SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700 + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700

32,942 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-12700 + Intel Arc A750: A Desktop Pairing at the 75th Percentile

This build combines Intel's 12th-generation Alder Lake desktop processor with Intel's Arc A750 discrete graphics card, creating a platform that sits at the 75th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU pairings in the benchmark database. The Core i7-12700 delivers a strong multi-threaded foundation with 12 cores and 20 threads, while the Arc A750 brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and modern Xe-HPG architecture to the table. The data shows a balanced pairing where the CPU generally leads in compute-heavy tasks and the GPU holds its own in the mid-range graphics tier, though neither component dramatically outclasses the other. This analysis examines the platform characteristics, benchmark results, and usage scenarios strictly from the measured data in the FACT PACK, with no external assumptions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface, which anchors this build to the Alder Lake generation of desktop processors. The architecture is Alder Lake-S, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, operating in dual-channel mode, which gives builders flexibility in choosing between older, more established memory modules or newer DDR5 kits depending on availability and platform support. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which narrows its appeal for mission-critical error-checking workloads but is typical for mainstream desktop processors.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU itself, offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes. This is a forward-looking feature that allows the system to take advantage of the latest PCIe 5.0 storage devices or graphics cards, though the Arc A750 in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16 as its bus interface. The power delivery requirements are modest at the CPU level — the 65 W TDP of the Core i7-12700 means a capable air cooler is sufficient for most operation. The GPU, however, draws a 225 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the system is 550 W, which provides the headroom needed for the combined load of both components plus the rest of the system.

The integrated graphics on the CPU is UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output, but the discrete Arc A750 renders that redundant for gaming and graphics work. The CPU has a locked multiplier, so overclocking is not a supported path; performance gains would come from enabling turbo boost up to 4.90 GHz rather than manual multiplier adjustments. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier Alder Lake processor on the same socket, leveraging the existing motherboard and memory infrastructure. The GPU, being end-of-life per the production status, could eventually be replaced by Intel's successor architecture, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 550 W PSU suggestion provide a reasonable envelope for future graphics options within the same power class.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing shows a CPU that performs well above average and a GPU that sits in the mid-range tier. The Core i7-12700 achieves an average benchmark score of 32942, which places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Arc A750, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 20582 and sits at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Combined, the pairing ranks at the 75th percentile, indicating that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

In 3DMark tests, the CPU scales from a single-thread score of 1012 up to 8764 at 16 threads and 9446 at max threads. The multi-thread scaling is not perfectly linear — 2-thread score is 1987, 4-thread is 3824, and 8-thread is 6775 — but the jump from 8 threads to 16 threads adds roughly 2000 points, showing good utilization of the hybrid core layout. Cinebench results reinforce this pattern: R23 multicore hits 21751 while single-core reaches 1894, and R20 multicore is 10639 with single-core at 1501. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads like rendering and encoding, while still delivering competitive single-thread performance for everyday tasks.

The GPU benchmarks show a different story. The PassMark G3D score is 12534, but the DirectX 9 score of 181 is far higher than the DirectX 10 (65), DirectX 11 (72), and DirectX 12 (70) scores, which is an unusual pattern that may reflect driver maturity or benchmark methodology. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 indicate strong compute capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 is a modern rasterization test, and combined with the compute scores, the data suggests the GPU is capable in both gaming and compute scenarios, though it does not reach the upper echelons of the GPU percentile rankings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which uses a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, allowing the processor to ramp up significantly under load. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast storage for active data. The process node is 10 nm from Intel, and the market segment is desktop, with a production status of active.

PassMark tests reveal the processor's strengths. The multi-thread score is 30273, while the single-thread score is 3864, showing a roughly 8x advantage for multi-threaded workloads. Integer math scores 106554 and floating-point math scores 81191, indicating robust arithmetic performance. Data compression scores 375950, which is exceptionally high and suggests strong performance in file compression and archiving tasks. Data encryption scores 20143, and extended instructions score 24184, showing good but not outstanding cryptographic and SIMD throughput. The find prime numbers score is 101, which is a measure of pure integer calculation speed.

In real workloads, these numbers translate to a CPU that can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 places it in a tier where content creation tasks like Blender renders or Premiere Pro exports would see solid performance. The single-thread score of 1894 in R23 means everyday responsiveness — web browsing, office applications, and light coding — will feel snappy. The 25 MB L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in many workloads. Compared to nearest rivals, the i7-12700 is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D in average score (33079 vs 32942, deltaPct -0.4), making them effectively equivalent in aggregate benchmarks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the CPU is the stronger component in terms of percentile standing, but the GPU is not drastically behind. The CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 66th percentile creates a situation where, in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and quality settings. However, the gap is not so large that the CPU idles — the i7-12700's strong multi-thread performance means it can feed the GPU efficiently in most titles.

The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8764 and the GPU's Steel Nomad score of 2612 suggest that CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at low settings or high-refresh-rate competitive gaming, will see the CPU pushing frame rates while the GPU keeps up. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the Arc A750 will be the constraining factor, with the CPU having headroom to spare. The PassMark physics score of 1558 and the GPU compute score of 5368 indicate that the CPU handles physics calculations better than the GPU handles compute tasks, which favors simulation-heavy games.

FPS scaling is not directly measured for this pairing, but the percentile data implies that at 1080p, the CPU may bottleneck in some titles due to its strong single-thread performance actually being ahead of the GPU's rasterization throughput. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the CPU's extra headroom goes unused. The 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth of the GPU suggest that texture-heavy workloads will hit memory limits before compute limits, which could cause frame drops in high-resolution gaming.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is based on the DG2-512 chip with the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. The die size is 406 mm² and contains 21,700 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and the memory operates at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is a key specification — it is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but at 4K or with heavy texture packs, capacity could become a limiting factor. The memory bandwidth of 512 GB/s is solid for the class, enabling high fill rates: the pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 34.41 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio, which supports compute workloads like machine learning inference and some content creation tasks.

The ray tracing cores are present (28 of them), and the API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning the GPU is fully modern in terms of feature support. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, allowing for multiple high-refresh monitors. The power draw is 225 W TDP, which requires a 550 W PSU and dual power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin). The PassMark G3D score of 12534 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 indicate that the GPU's compute performance is strong, but the DirectX 12 score of 70 is low relative to the DirectX 9 score of 181, which may reflect driver overhead or benchmark quirks. The production status is end-of-life, and the release date was October 2022, with the successor being Battlemage.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without sacrificing modern GPU features. The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 66th percentile make it a fit for gamers at 1080p and 1440p who want high settings and decent frame rates, especially in titles that benefit from ray tracing thanks to the 28 RT cores. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS, which accelerates previews and final exports. Software developers compiling large codebases will see the 20 threads and PassMark integer math score of 106554 shine, while the 25 MB L3 cache helps with repeated builds.

Students building a desktop for coursework and light gaming will find the balance reasonable, with the CPU handling productivity tasks and the GPU covering entertainment. Small business workstations that run office suites, databases, and occasional rendering will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 375950 and the overall stability of the platform. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps cooling simple, and the 550 W PSU suggestion is modest, making system integration straightforward. The lack of ECC memory support excludes server-class reliability needs, but for a general-purpose desktop, this pairing is versatile.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU's single-thread score of 1894 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 should drive frame rates above 144 Hz in esports titles, though the GPU's 66th percentile suggests it may struggle at maxed-out settings in AAA games. The 512 GB/s bandwidth helps maintain consistent frame pacing.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and multi-thread score of 30273 in PassMark provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, and the GPU's dedicated encode capabilities (implied by the Xe-HPG architecture) can offload the work. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for game capture at 1080p, and the dual-channel memory support ensures smooth system operation.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21751 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 98554 OpenCL score speeds up effects and color grading. The 25 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the 512 GB/s bandwidth allows fast preview scrubbing at 1080p.

3D rendering: CPU-based renders benefit from the 20 threads and 21751 R23 score, while GPU-based renders in Blender or similar use the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 28 RT cores for realistic lighting. The 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for large scenes, but smaller projects will complete quickly.

Software development: Compilation times are reduced by the integer math score of 106554 and the multi-thread score of 30273, and the 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow fast NVMe storage for source trees, and the 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet during long builds.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3864 in PassMark ensures responsive web browsing and document editing, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a backup. The 12 cores handle multitasking with dozens of tabs and apps, and the 550 W PSU suggestion keeps power costs low.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (classification: desktop) that pairs the Intel Core i7-12700 with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a mid-range-to-upper-tier Alder Lake processor, and the GPU is a mid-range Alchemist generation card. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper quarter of all benchmarked pairings, indicating a capable machine for a wide range of tasks. The CPU is the stronger component, with an 83rd percentile standing versus the GPU's 66th, but the gap is not extreme. The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with standard cooling and power infrastructure. The overall tier is solidly mid-range, with the CPU providing a foundation that outpaces the GPU in compute-heavy tasks, while the GPU handles modern graphics APIs and ray tracing at acceptable levels for the class. This is not a top-tier enthusiast system, but it is a well-rounded pairing for mainstream users.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all benchmarked CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Core i7-12700 compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the i7-12700 scoring 32942 and the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scoring 33079, a delta of -0.4% — essentially a statistical tie.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this CPU?

A: The Core i7-12700 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, but does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU supported by modern APIs?

A: Yes, the Arc A750 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, along with 28 ray tracing cores.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, given the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 225 W TDP.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: The CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, with a successor architecture named Battlemage.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — the data does not include any measuredFps entries for the Intel Core i7-12700 paired with the Intel Arc A750. Consequently, all FPS discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate rather than empirical results.

Based on the CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 66th percentile, the gaming performance picture is one of CPU headroom at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 512 GB/s bandwidth suggest the Arc A750 can deliver high frame rates in less demanding titles, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in esports games, while AAA games at ultra settings may see 60-90 FPS depending on optimization. The CPU's single-thread score of 1012 in 3DMark and 1894 in Cinebench R23 indicates it will not bottleneck at 1080p in most scenarios, so the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates.

At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM becomes a more significant factor, and the 66th percentile suggests frame rates will drop to the 45-70 FPS range in demanding titles at high settings. The 28 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the performance impact is likely substantial, pushing frame rates lower. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, and the 512 GB/s bandwidth may not be sufficient to maintain smooth performance at high settings; estimates suggest 30-45 FPS in optimized titles, with lower settings required for playable frame rates. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 70 is notably low, which could indicate driver-related issues in some DX12 titles, potentially causing inconsistent performance. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p at medium settings, with the CPU ensuring no frame rate drops from processing limitations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700 + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds