SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs Intel’s Core i7-12700KF with AMD’s Radeon RX 6600 XT, creating a desktop platform that targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and mainstream productivity. The CPU is a 12th Gen Alder Lake-S part on the LGA 1700 socket, while the GPU is a RDNA 2.0 mid-range card from the RX 6000 series. The combination places the system at the 78th percentile overall across all benchmarked desktop configurations, with the CPU landing at the 85th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This page analyzes the measured performance data, architectural details, and workload-specific results to determine where this system excels and where it falls short.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process node. Its die size is 215 mm², and it features a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores, though the core type breakdown is not specified in the data. The base clock is 3.60 GHz, boosting up to 5.00 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU itself. It lacks integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU, and carries a 125 W TDP.

Benchmark results show a processor that is strong in both single-threaded and heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 4,071 points single-core and 28,838 points multi-core. The multi-core figure is particularly notable when compared to the Geekbench multi-core score of 14,367, suggesting the Cinebench workload scales well with the 20 threads. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal a consistent climb: 2,065 points with 2 threads, 4,011 with 4 threads, 7,211 with 8 threads, 9,282 with 16 threads, and 9,983 with max threads. This indicates that performance gains taper off beyond 16 threads but remain positive, a sign that the core count is effectively utilized in multi-threaded applications.

The processor’s average benchmark score is 35,365, which places it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Among its nearest rivals, the Core i7-12700K scores 35,287, a delta of 0.2 percent in favor of the 12700KF, meaning the two are virtually identical in performance. The Core i7-13700T scores 35,403, which is 0.1 percent higher, while the Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, 0.2 percent lower. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35,428, 0.2 percent higher. These tiny deltas confirm that the 12700KF is positioned at a performance plateau where minor architectural variations between models produce negligible real-world differences.

In real workloads, the PassMark scores provide insights: integer math hits 113,521, floating point math reaches 87,449, and extended instructions score 28,650. Data compression scores 441,960, while data encryption hits 23,181. The single-thread PassMark score is 3,984, and the multi-thread score is 34,092. These figures suggest strong performance in scientific computing, financial modeling, and software compilation, where both integer and floating-point throughput matter. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,043 and 2-thread score of 2,065 indicate that lightly threaded tasks like office applications and web browsing will see excellent responsiveness.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The chip, codenamed Navi 23, has a base clock of 1,968 MHz, a game clock of 2,359 MHz, and a boost clock of 2,589 MHz. It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at an effective 16 Gbps for a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The GPU includes 32 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4.

Compute performance is rated at 10.60 TFLOPS for FP32 and 21.21 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s. These specifications place the card firmly in the mid-range segment, with enough raw throughput for 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles at 1080p with high settings, but the 128-bit memory bus may become a bottleneck in texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 16,461 in PassMark G3D, which places it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 24,442. The nearest rivals show it is tightly grouped: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24,277 (0.7 percent higher), the Intel Arc A350M scores 24,647 (0.8 percent lower), the GTX 780 Ti scores 24,236 (0.8 percent higher), and the RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24,170 (1.1 percent higher). This clustering indicates that the RX 6600 XT’s raw compute performance is competitive with older high-end cards and newer low-end cards, but it does not match modern upper-mid-range or high-end GPUs.

The compute benchmarks show a GPU that is more capable in OpenCL and Metal than in Vulkan. Geekbench OpenCL scores 80,503, Metal scores 88,720, and Vulkan scores 72,417. The PassMark DirectX scores vary by version: DirectX 9 scores 194, DirectX 10 scores 109, DirectX 11 scores 163, and DirectX 12 scores 61. The low DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 suggests that the card may not optimize newer API features as effectively, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,804 provides a more modern reference. GPU compute in PassMark scores 7,520, which is moderate for tasks like video encoding or physics simulations.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system places at the 78th percentile among all desktop builds. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35,365, ranking at the 85th percentile, while the GPU’s average is 24,442, ranking at the 70th percentile. The pair’s average FPS across all measured games at ultra settings is 100.8, with a rank of 2,721 out of 3,732 pairs. This FPS rank, lower than the individual component percentiles, indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter in gaming scenarios, pulling the overall gaming performance below what the CPU alone could sustain.

The CPU’s multi-threaded scores are its strong suit. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28,838 is a high figure for a 12-core part, rivaling newer 13th Gen chips in the same power class. The 3DMark max-thread score of 9,983 is close to the 16-thread score of 9,282, suggesting that the extra threads beyond 16 provide diminishing returns in that specific workload. In contrast, the single-thread Cinebench R23 score of 4,071 is competitive with modern high-end desktop CPUs, ensuring snappy performance in daily tasks.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,804 is a modern indicator of gaming performance, but it is not directly comparable to the PassMark scores. The PassMark G3D score of 16,461 shows the card’s position in the mid-range. When paired with the CPU, the system’s gaming FPS averages 100.8, which is strong for 1080p but falls off at higher resolutions, as detailed in later sections. The combined picture is a system where the CPU has headroom to spare, but the GPU caps the experience in graphically intensive scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory type and pricing. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the RX 6600 XT’s bandwidth needs. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 160 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that a 450 W power supply can handle, as indicated by the suggested PSU rating.

For upgrades, the CPU can be replaced with other LGA 1700 parts, though the nearest rivals in performance are the Core i7-13700T and Core i5-13600T, which offer nearly identical scores with deltas of -0.1 percent and 0.2 percent, respectively. Upgrading to a higher-core-count CPU would require a different socket, as the 12700KF is near the top of its generation’s mainstream desktop lineup. The GPU, however, has more room for growth. The RX 6600 XT is end-of-life, and its successor, Navi III, is the logical next step, though the data does not specify its performance.

The platform supports 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, which can be used for NVMe storage or other expansion cards. Memory bandwidth is dual-channel, and while the specific bandwidth is not listed, the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose between higher capacity or higher speed depending on their budget. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a potential bottleneck for future games at 1440p or 4K, so a GPU upgrade with more VRAM would be a sensible next step for higher-resolution gaming.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p gaming, as the measured FPS data shows strong performance at that resolution across a wide range of titles. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensures that it will not bottleneck in CPU-bound games, while the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking provides enough power for most esports and mainstream titles. Content creators who rely on multi-threaded CPU workloads, such as video editing or 3D rendering, will benefit from the 12700KF’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,838, though the GPU may limit GPU-accelerated rendering tasks.

Software developers writing multi-threaded code will see excellent compilation times thanks to the 20 threads and high integer math score of 113,521. Students and small business users will find the system more than adequate for office productivity, web browsing, and coding, with the single-thread PassMark score of 3,984 ensuring fast application loading. However, users who need high-end 4K gaming or GPU compute for machine learning may find the RX 6600 XT’s 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute performance insufficient.

The system is not ideal for those seeking maximum ray tracing performance, as the 32 RT cores are present but the GPU’s overall performance in modern DirectX 12 workloads is moderate, as shown by the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 61. For users building a workstation for professional 3D rendering, the CPU’s multi-core strength is a plus, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 10.60 TFLOPS may be a limiting factor in GPU-based renderers.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is this system’s primary strength. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the system hits 153 FPS at 1080p, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 342.1 FPS. Valorant is even higher at 355.1 FPS, making this a superb choice for competitive shooters. At 1440p, these frames drop to 140.8, 235.8, and 301 FPS respectively, still above the 144 Hz threshold for most monitors.

Streaming while gaming is feasible, as the CPU’s 20 threads can handle encoding overhead without severe FPS impact, though the data does not provide specific streaming benchmarks. Video editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will leverage the multi-core CPU, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28,838 indicating strong render times. However, GPU acceleration may be limited by the RX 6600 XT’s compute performance, which scores 7,520 in PassMark GPU compute.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya will see strong CPU performance for physics and simulation tasks, but GPU rendering will be slower than higher-end cards. Software development benefits from the high integer math score of 113,521 and the 20 threads, reducing compile times for large projects. Student and office work is effortless, with the single-thread performance ensuring quick spreadsheet calculations and document processing. For casual gaming at 1440p, the system handles most titles at medium to high settings, though frame rates drop significantly at 4K, as shown in the gaming data.

Gaming Performance

The measuredFpsUltraByGame data confirms that this system is optimized for 1080p gaming with ultra settings. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 153 FPS at 1920x1080, dropping to 140.8 at 2560x1440 and 116.2 at 3840x2160. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 155 FPS at 1080p, 103 at 1440p, and 57 at 4K. Valorant exceeds 355 FPS at 1080p and still manages 237.3 FPS at 4K, showing that the CPU is not a bottleneck in esports titles.

Demanding AAA titles show the GPU’s limits. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46 FPS at 1080p, 34 at 1440p, and 23 at 4K, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. Red Dead Redemption 2 scores 42.4 FPS at 1080p, 32.8 at 1440p, and 22.9 at 4K. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly heavy, with only 20.3 FPS at 1080p and 5.5 at 4K. These titles will require lower settings or upscaling to achieve playable frame rates.

Lighter titles perform exceptionally well. Minecraft hits 153 FPS at 1080p, Roblox reaches 200.3, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 184 FPS. The system also handles older games like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 342.1 FPS at 1080p. The average FPS across all measured games at 1080p is 100.8, which is a strong figure for ultra settings. At 1440p, the average drops, and at 4K, many games fall below 60 FPS, making 1080p the sweet spot for this configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35,365.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6600 XT have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the FPS results for Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p and 1440p?

A: At ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46 FPS at 1920x1080 and 34 FPS at 2560x1440.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Core i7-12700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6600 XT is 450 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-13700T?

A: The Core i7-13700T has an average score of 35,403, which is 0.1 percent higher than the 12700KF’s 35,365.

Q: What is the system’s combined percentile ranking?

A: The combined system sits at the 78th percentile among all desktop builds.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 70th percentile means that in most games, the RX 6600 XT will reach its limits before the CPU does. This is evident in the FPS scaling: at 1080p, where the GPU is the limiting factor, the average FPS is 100.8. At 1440p, the FPS drops significantly, and at 4K, many titles fall below 30 FPS, confirming that the GPU cannot maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles like Valorant and CS:GO, the CPU’s strength is apparent. Valorant reaches 355.1 FPS at 1080p, which is far above the GPU’s typical ceiling in AAA games. This shows that the CPU has significant headroom, and a GPU upgrade would yield substantial FPS gains in graphically intensive titles. Conversely, upgrading the CPU alone would not improve gaming performance in most scenarios, as the GPU would still be the limiting factor.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,838 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 34,092 indicate that the CPU handles multi-threaded tasks well, and the GPU’s compute performance is secondary. In video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU’s moderate compute scores will not bottleneck these tasks as severely as in gaming. The system is balanced for 1080p gaming and CPU-heavy productivity, but the GPU limits high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.