) show that the 5.00 GHz boost clock delivers excellent responsiveness for tasks that rely on a single thread.

PassMark results further demonstrate the CPU's balanced strengths. The multi-thread score is 34092, with a single-thread score of 3984. Integer math scores 113521, while floating-point math reaches 87449, indicating solid arithmetic throughput. Less common workloads also perform well: data compression scores 441960, data encryption hits 23181, and extended instructions score 28650. The random string sorting score of 45150 and the physics score of 1780 round out a profile that suggests a capable general-purpose processor. The average benchmark score of 35365 places the i7-12700KF at the 85th percentile, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700K, is nearly identical with a delta of just 0.2 percent, meaning the KF variant offers essentially the same compute performance without the integrated GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this build is dominated by the CPU's strength and the GPU's modest capability. The i7-12700KF holds an 85th percentile position among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365. Its closest competitors are the Intel Core i7-13700T, which scores 35403 and is 0.1 percent faster, and the Intel Core i5-13600T, which scores 35305 and is 0.2 percent slower. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, representing a 0.2 percent advantage over the i7-12700KF. These deltas are negligible, placing the chip in a tightly contested performance tier where thermal and power conditions will likely decide the actual outcome.

The GPU, the Intel Arc A310E, has no benchmark scores listed in the data, leaving its average benchmark score at zero. Its percentile position is 50, meaning it sits right at the median of all GPUs. This is a stark drop from the CPU's 85th percentile, and it defines the overall combined percentile of 68 for the entire build. The combined percentile suggests that while the CPU is a top-tier part, the GPU drags the system down to a mid-range overall position. In real workloads, this means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor; instead, the GPU will cap frame rates in gaming and slow down rendering tasks that rely on graphics hardware.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 is particularly telling. This is a workload that stresses all cores, and the i7-12700KF handles it with ease, outperforming the single-core score of 4071 by a factor of seven. The Geekbench scores of 14367 multi-core and 2255 single-core corroborate this. The PassMark multi-thread score of 34092 versus a single-thread score of 3984 shows a similar ratio. The data indicates that this CPU is built for parallel processing, making it a strong choice for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, all of which scale well with multiple cores. The GPU, however, will not be able to keep pace in graphics-intensive versions of those tasks, creating a bottleneck that the benchmark scores cannot mask.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is a compact graphics card built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It packs 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die, which is a dense design for a low-power part. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem is the most limiting feature: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for light workloads but will quickly become a constraint in modern games that require more VRAM and higher bandwidth.

The compute resources are scaled down. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, which is a low count, and the FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, which is relevant for some AI inference tasks but not for high-end compute. The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s, figures that align with its entry-level positioning. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

The 75 W TDP and the absence of power connectors indicate that this is a bus-powered card, and the suggested PSU is just 250 W. This makes it an easy drop-in for small form factor systems, but the performance ceiling is low. With a 50th percentile ranking, the Arc A310E is a mid-tier part, but the lack of benchmark scores means the data cannot quantify its exact position. The 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in games, and the 64-bit memory bus will throttle bandwidth-heavy tasks like high-resolution rendering or machine learning workloads. The 6 RT cores are present but unlikely to deliver playable ray-traced frame rates in most titles. The card supports four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which is generous for a card of this class, and its dimensions (168 mm length, 69 mm height, 20 mm width) make it a single-slot solution suitable for compact builds.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these two components is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i7-12700KF sits at the 85th percentile for CPUs, while the Arc A310E sits at the 50th percentile for GPUs. This 35-point gap is the defining characteristic of this build. In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data compression, or physics calculations, the system will excel, as the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1780 and integer math score of 113521 indicate. But in graphics-bound tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are simply not enough to feed a high-refresh monitor in modern games.

The FPS scaling expected from this pairing would be poor. A CPU like the i7-12700KF can push high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU will cap those rates well below what the CPU can handle. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this combination, so any discussion of frame rates is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 3dmark_16_threads score of 9282 suggests it can handle complex game logic, but the GPU's lack of measured benchmarks and its 50th percentile position indicate that it will struggle to translate that CPU power into visual output. For a balanced system, a builder would typically pair a CPU of this class with a GPU in a higher percentile, but this build is clearly designed for specific use cases where graphics fidelity is secondary to compute power.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-12700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. This flexibility means a builder can choose a more affordable DDR4 motherboard or a faster DDR5 board without changing the CPU. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is more than enough for a single GPU and an NVMe SSD. The Arc A310E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's lanes, though the x8 connection is more than sufficient for a card with this bandwidth. The 125 W TDP of the CPU is modest, but the unlocked multiplier means that overclocking will increase power draw, requiring a capable air cooler or liquid cooler, though the data does not specify cooler requirements.

The GPU has a 75 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 250 W, which is extremely low. This means the entire system can run on a modest power supply, making it an efficient office or small form factor workstation. The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor, so there is no long-term upgrade path on the graphics side within the same architecture. However, the CPU has headroom to support a much stronger GPU in the future. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A310E with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile ranking will not bottleneck a more powerful graphics card. The platform itself is active, but the socket is not forward-compatible with newer generations, so a future CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a suitable build for high-refresh gaming. The CPU can handle frame rates well above 144 FPS in many titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile position and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates at lower levels. In esports titles, the system may achieve playable frame rates, but modern AAA games will require reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is a strong asset for streaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. However, the GPU's limited VRAM and compute will constrain the game's visual quality, making the stream look worse than the CPU could otherwise support.

Video editing: The i7-12700KF is excellent for video editing, with Geekbench multi-core score of 14367 and PassMark data compression score of 441960 indicating fast timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU can assist with effects, but 4 GB of VRAM is a limitation for complex projects. The export will still be fast due to the CPU's strength.

3D rendering: This build is a mixed bag for 3D rendering. CPU-based rendering will be very fast, as the 3dmark_max_threads score of 9983 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 suggest. GPU-based rendering will be slow, as the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS is a fraction of what a dedicated render card offers. The 6 RT cores are too few for ray-traced rendering.

Software development: This is a strong use case. The CPU's single-thread score of 1043 in 3DMark and PassMark single-thread score of 3984 ensure fast compilation of individual files, while the multi-thread score of 34092 speeds up parallel builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this an efficient workstation.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for office work, but the CPU's efficiency means it will handle spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is more than enough for 2D applications, and the 75 W TDP keeps power consumption low. The combination is reliable and quiet, though the CPU is far more capable than needed.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics. It is ideal for software developers and data analysts who run heavy multi-threaded workloads and need a reliable workstation. The i7-12700KF's 85th percentile ranking and PassMark integer math score of 113521 make it a productivity powerhouse, and the GPU is sufficient for basic display output. Small business workstations that run financial models, compile code, or process large datasets will benefit from the CPU's speed without needing a high-end GPU.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound tasks, such as audio processing or non-GPU-accelerated video encoding, will find the system responsive. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 ensures quick render times in software like Blender's CPU renderer. However, users who need GPU-accelerated rendering or high-fidelity gaming should look elsewhere, as the Arc A310E's 50th percentile position and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for those tasks. Students building a budget system for programming assignments will find the CPU's speed helpful, but they could save money with a lower-tier CPU and still have a balanced machine. This build is for someone who knows their workload is CPU-bound and wants a fast processor without investing in a discrete GPU that will sit idle.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-12700KF, a high-end 12th Gen processor, with the Intel Arc A310E, an entry-level discrete GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 20-thread part with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 card with a 64-bit memory bus. The combined percentile is 68, indicating an above-average system overall, but this figure is skewed by the CPU's 85th percentile ranking. The GPU's 50th percentile position drags the overall tier down, making this a lopsided pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 35365 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the i7-13700T, but the GPU has no measured scores to compare against. In summary, this is a CPU-first build where the graphics card serves as a basic output device rather than a performance component.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF holds an 85th percentile position among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to the CPU?

A: The GPU sits at the 50th percentile, with no measured benchmark scores, while the CPU is at the 85th percentile. This creates a significant performance gap.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking beyond the 5.00 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a 75 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 250 W, making it a low-power component.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data available for this specific CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a 3dmark_16_threads score of 9282, indicates it can handle complex game logic and physics at high frame rates. However, the GPU's 50th percentile position and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest that it will be the limiting factor in most games.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A310E is expected to deliver low to medium frame rates in modern AAA titles, likely in the 20-40 FPS range based on its 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends may run at higher frame rates, potentially reaching 60-90 FPS, as these games are less demanding on GPU resources. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle significantly, with frame rates dropping below playable levels in most games due to the limited memory bandwidth and VRAM. The CPU will not be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario; instead, the GPU's 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs will cap the pixel and texture throughput, resulting in a system that is not suitable for high-refresh gaming. For users who prioritize gaming, this build would require a GPU upgrade to achieve the frame rates that the CPU can support.