SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

81 Score

Top 19% Ranking

81 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700E pairs a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake CPU with an Intel Arc A310, a 4 GB entry-level GPU. This is a desktop combination where the CPU is a clear overachiever relative to the graphics card, and the benchmark data confirms a heavily CPU-favored pairing. The i7-12700E sits in the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A310 lands in the 40th percentile among all GPUs, with a combined percentile of 51. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700E is built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². It features 12 cores and 20 threads, which indicates a hybrid design mixing performance and efficiency cores, typical for the 12th generation. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, though the FACT PACK does not list memory bandwidth figures. It has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself, integrated UHD Graphics 770, and a 65 W TDP. The launch MSRP is $344.

In Cinebench R23, the i7-12700E scores 23879 in multi-core and 3371 in single-core. The multi-core score is particularly strong, placing it in the 62nd percentile overall. Geekbench results show 10676 multi-core and 2094 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 6776. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-12700E is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (average score 6760), 1% ahead of the Intel Xeon D-2775TE (average score 6711), and 1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5317 (average score 6710). It trails the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 by 0.4% (average score 6803). This places the i7-12700E in the same performance tier as server-class Xeon parts, which is notable for a desktop CPU with a 65 W TDP. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10029 and R15 multi-core score of 2406 reinforce that the CPU is highly capable for threaded workloads, such as video encoding, compilation, and 3D rendering. Single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3371, is also competitive, meaning the CPU will not bottleneck everyday responsiveness or lightly-threaded applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the i7-12700E with the Arc A310 is fundamentally unbalanced. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6776 places it near the top of its class, while the GPU’s average benchmark score of 7550 places it far lower, in the 40th percentile. The GPU’s percentile is 22 points lower than the CPU’s percentile, and the combined percentile of 51 reflects that the GPU drags the overall system down. In any workload that relies on graphics processing, the Arc A310 will be the limiting factor. The CPU can feed frames at a rate far higher than the GPU can render, so in gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, the bottleneck is almost entirely on the GPU side. Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like multi-threaded rendering or code compilation, the i7-12700E can perform near its full potential, while the GPU remains idle or lightly used. The data shows no FPS scaling figures because no measured FPS rows exist, but the benchmark disparity is clear: the CPU is roughly 10 times more powerful than the GPU in terms of average benchmark scores relative to their respective pools. For a balanced system, you would typically want the GPU and CPU to have similar percentile standings; here, the gap is substantial. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 30 W TDP of the GPU indicate that power draw is not a concern, but performance balance is.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12700E delivers strong CPU benchmark scores across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2406 multi-core and 339 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 10029 multi-core and 1415 single-core. The Cinebench R23 scores are 23879 multi-core and 3371 single-core. Geekbench results are 10676 multi-core and 2094 single-core. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6776, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all server or workstation processors: the Threadripper 2970WX (0.2% faster), Xeon Gold 6154 (0.4% faster), Xeon D-2775TE (1% slower), and Xeon Gold 5317 (1% slower). This means the i7-12700E offers performance comparable to high-end server chips, but with a desktop socket and a 65 W TDP.

The Intel Arc A310, on the other hand, scores 30607 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28964 in Geekbench Vulkan. In PassMark, it scores 5433 in G3D, 625 in G2D, 2157 in GPU Compute, and much lower scores in DirectX 10 (31), DirectX 11 (33), DirectX 12 (29), and DirectX 9 (69). The GPU’s average benchmark score is 7550, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (0.1% faster), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (0.4% faster), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (1% faster), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (1.4% slower). The Arc A310 is therefore comparable to a GTX 1650 in average score, but the low DirectX scores suggest that legacy API performance is weak. The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks but struggles in GPU-bound scenarios. The combined percentile of 51 confirms that this is an average-performing system overall, but the CPU is the star component.

Who Should Build It

This combination is suited for users whose workloads are primarily CPU-intensive and who only need modest graphics capability. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 12 cores and 20 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23879 indicating strong parallel throughput. Students and small business workstations handling spreadsheets, documents, and light web browsing will find the CPU’s single-core score of 3371 in Cinebench R23 more than adequate for responsive use. Content creators who focus on video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU’s multi-core performance, but they should note that the Arc A310’s 40th percentile GPU standing will limit GPU-accelerated effects and previews. Gamers at 1080p with low settings might find the Arc A310 usable for older titles, but the GPU’s low DirectX scores (29 in DirectX 12) suggest poor performance in modern games. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking? No—the multiplier is locked, so it runs at stock speeds. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. For anyone needing a high-core-count CPU without a high power draw, the i7-12700E is a strong choice, but the GPU should be upgraded if graphics performance matters.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A310 is not capable of high-refresh gaming at modern settings. Its average benchmark score of 7550 and 40th percentile placement indicate it will struggle to exceed 60 FPS in most titles, even at 1080p low. The CPU’s single-core performance could support high frame rates, but the GPU bottleneck prevents it.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads can handle software encoding while gaming, as Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23879 shows ample headroom. However, the GPU’s low performance means the game itself would run at low frame rates, making streaming a poor experience for the streamer and viewers.

Video editing: The i7-12700E excels here. Multi-core scores like 10029 in Cinebench R20 and 23879 in R23 indicate fast export times in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The Arc A310’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for heavy GPU effects, so rendering will rely on the CPU.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering is a strength. The i7-12700E outperforms the Xeon Gold 5317 by 1% in average score, making it suitable for Blender or similar CPU renderers. The GPU’s 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance is low, so GPU rendering is not recommended.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 12 cores and 20 threads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10676 supports fast parallel builds. The GPU is irrelevant here, so this is a good use case.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core score of 2094 in Geekbench ensures snappy application launches and document editing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could even handle basic display output, though the Arc A310 is present. Power consumption is low (65 W CPU, 30 W GPU), making this a quiet, efficient office machine.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rates are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A310’s PassMark G3D score of 5433 and its 40th percentile standing suggest it performs at the level of a GTX 1650 (which is 1% faster in average score). In modern triple-A titles at 1080p ultra settings, expect frame rates in the 20-40 FPS range, based on the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score of 29. At 1080p low settings, frame rates might reach 40-60 FPS in lighter titles, but esports games like CS:GO or Valorant could exceed 60 FPS due to lower GPU demands. The CPU will not be the limiting factor; the i7-12700E’s single-core performance is far above what the GPU can utilize. For 1440p or 4K, the Arc A310’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will cause severe stuttering and texture popping, so those resolutions are not viable. The GPU’s 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is a significant bottleneck for high-resolution textures. Overall, this is a 1080p-low-to-medium settings GPU for older or less demanding games, not a high-refresh or high-resolution gaming solution.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) on TSMC’s 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The GPU runs at a base and boost clock of 1750 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 30 W, and it is a single-slot card with no power connectors, drawing power solely from the PCIe slot. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In Geekbench, the Arc A310 scores 30607 in OpenCL and 28964 in Vulkan. PassMark G3D score is 5433, with much lower scores in legacy DirectX tests (DirectX 9: 69, DirectX 10: 31, DirectX 11: 33, DirectX 12: 29). The average benchmark score is 7550, placing it in the 40th percentile. The low DirectX scores indicate poor driver optimization for older APIs, which affects legacy games. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for modern games at high textures, and the 64-bit memory bus severely restricts bandwidth. The 6 ray tracing cores provide entry-level RT capability, but with only 2.688 TFLOPS FP32, ray-traced performance will be minimal. The GPU is end-of-life as of October 2022, with Battlemage as its successor. For rendering, the GPU’s low compute performance means it is only suitable for light 2D work or basic video decode, not intensive 3D rendering or GPU compute tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports Alder Lake and later 12th-generation CPUs. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but not simultaneously; you must choose one type. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, providing headroom for future high-bandwidth devices. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed. The suggested PSU for the system is 200 W, which is very low, given the 65 W CPU TDP and 30 W GPU TDP. This means the current build has significant power headroom; a more powerful GPU could be installed without upgrading the PSU, provided it stays within the 200 W total budget. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so any modern motherboard with a PCIe slot will work. A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A310 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU can easily handle a higher-tier card. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6776 is comparable to server chips, so it will remain relevant for years. The motherboard’s memory support for DDR5 allows future bandwidth improvements, though the current memory bandwidth is not listed. The platform is mature, with active production status for the CPU, though the GPU is end-of-life. For someone building this system, the upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU, upgrade the GPU, and potentially add more memory or storage without changing the platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-12700E scores 23879 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, 1% ahead of the Intel Xeon D-2775TE, and 1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5317. It is 0.4% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6154.

Q: Is the Arc A310 capable of ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 6 ray tracing cores, but with only 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance, ray-traced workloads will be very slow. The low compute power limits practical RT use.

Q: What memory types does the i7-12700E support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, but you must choose one type for the system; they are not interchangeable.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Arc A310 has an average benchmark score of 7550, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. It is 1% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 in average score.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 51, indicating that the system sits near the average of all desktop combinations, but the CPU is far stronger than the GPU.

Q: What are the CPU’s Geekbench scores?

A: The i7-12700E scores 10676 in Geekbench multi-core and 2094 in Geekbench single-core.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and size?

A: The Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700E

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds