SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700E paired with the Intel Arc A580 is an all-Intel desktop combination that positions itself as a mid-range workstation-leaning build with a notably strong graphics card for its class. The processor sits at the 62nd percentile against all CPUs in the database, while the Arc A580 ranks at the 87th percentile against all GPUs — an unusual imbalance in which the graphics side clearly outranks the processor. The combined build percentile of 75 reflects that split. Note on frame rates: this exact pairing has no measured FPS rows in the database, so all gaming figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than recorded measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The i7-12700E's single-core results — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3371 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2094 — indicate enough per-thread throughput to drive high-refresh play in esports and mainstream titles at 1080p, provided the game is not heavily CPU-bound. The Arc A580, sitting in the 87th GPU percentile with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, is the stronger of the two components and should be the frame-rate limiter in most graphically demanding games rather than the processor.

Streaming. Streaming while gaming demands both sustained multi-thread throughput and spare cores for encoding. With 12 cores and 20 threads, and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23879, the i7-12700E has headroom beyond what many games use, which is the profile needed to run a broadcast encoder alongside gameplay. The caveat is single-core throughput: at the 62nd CPU percentile, the processor is competent but not elite, so the heaviest AAA games combined with software encoding could press against its limits.

Video editing. The CPU benchmark picture — 10029 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 10676 in Geekbench multi-core — supports timeline scrubbing, proxies and export work at a mid-tier professional level. The Arc A580 contributes through its Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381, both of which indicate usable GPU compute for accelerated effects and export pipelines that dispatch work to OpenCL or Vulkan.

3D rendering. Rendering is where the CPU's multi-core numbers translate most directly. A Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 23879 sits the processor roughly on par with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (average score 6760 versus the i7-12700E's 6776, a delta of just 0.2 percent) — hardware once aimed squarely at workstation rendering. That is a strong showing for a 65 W-class desktop part and makes this build viable for small-studio viewport work and overnight renders.

Software development. Code compilation scales with combined single- and multi-thread performance. The 339-point Cinebench R15 single-core score and 2406-point multi-core score give the i7-12700E a balanced profile for IDE responsiveness and parallel builds alike, while 25 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large working sets. The DDR4/DDR5 flexibility also lets a developer choose memory capacity and bandwidth priorities.

Student and office work. For documents, browsing, video calls and student coursework, this pairing is overqualified. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 means the system remains usable for display output even without the discrete card installed, and the 65 W processor TDP keeps the platform quiet under light loads — a practical trait for shared or dorm-adjacent spaces.

Benchmark Performance

Starting with the processor. The i7-12700E records 2406 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 339 in single-core, 10029 and 1415 in R20, and 23879 and 3371 in R23 multi- and single-core respectively. Geekbench returns 10676 multi-core and 2094 single-core. The average benchmark score across tests is 6776, placing the CPU at the 62nd percentile versus all CPUs in the database — solidly upper-middle territory, a workstation-capable part rather than an enthusiast flagship.

The rivalry data is revealing. The i7-12700E's average of 6776 sits 0.2 percent above the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (6760), 0.4 percent behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (6803), and 1 percent ahead of both the Intel Xeon D-2775TE (6711) and the Intel Xeon Gold 5317 (6710). In other words, this desktop processor benchmarks in the same aggregate band as dedicated workstation and server silicon — while carrying a 65 W TDP and a launch MSRP of $344.

On the graphics side, the Arc A580 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381, for an average of 57756 and an 87th-percentile rank against all GPUs. Its rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM leads it by 0.6 percent (58085), the Intel Arc A570M by 0.8 percent (58239) and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT by 1.1 percent (58392), while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE trails it by 0.7 percent (57367). All five parts are effectively interchangeable on aggregate benchmark performance.

The combined picture is a 75th-percentile build. The GPU is the star; the CPU is the supporting actor — capable, but the lower-ranked of the two.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is a GPU-forward pairing. The Arc A580's 87th GPU percentile against the i7-12700E's 62nd CPU percentile means that in graphically heavy workloads the graphics card will almost always be the first component saturated, which is actually the healthier bottleneck orientation for a gaming system: you want the GPU fed, and it is the stronger chip here.

The reverse case appears in CPU-bound scenarios. Games that hammer a few threads hard — simulation-heavy titles, large open-world draws — will encounter the processor's limits first. The single-core scores (339 in R15, 1415 in R20, 3371 in R23, 2094 in Geekbench) are respectable but not top-tier, so at lower resolutions where the GPU could otherwise push higher frame rates, the CPU will cap scaling. Estimated from the benchmark data rather than measured rows: expect diminishing FPS returns dropping from 1440p to 1080p in CPU-heavy titles, while 1440p and above should shift the constraint back to the Arc A580, where its 512 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 8 GB of GDDR6 define the ceiling.

For compute workloads, the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL result of 91657 makes it a genuine accelerant, not an accessory — but the CPU's 23879 R23 multi-core score means the system never becomes helpless if a workload cannot use the GPU at all.

Gaming Performance

As stated above, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; everything in this section is estimated from the benchmark scores.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A580's 87th-percentile standing and its rivalry band — clustered within roughly 1 percent of the RX 5600 OEM, RX 9070 GRE, Arc A570M and RX 6950 XT on aggregate — indicate mainstream 1080p ultra capability across most current titles, with esports titles comfortably reaching high refresh rates where the CPU permits. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 anchors that expectation.

At 1440p, the estimates suggest playable ultra-settings performance in most titles, with the 8 GB GDDR6 buffer and 256-bit bus providing the 512 GB/s of bandwidth needed to keep texture-heavy scenes fed. Demanding titles may require a step down from ultra to maintain smooth frame pacing.

At 4K, the estimates are less favorable: a card in this benchmark band typically demands significant setting reductions at native 4K in modern AAA games. Ray tracing deserves a specific caution — the Arc A580 has 24 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, but enabling RT will cut into estimated frame rates substantially, and its Alchemist architecture is better treated as RT-capable rather than RT-optimized. The 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 figure is the more relevant number for rasterized performance.

Who Should Build It

1080p-to-1440p gamers. This is the build's natural audience. The GPU percentile and rivalry data support high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p play, with the CPU fast enough single-threaded (Geekbench 2094) to not embarrass the card in the majority of titles.

Content creators on a secondary machine. Video editors and 3D artists get a processor that matches Threadripper 2970WX-class aggregate performance (within 0.2 percent) plus an OpenCL-capable GPU at 91657 points. It will not replace a flagship workstation, but the 62nd-to-87th percentile split covers a genuine production workload range.

Developers. The 12-core/20-thread layout, 25 MB shared L3 cache and dual DDR4/DDR5 support make this a competent compile-and-test box; the 65 W TDP keeps sustained builds thermally manageable.

Students and small business workstations. The "E" designation's efficiency orientation, the UHD Graphics 770 fallback, and ECC being absent (false in the fact data) frame this as a non-mission-critical office and study machine that can also game and create — a single-system answer for mixed use.

FAQ

Q: Is this build balanced?

A: No — it leans GPU-heavy. The Arc A580 ranks at the 87th percentile versus all GPUs while the i7-12700E sits at the 62nd percentile versus all CPUs, so the graphics card is the stronger component and the CPU is the likely limiter in CPU-bound games.

Q: How does the i7-12700E compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 6776 lands within about 1 percent of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (6760), Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (6803), Intel Xeon D-2775TE (6711) and Intel Xeon Gold 5317 (6710) — effectively matching workstation-class silicon on aggregate.

Q: How does the Arc A580 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average of 57756 is within roughly 1 percent of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085), RX 9070 GRE (57367), Intel Arc A570M (58239) and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392), making all five statistically interchangeable on aggregate benchmark scores.

Q: Are the gaming frame rates in this article measured?

A: No. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU/GPU combination in the database; all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplierUnlocked field is false, so tuning is limited to non-multiplier adjustments.

Q: What memory does the platform take?

A: The i7-12700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, giving builders platform choice.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: No — the eccMemory field is false, so this is not a candidate for error-correcting workstation configurations.

CPU Analysis

The i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 215 mm² die. Its hybrid-capable generation pairs a 4.80 GHz boost clock with a modest 2.10 GHz base, consistent with its 65 W TDP and efficiency-oriented "E" suffix. The part number is SRL6D, the socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the production status is Active.

The cache hierarchy — 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 — favors workloads with large shared working sets, which is why the rendering numbers hold up so well. The Cinebench progression tells the multi-core story: 2406 (R15), 10029 (R20) and 23879 (R23). The single-core chain — 339, 1415, 3371 — combined with Geekbench's 2094 single-core result shows a processor that trades a little peak per-thread speed for efficiency, landing at the 62nd percentile overall.

What does that mean in practice? Rendering, encoding and compiling — tasks that consume all 20 threads — perform at a level the rivalry data equates with former high-end workstation parts. Latency-sensitive tasks that lean on one or two fast threads are merely good. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes and dual DDR4/DDR5 support give the platform modern connectivity, and the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU provides display output without the discrete card.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a 65 W efficiency-oriented Intel 12th-generation processor with an Intel first-generation discrete Arc graphics card. The tier story comes from the percentiles: CPU at 62, GPU at 87, combined at 75. That places the overall system in the upper-middle band of the database — a mid-range desktop with an above-mid-range graphics card. It is an all-Intel platform end to end: Intel silicon, Intel Socket 1700, Intel-fabbed CPU (with the TSMC-fabbed Arc GPU as the notable fabrication exception at 6 nm). Its identity is a quiet, efficient, production-capable desktop that games respectably — not a pure gaming flagship, and not a pure workstation, but a credible hybrid of both.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundations are modern for the class. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU-side lanes. The Arc A580 occupies a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, so it does not consume the Gen 5 headroom — a future Gen 5 card could use it.

Power is well-defined. The CPU carries a 65 W TDP; the Arc A580 has a 175 W TDP, dual 8-pin power connectors and a manufacturer-suggested PSU of 450 W. That suggestion already covers both components with margin, so a quality 450 W unit is the floor; anything above that simply adds headroom for a stronger future GPU. The card is dual-slot, so case clearance is modest by modern standards.

The sensible upgrade trajectory follows the data. Because the GPU already outranks the CPU by 25 percentile points, the highest-leverage upgrade is the processor: Socket 1700 accepts other Intel 12th-generation and later-compatible desktop parts, so a move up the stack within the same socket and cooler envelope is straightforward. Memory is the second lever — moving to DDR5 (if the board supports it) uses the platform's full capability. The GPU, at the 87th percentile, is the component to keep longest.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A580 is a Xe-HPG architecture part on the DG2-512 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The silicon is substantial: 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, a density of 53.4 million transistors per square millimeter. It is the Alchemist generation (Arc 5), the successor to Intel's Xe Graphics line, and its own successor is Battlemage. Production status is Active, with a release date of October 2023.

The core configuration: 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 24 RT cores. Clocks run at a 1700 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, with memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) on an 8 GB GDDR6 buffer across a 256-bit bus — producing 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Theoretical rates are 192.0 GPixel/s of pixel fill and 384.0 GTexel/s of texture fill, with 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. Tensor cores are not listed in the data. API support spans DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, with HDMI and three DisplayPort 2.0-class outputs.

What the benchmarks mean: the 2229 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score and the 87th percentile ranking place this card in the upper band of the database for rasterized gaming, statistically inseparable from the RX 5600 OEM, RX 9070 GRE, Arc A570M and RX 6950 XT on aggregate. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 versus the Vulkan score of 79381 shows the compute side is a genuine strength, making the card useful for GPU-accelerated rendering and video work beyond pure gaming. The 24 RT cores and DX12 Ultimate feature set deliver ray tracing capability, but at this performance tier RT should be treated as a selective option rather than a default. For this build, the Arc A580 is the component that defines the system's gaming ceiling — and it is a higher ceiling than the CPU percentile alone would suggest.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + Intel Arc A580

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700E

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds