SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650HX

31,290 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12650HX and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific laptop configuration with a significant performance disparity between its two main components. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with a strong multi-threaded workload capacity, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete graphics solution. This imbalance defines the system's character, making it a capable productivity and development machine that is less suited for high-end gaming. The benchmark data shows the CPU at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined system percentile of 76. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the Intel Core i7-12650HX is the dominant component in this pairing. Its average benchmark score of 31,290 places it in the 82nd percentile for all CPUs, a significantly higher relative standing than the Intel Arc A350M's 70th percentile and average score of 24,647. This gap suggests that in most tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially in graphics-intensive workloads.

For gaming, the CPU's substantial multi-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,043, is more than sufficient to feed the Arc A350M. The GPU's compute capabilities, with an FP32 rating of 3.379 TFLOPS and a 64-bit memory bus, will be the primary bottleneck in modern titles. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios like high-frame-rate esports titles, the system may perform adequately, but in graphically demanding AAA games, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates, making the CPU's power largely untapped.

In productivity applications, the dynamic shifts. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a Passmark multi-thread score of 22,573, will drive tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, while the GPU provides acceleration for certain effects or previews. However, the GPU's 4 GB of VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth could become a limiting factor in large, complex 3D scenes or when working with high-resolution textures, potentially slowing down the entire workflow despite the CPU's capabilities. The data suggests a system where the user must carefully consider the workload to understand which component will be the constraint.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and can boost up to 2200 MHz. Its memory subsystem is a notable limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, which is modest for modern gaming.

The GPU's benchmark scores are 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan, putting it in the 70th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is only 0.4% faster, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which is 0.5% faster. This places the Arc A350M in the performance tier of older desktop GPUs, indicating it is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings in less demanding titles, but it will not handle high refresh rates or high graphical presets in new AAA releases.

For rendering tasks, the GPU features 6 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, allowing for hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games. However, the low pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s, stemming from 24 ROPs and 48 TMUs, will limit its effectiveness in such workloads. The 768 shading units provide a baseline for compute tasks, but the 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is not high, meaning the GPU is best viewed as an entry-level solution for light creative work and casual gaming rather than a serious rendering powerhouse.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This pairing is not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and limited 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a bottleneck in modern titles, making high frame rates at high settings unlikely. The CPU can handle the processing, but the GPU will limit performance, making it a better fit for 60Hz displays and esports titles at lower settings.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 19,043, is well-suited for software encoding via x264, which can offload the streaming workload from the GPU. The GPU can then dedicate its limited resources to rendering the game. This setup is viable for streaming less demanding games, but the GPU's limitations may require lower in-game settings to maintain a smooth stream.

Video Editing: The CPU is the star here, with its 14 cores and 20 threads accelerating timeline scrubbing, encoding, and effects processing. The Passmark multi-thread score of 22,573 confirms its capability for export tasks. The GPU can assist with certain effects, but its 4 GB VRAM may limit work with high-resolution footage or complex multi-layer compositions, potentially causing slowdowns.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based renderers like V-Ray or Blender's Cycles, the i7-12650HX will deliver strong performance, as indicated by its high multi-core scores. The GPU can be used for real-time viewport previews, but its 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance means it is not a primary renderer. Users will rely on the CPU, which is a solid choice for this workload.

Software Development: The CPU is excellent for compilation tasks, with high single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,688) for build processes and multi-thread scores for parallel compilation. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, but the system's overall responsiveness will be excellent. This is a strong use case for developers.

Student and Office Work: For everyday tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, this system is significantly overpowered. The CPU's performance is far beyond what is needed, ensuring a snappy experience. The GPU is also sufficient for driving multiple displays and basic graphical tasks, making this a robust, if pricey, choice for productivity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. This is a mobile platform, so the upgrade path is limited to components that can be changed externally, such as RAM and storage. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing for a potential upgrade to faster memory if the laptop supports it.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for future devices. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means that while the CPU is ready for next-generation storage and peripherals, the GPU is not utilizing the full bandwidth available. For an upgrade, a user would be limited to replacing the entire laptop, as the CPU and GPU are typically not user-serviceable in a mobile form factor.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 watts. This suggests a combined thermal load that is manageable for a laptop designed for this configuration. There is no suggested PSU listed, which is common for laptops. The practical upgrade path is therefore not about swapping internal components, but rather about ensuring the system has sufficient RAM and fast NVMe storage to keep the CPU fed. A sensible next step would be to maximize the memory capacity and speed, as the CPU's performance in multi-threaded tasks could be further enhanced by faster memory bandwidth.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12650HX is a member of the Core 12th Gen series, built on the Alder Lake architecture with the codename Alder Lake-HX. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process and has a die size of 215 mm². This is a mobile processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that includes both performance and efficiency cores for balanced power consumption. The base clock is 2000 MHz, with a boost clock of up to 4.70 GHz.

The CPU's benchmark performance is strong across the board. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,043 and single-core score of 2,688 place it in the 82nd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 9 273PTE, which is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, which is 0.6% slower. In the Passmark suite, it scores 22,573 in multi-thread, 3,637 in single-thread, and a particularly high 266,700 in data compression, indicating strong performance in archiving and compression tasks.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache helps with data-intensive workloads. The CPU also features an integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can handle basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed. With a TDP of 55 watts, it is a power-hungry mobile chip, but its performance is commensurate with that power draw, making it a top-tier choice for demanding mobile workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12650HX a fast processor for its generation?

A: Yes, its average benchmark score of 31,290 puts it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, making it a high-performing mobile processor.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A350M's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: It is essentially on par with the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is only 0.4% faster, and slightly slower than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 0.5%.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The GPU has a 64-bit memory bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support the latest memory technology?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-12650HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The GPU's production status is listed as "End-of-life," while the CPU is listed as "Active."

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, which can be used for basic display output when the discrete GPU is not necessary.

Q: What is the socket type for this CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-12650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of a high-performing CPU paired with a mid-tier mobile GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 31,290, a figure that is 0.5% higher than the Intel Core 9 273PTE and 0.6% higher than both the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 and the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX. This places it in the 82nd percentile, indicating it outperforms the majority of processors. The GPU's average score is 24,647, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, but 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT.

In specific workloads, the CPU shows strong multi-threaded capabilities with a Cinebench R23 score of 19,043 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 22,573. Its single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2,688. The GPU's Geekbench scores are 24,546 in OpenCL and 24,747 in Vulkan, showing consistent performance across different APIs. The system's combined percentile is 76, which is a balanced indicator, but the gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles shows that the GPU will hold the system back in graphics-intensive tasks.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop configuration (buildClass: "laptop") that combines an Intel Core i7-12650HX processor with an Intel Arc A350M GPU. The CPU is a high-end mobile part, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete solution. This pairing creates a system that is best classified as a powerful productivity and development machine with casual gaming capabilities.

The overall tier of this system is determined by its combined percentile of 76. This is a strong score, driven mostly by the CPU's high performance. The GPU, at the 70th percentile, is adequate but not exceptional. In the context of all systems, this is a solidly above-average laptop, but its performance profile is lopsided. Users will get a top-tier computing experience for tasks that rely on the CPU, but will find the GPU to be a limiting factor for high-end gaming or professional 3D rendering.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is targeted at users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks and need a laptop that can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads. Software developers will find the CPU's compilation speeds and high single-thread performance beneficial. Students and professionals working with large datasets, virtualization, or complex spreadsheets will also benefit from the 14 cores and 20 threads.

For content creators, the system is suitable for video editing and 3D rendering that relies on the CPU, given its strong Cinebench scores. However, gamers should be aware that this is not a high-refresh gaming machine; it is best for casual gaming at 1080p with medium settings. Small business users running data analysis or accounting software will see excellent performance. In short, this build is for users who need a mobile workstation-level CPU and are willing to accept a modest GPU for their graphics needs.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12650HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds