SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650H

28,815 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12650H and Intel Arc A370M combination represents a specific tier of mobile computing, pairing a high-performance 10-core processor with a dedicated entry-level discrete GPU. The benchmark data indicates this is a laptop-class build designed for versatility, where the CPU carries the primary workload and the GPU provides a tangible upgrade over integrated graphics. With a combined percentile of 77, this pairing sits comfortably above the majority of mobile configurations, though the data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, meaning all gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

The Core i7-12650H’s multi-core muscle makes this configuration a strong candidate for demanding productivity tasks. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 12,074 points in multi-core tests, placing it just 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-13900H and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT. This level of performance supports sustained workloads like video editing and 3D rendering, where the 10 cores and 16 threads can be fully utilized. The Passmark multithread score of 21,962 further corroborates this, showing the CPU can handle complex, parallelized applications without stalling.

For high-refresh gaming, the picture is more nuanced, as the Arc A370M’s capabilities are the limiting factor. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 29,175 places it just 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 indicates that the GPU can handle modern titles, but the estimated FPS will likely fall short of high-refresh 1080p targets in demanding games. However, for esports and less graphically intensive titles, the combination of the CPU’s strong single-core performance (1,763 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU’s dedicated memory should provide a smooth esports experience.

Streaming is a workload where this pairing excels, primarily due to the CPU’s headroom. The i7-12650H’s Passmark data encryption score of 14,041 and data compression score of 250,026 show that the processor can handle the encoding and compression overhead required for live streaming while maintaining game performance. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce latency, ensuring that background tasks do not severely impact foreground applications. This makes the configuration a viable option for content creators who need to broadcast gameplay or record tutorials.

Software development and compilation tasks are well-served by this CPU. The Passmark integer math score of 73,641 and extended instructions score of 15,438 indicate strong performance in code compilation and execution of complex algorithms. The single-thread score of 3,539 in Passmark ensures that the processor remains responsive for interactive development environments. For student and office work, this configuration is overqualified, as the CPU’s single-core performance in Cinebench R15 (250 points) and R20 (1,073 points) guarantees snappy application loading and smooth multitasking, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for modern web applications and office suites.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and boosts up to 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz running at 14 Gbps effective. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, which is a critical specification for understanding its performance ceiling. While the 64-bit bus limits memory throughput, the 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s.

The FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS places the A370M in a competitive position for its class, as evidenced by its average benchmark score of 29,175. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,673 and OpenCL score of 29,676 show that the GPU is well-optimized for modern APIs, which is expected given its DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The inclusion of 8 RT cores provides entry-level ray tracing capability, though the modest FP32 throughput suggests ray-traced workloads will be challenging. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it outperforms a significant majority of integrated and entry-level discrete solutions.

The GPU’s TDP of 35 W is modest, and its bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x8 provides sufficient bandwidth for its memory architecture. For rendering tasks, the GPU can accelerate previews and assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 4 GB VRAM capacity may limit complex 3D scenes. The texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s is sufficient for 1080p gaming, but the estimated FPS will be constrained by the 112 GB/s bandwidth in memory-intensive scenarios. The A370M’s production status is end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022, indicating it represents a first-generation Arc product.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-12650H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility for system builders, though the exact memory bandwidth is not specified. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and an NVMe SSD. The integrated UHD Graphics serves as a fallback, but the dedicated Arc A370M is the primary display output.

The CPU’s TDP of 45 W and the GPU’s TDP of 35 W suggest a combined thermal envelope of approximately 80 W for the core components. While no suggested PSU is listed and this is a laptop build, the PSU headroom is dictated by the laptop’s power adapter. A sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a higher-tier GPU, though the BGA socket limits CPU upgrades. The platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for memory upgrades, but the dual-channel limitation means capacity increases are more beneficial than bandwidth gains.

Given the GPU’s end-of-life status, the primary upgrade path is a full platform change. The PCIe Gen 4 support ensures that newer GPUs will be compatible, but the 20 CPU lanes limit multi-GPU configurations. The laptop form factor means upgrades are constrained to what the chassis supports, but the data shows the i7-12650H has enough headroom to pair with a more powerful GPU in a future build. The 24 MB L3 cache and 10-core configuration will not bottleneck a modern mid-range GPU in most scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU, creating a potential bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking among all CPUs contrasts with the GPU’s 74th percentile, indicating the processor is the stronger component. In gaming, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor, as its estimated FPS will be constrained by the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth, not the CPU’s processing power. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3,539 ensures that frame times will not be artificially inflated by processor limitations.

In productivity tasks, the balance shifts, as the CPU’s multi-core performance is the primary driver. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,074 is only 0.2% behind the Core i9-13900H, showing that the CPU is not a bottleneck for most content creation workflows. The GPU can assist in GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding, but the CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 14,041 suggests that software encoding is also viable. For 3D rendering, the CPU will handle most of the workload, with the GPU providing marginal acceleration.

The FPS scaling in gaming will be dominated by the GPU’s limits. The estimated FPS will scale with resolution, but the 4 GB VRAM will cause issues at higher resolutions and texture settings. The CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures that the GPU is fed efficiently, but the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS will cap the maximum frame rate. In CPU-intensive games, the i7-12650H will excel, but in GPU-intensive titles, the A370M will be the clear bottleneck.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12650H is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the specific core configuration is not detailed. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which is crucial for data-intensive workloads.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded processor. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,763 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is essential for gaming and legacy applications. The multi-core score of 12,074 shows the processor can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads, and the Passmark multithread score of 21,962 corroborates this. The Passmark floating-point math score of 54,934 and integer math score of 73,641 indicate robust computational abilities for scientific and financial applications.

The processor’s 80th percentile ranking places it near the top of the CPU hierarchy, and its average benchmark score of 28,815 is remarkably close to its rivals. It is only 0.2% slower than the Core i9-13900H and 0.4% slower than the Ryzen 5 5600XT, while being 0.5% faster than the Core i5-13500T. This positions the i7-12650H as a high-end mobile processor that competes with desktop-class chips. The Passmark physics score of 1,430 and find prime numbers score of 91 show it handles specialized tasks effectively, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of users.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideal for users who need a laptop with strong CPU performance for productivity, but do not require high-end gaming graphics. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the i7-12650H’s multi-core strength, as the Cinebench R23 score of 12,074 ensures efficient rendering times. Software developers will appreciate the integer math score of 73,641 for compilation tasks, and the single-thread score of 3,539 ensures a responsive development environment.

For gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings, the Arc A370M provides a playable experience, but those targeting high-refresh or high-detail gaming should look elsewhere. Students and office workers will find this configuration more than adequate, as the CPU’s performance ensures smooth multitasking and application responsiveness. Small business workstations can leverage the CPU’s data encryption score of 14,041 for secure operations and the extended instructions score of 15,438 for specialized software.

The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of mobile GPUs, making this a suitable choice for users who need dedicated graphics for light gaming or GPU-accelerated productivity. The combined percentile of 77 indicates this pairing is a solid mid-range option. Users who prioritize CPU-bound tasks like programming, data analysis, or heavy multitasking will see the most benefit, while those who need high-end gaming performance will find the GPU lacking.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A370M’s average benchmark score of 29,175 and its position just 0.1% behind the Radeon RX Vega M GH suggest it can handle modern games at 1080p with low-to-medium settings. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s indicate that it can produce playable frame rates in most titles, but not at high detail levels.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the estimated FPS is likely to exceed 60 frames per second, given the GPU’s strong single-thread performance and the CPU’s high boost clock of 4.70 GHz. In more demanding games, the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors, potentially causing texture pop-in or stuttering at higher resolutions. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms the majority of integrated graphics and entry-level discrete GPUs, but it is not competitive with mid-range or high-end mobile GPUs.

The estimated FPS will scale well in CPU-bound scenarios, as the i7-12650H’s single-core score of 1,763 in Cinebench R23 ensures minimal bottleneck. However, in GPU-bound scenarios, the A370M will cap the frame rate, and users should expect to adjust settings to achieve smooth gameplay. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support enables modern rendering techniques, but the hardware may struggle with ray tracing. Overall, the gaming performance is suitable for casual play, but not for competitive high-refresh gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, indicating the pairing outperforms the majority of mobile configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12650H compare to the Intel Core i9-13900H?

A: The i7-12650H is 0.2% slower than the Core i9-13900H in average benchmark score, with an average score of 28,815 versus 28,886.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i7-12650H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core i7-12650H?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile platform.

Q: What is the release date of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The GPU was released on March 29, 2022, and its production status is end-of-life.

Q: How does the Arc A370M compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29,175, which is 0.6% higher than the Radeon RX 470’s score of 28,996.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12650H achieves an average benchmark score of 28,815, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 12,074 in multi-core and 1,763 in single-core tests. The CPU’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-12600H, which scores 28,882, a delta of -0.2%; the Core i9-13900H also scores 28,886, another -0.2% delta. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28,940, a -0.4% delta, while the Intel Core i5-13500T scores 28,670, a +0.5% delta, meaning the i7-12650H is faster than the latter.

The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 29,676, and its Vulkan score is 28,673. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29,197, a delta of -0.1%; the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29,211, also a -0.1% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996, a +0.6% delta, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874, a +1% delta. The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in percentile terms, indicating a processor-heavy build that is well-suited for productivity tasks but limited in high-end gaming. The combined percentile of 77 reflects this balanced yet CPU-dominant configuration.