SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12650H

28,815 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12650H and Intel Arc A350M combination represents a mid-range mobile computing package, with the CPU performing at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 70th percentile among all tested components. This pairing yields a combined percentile of 75, placing it firmly in the upper-middle tier of laptop hardware. The data indicates a system built for balanced productivity and entry-level gaming, where the processor carries the heavier load in complex workloads while the graphics solution handles modern rendering APIs with architectural efficiency.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. This mobile graphics processor contains 7,200 million transistors within a 157 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, indicating a significant dynamic range that allows for power savings during light loads and higher sustained performance under demanding tasks.

Memory configuration for the A350M consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock is rated at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is modest for the current graphics landscape, but architectural efficiency in the Xe-HPG design partially compensates for the narrow bus in certain workloads. The 64-bit interface is a clear indicator that this GPU targets 1080p gaming and content creation rather than high-resolution rendering.

The compute configuration includes 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. Pixel rate is rated at 52.80 GPixel/s, while the texture rate reaches 105.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 3.379 TFLOPS for FP32, with FP16 performance doubling to 6.758 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. This places the A350M in a performance class comparable to older desktop GPUs, though with modern feature support.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 6 dedicated RT cores, enabling DirectX 12 Ultimate support at the 12_2 feature level. The GPU also supports OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's memory architecture. With a TDP of 25 W, this is an efficiency-focused design suitable for thin-and-light laptops, and it is classified as an integrated form factor (IGP) in terms of slot width.

Benchmark data shows the A350M scoring 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 24647. The Vulkan score slightly exceeding the OpenCL score suggests that the GPU performs well with low-level graphics APIs, which is beneficial for modern game engines. The average score places it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, a respectable position for a mobile part.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the A350M trails the AMD Radeon RX 590 by 0.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 0.5%, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%. These deltas are remarkably tight, indicating that the A350M sits in a crowded performance bracket where architectural differences matter more than raw throughput. For rendering tasks, the presence of RT cores and support for modern APIs means that ray-traced effects and mesh shaders are handled with hardware acceleration, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution rendering.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i7-12650H achieves an average benchmark score of 28815 across all tests, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU scores an average of 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 75, which represents the overall tier of the system when both components are considered together.

CPU benchmark results are comprehensive across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, the processor scores 1851.5 in multi-core and 250 in single-core tests. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores improve to 7608 multi-core and 1073 single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 12074 multi-core and 1763 single-core. These progressive scores indicate strong scaling across rendering workloads, with the multi-core results being particularly robust.

The PassMark suite reveals additional capabilities. Data compression scores 250026, while data encryption achieves 14041. Extended instructions score 15438, and finding prime numbers scores 91. Floating-point math scores 54934, integer math scores 73641, and multithread performance scores 21962. Physics simulation scores 1430, random string sorting scores 26591, and single-thread performance scores 3539. These varied scores indicate a processor that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads competently.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for these numbers. The Intel Core i5-12600H scores 28882, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-12650H. The Intel Core i9-13900H scores 28886, also 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28940, which is 0.4% higher. However, the Intel Core i5-13500T scores 28670, which is 0.5% lower than the i7-12650H. This places the i7-12650H in a very tight competitive cluster where performance differences are negligible in real-world terms.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is proportionally stronger than the GPU. The CPU sits 10 percentile points higher than the GPU, indicating that the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics solution does. For workloads that are CPU-bound, such as software compilation or spreadsheet calculations, this system will perform admirably. For GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or complex 3D rendering, the A350M will be the limiting factor.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-12650H is a mobile processor from the Core 12th Gen series, built on the Alder Lake architecture and codenamed Alder Lake-H. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 217 mm². The processor is designed for the Intel BGA 1744 socket and is part of the mobile market segment, with a TDP of 45 W. It remains in active production status.

The CPU configuration consists of 10 cores and 16 threads, utilizing a hybrid architecture that combines performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 2.30 GHz, which can boost up to 4.70 GHz under load conditions. This boost clock is particularly important for single-threaded workloads where frequency is the primary driver of performance. The processor is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported.

Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that exhibit data locality, such as database operations and certain scientific computations. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though the memory bus width is not specified. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics.

PassMark single-thread performance scores 3539, which is a strong result and reflects the 4.70 GHz boost clock. This makes the processor well-suited for applications that rely on single-core performance, such as legacy software or lightly-threaded games. The multithread score of 21962 indicates excellent scaling across the 16 threads, making the CPU capable in heavily threaded workloads.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12074 is particularly telling. This represents sustained multi-threaded rendering performance, and the score suggests the CPU can handle moderate 3D rendering tasks and video encoding without excessive wait times. The single-core score of 1763 in the same test confirms that the processor maintains high frequency even in lightly-threaded scenarios.

Real-world workload analysis shows that the PassMark data compression score of 250026 indicates strong file archiving and data transfer performance. The encryption score of 14041 suggests adequate security-related processing. Floating-point math at 54934 and integer math at 73641 both indicate solid computational throughput for scientific and financial applications. The physics score of 1430 is moderate, which may impact simulation-heavy workloads.

The nearest rivals show that this CPU is nearly indistinguishable in performance from the Core i5-12600H and Core i9-13900H, with deltas of just 0.2%. This suggests that within the 12th and 13th generation Intel mobile lineup, the i7-12650H occupies a sweet spot where additional cores or higher clocks in other models do not translate to significant benchmark advantages. The 0.5% lead over the Core i5-13500T reinforces this positioning.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's average benchmark score of 24647 at the 70th percentile, combined with the CPU's 80th percentile performance, suggests this system can drive esports titles at high frame rates in 1080p. The 2200 MHz boost clock and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide sufficient throughput for competitive games, though the 4 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in modern titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 3539 ensures that game logic and physics calculations do not bottleneck the GPU.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12074, provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The PassMark multithread score of 21962 indicates that background encoding tasks will have minimal impact on game performance. The GPU's support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate ensures that hardware-accelerated encoding features can be utilized where available.

Video editing: The combination of strong multi-core CPU performance and the GPU's 768 shading units supports timeline editing and effects processing. The CPU's data compression score of 250026 aids in efficient codec handling, while the GPU's FP16 performance of 6.758 TFLOPS accelerates certain effects. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the 4 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing timelines.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12074 indicates that CPU-based rendering will be serviceable for moderate projects. The GPU's 6 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced previews and final renders in supported applications. However, the 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit complex scenes, making this system suitable for entry-level or student rendering work.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and high single-thread score of 3539 make this system well-suited for compilation tasks and code analysis. The PassMark integer math score of 73641 supports algorithm-heavy workloads, while the 24 MB L3 cache speeds up repeated access to code modules. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, but the overall system responsiveness will be high.

Student and office work: The CPU's 80th percentile ranking ensures snappy performance in productivity applications, document processing, and web browsing. The PassMark single-thread score of 3539 guarantees smooth interaction with office suites, and the 45 W TDP allows for reasonable battery life in a laptop form factor. The GPU's capabilities are more than sufficient for presentation graphics and basic image editing.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the Intel Core i7-12650H and Intel Arc A350M pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 75, placing it in the upper-middle tier of laptop hardware configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A350M compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Intel Arc A350M trails the AMD Radeon RX 590 by 0.4% in average benchmark score, with the A350M scoring 24647 and the RX 590 scoring 24744.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i7-12650H and how does it affect single-thread performance?

A: The boost clock is 4.70 GHz, which contributes to a PassMark single-thread score of 3539 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1763.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the Intel Arc A350M have and what memory type does it use?

A: The GPU has 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth using 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the manufacturing process for the Intel Arc A350M and who fabricates it?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the Intel Core i7-12650H?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 12074 and the single-core score is 1763.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A350M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate at the 12_2 feature level, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core i7-12650H and Intel Arc A350M. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. All FPS figures discussed in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical measurements.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 24647, which sits at the 70th percentile, provides a baseline for estimating gaming performance. Given that the GPU is within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590's average score of 24744, frame rates in DirectX 11 and Vulkan titles are expected to be comparable to that older desktop GPU. This suggests that at 1080p with medium to high settings, most modern games should achieve playable frame rates ranging from 30 to 60 FPS depending on the title's optimization.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the PassMark score of 3539, ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will be consistent. The 10 cores and 16 threads prevent the processor from being a bottleneck in most gaming titles, even those that utilize multiple threads. The 24 MB L3 cache helps maintain smooth performance in open-world games with large streaming environments.

For esports titles that are lightly threaded, the 4.70 GHz boost clock should push frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p. The GPU's 768 shading units and 48 TMUs provide sufficient pixel throughput for competitive games. However, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will require reduced texture settings in graphically demanding titles, and the 64-bit memory bus may cause performance drops in games that emphasize memory bandwidth.

Ray-traced gaming performance will be limited by the 6 RT cores and the modest FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS. Games utilizing DirectX 12 Ultimate features will run, but frame rates are expected to be lower than in rasterized mode. The Vulkan score of 24747 suggests that games using the Vulkan API may perform slightly better than those using OpenGL, due to the lower overhead of the former.

Overall, gaming expectations should be set at 1080p as the primary resolution, with 1440p possible in less demanding titles or with significant settings reductions. The estimates are based on the GPU's percentile ranking and its proximity to the RX 590 in benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance balance between the Intel Core i7-12650H and the Intel Arc A350M is skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 80th percentile ranking is 10 points higher than the GPU's 70th percentile, indicating that the CPU has more relative headroom than the GPU. This imbalance manifests differently across workloads.

In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data analysis, and office productivity, the CPU performs admirably, with the PassMark multithread score of 21962 and single-thread score of 3539 indicating robust performance. The GPU plays a minimal role in these tasks, so the system operates efficiently without a bottleneck.

In gaming workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The A350M's 70th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM capacity will constrain frame rates and texture quality, particularly at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, meaning that the graphics solution will be the first component to reach its limit. The 0.8% lead over the RX 6600 XT in benchmark scores suggests that the GPU operates at a level where CPU limitations are unlikely to emerge in most titles.

For 3D rendering and video editing, the bottleneck shifts depending on the specific task. CPU-based rendering will be limited by the processor's multi-core performance, which is competitive but not class-leading. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the A350M's FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS and its 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 6 RT cores provide some acceleration for ray-traced workloads, but the overall GPU performance will be the limiting factor in GPU-intensive rendering tasks.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores indicates that in gaming, the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU's high single-thread performance ensures that it will not hold back frame rates, but the GPU's modest compute and memory resources will cap performance. In productivity tasks, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU's capabilities are largely irrelevant.

The 25 W TDP of the GPU, combined with the 45 W TDP of the CPU, suggests that the system can maintain balanced power delivery without thermal throttling in most laptop chassis. The combined percentile of 75 indicates that neither component is drastically underpowered relative to the other, but the GPU presents a more significant constraint for graphics-intensive applications.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-12650H, a 10-core 16-thread mobile processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with the Intel Arc A350M, a 6 nm Xe-HPG graphics solution with 768 shading units and 6 RT cores. The build class is laptop, indicating that these components are designed for mobile computing in a notebook form factor. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the GPU is a 25 W part classified as an integrated form factor.

The overall tier of this system is defined by its combined percentile of 75, which places it in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking is strong for a mobile processor, while the GPU's 70th percentile ranking is respectable but not exceptional. This puts the system in the range of mainstream gaming laptops and high-end productivity notebooks.

The CPU is part of the Core 12th Gen series, specifically the Alder Lake-H codename, and remains in active production. It offers a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The GPU is part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile) and is marked as end-of-life, having been released on 2022-03-29. This indicates that the graphics solution is from the first generation of Intel Arc products.

As a laptop pairing, this system is designed for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks while maintaining the ability to run modern games and graphics applications at entry-level settings. The 45 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP suggest a chassis that can dissipate moderate heat, likely in a 15-inch or larger form factor. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU provides adequate bandwidth for the 4 GB GDDR6 memory.

The build represents a balanced approach to mobile computing, where the CPU carries more performance weight than the GPU. This makes it suitable for users who prioritize processor-intensive tasks such as coding, data processing, and content creation, while still having access to hardware-accelerated graphics and ray tracing when needed. The end-of-life status of the GPU suggests that this configuration may be from a previous generation of laptops, but the CPU's active production status ensures ongoing software support.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The Intel Core i7-12650H and Intel Arc A350M laptop configuration is best suited for gamers playing at 1080p resolution who prioritize frame rate over graphical fidelity. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 590 in benchmark scores indicate that esports titles and older games will run smoothly, while newer AAA games will require medium settings to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures that competitive games benefit from high frame rates without CPU-induced stutters.

Content creators working with 1080p video footage will find this system adequate for editing and effects work. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12074 supports smooth timeline scrubbing and export times, while the GPU's 768 shading units accelerate effects and transitions. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p projects but may struggle with 4K timelines or complex multi-layer compositions.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and 24 MB L3 cache, which accelerate compilation and code analysis tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 73641 and data compression score of 250026 indicate strong performance for build systems and version control operations. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, but the overall system responsiveness will be high.

Students in engineering, computer science, or media programs will find this laptop capable of handling coursework including programming assignments, 3D modeling projects, and video presentations. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking ensures that resource-intensive applications like virtual machines and simulation software run acceptably, while the GPU supports graphics applications and moderate gaming during leisure time.

Small business workstations that require reliable performance for office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and database management will be well-served by this configuration. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and the PassMark multithread score of 21962 ensure smooth operation of business applications. The GPU's capabilities are more than sufficient for business presentations and data visualization, and the 45 W CPU TDP contributes to efficient operation in an office environment.

The system is not recommended for users who demand high-resolution gaming at 1440p or 4K, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient. Similarly, professionals engaged in heavy 3D rendering or complex GPU compute tasks should look for a more powerful graphics solution. However, for the target users described above, this pairing represents a capable and balanced laptop configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12650H + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12650H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds