SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 pairing represents a desktop build that combines a power-efficient 14th Gen processor with a high-end Ada Lovelace graphics card. The data indicates a system positioned in the upper tier of performance, with the GPU acting as the dominant force for graphics-intensive workloads while the CPU provides a robust foundation for general computing and multitasking. This analysis draws exclusively from the supplied benchmark and specification data to outline the capabilities, balance, and target use cases for this combination.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, housing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a substantial memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. This configuration provides ample capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The memory clock runs at 1400 MHz, with an effective data rate of 22.4 Gbps, ensuring that the memory subsystem does not bottleneck the processor.

Clock speeds are set to a base of 2205 MHz with a boost up to 2505 MHz. The RTX 4080's compute resources are extensive, featuring 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. For ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, the card includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The theoretical performance figures are impressive: the GPU achieves a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 48.74 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), indicating strong raw compute capability for rendering tasks.

Benchmark results for the GPU underscore its high-end status. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 6567 points. Geekbench results show an OpenCL score of 214,739 and a Vulkan score of 263,779. The Passmark G3D score is 34,457, while the GPU compute score is 20,671. The GPU sits in the 86th percentile relative to all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores a nearly identical 54,209, a delta of just 0.1% — effectively a statistical tie. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 1.1% with a score of 54,828, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S are 2.6% and 2.7% behind, respectively. In rendering, these scores translate to a GPU that can handle high-fidelity ray-traced scenes and complex shader workloads with ease, though the data shows it is not the absolute fastest, sitting just below the RTX 4080 SUPER.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined benchmark picture for this desktop build is one of high overall performance, reflected in a combined percentile of 85. This places the system above the vast majority of configurations. The CPU, an Intel Core i5-14600T, delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22,447 points in the multi-core test and 3,169 points in single-core. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 12,840 and a single-core score of 2,559. Passmark results are similarly robust, with a multi-thread score of 26,409 and a single-thread score of 3,744.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,707, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the data are a mixed group of mobile and desktop processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750, a delta of -0.1%, making it slightly faster. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697, a 0% delta, indicating equal performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32,662, a 0.1% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812, a -0.3% delta. These tight margins indicate that the i5-14600T is competitively positioned in its performance class.

The GPU, as detailed previously, holds an 86th percentile position with an average score of 54,247. When combined, the CPU and GPU deliver a balanced system where neither component is drastically weaker than the other. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are closely aligned, suggesting a harmonious pairing. The data shows that this build is capable of handling demanding applications, with the GPU providing the bulk of the graphical horsepower and the CPU ensuring that data processing and game logic do not become a limiting factor. The overall system is firmly in the upper echelon of desktop performance, though not at the absolute top tier.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The i5-14600T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in memory choice, though it operates in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the primary slot, with 16 lanes available from the CPU itself. This is a forward-looking feature, though the RTX 4080 GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is still fully compatible and offers sufficient bandwidth for the graphics card.

Power requirements are a key consideration. The CPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 watts, making it exceptionally power-efficient. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 320 watts and requires a 700-watt power supply according to the suggested PSU rating. This leaves significant headroom for other components and potential upgrades. The system uses a 1x 16-pin power connector for the GPU, which is standard for this generation of cards.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU. The data shows the RTX 4080 is near the top of the performance charts, and a future upgrade might involve moving to a successor model, such as the GeForce 50 series, which is listed as the successor to the 40-series. However, the current GPU is only 0.1% behind the RTX 4080 SUPER, so an upgrade within the same generation would yield minimal gains. For the CPU, the socket is likely at the end of its lifecycle with the 14th Gen series, so a future upgrade would require a new motherboard. The 35W TDP of the CPU also means that a substantial upgrade in core count would likely require a more robust cooling solution, though the current system runs cool.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this desktop build?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 85, indicating it outperforms 85% of all systems in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its direct rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the RTX 4080 scoring 54,247 and the RTX 4080 SUPER scoring 54,209, a delta of just 0.1%.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4080?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14600T support error-correcting code (ECC) memory?

A: Yes, the CPU specification lists ECC memory support as true.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has a launch MSRP of $255, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and the recommended PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 watts. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 watts.

Q: In Cinebench R23, what are the multi-core and single-core scores for the i5-14600T?

A: The CPU scores 22,447 points in the multi-core test and 3,169 points in the single-core test.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This desktop build is suited for users who need high-end graphics performance without sacrificing CPU efficiency. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and strong scores in 3DMark and Geekbench Vulkan make it ideal for gamers targeting high resolutions and demanding graphical settings. The 16 GB of VRAM and high bandwidth are well-suited for 4K gaming or for users who want to enable ray tracing, given the 76 RT cores.

Content creators and developers will also benefit from this configuration. The CPU's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447, handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks efficiently. The GPU's compute capabilities, indicated by a Passmark GPU compute score of 20,671, accelerate tasks like AI inference and data processing. Students and small business workstations could use this for engineering simulations or data analysis, where the ECC memory support on the CPU adds stability for long-running computations. The 35W TDP of the CPU makes it a power-efficient choice for systems that run continuously, though the GPU's 320W TDP means overall system power draw is still significant.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise measurements.

Based on the GPU's performance, particularly its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 and its 86th percentile ranking, this system is expected to deliver very high frame rates in most games. The combination of a high-end GPU and a capable CPU suggests that at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, the system should easily handle high refresh rate monitors, with frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles. At 4K resolution, the data implies that the system would still provide playable frame rates, though the exact numbers would depend on the game's optimization and graphical fidelity settings.

The CPU's single-threaded performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2559, is sufficient to keep up with the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 20 threads and 14 cores provide solid multi-tasking capabilities, allowing for background applications while gaming. However, the exact frame rates are not available in the data, so these expectations are based on the relative performance of the components compared to other systems in the database.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is well-matched, with the CPU in the 83rd percentile and the GPU in the 86th percentile. This close alignment suggests that in most gaming workloads, the GPU will be the primary determinant of performance. The GPU's high bandwidth and compute throughput are designed for graphics-intensive tasks, and its performance ceiling is likely to be the limiting factor in scenarios with high resolution and demanding visual effects.

For CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations or heavy multitasking, the i5-14600T is the more relevant component. Its Passmark physics score of 1873 and multi-thread score of 26,409 indicate strong performance, but it is not in the top tier of processors. In gaming, this means that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU could become a bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles, potentially limiting frame rates if the GPU is not fully utilized. However, at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the CPU is less likely to be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The GPU's strong performance in DirectX 12 (Passmark score of 132) and Vulkan (Geekbench score of 263,779) suggests it scales well with modern APIs. The CPU's single-thread performance is adequate but not exceptional, meaning that in scenarios where frame rates are extremely high (e.g., 300+ FPS in esports titles), the CPU might struggle to keep pace. Overall, the system is well-balanced for a high-end gaming and productivity machine, with the GPU being the dominant component for graphics and the CPU providing solid, but not overwhelming, support.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This pairing consists of the Intel Core i5-14600T and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, assembled as a desktop-class system. The build class is explicitly listed as "desktop," confirming its form factor. The overall tier of this system is high-end, as indicated by the combined percentile of 85. This places it in the top 15% of all systems, making it a powerful machine for gaming and professional workloads.

The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, designed for efficiency with a 35W TDP. The GPU is a flagship-tier card from the GeForce 40-series, with 16 GB of VRAM and high compute throughput. The combination of a power-efficient CPU with a high-performance GPU creates a system that can deliver excellent frame rates in games and fast rendering times in creative applications. While the CPU is not the absolute fastest in its class, its performance is closely matched to its rivals, and the GPU is near the top of the charts. This build represents a sweet spot for users who want top-tier graphics performance without the need for the most extreme CPU available.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. This configuration provides a balance between high core count and efficient clock speeds, making it suitable for both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

Benchmark scores illustrate its capabilities across various tasks. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2262 points multi-core and 319 points single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show 9427 multi-core and 1330 single-core. The Passmark suite provides a broader view: data compression scores 301,827, encryption scores 18,226, and extended instructions score 16,985. The floating-point math score is 64,726, and integer math is 95,112. These scores indicate a processor that excels in integer and floating-point calculations, making it suitable for scientific computing, financial modeling, and data analysis.

For real-world workloads, the 14 cores and 20 threads allow for efficient parallel processing in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The high boost clock of 5.10 GHz ensures snappy performance in single-threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity. The 35W TDP means it generates less heat and consumes less power than higher-end desktop CPUs, making it an excellent choice for compact or energy-conscious builds without significantly sacrificing performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32,707 places it in the 83rd percentile, confirming its position as a strong mid-to-high-end processor for a variety of tasks.