SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

76 Score

Top 24% Ranking

76 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 24% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700E and Intel Arc A310E combine into a desktop build that sits at the 56th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings, with the CPU ranking in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs and the GPU in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance estimates in this analysis are derived from the underlying benchmark scores rather than from direct FPS measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-12700E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders the flexibility to choose between the two memory standards based on availability and preference. The CPU itself is a 65W TDP part, while the Arc A310E has a 75W TDP and a suggested PSU rating of 250W, so the entire system load is modest—a typical desktop PSU will easily handle this pair without requiring a high-capacity unit.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-looking for storage and other expansion cards, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. That x8 connection is sufficient for a card of this performance class, and the slot width is single-slot with no external power connectors, meaning the GPU draws all its power from the slot. Because the CPU is from the 12th generation (Alder Lake) and the socket is still a standard desktop platform, a user could later swap in a more powerful GPU without changing the motherboard, provided the PSU is upgraded accordingly. The CPU also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which serves as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The platform’s power envelope is low enough to allow compact builds. The CPU’s 65W TDP and the GPU’s 75W TDP combine for a total draw well under the 250W suggested PSU, leaving headroom for other components. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU can be used for NVMe SSDs, and the dual-channel memory controller supports either DDR4 or DDR5, so the build can be tuned for cost or performance depending on available memory types. Overall, this is a platform that prioritizes efficiency and flexibility, with a clear path to swap the GPU for a higher-tier card if the user later needs more graphics power.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are extensive. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2406 in multicore and 339 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 10029 multicore and 1415 single-core. The more modern Cinebench R23 yields 23879 multicore and 3371 single-core. Geekbench reports 10676 multicore and 2094 single-core. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6776, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all high-end server parts: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (average score 6760, deltaPct 0.2%), the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (6803, -0.4%), the Intel Xeon D-2775TE (6711, +1%), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5317 (6710, +1%). These deltas are all within 1% of the i7-12700E, indicating that the desktop i7 delivers performance on par with multi-socket-class server chips.

The GPU, in contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in this dataset—its benchmark list is empty, and its average benchmark score is zero. However, it holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, which suggests that it sits at the median of the GPU performance distribution. The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 56, which is slightly higher than the GPU’s individual percentile, reflecting the CPU’s stronger showing. In practice, the CPU is clearly the stronger component: it outperforms the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU only reaches the 50th percentile. This asymmetry means that the system’s overall performance will be constrained by the GPU in graphics-heavy tasks, while CPU-heavy workloads will benefit from the i7’s strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode and includes UHD Graphics 770 as an integrated GPU. The CPU is unlocked? No, the multiplier is not unlocked, so it is not designed for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $344, which is a single data point for reference.

The benchmark scores show a balanced performance profile. The single-core score of 3371 in Cinebench R23 is strong, and the multicore score of 23879 is equally impressive. The Geekbench single-core score of 2094 and multicore score of 10676 reinforce the CPU’s versatility. The 62nd percentile placement means that this CPU outperforms roughly 62% of all CPUs in the database. The near-identical average scores of its nearest rivals—all within a 1% delta—suggest that the i7-12700E is a very well-rounded part. The 12 cores and 20 threads provide a high thread count for parallel workloads, while the 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response in applications like spreadsheets, web browsing, and legacy software.

The architecture is Alder Lake, which uses a hybrid design (though the fact pack does not specify P-cores vs E-cores, the core/thread count implies a mixture of performance and efficiency cores). The 10nm process and 65W TDP make it an efficient part for desktop systems, and the integrated UHD 770 can handle light graphics tasks without the discrete GPU. The CPU’s high single-core score is particularly relevant for games that are not highly multi-threaded, while the multicore score is enough for content creation and heavy multitasking.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and light gaming. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and its ability to match server-class processors in multi-core tests make it a solid choice for developers who compile large codebases, researchers running simulations, or small business workstations that handle database queries or document processing. The GPU, with a 50th percentile placement and 4GB of VRAM, is best suited for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, especially esports titles that rely on high frame rates rather than high texture fidelity. Gamers who prioritize CPU-bound tasks—like physics simulation or large open-world games—will benefit from the i7-12700E’s strong single-core performance, but they will need to lower graphics settings to accommodate the GPU’s memory limitations.

Content creators can use the CPU’s 20 threads for video encoding and 3D rendering, where the 23879 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensures quick turnaround. Students and small business users will find the 65W TDP and low system power draw attractive, as it allows for a compact, quiet PC that can handle everyday productivity, office software, and web browsing. The integrated UHD 770 GPU can also serve as a backup for basic tasks, reducing the dependency on the discrete GPU. For those who want a balanced desktop that can handle both work and play, this pairing provides a solid foundation, but the GPU should be considered the limiting factor for high-end gaming or VR workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and is manufactured on TSMC’s 6nm process, with 7,200 million transistors and a die size of 157 mm². Its clocks are fixed at 2000 MHz base and boost, and the memory runs at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The GPU has 4GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The shading units number 768, with 32 texture mapping units and 16 render output units. It features 6 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1). The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s 4GB VRAM is the primary bottleneck. At 1080p, many modern games exceed 4GB for ultra textures, so the card will need to use lower texture settings or risk stuttering. The 64-bit memory bus and 124 GB/s bandwidth are also modest, limiting the data throughput for high-resolution textures. The ray tracing cores are present but limited in number (6), so ray-traced effects will be light-weight. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, so it can run modern APIs and features, but its raw compute (3.072 TFLOPS) is entry-level.

The GPU is end-of-life, with a release date of 2024-03-31, and its successor is Battlemage. It is a single-slot, low-profile card with no power connectors, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0, which is a high-end output suite. Given the 50th percentile, the GPU performs at the median of all GPUs, but its low VRAM and bandwidth keep it from high-end gaming. For productivity tasks like GPU-accelerated video transcoding or light 3D rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS can be used, but the 4GB VRAM will limit the size of datasets or textures.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core score (3371 in Cinebench R23) indicates that it will not be a bottleneck for most games at 1080p, even those that rely heavily on the CPU. The GPU, with 3.072 TFLOPS and 4GB VRAM, is suited for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in AAA titles, and at high settings in esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends. The 124 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p, but 1440p or higher will likely exceed the memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity, leading to significant frame rate drops.

For ray tracing, the 6 RT cores will allow some effects, but the performance will be limited. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate ensures compatibility with modern games, but the hardware is not built for high-fidelity ray tracing. In general, the estimated frame rates would be playable at 1080p for most competitive games, but users should not expect high refresh rates (above 60 FPS) on the latest AAA titles at ultra settings. The 4GB VRAM is the primary constraint; games that require more than 4GB of texture memory will stutter or reduce texture quality. Users can expect a playable experience at 1080p medium settings, but the GPU is not designed for high-resolution or high-refresh gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 3371 single-core score in Cinebench R23 can push high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 4GB VRAM will cap the maximum FPS. For esports games at 1080p, the combination can likely reach 144 FPS or more, but AAA games will hover around 60 FPS on medium settings.

Streaming: The 20-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding and running a game simultaneously. The multi-core score of 23879 in Cinebench R23 indicates that the CPU can handle the extra load of software encoding while maintaining gameplay. The GPU has no dedicated encoder details in the data, but the CPU’s strong multi-core performance makes it a viable streaming machine.

Video editing: The CPU’s high multi-core score (23879) is excellent for video rendering and encoding. The GPU can accelerate certain effects, but its 4GB VRAM may limit the use of large GPU-accelerated effects. For 1080p video editing, the system will handle most tasks smoothly, and the dual-channel memory support (DDR4/DDR5) allows for fast data transfer.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 20 threads are ideal for CPU-based rendering engines, and the 23879 C23 score will provide quick render times. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 4GB VRAM limits the size of scenes and textures that can be loaded. For smaller projects, this is a capable pairing.

Software development: The CPU’s single-core 3371 and multi-core 23879 scores make it an excellent choice for compilation, running virtual machines, and multitasking. The 20 threads allow for efficient parallel build, and the high single-core speed ensures responsive IDEs and code analysis.

Student and office: The 65W CPU and 75W GPU create a low-power system that is quiet and cool. The integrated UHD 770 GPU can handle basic display tasks, and the discrete GPU is sufficient for occasional light gaming or GPU-accelerated apps. The platform’s DDR4/DDR5 support means users can choose affordable memory, and the overall system is well-suited for everyday productivity.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i7-12700E use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: It supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU’s TDP is 65W.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A310E has 4GB GDDR6 memory with a 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 56.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 250W.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP is $344.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 62nd percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile show a clear imbalance: the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. For gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, especially in graphics-intensive scenes that require large amounts of VRAM. The 4GB VRAM and 124 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution, while the CPU’s high single-core score means it is unlikely to hold back the frame rate in most titles. For productivity workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will dominate, and the GPU can assist, but its lower percentile means it will be less effective in GPU-accelerated tasks. The combined percentile of 56 is dragged down by the GPU, but the CPU’s performance is the system’s strong point.

The CPU’s 20 threads and 4.80 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom for multi-tasking and heavy workloads. In contrast, the GPU’s 4GB VRAM is a hard ceiling for modern games, and the 3.072 TFLOPS is below the average. Users who upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier model will see a large performance uplift in gaming, while the CPU can keep pace. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is not a bottleneck for the current GPU, but it will be sufficient for a faster GPU as well. The platform’s power supply suggestion of 250W leaves room for a more powerful GPU, but the system would need a larger PSU if a user moves to a card with higher power draw.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 12th-generation Intel Core i7-12700E with an Intel Arc A310E. The CPU is a high-performance part with a 62nd percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 56, indicating a mid-tier system overall. The CPU is the dominant component, offering strong single-core and multi-core performance for its class, while the GPU is a modest entry-level part with 4GB of VRAM and a 75W TDP. The system is well-suited for productivity tasks, light 1080p gaming, and content creation, but it is not intended for high-end gaming or professional 3D workloads. The platform’s flexibility—supporting DDR4/DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5—makes it a future-proof base for a GPU upgrade, but as configured, the GPU is the limiting factor. This pairing is best described as a balanced mid-tier desktop with a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700E

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds