SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650HX + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650HX

31,290 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12650HX pairs a 14-core Alder Lake-HX processor with Intel’s Arc A550M mobile GPU, creating a laptop platform aimed at high-throughput productivity and modern gaming. The CPU’s hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, and its benchmark scores place it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outpaces the majority of processors currently tracked. The GPU, built on the Xe-HPG architecture, sits even higher at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, driven by Geekbench scores that, while synthetic, indicate strong compute capability. This pairing targets users who need a single mobile system for both demanding multi-threaded workloads and 1080p-class gaming, though the lack of measured frame rates means gaming expectations must be inferred from the compute benchmarks rather than confirmed with empirical data.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-12650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on Intel’s Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The BGA 1964 socket indicates it is soldered to the motherboard, typical for high-performance laptops. Its base clock is 2000 MHz with a boost clock reaching 4.70 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 55 W, which is modest for a 14-core part, suggesting power management is critical in a mobile chassis. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and external GPU connectivity.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in sustained multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 19043, while the single-core score is 2688; the R20 scores are 7998 multi-core and 1128 single-core, and R15 scores are 1919 multi-core and 270 single-core. The Passmark suite reinforces this profile: multi-thread score is 22573, single-thread is 3637, integer math hits 81810, floating-point math reaches 58426, and extended instructions score 15856. Notably, data compression scores 266700, and data encryption scores 15325, indicating strong throughput for archival and security-related workloads. The physics test score of 1152 and random string sorting at 29692 are lower, but these are less representative of mainstream tasks.

Against its nearest rivals, the 12650HX is essentially neck-and-neck. The Intel Core 9 273PTE averages 31143, a 0.5% lead over the 12650HX’s average benchmark score of 31290. The Core Ultra 3 205, Core 7 240H, and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX are all within 0.6% behind, with average scores of 31473, 31483, and 31495 respectively. This means the 12650HX is a middle-of-the-pack performer among modern high-end mobile CPUs, neither a leader nor a laggard. In practical terms, the data shows it can handle video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering with ease, but it will not crush newer high-end parts in multi-core races. The single-core performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3637 and R23 single-core of 2688, is strong for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications, though it trails the latest architectures in raw IPC.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31290, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs tracked. This is a solid position, but the nuance comes from the comparison to its nearest rivals, where the deltas are all under 1%. The 12650HX is functionally equivalent to the Core 9 273PTE, Core Ultra 3 205, Core 7 240H, and Ryzen 9 5980HX in aggregate CPU performance. The 0.5% gap to the 273PTE and the 0.6% gap to the other three are within run-to-run variance, so buyers should not choose between these based on compute alone.

The GPU, the Intel Arc A550M, has an average benchmark score of 49737 from its Geekbench results: 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan. This places it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, which is higher than the CPU’s standing. The nearest rivals show a mixed picture: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, just 0.4% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2.4% ahead at 50951, and the RX 6800 XT is 2.6% behind at 48477. This indicates the A550M trades blows with desktop-class GPUs from a few generations ago, which is notable for a mobile part. The combined percentile for the system is 84, reflecting that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers than the CPU is to its own peers.

The combined picture is a laptop that is balanced but slightly GPU-leaning. The CPU is a reliable workhorse, while the GPU offers competitive compute performance that should translate to smooth frame rates in most titles, assuming proper drivers and power delivery. The Geekbench scores suggest the A550M handles both OpenCL and Vulkan workloads well, which is relevant for cross-platform applications and modern game engines that rely on Vulkan.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and the GPU’s relative position among rivals. No empirical gaming data exists for this pairing, so treat every frame rate mentioned as a projection, not a result.

Based on the GPU’s 86th percentile rank and its proximity to the RX 6800 XT (2.6% ahead), the A550M should be capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1080p with ultra settings in most current titles, and it should manage 1440p with adjustments to settings or with less demanding games. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and entry-level 1440p, but it may become a limiting factor in games that require more than 8 GB of VRAM at higher resolutions. The GPU’s 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs are well-proportioned for its class, and the pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s support the idea of solid rasterization performance.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Passmark score of 3637 and R23 single-core of 2688, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios without becoming a bottleneck at 1080p. Multi-threaded games that utilize more than eight cores may benefit from the 20 threads, but the 55 W TDP could limit sustained boost clocks in a thin chassis. For competitive esports titles, frame rates in the hundreds are plausible at 1080p low-to-medium settings. For AAA games, expect playable frame rates at 1080p ultra, with drops to high settings needed for 1440p. Again, these are estimates; the lack of measured data means there is no guarantee of specific performance in any given title.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the GPU is the stronger relative component. The CPU’s 82nd percentile versus the GPU’s 86th percentile suggests that in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the A550M will be the primary driver of performance. The CPU has enough compute headroom to handle the GPU’s output, so a CPU bottleneck is unlikely in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming. However, in CPU-bound tasks such as physics simulation or strategy games with heavy AI, the 12650HX’s 55 W TDP might cause it to throttle, making it the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling cannot be measured directly, but the benchmark scores imply that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p will shift the load heavily onto the GPU, where the A550M’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will be tested. The CPU’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the system memory bandwidth will vary depending on the laptop’s configuration, which can affect CPU-heavy workloads more than GPU-bound games. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU are overkill for the GPU, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no interface bottleneck.

The combined percentile of 84 is a strong indicator that this pairing is well-matched for its intended class. The GPU’s 2.6% lead over the RX 6800 XT in compute benchmarks is impressive, but the CPU’s near-identical performance to several rivals means that the choice of laptop chassis and cooling solution will have a larger impact on real-world performance than the CPU die itself. In workloads that use both components, such as game streaming or rendering while gaming, the system should maintain balance, though the GPU’s higher relative standing suggests it will be the component that dictates overall system performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the DG2-512 chip, using the Xe-HPG architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. The die is 406 mm² and contains 21,700 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz, effectively 14 Gbps. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest for the GPU’s compute power but adequate for its target resolutions.

The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 16 ray tracing cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully modern for API support. The FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1), and the pixel and texture rates are 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s, respectively. The TDP is 60 W, which is low for the performance class, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," confirming its mobile-only nature.

In Geekbench, the OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly identical, indicating balanced compute performance across APIs. The 86th percentile rank places it above the RX 6800 XT by 2.6% and just below the RTX 5070 Ti by 0.4%. This is a strong result for a mobile GPU, suggesting it can rival desktop parts from previous generations. The 16 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but given the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32, ray tracing performance will be adequate rather than exceptional; expect to use it for effects at 1080p with upscaling or at lower settings. The 8 GB VRAM is a potential constraint for future titles and high-resolution textures, but for 1080p gaming, it is a workable amount.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is for users who need a laptop that can do heavy compute work and game on the side, without sacrificing portability. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score above 19000, suit content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile code. The Passmark data compression and encryption scores indicate it can handle database archiving and secure communications tasks efficiently. Students in engineering or computer science will find the multi-threaded performance useful for simulations and parallel programming assignments, while the GPU’s compute capabilities support CUDA-like workloads, though without NVIDIA’s proprietary ecosystem.

For gamers, this is a 1080p-focused machine. The GPU’s performance close to desktop RX 6800 XT levels means it can drive high refresh rate monitors at 1080p with max settings in most titles, and it can attempt 1440p with reduced settings. The 8 GB VRAM is a caveat for heavily modded games or those with high-resolution texture packs. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, process large spreadsheets, or perform moderate data analysis will benefit from the CPU’s thread count and the GPU’s OpenCL performance for acceleration. This is not a machine for 4K gaming or professional-grade ray tracing; it is a practical high-performance mobile platform for users who want one device for work and play.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU itself is not upgradeable. The GPU is also integrated on the board, so neither component can be swapped in a typical laptop. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode; upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 is only possible if the laptop’s motherboard was designed for it, so check the specific model. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is future-proof for NVMe storage, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no bottleneck there.

The TDP values are 55 W for the CPU and 60 W for the GPU, totaling 115 W for the compute components. The suggested PSU field is null, but the low TDPs mean a typical laptop power brick should handle the load without issue. A sensible next upgrade for this platform is to maximize RAM capacity and speed, and to install the fastest NVMe SSD supported, as these are the only user-replaceable components that will meaningfully improve performance. The production status of the GPU is listed as "End-of-life," while the CPU is "Active," so the platform is aging, but the CPU will remain viable for several years. If building a desktop instead, this mobile platform has no direct upgrade path; users should look to newer mobile platforms with higher percentiles.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing of the Intel Core i7-12650HX and Intel Arc A550M creates a balanced mobile workstation and gaming hybrid. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile combine for an overall 84th percentile system, which places it in the upper tier of laptops tracked. The CPU is a solid multi-threaded performer, nearly tied with several newer high-end parts, while the GPU offers compute performance that rivals desktop GPUs from a few years ago. The 55 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP are low enough for a reasonably thin laptop, but the performance class suggests a thicker chassis with adequate cooling is likely. This is a capable machine for 1080p gaming and productive multi-threaded work, but it is not at the absolute top of the mobile performance charts. It sits just below the best available hardware, making it a strong choice for users who do not require the latest flagship and prefer a balance of compute and graphics power.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for the system is 84. The CPU is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12650HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX?

A: The Intel CPU has an average benchmark score of 31290, which is 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 5980HX’s average score of 31495. The difference is negligible.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A550M faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The A550M’s average benchmark score is 49737, which is 2.6% higher than the RX 6800 XT’s score of 48477. It is also 0.4% slower than the RTX 5070 Ti.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-12650HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Does the data include measured gaming frame rates for this build?

A: No. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and no measured FPS rows exist. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the L3 cache size of the CPU?

A: The CPU has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, plus 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Q: What APIs does the Intel Arc A550M support?

A: It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 49580.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650HX + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12650HX

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds