SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700K + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700K

35,287 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-12700K + Intel Arc A310: A High-End CPU Paired with an Entry-Level GPU

This desktop build pairs Intel's 12-core Core i7-12700K with the entry-level Intel Arc A310 graphics card, creating a system with a stark performance asymmetry. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 62. This is a configuration where the processor dominates the performance envelope, and the graphics card serves as a basic display and compute companion rather than a gaming powerhouse. The benchmark data shows a clear division of labor: the i7-12700K delivers upper-mid-range computing muscle for productivity and multi-threaded workloads, while the Arc A310 provides modest graphics capability suitable for lightweight rendering, office tasks, and legacy gaming.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It operates at a fixed 1750 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The card features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a deliberately small memory subsystem — 4 GB is sufficient for basic desktop compositing and light 3D work, but it will cap texture detail and resolution in modern games.

The A310 has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units, producing a pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance sits at 2.688 TFLOPS for FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). Critically, the card includes 6 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in supported titles, though the low overall throughput means RT workloads will be severely limited. The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which ensures modern feature compatibility.

Benchmark results reflect the entry-level positioning. The GPU scores 30,607 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,964 in Geekbench Vulkan, indicating competent compute performance for its class. However, PassMark scores tell a more nuanced story: DirectX 9 scores 69, DirectX 10 scores 31, DirectX 11 scores 33, and DirectX 12 scores 29. These low DirectX scores suggest that the A310's driver stack and hardware are optimized for newer APIs — the card performs relatively better in Vulkan and OpenCL than in legacy DirectX paths. The PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and G2D score of 625 place it at the 40th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon R7 250 (deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (deltaPct -0.4), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (deltaPct 1), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (deltaPct 1.4). The data indicates the A310 trades blows with decade-old discrete GPUs, meaning it is fundamentally a display adapter with some 3D capability, not a serious rendering engine.

For rendering workloads specifically, the 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 compute is adequate for basic 3D previews and simple scenes, but the 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will bottleneck any substantial texture-heavy or ray-traced project. The 6 RT cores provide architectural support for ray tracing, yet the raw throughput means users should expect single-digit frame rates in RT-enabled scenarios. The 40th percentile ranking confirms this is a bottom-quartile-to-mid graphics solution, suitable for 2D design, video playback, and very light 3D tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between these components is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i7-12700K's 84th percentile ranking versus the A310's 40th percentile creates a situation where the graphics card is the definitive bottleneck in any graphics-intensive application. In gaming, the CPU's 3DMark scores — 9,976 at max threads, 9,276 at 16 threads, 7,202 at 8 threads, 4,011 at 4 threads, 2,065 at 2 threads, and 1,043 single-thread — vastly exceed what the A310 can feed to a display. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 is roughly 15% of what a mid-range card would achieve, meaning the CPU will be idle waiting for frames in most 3D workloads.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, or multi-threaded productivity, the A310 plays no role and the i7-12700K operates at its full potential. The PassMark data compression score of 446,595 and data encryption score of 23,408 demonstrate the CPU's strength, while the GPU's compute score of 2,157 in PassMark GPU Compute shows it cannot accelerate these workloads meaningfully. The bottleneck analysis points to a system where the CPU is never the limiting factor in graphics scenarios — the GPU always is. For general desktop use, 2D acceleration, and office productivity, the A310's G2D score of 625 is sufficient, and the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1,043, PassMark single-thread 4,013) ensures snappy responsiveness.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, the A310's nearest rival, the GTX 1650, has a deltaPct of 1 — meaning the A310 is essentially equivalent in average benchmark score. This suggests that in gaming, the A310 will deliver playable frame rates only at 1080p with low settings in older titles, while the CPU's headroom (84th percentile) remains untapped. The combined percentile of 62 reflects this imbalance: the system is stronger than the sum of its parts in CPU workloads, but far weaker in GPU-bound scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The i7-12700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on motherboard selection. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and a dedicated graphics card slot. The Arc A310 connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs — the card's 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is far below what PCIe 4.0 x8 can deliver (roughly 16 GB/s per lane, so 128 GB/s total).

The power situation is unusual. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of just 30 W with no power connectors required — it draws power entirely from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W, which is remarkably low, but the system's total power draw will be dominated by the CPU. A sensible PSU for this build would need to handle the CPU's 125 W TDP plus the rest of the system, meaning a 400-500 W unit would be adequate, though the 200 W suggestion from the GPU data indicates the graphics card itself is not a power concern.

The upgrade path is clear: replace the A310 with a more capable GPU. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking means it has years of headroom, and the PCIe Gen 4 x8 interface on the GPU will not bottleneck a faster card — the slot itself is capable of Gen 4 x16 if the motherboard supports it, and the CPU's 20 lanes allow for x16 graphics plus x4 storage. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU in the 60th-70th percentile range, which would pair far better with the i7-12700K's compute power. The 12 cores, 20 threads, and 25 MB L3 cache will feed any mainstream graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Memory-wise, the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means users can upgrade RAM without changing the CPU, though the platform is limited to two memory channels.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics. The i7-12700K's benchmark scores — Cinebench R23 multi-core 19,784, single-core 1,850.5, Geekbench multi-core 15,790, single-core 2,308 — make it an excellent choice for software developers compiling code, data analysts running simulations, and students in computer science or engineering programs. The PassMark integer math score of 114,264 and floating-point math score of 88,035 indicate strong number-crunching ability for scientific computing or financial modeling. The data encryption score of 23,408 and data compression score of 446,595 suggest the CPU handles security-related workloads and archive management efficiently.

For content creators, the Arc A310 is not a suitable partner for video editing or 3D rendering. The GPU's 40th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM will struggle with modern creative applications. However, the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads can handle CPU-based rendering (e.g., software renderers) and video encoding (via the integrated UHD Graphics 770 or the A310's Quick Sync support), making this a viable option for lightweight content creation where the final output is not GPU-accelerated.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with low-to-medium settings in esports or older titles will find the A310 adequate — its PassMark G3D score of 5,433 is comparable to the GTX 1650 (deltaPct 1), which historically handles 1080p esports at high frame rates. However, at 1440p or 4K, or with modern AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will be severe limitations. Small business workstations running office suites, web applications, and database management will benefit from the CPU's responsiveness and the GPU's basic 2D acceleration (G2D score 625), with the 30 W GPU power draw keeping electricity costs minimal.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks paint a picture of a strong upper-mid-range processor. The i7-12700K achieves an average benchmark score of 35,287, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals are the Intel Core i5-13600T (avg score 35,305, deltaPct -0.1), Intel Core i7-12700KF (avg score 35,365, deltaPct -0.2), Intel Core i7-13700T (avg score 35,403, deltaPct -0.3), and Intel Core 5 213PE (avg score 35,428, deltaPct -0.4). The negative deltaPct values mean the i7-12700K scores slightly lower than each rival, but the differences are under half a percent — effectively a statistical tie. This places the 12700K in the same performance tier as newer 13th-gen lower-TDP parts and the KF variant without integrated graphics.

In specific benchmarks, the CPU shows a scaling curve from 1,043 (single-thread) to 9,979 (max threads) in 3DMark, indicating good multi-threading efficiency. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 19,784 is a strong result for a 12-core, 20-thread chip, while the single-core 1,850.5 is competitive for a 2021 release. Geekbench multi-core 15,790 and single-core 2,308 reinforce the picture of a balanced high-performance desktop CPU.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 7,550, placing it at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R7 250 (avg score 7,557, deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (avg score 7,580, deltaPct -0.4), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (avg score 7,472, deltaPct 1), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (avg score 7,447, deltaPct 1.4). The positive deltaPct for the GTX 1650 and HD 8850M means the A310 scores higher than those cards, but the margin is only 1-1.4%. This positions the A310 as a very low-end discrete GPU, roughly equivalent to a 2019-2020 entry-level card.

The combined picture is a system with a 62nd percentile overall ranking. The CPU carries the entire performance weight, with the GPU contributing only minimal graphics capability. In mixed workloads, the CPU will complete tasks quickly while the GPU may lag behind, but for pure CPU tasks, this system outperforms 84% of all desktops.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not actual test results.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and its equivalence to the GTX 1650 (deltaPct 1), the Arc A310 should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with low settings in esports titles like CS:GO, League of Legends, or Valorant, where frame rates are typically CPU-bound. The i7-12700K's strong single-thread score (3DMark single-thread 1,043, PassMark single-thread 4,013) ensures the CPU will not limit frame rates in these scenarios. For older AAA titles from 2015-2019, medium settings at 1080p may achieve 30-60 FPS depending on the game's optimization.

Modern AAA games with high VRAM requirements will be problematic. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 1080p high textures in most 2020+ releases, and the DirectX 12 score of 29 in PassMark suggests poor performance in DX12-based titles. The 6 RT cores are present, but ray tracing will likely result in sub-20 FPS even at 720p. The GPU's low pixel rate (28.00 GPixel/s) and texture rate (56.00 GTexel/s) cap fill-rate-intensive scenes, so resolution above 1080p is not recommended. For 1440p or 4K gaming, the A310 is not viable for any demanding title — the data indicates it belongs in the 720p-1080p entry-level segment.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 25 MB shared L3. This hybrid architecture (performance cores plus efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify core types) delivers strong multi-threaded performance while maintaining high single-thread clocks.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,784 is within 1% of the i5-13600T, i7-12700KF, i7-13700T, and Core 5 213PE, indicating that the 12700K's performance is competitive with newer and more power-efficient parts. The single-core score of 1,850.5 in R23 and 2,308 in Geekbench show the 5.00 GHz boost clock delivers excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks, office productivity, and lightly-threaded applications.

For real workloads, the PassMark scores are instructive. Integer math at 114,264 and floating-point math at 88,035 indicate strong computational throughput for scientific calculations, financial modeling, and engineering simulations. Data compression at 446,595 and random string sorting at 45,805 suggest the CPU handles database operations, file archiving, and data processing efficiently. The extended instructions score of 28,885 and find prime numbers score of 114 (a measure of integer performance) round out a profile that favors compute-heavy tasks. The multithread score of 34,404 and physics score of 1,790 indicate good performance for physics simulations and CPU-based rendering. Data encryption at 23,408 shows the CPU can handle VPN, disk encryption, and secure communication workloads without a dedicated AES-NI bottleneck (the score is respectable for a consumer chip).

The 12 cores and 20 threads make this a capable workstation CPU for developers compiling large codebases, video editors using CPU-based effects, and 3D artists using software rendering. The 25 MB L3 cache helps with working sets that exceed 8-16 MB, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support (memory bus is dual-channel) provides flexible memory configurations. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or is removed.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a top-tier 12th-gen Intel processor with an entry-level Intel Arc graphics card. The i7-12700K is a high-end CPU with an unlocked multiplier, released in November 2021 with a launch MSRP of $409, and it remains an active production part. The Arc A310 is an end-of-life GPU with a 30 W TDP, released in October 2022, and it is the weakest discrete GPU in Intel's Arc lineup.

The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 62, places this system in the mid-range of all desktop configurations. However, this percentile is misleading because it averages a high CPU percentile (84) with a low GPU percentile (40). In practice, this system will feel like a high-end workstation for CPU-bound tasks and a low-end gaming PC for GPU-bound tasks. The CPU's 84th percentile means it outperforms 84% of all CPUs, while the GPU's 40th percentile means it outperforms only 40% of all GPUs.

The build is best understood as a CPU-centric system with a placeholder GPU. It is suitable for users who need maximum CPU compute power but have minimal graphics requirements — for example, a software developer who occasionally plays older games, or a data analyst who needs fast multi-threaded processing but only uses 2D visualization. The Arc A310's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for desktop compositing and light 3D, but the system's true potential lies in upgrading the GPU to match the CPU's capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 62, meaning this desktop build outperforms 62% of all systems. The CPU alone sits at the 84th percentile, while the GPU is at the 40th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12700K compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600T?

A: The i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35,287, while the i5-13600T scores 35,305, a deltaPct of -0.1%. This means the 12700K is effectively tied with the newer 13600T, trailing by less than one-tenth of a percent.

Q: What memory types does the i7-12700K support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A310 comparable to any NVIDIA or AMD cards?

A: The A310's average benchmark score of 7,550 is closest to the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7,557, deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (7,580, deltaPct -0.4), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7,472, deltaPct 1), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7,447, deltaPct 1.4). It is statistically equivalent to these cards.

Q: What is the power draw of the Arc A310, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 30 W and requires no power connectors — it draws power solely from the PCIe slot. Intel suggests a 200 W PSU for the GPU alone.

Q: Does the Arc A310 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, with only 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, ray-traced workloads will be very slow.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe configuration?

A: The i7-12700K uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The Arc A310 connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving additional lanes for storage or other devices.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700K + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds