SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650H

28,815 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12650H and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a mobile computing package built on Intel's Alder Lake-H architecture and Xe-HPG graphics. As a laptop-class platform, this combination targets a broad spectrum of workloads, from productivity and development to gaming and content creation. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured frame-rate data exists for this specific configuration. All performance assessments regarding gaming and real-world applications are therefore extrapolated from the CPU’s and GPU’s respective benchmark positions, offering a reliable estimate of the platform’s capabilities relative to its direct competitors.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12650H is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It features a hybrid design, though the data specifies a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 45 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory and offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 80th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong performance for a mobile part. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 12,074 points demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 1,763 points shows competitive per-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern, with 7,608 multi-core and 1,073 single-core points. The older Cinebench R15 test yields 1,851.5 multi-core and 250 single-core points.

PassMark results further characterize the CPU’s strengths. The multi-thread score of 21,962 and the integer math score of 73,641 indicate robust performance in heavily threaded tasks like video encoding and software compilation. The floating-point math score of 54,934 shows solid capability for scientific computing and 3D rendering workloads. Data compression and encryption scores of 250,026 and 14,041, respectively, point to efficient handling of file archiving and security-related tasks. The single-thread score of 3,539 reinforces the processor’s ability to handle lightly threaded applications, such as legacy software or games that rely on a few fast cores.

The average benchmark score of 28,815 places the i7-12650H in close competition with several notable rivals. It sits 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-12600H and the Intel Core i9-13900H, which score 28,882 and 28,886, respectively. It is also 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, which scores 28,940. Conversely, it is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500T, which scores 28,670. These minimal deltas indicate that the i7-12650H performs nearly identically to its closest peers, offering a balanced mix of multi-core throughput and single-core responsiveness that will handle demanding productivity software with ease.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile graphics processor built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically from the Alchemist generation, and is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The chip, designated DG2-512, contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

The compute configuration includes 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster operations pipelines (ROPs). For ray tracing, the GPU features 16 dedicated RT cores. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance reaches 16.79 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The GPU’s TDP is 60 W, and it interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Arc A550M holds an 86th percentile position among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49,737. In Geekbench compute tests, it scores 49,894 in OpenCL and 49,580 in Vulkan. These scores place it in a competitive tier against some high-end desktop parts. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 0.4% (that card scores 49,957) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 0.5% (that card scores 50,001). It is 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, which scores 50,951. However, it is 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, which scores 48,477.

The benchmark data suggests that the A550M delivers performance comparable to a high-end desktop GPU from a previous generation. The 224 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 8 GB of VRAM are sufficient for 1080p gaming and 1440p in many titles, though the 128-bit memory bus may limit performance in texture-heavy scenarios. The presence of 16 RT cores indicates that hardware-accelerated ray tracing is supported, though the overall FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS will define the baseline for rasterized and ray-traced workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this platform is defined by the CPU’s 80th percentile and the GPU’s 86th percentile standings, resulting in a combined percentile of 83 across all system benchmarks. This indicates a well-matched pair where both components sit in the upper quintile of their respective categories.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 28,815 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with all deltas within 0.5% of the i7-12650H. The GPU’s average score of 49,737 shows a wider variance against its nearest rivals, ranging from 2.6% ahead of the RX 6800 XT to 2.4% behind the RX 6900 XT. This suggests that the GPU is slightly more variable in its relative positioning, but still firmly within the performance envelope of high-end graphics solutions.

When looking at specific CPU benchmarks, the multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 12,074 is the most representative of heavy rendering workloads. The single-core score of 1,763 indicates that the processor can also deliver snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks. For the GPU, the Geekbench Vulkan score of 49,580 is a strong indicator of gaming performance, as Vulkan is a common API for modern titles. The OpenCL score of 49,894 is more relevant for compute-heavy applications like video encoding or GPU-accelerated rendering.

The combination of a strong multi-core CPU and a high-percentile GPU suggests that this platform can handle a wide range of tasks without a significant performance bottleneck. The CPU’s ability to feed the GPU with data is supported by its high integer math score of 73,641 and its data compression score of 250,026, which indicate fast arithmetic and memory-handling capabilities. The GPU’s 224 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB of VRAM will be the limiting factor for very high-resolution textures or large datasets, but for standard gaming and productivity scenarios, the pairing is well-balanced.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i7-12650H and the Intel Arc A550M is a critical factor in determining real-world performance. The data shows that the CPU sits in the 80th percentile, while the GPU is in the 86th percentile. This suggests that the GPU is slightly more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU, which could lead to CPU-bound scenarios in certain workloads.

For gaming, the GPU is often the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The A550M’s 86th percentile ranking means it is a strong performer, but the CPU’s 80th percentile standing is not significantly lower. In most gaming scenarios, especially at 1080p, the CPU will likely be the limiting factor in achieving very high frame rates, as the i7-12650H’s single-core score of 3,539 in PassMark is solid but not exceptional. At 1440p, the GPU’s load increases, and the balance shifts closer to a GPU-bound scenario, allowing the CPU to keep pace more easily.

In productivity workloads, the CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,074) will be the primary driver. The GPU can assist in tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering if the software supports GPU acceleration, but the CPU’s 16 threads will handle the majority of the workload. The data compression and encryption scores suggest that the CPU is capable of handling large data sets without stalling the system.

The memory bandwidth of the GPU at 224 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for high-end gaming. With only a 128-bit bus, the A550M may struggle to feed its 2,048 shading units in bandwidth-intensive scenarios, such as high-resolution texture streaming. However, the FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS is sufficient to maintain playable frame rates in most titles. The CPU’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory means that system memory bandwidth can be tuned to avoid a system-level bottleneck, but the GPU’s memory interface is fixed.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core i7-12650H and the Intel Core i5-12600H?

A: The i7-12650H has an average benchmark score of 28,815, which is 0.2% lower than the i5-12600H’s score of 28,882. The two processors are effectively identical in overall performance.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A550M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Arc A550M scores 49,737 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the RTX 5070 Ti’s score of 49,957. This puts the two GPUs in a very close performance tier, despite the generational gap.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-12650H support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Arc A550M?

A: The GPU has a thermal design power of 60 W, which is relatively low for the performance level indicated by its 86th percentile ranking.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this platform is 83, indicating that it performs better than 83% of all tested CPU and GPU combinations.

Q: How many RT cores does the Intel Arc A550M have?

A: The GPU is equipped with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games.

Q: What is the single-core Cinebench R23 score for the i7-12650H?

A: The single-core score is 1,763 points, which places it in the 80th percentile for all CPUs and indicates strong performance for legacy or lightly threaded applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than exact results.

Based on the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 49,737, the Intel Arc A550M is positioned to deliver high frame rates at 1080p resolution in most modern titles. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p ultra settings in many games, though the 128-bit memory bus may cause performance dips in games with very large texture packs. At 1440p, the GPU will still be capable, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity may become a limitation in the most demanding titles, requiring a reduction in texture quality to maintain smooth performance.

The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking and single-core score of 3,539 in PassMark suggest that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The i7-12650H’s 16 threads are more than sufficient for modern game engines, which typically utilize 8 to 12 threads. The boost clock of 4.70 GHz provides the single-thread speed needed for high frame rates in esports titles like first-person shooters, which are often CPU-bound.

For ray tracing, the A550M’s 16 RT cores provide the hardware foundation, but the FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS will limit the performance when ray tracing is enabled. Users can expect playable frame rates at 1080p with ray tracing at medium settings, but may need to disable it at higher resolutions or rely on upscaling technologies. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is strong for 1080p and acceptable for 1440p, making this platform a viable choice for gamers who prioritize resolution and visual fidelity over maximum frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This platform is best suited for users who need a versatile laptop that can handle both productivity and gaming without compromising on either front. The Intel Core i7-12650H’s 80th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, or software development. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 12,074 indicates that rendering times will be reasonable, while the data compression score of 250,026 suggests efficient handling of large project files.

For gamers, the Intel Arc A550M’s 86th percentile ranking means that 1080p gaming at high or ultra settings is well within reach. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current game titles, and the 224 GB/s bandwidth is enough for smooth texture streaming. This laptop is also a good fit for students and small business workstations that require a balance of CPU and GPU power for tasks like data analysis, CAD software, and light video production.

The platform’s combined percentile of 83 indicates that it is a high-tier configuration, suitable for users who demand performance without moving to high-end desktop alternatives. The 45 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP make it a relatively power-efficient option for a mobile workstation, which is important for users who are frequently on the move. This pairing is not ideal for users who require maximum performance at 4K resolution or those who need to run extreme multi-GPU workloads, but it excels as a balanced mobile solution.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12650H is based on the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which means it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable in a traditional sense. Users who want a faster CPU will need to purchase a new laptop with a higher-tier processor. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for memory upgrades if the laptop manufacturer has provided accessible SO-DIMM slots. The CPU offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which can be used for high-speed SSDs or external GPU enclosures, though the latter is dependent on the laptop’s chassis design.

The Intel Arc A550M is also a mobile component, so it cannot be upgraded independently. The GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, but as an integrated part of the motherboard, it is not user-serviceable. The GPU’s 60 W TDP and the CPU’s 45 W TDP combined suggest that the laptop’s power supply is sized for a total system draw of around 105 W, plus overhead for other components. The data does not include a suggested PSU rating, so users should rely on the laptop’s included power adapter.

The most sensible next upgrade for this platform is to increase the system memory to the maximum supported capacity and ensure that the storage is a fast NVMe SSD to fully utilize the PCIe Gen 4 lanes. For users who outgrow the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM, the next step would be to move to a laptop with a higher-tier GPU, such as one from a newer generation, given that the A550M is marked as end-of-life. The platform’s support for DDR5 memory future-proofs it to some extent, but the CPU and GPU are both fixed components, making the entire laptop the upgrade path rather than individual parts.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-12650H with the Intel Arc A550M in a laptop-class configuration. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, is a strong performer in its class, sitting in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, with its 8 GB VRAM and 2,048 shading units, is an even stronger performer, sitting in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 83 signifies that this platform outperforms the majority of existing systems.

The i7-12650H is part of Intel’s Core 12th Gen series, using the Alder Lake architecture on a 10 nm process. The Arc A550M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, using a 6 nm process from TSMC. Both components are designed for mobile use, with the CPU’s 45 W TDP and the GPU’s 60 W TDP balancing performance with power consumption. The GPU’s production status is marked as end-of-life, indicating that it is a mature product with established driver support.

Overall, this is a high-tier laptop configuration that excels in both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive workloads. The benchmark data shows that the platform is well-balanced, with the GPU having a slight edge in percentile ranking over the CPU. For users seeking a mobile solution for gaming at 1080p or 1440p, content creation, or software development, this pairing offers a compelling combination of performance and efficiency. The lack of measured FPS data means that real-world gaming performance is estimated, but the strong benchmark scores suggest that the system will deliver a satisfying experience in modern applications.